Prenatal screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities using ear length and shape as an ultrasound marker
Lech Dudarewicz, Bogdan KałużewskiMed Sci Monit 2000; 6(4): MT801-806 :: ID: 508234
Abstract
Introduction: to determine the range of fetal ear length and ear shape variability in healthy fetuses and in fetuses with aneuploidies in the population of patients of our institution and to evaluate the clinical value of fetal ear length and shape assessment in screening for fetal aneuploidies.
Material and methods: Fetal ear length was determined in 210 healthy and 15 aneuploid fetuses of pregnant women undergoing targeted ultrasound examination. Fetal ear shape was assessed in the coronal section of the head and classified into one of three categories: flat, slightly protruding, markedly protruding and curved in 175 healthy and 14 aneuploid fetuses.
Results: Fetal ear length showed significant positive linear relationship with gestational age, which could be described by the following equation: Ear length (mm) = 0.968566 ´ gestational age (weeks) - 4.81629 Fetal ear shortening below 79% of expected length yielded the sensitivity of 26.7% in the detection of fetal aneuploidy at the false positive rate of 4.8%. Finding of markedly protruding and curved ears predicted fetal aneuploidy with the sensitivity of 28.6% at the false positive rate of 1.7%. The combination of fetal ear shortening below 74% of expected length or markedly protruding and curved ears resulted in the sensitivity of 33.3% and false positive rate of 3.33% in the detection of fetal aneuploidies.
Conclusion: Fetal ear shortening has been confirmed as a marker of fetal aneuploidies. Abnormal fetal ear shape has been shown to constitute an additional marker of fetal aneuploidies, increasing the clinical value of fetal ear length measurements.
Keywords: ultrasound, Prenatal Diagnosis, fetal aneuploidy, Ear
Editorial
01 January 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: Increasing Awareness of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers and Never-Smokers Challenges Current Approaches to Prevention and ScreeningDOI: 10.12659/MSM.952454
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952454
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






