Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Parathyroid Hormone Test Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

24 December 2020 : Clinical Research

Magdalena Wójtowicz^1ABCDEF, Wiesław Piechota^1CDEF*, Zofia Wańkowicz^2DEF, Jerzy Smoszna^2DE, Stanisław Niemczyk^2DE

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.928301

Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e928301

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 8 Multiple regression analysis for correlates of intact parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone 1–84 in hemodialyzed patients (n=95).

Log[iPTH] – hemodialyzed patients
Explanatory variable	β±SE	p

Log[CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin]	0.1133±0.0828	0.1748
Log[Ca ionized]	−0.2484±0.0718	0.0008
Log[BAP]	0.1525±0.1152	0.1890
Log[Osteocalcin]	0.3996±0.1566	0.0125
Log[-CrossLaps]^β	0.2585±0.1320	0.0536

Log[Ca ionized]	−0.2746±0.0729	0.0003
Log[Osteocalcin]	0.6787±0.0729	<0.0001



Log[CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin]	0.1356±0.0849	0.1140
Log[Ca ionized]	−0.2774±0.0734	0.0003
Log[BAP]	0.1617±0.1148	0.1626
Log[Osteocalcin]	0.4113±0.1566	0.0103
Log[-CrossLaps]^β	0.2216±0.1330	0.0995

Log[Ca ionized]	−0.3041±0.0745	0.0001
Log[Osteocalcin]	0.6501±0.0745	<0.0001
β – standardized regression coefficient; SE – standard error; R – determination coefficient; p – significance level.

Back to the Article