Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

07 March 2022: Clinical Research

Comparison of Outcomes Following General Anesthesia and Spinal Anesthesia During Emergency Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnant Women in the Second Trimester at a Single Center

Yan Wang 12BCEF , Xiaoli Ning 2BF , Yue Yu 2AB , Xiaoqiong Xia 2BC , Wei Wang 3C* , Xianwen Hu 1AG*

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.934771

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e934771

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes between women who received general anesthesia and those who received spinal anesthesia for emergency cervical cerclage.

MeasureGeneral anesthesia group (n=141)Spinal anesthesia group (n=156)P value
Surgical time, mean min (SD)25.78 (9.4)30.88 (10.5)0.015
Time in PACU, mean min (SD)35.54 (8.3)28.73 (9.1)0.009
Iatrogenic rupture, n (%)3 (2.1)5 (3.2)0.576
laceration of the cervix, n (%)1 (0.7)2 (1.3)0.622
Nausea, n (%)31 (22.0)50 (32.1)0.051
Vomiting, n (%)20 (14.2)28 (17.9)0.378
Hypotension, n (%)25 (17.7)47 (30.1)0.013
Uterine contraction62 (44.0)79 (50.6)0.250

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750