20 February 2024>: Lab/In Vitro Research
Influence of Chairside Simulated Adjustment (Finishing and Polishing) Protocol and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash Immersion on Color Stability and Translucency of 2 and 3 Preshaded Multilayered Monolithic Zirconia
Mohammed E. Sayed 1ACDEG* , Saurabh Jain 1ABDEF , Abrar A. Ageeli 2BCEFG , Alhanouf K. Alnajdi 3BCEFG , Asma Ahmed Zain 3BCEFG , Maimonah Alali 3BCEFG , Abdulaziz Ali Ahmed Alhazmi 3BCEFG , Ebrahim Fihaid Alsubaiy 4ADEFG , Abdullah Hasan Alshehri 4ACDEG , Ahid Amer Alshahrani 5CDEFG , Mohammad Alamri 6CDEFG , Mohammed H. Al Wadei 6CDEFG , Hossam F. Jokhadar 7ACDEG , Khurshid Mattoo 1ACDEFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.943404
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943404
Table 5 Least significant difference (LSD) test results for individual subgroup comparison with other subgroups for Nacera Ceramic type.
Reference group | Comparison groups | Mean differences | Std. error | p Value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Color | Contrast ratio | Translucency | Color | Contrast ratio | Translucency | Color | Contrast ratio | Translucency | ||
Gp NGS | Gp NGCh | −1.9630* | −0.0474* | 2.9772* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NDS | −0.1950* | −0.1090* | 0.7939* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.010* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | −0.2900* | −0.0144* | 0.9280* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDCh | −2.6008* | −0.0733* | 3.2022* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSCh | −2.7566* | −0.0883* | 3.5322* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NGCh | Gp NGS | 1.9630* | 0.0474* | −2.9772* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NDS | 1.7680* | −0.0616* | −2.1833* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | 1.6730* | 0.0330* | −2.0491* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDCh | −0.6377* | −0.0259* | 0.2250* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSCh | −0.7935* | −0.0409* | 0.5550* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDS | Gp NGS | 0.1950* | 0.1090* | −0.7939* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.010* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NGCh | −1.7680* | 0.0616* | 2.1833* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | −0.09500 | 0.0946* | 0.1341* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.527 | 0.001* | 0.003* | |
Gp NDCh | −2.4058* | 0.0357* | 2.4083* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSCh | −2.5616* | 0.0207* | 2.7383* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | Gp NGS | 0.2900* | 0.0144* | −0.9280* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NGCh | −1.6730* | −0.0330* | 2.0491* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDS | 0.0950 | −0.0946* | −0.1341* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.527 | 0.001* | 0.003* | |
Gp NDCh | −2.3108* | −0.0589* | 2.2741* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSCh | −2.4666* | −0.0739* | 2.6041* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDCh | Gp NGS | 2.6008* | 0.0733* | −3.2022* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NGCh | 0.6377* | 0.0259* | −0.2250* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDS | 2.4058* | −0.0357* | −2.4083* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | 2.3108* | 0.0589* | −2.2741* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSCh | 0−.1558 | −0.0150* | 0.3300* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.068 | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSC | Gp NGS | 2.7566* | 0.0883* | −3.5322* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* |
Gp NGCh | 0.7935* | 0.0409* | −0.5550* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDS | 2.5616* | −0.0207* | −2.7383* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NSS | 2.4666* | 0.0739* | −2.6041* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Gp NDCh | 0.1558 | 0.0150* | −0.3300* | 0.055 | 0.003 | 0.034 | 0.068 | 0.001* | 0.001* | |
Std. – standard; p – probability value. Statistical Interpretation: Test employed – Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) Post Hoc Tukey Test; level of the degree of significance was determined on the value of p * significant. |