Evaluation of the Trueness and Precision of Cast, Milled-Cast, Milled, and 3D-Printed Post-and-Core Techniques Using Matching Software: An In Vitro Study

17 July 2026 : Laboratory Research

Majed S. Altoman

^{ABEG 1*}, Manar K. Alamri

^{BEF 2}, Asim A. Alsarh

^{EF 3}, Nada S. Alahmari^{EF 4}, Ali J. Asiri

^{EF 5}, Atheer N. Almuaddi^{EF 3}, Mohammed A. Alfaifi^{ABD 1}, Hatem Alqarni^{ABE 6}, Satheesh B. Haralur^{ABCD 1}

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.953491

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e953491

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Introduction Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Games–Howell post hoc pairwise comparisons for mean RMS values.

Comparison	MD	SE	P	95% CI
Comparison	MD	SE	P	Lower	Upper
Group I vs Group II	−0.422	0.015	< 0.001	−0.470	−0.375
Group I vs Group III	−0.430	0.016	< 0.001	−0.478	−0.381
Group I vs Group IV	−0.460	0.015	< 0.001	−0.508	−0.413
Group II vs Group III	−0.007	0.007	0.735	−0.027	0.012
Group II vs Group IV	−0.038	0.006	< 0.001	−0.055	−0.020
Group III vs Group IV	−0.030	0.007	0.002	−0.050	−0.010
RMS, root mean square; MD, mean difference; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

Back to the Article