22 September 2023>: Clinical Research
Comparative Analysis of Morphological Characteristics and Localization of Maxillary Impacted Canines using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
Vilte Viktoraviciute 1ABCDEF , Guoda Mockute 1CDEF* , Dalia Smailiene 2ADEDOI: 10.12659/MSM.941476
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941476
Table 1 Comparison of crown length and width and root length of impacted and contralateral canines.
Impacted canine n=40 | Contralateral canine n=40 | Mean difference | p | Pearson correlation coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | Mdn. (Min–Max) | Mean (SD) | Mdn. (Min–Max) | ||||
Crown length (mm) | 9.95 (1.23) | 9.9 (7.8–13.4) | 9.80 (1.07) | 9.7 (7.6–12.7) | 0.15 | 0.839 | |
Crown width (mm) | 7.84 (0.52) | 7.9 (6.7–9.4) | 7.58 (0.51) | 7.6 (6.1–8.5) | 0.26 | 0.579 | |
Root length (mm) | 15.86 (2.64) | 15.9 (10.7–21.2) | 17.32 (3.04) | 17.5 (10.9–25.0) | 1.46 | 0.813 | |
SD – standard deviation; Mdn – median; Min – the lowest observation; Max – the highest observation. |