09 July 2022: Meta-Analysis
Urodynamics in Early Diagnosis of Diabetic Bladder Dysfunction in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ágnes Rita Martonosi 123BCDEF , Piroska Pázmány 123BE , Szabolcs Kiss 123AD , Fanni Dembrovszky 3AF , Eduard Oštarijaš 3C , László Szabó 124ADG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937166
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937166
Table 3 Baseline characteristics of urodynamic parameters of diabetic women in the included studies.
| First Author | Mean voided volume (mL) ±SD | Mean postvoid residual volume (mL) ±SD | Mean Qmax (mL/sec) ±SD | Mean PdetQmax (cmH2O) ±SD | Mean first sensation of bladder filling (mL) ±SD | Mean cystometric capacity (mL) ±SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Timimi et al 2020 []20 | NA | 127±15 | 14±1.3 | NA | NA | 426±414 |
| Changxiao et al 2014 []21 | NA | 323±79.7 | 9.6±7.1 | 32.4±13.2 | 238.1±58.3 | 624±117.4 |
| Galí et al 2015 []22 | NA | 12.1±14 | 19.8±3 | NA | 165.5±55.3 | 380±78 |
| Golabek et al 2012 []23 | 414.59±154.87 | 5 (0–35)** | 22.331±9.99 | 40.69±22 | NA | 447±118.95 |
| Lee et al 2007 []24 | 239.4±173.6 | 104.9±59.1 | 15.2±1.2 | NA | NA | NA |
| Løwenstein et al 2021 []25 | 327 (293–348)* | NA | 27.6±11.1 | 22.5±10.8 | 139±119 | NA |
| Malik et al 2020 []26 | NA | 99±46 | 19±15 | 27±18 | 174±179 | 493±284 |
| Shin et al 2016 []27 | 274.73±131.92 | 33.24±55.63 | 23.55±10.26 | 26.78±15.4 | 173.4±75.84 | NA |
| Tai et al 2009 []28 | 199.5±85.2 | 74.3±30.5 | 13.9±7.2 | NA | NA | NA |
| Yenilmez et al 2008 []29 | NA | 55.4±11# | 24.8±1.3# | 34.1±1.5# | 166±10# | 495±23# |
| Of 2342 patients, 1620 had urodynamic measurements and thus were included in the meta-analysis. * Data presented as median, and range in brackets; # Data presented as mean and standard error; ** Data presented as median, 25 percentile (first figure in brackets), and 75 percentile (second figure in brackets). NA – data not available (not reported); PQ – maximal detrusor pressure at maximal flow rate; Q – maximum flow rate; SD – standard deviation. | ||||||