02 November 2023>: Clinical Research
Effect of Dynamic Taping versus Kinesiology Taping on Pain, Foot Function, Balance, and Foot Pressure in 3 Groups of Plantar Fasciitis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study
Dong-Ho Kim ABCDEF , Yongwoo Lee ACDE*DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941043
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941043
Table 3 Changes of foot function index according to intervention methods (N=69).
Dynamic taping with PT Group (n=23) | KT with PT Group (n=23) | Control Group (n=23) | F(p) | Post-hoc | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFI Pain (point) | Pre | 83.10±6.20a | 82.29±6.82 | 79.31±5.95 | ||
Post | 56.89±5.14 | 59.44±6.87 | 68.07±9.21 | |||
Pre-Post | −26.21±95% CI [−27.70, −24.71]b | −22.85±95% CI [−25.11, −20.59] | −11.24±95% CI [−13.29, −9.18] | 68.905 (0.000)* | A>B>C | |
36.308 (0.000)* | 20.990 (0.000)* | 11.36 (0.000)* | ||||
FFI Function (point) | Pre | 80.53±5.33a | 79.71±5.13 | 78.21±5.28 | ||
Post | 51.35±5.50 | 58.21±5.39 | 69.22±6.88 | |||
Pre-Post | −29.17±95% CI [−30.67, −27.67] | −21.49±95% CI [−22.94, −20.04] | −8.98±95% CI [−10.42, −7.54] | 208.292 (0.000)* | A>B>C | |
40.340 (0.000)* | 30.681 (0.000)* | 12.934 (0.000)* | ||||
FFI Limit of activity (point) | Pre | 73.91±6.86a | 72.17±6.32 | 71.88±6.18 | ||
Post | 44.92±6.73 | 49.56±6.05 | 60.86±7.53 | |||
Pre-Post | −28.98±95% CI [−31.46, −26.50] | −22.60±95% CI [−23.97, −21.23] | −11.01±95% CI [−12.77, −9.25] | 96.387 (0.000)* | A>B>C | |
24.286 (0.000)* | 34.190 (0.000)* | 12.965 (0.000)* | ||||
FFI – functional foot index; PT – conservative physical therapy; KT – kinesiology taping; CI – confidence interval; A – dynamic taping group; B – KT group; C – control group. a Means±standard deviation; b means± 95% CI [lower value, upper value]. * p |