Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive

Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska; Zofia Maciejewska-Szaniec; Aneta Olszewska; Marta Polichnowska; Beniamin Oskar Grabarek; Damian Dudek; Dawid Sobański; Agata Czajka-Jakubowska

doi:10.12659/MSM.938867

21 December 2022 : Clinical Research

Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive

Agata Prylińska-Czyżewska^1ABCDE*, Zofia Maciejewska-Szaniec^1BEF, Aneta Olszewska^1DF, Marta Polichnowska^2D, Beniamin Oskar Grabarek^3F, Damian Dudek^4F, Dawid Sobański^3F, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska^1DE

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938867

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938867

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 2 The results of the shear stress examination using 4 different adhesive materials bonding stainless-steel brackets to tooth enamel during 6-month observation.

Time		T1 – 24 hours 1a,3b,4b,5b				T2 – 3 months				T3 – 6 months 3b,4b,5b
Name of the adhesive material		M±SD	Med	Min	Max	M±SD	Med	Min	Max	M±SD	Med	Min	Max
1	Fuji Ortho LC (GC Orthodontics Europe GmbH, Breckerfeld, Germany)	29.06± 5.49	31.11	19.57	35.37	21.77± 6.99	22.49	12.72	34.57	14.75± 3.90	15.47	8.89	20.42
2	Transbond Plus Light Cure Band (3M ESPE, Wrocław, Poland)	24.16± 4.99	23.67	16.53	31.43	22.51± 6.26	21.35	13.37	33.93	18.40± 7.10	19.48	6.65	25.91
3	Transbond Supreme Low Viscosity (3M ESPE, Wrocław, Poland)	21.01± 8.07	18.60	11.39	34.33	20.04± 5.84	20.56	10.49	29.66	16.29± 7.76	17.00	7.07	28.61
4	GC Ortho Connect (GC Orthodontics Europe GmbH, Breckerfeld, Germany)	39.53± 6.11	37.15	33.46	53.50	32.13± 12.34	25.66	20.11	52.50	30.71± 9.22	32.64	16.53	42.72
M – mean; Med – median; Min – minimum; Max – maximum; SD – standard deviation, T1, T2, T3 – time after attaching the brackets; ¹ – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 1 vs 2; ² – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 1 vs 3; ³ – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 1 vs 4; ⁴ – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 2 vs 3; ⁵ – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 2 vs 4; ⁶ – statistically significant differences between adhesive material 3 vs 4; ^a – statistically significant differences obtained by Mann-Whitney U test ( ^b – statistically significant differences obtained by test (

Back to the Article

Comparison of Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Onto the Tooth Enamel of 120 Freshly Extracted Adult Bovine Medial Lower Incisors Using 4 Adhesives: A Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Adhesive, a Composite Adhesive, a Liquid Composite Adhesive, and a One-Step Light-Cured Adhesive

Your Privacy