01 May 2013: Epidemiology
Molecular characterization and drug resistance of Escherichia coli strains isolated from urine from long-term care facility residents in Cracow, Poland
Monika Pobiega BDEF , Jadwiga Wojkowska-Mach ABDFG , Agnieszka Chmielarczyk BDE , Dorota Romaniszyn BD , Paweł Adamski CD , Piotr B. Heczko ADEG , Barbara Gryglewska AEF , Tomasz Grodzicki FG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.883898
Med Sci Monit 2013; 19:317-326
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and extended-spectrum â-lactamases (ESBL) pathogens isolated from asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections (UTIs), and the relationship between the phylogeny, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence among isolates in residents of 3 long-term care facilities (LTCF) in Krakow, Poland.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was point prevalence study and prospective infection control in a group of 217 people. Urine samples were examined with standard microbiological methods and screened for the presence of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM. E. coli isolates were screened for 6 common virulence factors (VFs) and classified according to the rapid phylogenetic grouping technique.
RESULTS: Among all the strains tested, 14 isolates (13.9%) expressed ESBL activity. A significant proportion of isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (32.7%, n=33). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was identified among 45 isolates (44.5%). Independent risk factors for the presence of an ESBL-producing strain were: UTI, urinary and/or fecal incontinence, bedridden, and low values of the Barthel and Katz Indexes. Gene sequencing identified 8 blaCTX-M-15, 1 blaCTX-M-3, 9 blaTEM-1, and 1 blaSHV-12. Among E. coli, no relationship between number of VF genes and phylogeny was found. The most prevalent virulence factor was fimH (82.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study emphasize the need for further research on the epidemiology of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) and ESBL in LTCF, including transmission patterns, rates of infection, and factors associated with infections. It may be necessary to extend the requirements and precautions to MDRO and ESBL-producers.
Keywords: Residential Facilities - statistics & numerical data, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Poland - epidemiology, Long-Term Care - statistics & numerical data, Escherichia coli Infections - urine, Escherichia coli - isolation & purification, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use, Risk Factors, beta-Lactamases - metabolism
Background
The high incidence of infections and high rates of hospitalization, together with institutionalized long-term care (LTC), highlights the important role of management to the decrease antibacterial susceptibility of organisms cultured from elderly patients. The reservoir for these microorganisms may be the bacterial flora in patients receiving long-term antimicrobial therapy or health care personnel who are colonized with resistant strains or infected with the same pathogens. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods (MDR-GNR) are rapidly spreading throughout LTCFs around the world, and antibiotics are also commonly prescribed for older adults residing in LTCFs. There are a number of risks associated with the inappropriate use of antibiotics. There is risk of development of multi-drug antibiotic resistance after exposure [1,2] and risk of drug-related adverse effects. Furthermore, the increased use of antibiotics in LTCFs results in significant costs [3]. The rapid spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria through health care institutions is considered a serious medical and public health issue [4]. The intensive use of antibiotics promotes a relatively high prevalence of MDR-GNR and pathogens able to produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) in LTCFs [5,6]. LTCFs have older populations with increased prevalence of resistant bacteria isolated from urinary tract infections (UTI). Resistant isolates are more frequent in long-term care populations than in the general population [5,6]. Preceding colonization with such microorganisms is a risk factor for the development of infection, but the presence of virulence factors in the pathogens is equally important. A wide range of virulence factors (VFs) and a persistence of multidrug resistance can make the treatment of infections challenging. VFs for
Until now, the prevalence of ESBL-positive strains and drug resistance among LTCF-residents in Poland has not been studied. For this reason, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MDR-GNR and ESBL pathogens isolated from asymptomatic bacteriuria and UTIs. The second purpose of this study was to look for a relationship between the phylogeny, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence among
There have been no epidemiological descriptions of the elderly population in Poland. This has resulted in an inability to design feasible infection prevention programs. The proposed methods will be the basis for the development of recommendations for empirical treatment of LTCF residents. The point prevalence study was conducted for cases of asymptomatic bacteriuria and a continuing study is being conducted to measure the rate of infections with ESBL etiology.
Material and Methods
PART I. POINT PREVALENCE STUDY, PPS:
A 1-day prevalence survey (point prevalence study [PPS]) was carried out in October 2009 in 3 LTCFs in Krakow, Poland: 2 residential homes and 1 nursing home. A resident was defined as a person staying in an LTCF during the study day for at least 48 h. A control patient was a person staying in home care (HC), but requiring home visits of a physician. In a nursing home (NH), residents need 24 h/day medical or skilled nurse supervision and intensive health care is provided. In the residential home (RH), residents are unable to live independently and require supervision or assistance with activities of daily living. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jagiellonian University (KBET/57/B/2008), conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and carefully explained to the participants, who then gave their written informed consent. Medical charts were reviewed for patient demographic data, comorbidities, and residency in an LTCF. Medical documentation of residents was analyzed for the presence of chronic diseases and other medical problems. Barthel Index values and Katz Index were obtained from all studied participants. The Barthel Index (BI) is a 10-item measure of disability based on daily activities (e.g., bathing, transfer, dressing, feeding, mobility, stairs, using the toilet, and grooming) [10]. The score corresponds to the sum of all the points obtained, and can range from 0 to 100 points. Lower scores are associated with worse functional status – elderly patients with scores from 0 to 20 are considered to be totally dependent [10]. The Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living is an instrument used to assess functional status as a measurement of the patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living independently [11]. The Index ranks the adequacy of performance in 6 functions: bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding. Patients are scored for independence in each of these functions. A score of 6 indicates full function, 4 indicates moderate impairment, and 2 or less indicates severe functional impairment [11]. Physical dependence (mobility) was classified according to a 5-point scale (1 – independent, 2 – independent with falls, 3 – limitations in mobility, 4 – confined to bed, self-changing body position, 5 – confined to bed, dependent). Data on hospital exposure longer than 7 days in the 3 months preceding enrollment and antibiotics taken in the last month were collected. Infections were defined according to the McGeer criteria and were detected by trained health personnel in cooperation with a project worker [12].
PART II. CONTINUING STUDY:
Continuing prospective infection control was performed between 1 December 2009 and 30 November 2010, using the standard McGeer definition protocol [12]. Cases of infections were registered by a nurse and accompanying physician. Urine samples were taken only from residents when the symptoms of infections occurred. In the period between enrollment and each follow-up, data on potential factors that would increase the likelihood of MDRO acquisition were also collected (ie, antibiotic and hospital exposure, and presence of infections).
The relationship between types of care, socio-demographic characteristics, probability, and epidemiology of ESBL were analyzed with 2 main groups of statistical techniques. If the numerical parameters (e.g., age, length of stay) were compared with the nominal characteristics (e.g., type of care, form of infection), a simple ANOVA test was used. If the distribution of numerical characteristics did not fit the normal distribution, the nonparametric alternative to ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, was used. Chi-square (χ2) frequency tests and a likelihood ratio were used for the contingency of nominal characteristics.
Detailed information about epidemiology of infections in the point prevalence study and the continuing study among included LTCFs has been described [13].
BACTERIAL ISOLATES: Samples of urine were routinely collected (clean-catch method) and cultured by standard quantitative methods at the beginning of the study (PPS). When symptoms of UTI in any enrolled resident occurred throughout the study (continuing study), urine samples were also taken. Isolates were identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with species-specific primers [14,15] or phenotypic methods (API ID 32E,BioMerieux). Strains belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family were further tested.
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY:
All strains belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family were tested using disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility methods on Mueller-Hinton agar plates according to current guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (Clinical breakpoints tables v. 1.3;
ESBL activity was detected with a modified double-disk synergy test (DDST) using a combination of cefotaxime (5 μg), ceftazidime (10 μg), cefepime (30 μg), and aztreonam (30 μg) disks, placed 20 mm apart around a disk containing amoxicillin-clavulanate (20 μg/10 μg) [16]. Enhancement of the inhibition zone toward the amoxicillin-clavulanate disks was taken as presumptive evidence of ESBL production. All disks were obtained from Oxoid, Ltd. (Basingstoke, UK). Each isolate was classified as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. Criteria for multidrug resistance were defined as resistance or intermediate resistance to 3 or more antimicrobial groups (co-resistance) or 4 or more of the antimicrobials [17].
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (PCR) SCREENING FOR EXTENDED-SPECTRUM β-LACTAMASE GENES AND SEQUENCING OF BLA GENES: All isolates with ESBL activity (according to DDST) were screened with multiplex-PCR for the presence of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM genes using previously published primers [18]. Bacterial DNA was extracted by the boiling method (10 minutes at 100°C). Relevant positive and negative controls were included in each PCR run. The reaction mixture (25 μl) was amplified using the following conditions: 15 min at 95°C, 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 2 min at 72°C, with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The amplicon sizes were 445, 593, and 747 bp for blaTEM, blaCTX-M, and blaSHV, respectively. Bands were visualized using the UVP GelDocIT Imaging System after 1.5% TAE-agarose electrophoresis (90 min, 100 mV) with ethidium bromide (BioRad). GeneRuler DNA-ladder 100bp (Fermentas) was used as a size marker. The strains with PCR amplicons positive for any of the previously described bla were selected for sequencing. PCR products were purified using a NucleoSpin extract II kit (Macherey-Nagel). Sequencing was performed by an outsourced company (Genomed, Warsaw, Poland). The nucleotide sequences were analyzed with the software available at the National Center of Biotechnology Information (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi).
VIRULENCE FACTOR SCREENING: E. coli isolates from bacteriuria were checked for the presence of selected virulence genes usually associated with the E. coli strains responsible for extraintestinal infections: papC and papEF (P fimbriae), fimH (type 1 pili), hlyA (hemolysin), iutA (aerobactin), and sfa (S and F1C fimbriae) using PCR with previously published primers [7]. Each VF gene was amplified in a total volume of 25 μl containing 2× Master Mix (A&A Biotechnology, Poland), 0.5 μM primer and DNA. A negative control (containing the same mixture, but with water instead of DNA) was included in each PCR run. The amplification products were separated by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel and visualized using the UVP GelDocIT Imaging System. GeneRuler DNA-ladder 100bp (Fermentas) was used as a size marker. The results were considered positive if the amplification product was of the expected molecular size (papC – 200 bp, papEF – 326bp, fimH – 508bp, hlyA – 1177bp, iutA – 300bp, and sfa – 410bp). The strains were classified according to the Escherichia coli Reference Collection (ECOR) system by the use of the rapid phylogenetic grouping technique described by Clermont et al. [19]. This method is based on a multiplex PCR involving the amplification of 2 genes (chuA and yjaA) and of an anonymous fragment of DNA from E. coli (TspE4C2). The results are interpreting as follows: chuA and yjaA positive indicated group B2; chuA positive and yjaA negative indicated group D; chuA negative and TspE4C2 positive indicated group B1; and chuA negative and TspE4C2 negative indicated group A. Differences were tested using the χ2 test.
Results
The study was conducted in a group of 217 persons (193 residents of LTCFs and 24 from HC as a control group). Of these residents, 86 (39.6%) stayed at RHs, and 107 stayed at NHs. The studied sample corresponded to 2.6% of the total LTCF population in Poland in 2010 [20]. Among the 217 patients participating in this research, 1 patient quit being in a LTCF, 1 was moved to another facility, and 31 patients died during the study.
The population studied was heterogeneous and significantly diverse with regards to: incidence of hospitalization before study, body weight, problems with maintaining personal hygiene (expressed as urinary/stool incontinence and the Katz Index), and expressed necessity of care (Barthel Index, Table 1). The mean value of the Barthel Index was 75.4 in HC (SD: 27.7, 95% CI: 63.7–87.1), 75.6 in RH (SD: 34.5, 95% CI: 68.2–83.0), and 19.5 in NHs (SD: 17.4, 95% CI: 16.1–22.9). In NHs none of the residents had BI higher than 76 points, and 66.7% of HC patients and 69.8% of RH residents had scores above 76 points. The mean value of Katz Index was 4.4 for HC patients (SD: 2.2, 95% CI: 3.4–5.3), 4.7 for RH residents (SD: 2.1, 95% CI: 4.2–5.1), and 1.3 for NH residents (SD: 1.6, 95% CI: 0.9–1.6). Considerably older patients (aged ≥80) stayed in HC, while younger (age <80) patients were more likely to be residents of RHs. The average age for the population (63.2% female) was 76.2 years in RH (standard deviation SD: 10.5, 95% CI: 73.9–78.4), 76.8 years in NHs (SD: 11.1, 95% CI: 74.6–78.9), and 82.9 in HC (SD: 9.9, 95% CI: 78.7–87.0). The average length of LTCF stay was 6.5 years (SD 5.9; 95%CI 4.1–5.9). Differences were also observed in the physical activity of residents – NH residents were more likely to have limited ability to walk independently. The mean mobility was 2.4 for HC patients (SD: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.7–3.1), 1.9 for RH residents (SD: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.7–2.2), and 3.7 for NH residents (SD: 1.1, 95% CI: 3.5–3.9). Independent mobility (with no restrictions) was characteristic for 12 (50.0%) HC patients, 48 (55.8%) RH residents, and 5 (4.7%) NH residents. There were 5 (20.8%) HC residents who were confined to bed and dependent, 4 (4.7%) in RH, and 33 (30.8%) in NHs.
The general prevalence rate of infections was 22.1/100 residents and general incidence density rate was 2.7/1000 residents per day for both groups (residents and home care patients). The general prevalence rate of ESBL was 4.6/100 in residents with bacteriuria and 0.0/100 in the control group. The incidence density of ESBL-producing isolates was 0.3/1000 residents per day (only in NHs and RH). Of the residents, 22 were taking antibiotics in the month preceding PPS.
Gram-negative rods were identified in 101 cultures of urine: 9 from UTIs and 92 from asymptomatic bacteriuria. Bacteriuria was found in 82 (42.5%) residents. The most commonly isolated pathogen was
Accordingly, 60 isolates were ampicillin resistant (58.7% from bacteriuria and 75.0% from UTI) (Figure 1.). Aminoglycoside resistance was present in 11 isolates (10.9%). Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was identified in 45 isolates (43.5% from bacteriuria and 71.4% UTI). A significant proportion of isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones, and 33 isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (32.7%). The prevalence of pathogens resistant to more than 4 antimicrobials was 16.3% among asymptomatic bacteriuria samples and 33.3% among UTIs. The most common co-resistance pattern was gentamycin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, present among 9.1% of isolates.
Of the isolates, 14 had ESBL activity (13.9%). ESBL was most prevalent in
From the group of LTCF resident isolates, PCR experiments performed on bacterial DNA with primers specific for 3
Among
Discussion
The presented results are derived from the first Polish study concerning urinary tract infections among long-term care facility residents. The study was performed using 2 independent approaches: a prevalence study (PPS) and an incidence study. These kinds of research programs are carried out in Europe and worldwide [21]
The population of Polish NH and RH residents was slightly different from the population of institutionalized elderly in other countries. The mean age of such residents in Italy is 81 years [22] and 83 in Germany [23]. In Norwegian LTCFs, more that 78% of residents are 81 years or older [24]. The average age of Polish residents was about 5 years younger. Furthermore, the participation of residents confined to bed and residents with low Barthel and Katz Index scores was relatively lower compared to Norwegian or Italian surveys [25]. The use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (e.g., catheterization) was also lower in this study than in Italy (18.4%
The most commonly isolated pathogen was
MDRO are a serious problem in health care institutions such as hospitals and LTCFs. Resistance determined by ESBL-synthesis is one of the most important resistance mechanisms. Patients colonized with ESBL-positive strains and MDRO are considered as reservoirs and are potential sources of infection. It is important to note that colonization often precedes an infection, and about one-fourth of colonized residents may develop an infection with the same factor [17,28]. The prevalence of bacteriuria in residents without chronic long-term indwelling catheters reaches 25–50% for women and 15–40% for men [5], and approximately 40% of nosocomial infections originate in the urinary tract [29]. In this study, bacteriuria was found in 42.5% of residents, and infection developed in 4.6%.
In this study, residents infected with ESBL-positive strains were 2.6 times more frequently transferred from LTCFs to hospitals and treated under hospital conditions. Their attendance at hospital units requires special rules for isolation, common for patients with MDROs (contact isolation). The genes responsible for drug resistance are frequently located on plasmids, which contributes to their fast spread [30]. This study identified a relatively high prevalence of ESBL-positive strains among residents of LTCFs. Another Polish survey, conducted in 13 Polish hospitals, found a 11.1% prevalence of ESBL-positive pathogens [31], which is consistent with our study. The identification of ESBL types revealed the very common occurrence of CTX-M-15 β-lactamase, as far as TEM-1, whereas SHV appeared rarely (only 1 case). The rapid increase in the prevalence of CTX-M producers cannot be questioned and it is the most prevalent ESBL in other countries [32].
Predictors of ESBL-positive strains found by other authors include permanent urinary catheter, pressure sores, and any recent invasive procedures [33,34]. Other strong risk factors that increased the likelihood of ESBL, like being wheelchair-dependent or confined to bed, and low scores on the Barthel or Katz Indexes, have not yet been investigated. Our studies indicate the significance of this element in a long-term care.
Resistance to gentamicin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole frequently occurs among ESBL-positive isolates [17,30,35–37]. Our study confirmed that 35.7% of ESBL-positive strains were resistant to both of these antibiotics. The majority of the studied isolates were resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics, including ampicillin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin. This data raises serious concern about the therapeutic options available for physicians treating LTCF residents. The prevalence of pathogens resistant to more than 4 antimicrobials was 16.2%, which is less than in the O’Fallon report from Boston LTCFs [17]. Resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam, which are counted as broad-spectrum antimicrobials, was very low (1.4%). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent for out-patient urinary isolates in Turkey [37].
It has been shown that the number of VFs is proportional to its pathogenic potential [38]. FimH protein recognizes its receptor on uroplakin, which is disseminated on the surface of uroepithelium [9]. It acts as an adhesin but also as an invasin, because it is necessary to initiate the response signalling pathways of the host, leading to internalization of
Conclusions
This study shows that the prevalence of ESBL-producing rods isolated from urine samples from LTCF residents was lower then in other similar studies published recently. The findings derived from this study emphasize the need for further research on epidemiology of MDRO and ESBL in LTCFs, including transmission patterns, rates of infection, and factors associated with infections. It may be necessary to extend the requirements and precautions to MDR-GNR and ESBL-producers. Several potential limitations should be considered in the interpretation of data presented here. First, the number of patients included was very low (only 193 residents from 3 LTCFs). This was due to mistrust on the part of residents (who had to agree to participate) and the insufficiently enthusiastic attitude of personnel. Therefore, the number of isolates was relatively low. The control group was also very small, as these patients also had to agree to participate in the study. However, this is the first Polish surveillance conducted in LTCFs, and further research should be done because it might benefit physicians in Poland in the treatment of LTCF patients. In addition, to develop recommendations for treatment, an extended study is recommended.
References
1. Gaynes R, Weinstein RA, Chamberlain W, Kabins SA, Antibiotic resistant flora in nursing home patients admitted to the hospital: Arch Intern Med, 1985; 145; 1804-7, pmid: 3929707
2. Muder RR, Brennen C, Drenning SD, Multiply antibiotic-resist gram-negative bacilli in a long-term-care facility: a case-control study of patient risk factors and prior antibiotic use: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1997; 18; 809-11, pmid: 9442404
3. Loeb M, Brazil K, Lohfeld K, Optimizing antibiotics in residents of nursing homes: protocol of a randomized trial: BMC Health Serv Res, 2002; 2; 17, pmid: 12207826
4. Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D, The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America: Clin Infect Dis, 2008; 46; 155-64, pmid: 18171244
5. Nicolle LE, Urinary infections in the elderly: symptomatic or asymptomatic?: Int J Antimicrob Agents, 1999; 11; 265-68, pmid: 10394981
6. Nicolle LE, Resistant pathogens in urinary tract infections: J Am Geriatr Soc, 2002; 50; 230-35, pmid: 12028203
7. Johnson JR, Stell AL: J Infect Dis, 2000; 181(1); 261-72, pmid: 10608775
8. Johnson JR, Epidemiological considerations in studies of adherence: Adhesion of microbial pathogens: methods in enzymology, 1995; 253; 167-78, Orlando, FL, Academic Press
9. Narciso A, Nunes F, Amores T: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2012; 31; 1211-17, pmid: 21990017
10. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW, Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index: Md State Med J, 1965; 14; 61-65, pmid: 14258950
11. Wallace M, Shelkey MHartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living (ADL): Urol Nurs, 2007; 27; 93-94, pmid: 17390935
12. McGeer A, Campbell B, Emori TG, Definitions of Infection for Surveillance in Long-term Care Facilities: Am J Infect Control, 1991; 19; 1-7, pmid: 1902352
13. Wójkowska-Mach J, Gryglewska B, Czekaj J, Infection control: point prevalence study versus incidence study in Polish long-term care facilities in 2009–2010 in the Małopolska Region: Infection, 2013; 41(1); 1-8, pmid: 23086684
14. Liu Y, Liu C, Zheng W: Int J Food Microbiol, 2008; 125; 230-35, pmid: 18579248
15. Maheux AF: Water Res, 2009; 43; 3019-28, pmid: 19482328
16. Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, Jarlier V, Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2008; 14; 90-103, pmid: 18154532
17. O’Fallon E, Pop-Vicas A, D’Agata E, The emerging threat of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms in Long-Term Care Facilities: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2009; 64A; 138-41, pmid: 19164271
18. Monstein HJ, Ostholm-Balkhed A, Nilsson MV: APMIS, 2007; 115(12); 1400-8, pmid: 18184411
19. Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E: Appl Environ Microbiol, 2000; 66(10); 4555-58, pmid: 11010916
20. : Demographic yearbook of Poland 2010, 2010; 474-75, Warsaw, Central Statistical Office
21. Moro ML, Jans B, Cookson B, Fabry J, The burden of healthcare-associated infections in European long-term care facilities: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2010; 31; 59-62, pmid: 19951201
22. Brusaferro S, Regattin L, Silvestro A, Vidotto L, Incidence of hospital-acquired infections in Italian long-term-care facilities: a prospective six-month surveillance: J Hosp Infect, 2006; 63; 211-15, pmid: 16600433
23. Engelhart ST, Hanses-Derendorf L, Exner M, Kramer MH, Prospective surveillance for healthcare-associated infections in German nursing home residents: J Hosp Infect, 2005; 60; 46-50, pmid: 15823656
24. Eriksen HM, Koch AM, Elstrøm P, Healthcare-associated infection among residents of long-term care facilities: a cohort and nested case-control study: J Hosp Infect, 2007; 65; 334-40, pmid: 17275954
25. Moro ML, Mongardi M, Marchi M, Taroni F, Prevalence of long-term care acquired infections in nursing and residential homes in the Emilia-Romagna Region: Infection, 2007; 35; 250-55, pmid: 17646916
26. Frankhauser C, Zingg Q, Francois P: Swiss Med Wkly, 2009; 139; 747-51, pmid: 19924582
27. De Francesco MA, Ravizzola G, Peroni L, Urinary tract infections in Brescia, Italy: etiology of uropathogens and antimicrobial resistance of common uropathogens: Med Sci Monit, 2007; 13(6); BR136-44, pmid: 17534228
28. Ben-Ami R, Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S: Clin Infect Dis, 2006; 42; 925-34, pmid: 16511754
29. Tenke P, Kovacs B, Johansen TE, European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections: Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2008; 31; S68-78, pmid: 18006279
30. Livermore DM, β-Lactamases in Laboratory and Clinical Resistance: Clin Microbiol Rev, 1995; 8; 557-84, pmid: 8665470
31. Empel J, Baraniak A, Literacka E: Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2008; 52(7); 2449-54, pmid: 18458126
32. Livermore DM, Canton R, Gniadkowski M, CTX-M: changing the face of ESBLs in Europe: J Antimicrob Chemother, 2007; 59(2); 165-74, pmid: 17158117
33. Mendelson G, Hait V, Ben-Israel J: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2005; 24; 17-22, pmid: 15660255
34. Wiener J, Quinn JP, Bradford PA: JAMA, 1999; 281; 517-23, pmid: 10022107
35. March A, Aschbacher R, Dhanji H, Colonization of residents and staff of a long-term-care facility and adjacent acute-care hospital geriatric unit by multiresistant bacteria: Clin Microbiol Infect, 2010; 16; 934-44, pmid: 19686277
36. Kurtaran B, Candevir A, Tasova Y, Antibiotic resistance in community-acquired urinary tract infections: prevalence and risk factors: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(5); CR246-51, pmid: 20424552
37. Yilmaz N, Agus N, Yurtsever SG: Med Sci Monit, 2009; 15(11); PI61-65, pmid: 19865064
38. Picard B, Sevali Garcia J, Gouriou S, The Link between Phylogeny and Virulence in Escherichia coli Extraintestinal Infection: Infect Immun, 1999; 67; 546-53, pmid: 9916057
39. Wang H, Min G, Glockshuber R: J Mol Biol, 2009; 392; 352-61, pmid: 19577575
40. Bien J, Sokolova O, Bozko P: Int J Nephrol, 2012; 681473, pmid: 22506110
41. Plos K, Connell H, Jodal U: J Infect Dis, 1995; 171; 625-31, pmid: 7876609
42. Marre R, Kreft B, Hacker J: Infect Immun, 1990; 58; 3434-37, pmid: 1976115
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






