18 May 2024 : Clinical Research
New Computerized Planning Algorithm and Clinical Testing of Optimized Nuss Bar Design for Patients with Pectus Excavatum
János György Papp1ABCDEF*, Ákos Kiss1B, Krisztián Balogh2BC, László Kostyál3BC, Imre Tóth4BC, Tibor Gáll5BCD, Péter VajdaDOI: 10.12659/MSM.943705
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943705
Table 4 Pilot study data of patients operated on with pectus excavatum.
| Patient number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Male | Female | Female |
| Age | 17 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 15 |
| Haller index | 4.2 | 7.14 | 5.00 | 3.3 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 5.6 |
| Number of bars | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Patient satisfaction score (1–10)/10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
| Surgeon satisfaction score (1–10)/10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
| Operation time (min) | 75 | 145 | 80 | 75 | 90 | 60 | 105 | 155 | 80 | 95 |
| Stay in hospital (day) | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| The table shows data from patients operated on using the technique described by the authors. It is a heterogeneous group with varying Haller indices. The first bar was customized for each individual, while the shaping of the second bar was possible only after the first implantation. Dynamic chest model is currently unavailable; therefore, we could design the first bar tailored only to the individual. Satisfaction is a subjective factor from both the patient and surgeon perspectives. Comparing results is challenging due to the unique nature of each deformity. The surgery duration is shortened, as the bar bending is not done beside the operating table. | ||||||||||






