16 October 2020 : Clinical Research
In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology
Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz1AB, Aleksandra Sender-Janeczek2EF, Jacek Zborowski2CDE, Tomasz Gedrange3DEF, Tomasz Konopka2CDE, Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska4BCD, Elżbieta Dembowska5EFG*, Wojciech Bednarz12ABCDOI: 10.12659/MSM.924469
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924469
Table 1 Average values of the clinical parameters and CAD/CBCT visualization.
| n | Mean (mm) | Min (mm) | Max (mm) | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC-CEJ | 180 | 2.23 | 1.10 | 4.50 | 0.58 |
| AC-GM | 180 | 3.32 | 1.80 | 5.40 | 0.67 |
| TLPAC2 | 180 | 0.73 | 0.30 | 2.00 | 0.34 |
| TLPAC4 | 180 | 0.56 | 0.00 | 1.90 | 0.31 |
| TLPAC8 | 180 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 1.70 | 0.27 |
| PD | 180 | 1.23 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 0.43 |
| WKT | 180 | 5.28 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 1.26 |
| CAL | 180 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| FGT | 180 | 0.81 | 0.50 | 1.90 | 0.19 |
| SGT | 180 | 1.58 | 0.70 | 2.50 | 0.32 |
| CGT | 180 | 0.87 | 0.30 | 1.70 | 0.25 |
| AC-CEJ – alveolar crest-cementoenamel junction; AC-GM – alveolar crest-gingival margin; CAD/CBCT – computer-assisted design/cone beam computed tomography; CAL – clinical attachment level; CGT – crestal gingival thickness; FGT – free gingival thickness; n – number of teeth; PD – probing depth; SD – standard deviation; SGT – supracrestal gingival thickness; TLPAC2 – thickness of labial plate of alveolar crest 2 mm below the edge; TLPAC4 – thickness of labial plate of alveolar crest 4 mm below; TLPAC8 – thickness of the labial plate of alveolar crest 8 mm below; WKT – width of keratinized tissue. | |||||