19 September 2023 : Clinical Research
Impact of Verbal Suggestions on Finger Flexor Activation and Strength in Healthy Individuals
Kamil Zaworski
1ABCDEFG*, Monika Kadłubowska 1BCDF, Joanna Baj-Korpak 1CDEG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941548
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941548
Table 6 Correlations between subjective evaluation of muscle strength and dynamometric and sEMG measurements (N=88).
| P | Do you think the tape influenced your hand muscle strength? | |
|---|---|---|
| Dynamometric measurement (N) after | Correlation coefficient | 0.180 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.350 | |
| N | 29 | |
| sEMG (μV) after | Correlation coefficient | −0.070 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.717 | |
| N | 29 | |
| Dynamometric measurement (N) after | Correlation coefficient | 0.217 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.258 | |
| N | 29 | |
| sEMG (μV) after | Correlation coefficient | −0.008 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.968 | |
| N | 29 | |
| Dynamometric measurement (N) after | Correlation coefficient | −0.044 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.816 | |
| N | 30 | |
| sEMG (μV) after | Correlation coefficient | −0.358 |
| Significance (bilateral) | 0.052 | |
| N | 30 | |
| P – positive information group; N – negative information group; C – control group; N – Newton; μV – microvolt. | ||