In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology

Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz; Aleksandra Sender-Janeczek; Jacek Zborowski; Tomasz Gedrange; Tomasz Konopka; Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska; Elżbieta Dembowska; Wojciech Bednarz

doi:10.12659/MSM.924469

16 October 2020 : Clinical Research

In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology

Magdalena Bednarz-Tumidajewicz^1AB, Aleksandra Sender-Janeczek^2EF, Jacek Zborowski^2CDE, Tomasz Gedrange^3DEF, Tomasz Konopka^2CDE, Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska^4BCD, Elżbieta Dembowska^5EFG*, Wojciech Bednarz^12ABC

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.924469

Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e924469

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 3 Average values of gingival thickness at 3 measurement points within the teeth 13–23 using CAD/CBCT including division into two phenotype groups.

Tooth	NMean±SD or M (25Q÷75Q) [mm]			WMean±SD or M (25Q÷75Q) [mm]
Tooth	FGT	SGT	CGT	FGT	SGT	CGT
Teeth 13–23	0.74±0.13	1.46±0.31	0.79±0.25	0.84±0.20	1.63±0.31	0.91±0.24
Central incisors	0.80 (0.70÷0.90)	1.60 (1.50÷1.70)	0.90 (0.60÷1.00)	0.90 (0.80÷0.90)	1.70 (1.60÷1.90)	1.00 (0.90÷1.20)
Lateral incisors	0.70 (0.60÷0.80)	1.60 (1.20÷1.70)	0.70 (0.70÷0.90)	0.80 (0.70÷1.0)	1.65 (1.50÷1.90)	0.90 (0.80÷1.10)
Canines	0.70 (0.55÷0.70)	1.40 (1.20÷1.40)	0.70 (0.60÷0.80)	0.75 (0.60÷0.80)	1.40 (1.30÷1.60)	0.80 (0.60÷0.90)

Back to the Article

In Vivo Evaluation of Periodontal Phenotypes Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Intraoral Scanning by Computer-Aided Design, and Prosthetic-Driven Implant Planning Technology

Your Privacy