Influence of Chairside Simulated Adjustment (Finishing and Polishing) Protocol and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Immersion on Color Stability and Translucency of 2 and 3 Preshaded Multilayered Monolithic Zirconia

Mohammed E. Sayed; Saurabh Jain; Abrar A. Ageeli; Alhanouf K. Alnajdi; Asma Ahmed Zain; Maimonah Alali; Abdulaziz Ali Ahmed Alhazmi; Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy; Abdullah Hasan Alshehri; Ahid Amer Alshahrani; Mohammad Alamri; Mohammed H. Al Wadei; Hossam F. Jokhadar; Khurshid Mattoo

doi:10.12659/MSM.943404

20 February 2024 : Laboratory Research

Influence of Chairside Simulated Adjustment (Finishing and Polishing) Protocol and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Immersion on Color Stability and Translucency of 2 and 3 Preshaded Multilayered Monolithic Zirconia

Mohammed E. Sayed

^1ACDEG*, Saurabh Jain

^1ABDEF, Abrar A. Ageeli

^2BCEFG, Alhanouf K. Alnajdi

^3BCEFG, Asma Ahmed Zain

^3BCEFG, Maimonah Alali

^3BCEFG, Abdulaziz Ali Ahmed Alhazmi

^3BCEFG, Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy

^4ADEFG, Abdullah Hasan Alshehri

^4ACDEG, Ahid Amer Alshahrani

^5CDEFG, Mohammad Alamri

^6CDEFG, Mohammed H. Al Wadei

^6CDEFG, Hossam F. Jokhadar

^7ACDEG, Khurshid Mattoo

^1ACDEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.943404

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943404

Authors information Article notes Copyright and License information

Background Material and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions References

Related articles Order reprints Share article Share by email

View HTML version

Table 2 One-way ANOVA test results for comparison of color, contrast ratio and translucency between studied ceramics (Nacera Pearl Multi-Shade/Ceramill Zolid FX multilayer) after surface alteration (finishing/polishing) with 2 different commercial kits and immersion in media (saliva/chlorhexidine).

Groups	Color		Contrast ratio		Translucency
Groups	Mean±SD	P value	Mean±SD	P value	Mean±SD	P value
Gp NGS	0.1441±0.023	0.001^*	0.0047±0.009	0.632	−0.0285±0.012	0.116
Gp CGS	0.1100±0.217	0.001^*	0.0034±0.002	0.632	−0.0204±0.012	0.116
Gp NGCh	2.1072±0.118	0.880	0.0523±0.006	0.680	−3.0058±0.089	0.648
Gp CGCh	2.1167±0.177	0.880	0.0511±0.006	0.680	−3.0225±0.891	0.648
Gp NDS	0.3391±0.041	0.724	0.1140±0.032	0.001^*	−0.8225±0.079	0.727
Gp CDS	0.3328±0.045	0.724	0.0143±0.005	0.001^*	−0.8125±0.051	0.727
Gp NSS	0.4341±0.042	0.001^*	0.0193±0.006	0.112	−0.9566±0.060	0.343
Gp CSS	0.3750±0.032	0.001^*	0.0156±0.003	0.112	−0.9316±0.065	0.343
Gp NDCh	2.7450±0.207	0.132	0.0782±0.009	0.001^*	−3.2308±0.105	0.014^*
Gp CDCh	2.6066±0.225	0.132	0.0658±0.006	0.001^*	−3.1091±0.104	0.014^*
Gp NSCh	2.9008±0.222	0.339	0.0932±0.110	0.081	−3.5608±0.113	0.029^*
Gp CSCh	2.8133±0.216	0.339	0.0860±0.008	0.081	−3.4383±0.141	0.029^*
SD – standard deviation; p – probability value; Gp – group; Basis of Grouping – first alphabet represents type of ceramic (N=Nacera Pearl Multi-Shade, C=Ceramill Zolid FX Multilayer), Second alphabet represents surface treatment/adjustment (G=glazed, D=with Diasynt Plus, Diacera, S=with SUN) for finishing/polishing, third alphabet represents the medium used (S=saliva and Ch=chlorhexidine). [Example Gp NDCh represents Nacera ceramic adjusted with Diasynt Plus and immersed in chlorhexidine]. Statistical Interpretation: Test employed – One way ANOVA; level of the degree of significance was determined on the value of p ^* significant. Clinical acceptance (perceptible) threshold (CAT/CPT) (indicated by ): (1) Color difference (ΔE), []: ΔE = ≤1.00 – clinically not appreciable; ΔE = 1.0–3.3 – perceivable only by skilled operators therefore clinically acceptable; ΔE = ≥3.3 – appreciable by anyone (layman) therefore clinically unacceptable (2) Translucency perception threshold (TPT) []: CR (Y

Back to the Article

Influence of Chairside Simulated Adjustment (Finishing and Polishing) Protocol and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Immersion on Color Stability and Translucency of 2 and 3 Preshaded Multilayered Monolithic Zirconia

Your Privacy