02 November 2023>: Clinical Research
Effect of Dynamic Taping versus Kinesiology Taping on Pain, Foot Function, Balance, and Foot Pressure in 3 Groups of Plantar Fasciitis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study
Dong-Ho Kim ABCDEF , Yongwoo Lee ACDE*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941043
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941043
Table 2 Changes of visual analog scale according to intervention methods (N=69).
Dynamic taping with PT Group (n=23) | KT with PT Group (n=23) | Control Group (n=23) | F(p) | Post-hoc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VAS (point) | Pre | 83.92±8.84a | 86.08±7.06 | 85.21±7.30 | ||
Post | 63.26±8.20 | 69.13±7.48 | 75.65±8.56 | |||
Pre-post | −20.21±95% CI [−23.57, −16.86]b | −16.95±95% CI [−19.45, −14.45] | −9.56±95% CI [−12.47, −6.65] | 14.794 (0.000)* | A,B>C | |
12.499 (0.000)* | 14.050 (0.000)* | 6.819 (0.000)* | ||||
VAS – visual analogue scale; PT – conservative physical therapy; KT – kinesiology taping; CI – confidence interval; A – dynamic taping group; B – KT group; C – control group. a Means±standard deviation; b means±95% CI [lower value, upper value]. * p |