02 March 2022 : Clinical Research
A Radiographic Study of the Root-to-Crown Ratio of Natural Permanent Teeth in 81 Saudi Adults
Abdulelah Sameer Sindi1ADEF, Fuad Al Sanabani23ADFG, Bandar M.A. Al-Makramani23ABCDE, Khurshid Mattoo2ABDE*, Hafiz Adawi2BDEG, Hosain Al-Mansour4CDEF, Fahad M. Albakri5BDE, Mohammed M. Al Moaleem2BDEG, Mohamed Sobhy2ADEF, Hatem Abdu Humadi6BCDE, Mossab Ahmad Hamzi6BCDE, Essa Mosa Agili6BCDE, Shailesh JainDOI: 10.12659/MSM.936085
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936085
Table 2 Mean root to crown ratios for individual type of teeth and their relative differences against their opposing antagonist tooth between males and female subjects.
| Teeth | Males | Females | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean ±std. deviation | P value (maxillary vs mandibular) | N | Mean ±std. deviation | P value (maxillary vs mandibular) | |
| 11, 21 | 40 | 1.6790±0.26793 | .002* | 41 | 1.7534±0.30036 | .291 |
| 31, 41 | 40 | 1.5160±0.33590 | 41 | 1.6696±0.41982 | ||
| 12, 22 | 39 | 1.6646±0.30023 | .027* | 41 | 1.7705±0.34823 | .943 |
| 32, 42 | 39 | 1.5154±0.31438 | 41 | 1.7758±0.41225 | ||
| 13, 23 | 40 | 1.9319±0.31949 | .122 | 41 | 1.8798±0.23888 | .064 |
| 33, 43 | 40 | 1.8367±0.37704 | 41 | 1.9909±0.33052 | ||
| 14, 24 | 39 | 1.7665±0.32231 | .734 | 39 | 1.8647±0.26517 | .013* |
| 34, 44 | 39 | 1.7878±0.31143 | 39 | 2.0449±0.36169 | ||
| 15, 25 | 38 | 1.7220±0.27180 | .002* | 41 | 1.8535±0.30829 | .001* |
| 35, 45 | 38 | 1.9385±0.34435 | 41 | 2.1080±0.37385 | ||
| 16, 26 | 39 | 1.6168±0.23051 | .022* | 39 | 1.6777±0.28088 | .003* |
| 36, 46 | 39 | 1.7449±0.29966 | 39 | 1.9136±0.30875 | ||
| 17, 27 | 40 | 1.7248±0.25296 | 0.049* | 41 | 1.7954±0.28719 | 0.004* |
| 37, 47 | 40 | 1.8475±0.33430 | 41 | 2.0351±0.22974 | ||
| * P Mx – maxilla; Mn – mandible; M – Males; F – Females. | ||||||






