27 February 2023>: Clinical Research
Comparison of Lumbar Fusion Surgical Outcomes Between Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis ≥80 Versus 65–79 Years Old
Kuan Li 1BCDE , Xiao Han 12BCD , Haozhi Zhang 1BCD , Xin Chen 1BCD , Derong Xu 3BCD , Zheng Li 1ABG*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938837
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e938837
Table 2 Clinical outcomes.
≥80 years (n=33) | 65–79 years (n=33) | P | |
---|---|---|---|
NRS (back) | 2 (0–3) | 1 (0–3) | 0.001 |
NRS (leg) | 2 (0–6) | 2 (0–3) | 0.516 |
ODI | 25.0±7.2 | 22.8±4.9 | 0.166 |
ODI improvement | 42.3±12.0 | 39.1±12.3 | 0.308 |
SF-36 | 91.6±6.2 | 109.7±4.9 | |
SF-36 improvement | 15.7±4.9 | 27.6±5.4 | |
PCS | 40.5±4.4 | 54.2±3.3 | |
PCS improvement | 6.5±2.5 | 17.0±3.6 | |
MCS | 51.1±3.2 | 55.5±2.2 | |
MCS improvement | 9.2±3.5 | 10.6±3.0 | 0.085 |
NRS (back) | 2 (0–4) | 1 (0–2) | 0.130 |
NRS (leg) | 1 (0–4) | 1 (0–2) | 0.305 |
ODI | 22.5±5.8 | 20.54±3.6 | 0.117 |
ODI improvement | 43.9±12.4 | 40.7±12.4 | 0.317 |
SF-36 | 103.5±6.5 | 113.9±3.9 | |
SF-36 improvement | 27.3±6.8 | 31.5±5.6 | 0.011 |
PCS | 50.2±4.1 | 57.6±2.7 | |
PCS improvement | 15.9±3.4 | 20.1±3.1 | |
MCS | 53.3±4.2 | 56.3±2.3 | 0.001 |
MCS improvement | 11.4±4.6 | 11.3±3.6 | 0.951 |
NRS (back) | 1 (0–4) | 1 (0–2) | 0.072 |
NRS (leg) | 1 (0–3) | 1 (0–2) | 0.576 |
ODI | 21.6±4.3 | 19.6±3.7 | 0.077 |
ODI improvement | 44.3±14.8 | 42.6±13.2 | 0.660 |
6SF-36 | 108.7±6.6 | 117.0±4.4 | |
SF-36 improvement | 33.0±7.4 | 34.8±6.0 | 0.332 |
PCS | 54.6±3.9 | 59.4±2.7 | |
PCS improvement | 20.4±3.6 | 22.2±3.2 | 0.064 |
MCS | 54.1±4.1 | 57.5±2.6 | |
MCS improvement | 12.6±4.8 | 12.6±3.9 | 0.976 |
NRS – numerical rating scale; ODI – Oswestry Disability Index; SF-36 – Short-Form Health Survey; PCS – physical component score; MCS – mental component score. |