04 November 2023>: Clinical Research
Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional and Occlusal Accuracy of Non-Working Antagonist Casts: A Study on Different Impression Materials and 3D Printing
Bandar M.A. Al-Makramani 1ABCEF* , Mohammed E. Sayed 1ABCEG , Fuad A. Al-Sanabani 1ABDEF , Khurshid Ahmed Mattoo 1ABCEF , Nasser M. Alqahtani 2ACDEG , Saeed M. Alqahtani 2ACDEG , Hossam F. Jokhadar 3ACDEG , Saad Saleh AlResayes 4ACDEF , Mohammad Alamri 5ADEFG , Mohammed H. AlWadei 5CDEFG , Khalid Motlaq 56CDEF , Faisal Hasan Alshehri 5CDEFG , Ahid Amer Alshahrani 7CDEF , Rami Eshaq 8BCDEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.941654
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941654
Table 6 Multiple pairwise comparisons of the accuracy of the articulated casts by the 3 impression materials and 3D printed system using Tukey’s HSD test.
Pairwise comparison | Mean (SD) | Mean difference | P value# | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Anterior vertical | AL(C) | 0.22 (0.12) | 0.08 | 0.181 |
AL(E) | 0.14 (0.12) | |||
AL(C) | 0.22 (0.12) | 0.09 | 0.693 | |
AL(F) | 0.13 (0.09) | |||
AL(C) | 0.22 (0.12) | −0.16 | 0.157 | |
3DC | 0.38 (0.33) | |||
AL(E) | 0.14 (0.12) | −0.01 | 0.765 | |
AL(F) | 0.13 (0.09) | |||
AL(E) | 0.14 (0.12) | −0.24 | 0.001** | |
3DC | 0.38 (0.33) | |||
AL(F) | 0.13 (0.09) | −.25 | 0.013* | |
3DC | 0.38 (0.33) | |||
Posterior vertical | AL(C) | 0.38 (0.25) | 0.15 | 0.152 |
AL(E) | 0.23 (0.12) | |||
AL(C) | 0.38 (0.25) | 0.16 | 0.071 | |
AL(F) | 0.22 (0.20) | |||
AL(C) | 0.38 (0.25) | −0.18 | 0.377 | |
3DC | 0.56 (0.26) | |||
AL(E) | 0.23 (0.12) | 0.01 | 0.983 | |
AL(F) | 0.22 (0.20) | |||
AL(E) | 0.23 (0.12) | −0.33 | 0.003** | |
3DC | 0.56 (0.26) | |||
AL(F) | 0.22 (0.20) | −0.34 | 0.001** | |
3DC | 0.56 (0.26) | |||
AL(C) – conventional alginate; AL(E) – extended pour alginate; AL(F) – alginate free; 3D-C – three-dimensional printed cast; df – degree of freedom; CI – confidence interval. # Tukey’s HSD Test. Levels of significance: NS (not-significant)=P≥0.05; * Significant=P≤0.05; ** Very significant=P≤0.01; *** Highly significant=P≤0.001. |