Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

16 July 2014: Preliminary Report  

Antiphospholipid antibodies during 6-month treatment with infliximab: A preliminary report

Bogdan Kolarz ABCDEF , Maria Majdan ADG , Dorota A. Darmochwal-Kolarz CDF , Magdalena Dryglewska B

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890270

Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:1227-1231

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept) was a major advance and was highly important and beneficial in most rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The adverse effects of this treatment are infrequent, but include opportunistic intracellular infection (especially the reactivation of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis); exacerbation of demyelinating disorders; and the production of various types of antibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or double-stranded DNA autoantibodies (dsDNA) and antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-B2GP-I antibodies (B2GP-I). The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of aCL and B2GP-I in IgM and IgG classes, using ELISA tests, during 6 months of follow-up in patients with refractory RA successfully treated with infliximab.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We determined the prevalence of aCL and B2GP-I in IgM and IgG classes, using ELISA tests, during 6 months of follow-up in patients with refractory RA successfully treated with infliximab.

RESULTS: We observed a statistically important increase only in the group of B2GP-I IgM (p<0.05). There are contradictory results concerning the ability of infliximab to induce aPL, but most authors confirm this phenomenon.

CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are needed to determine if the new aPL appears in patients with β2-GPI gene polymorphisms such as leucine-to-valine substitution at position 247, which can lead to a conformational changes in β2-GPI protein, leading to aPL synthesis. The role of aPL in pathogenesis of APS is still unclear, but we should remember the immunogenic aspect of TNF antagonist treatment. Therefore, we recommend early detection of aPL and observation of the patient, paying special attention to signs and symptoms of thromboembolism.

Keywords: Antibodies, Antiphospholipid - blood, Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology, Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy, Cardiolipins - immunology, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Follow-Up Studies, Methotrexate - pharmacology, Time Factors, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha - antagonists & inhibitors, beta 2-Glycoprotein I - immunology

Background

The introduction of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists – adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept – was a major advance and was highly important and beneficial in treating most rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are refractory to a classic treatment with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) [1–5].

The adverse effects of this treatment are infrequent, opportunistic, intracellular infections, especially the reactivation of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an exacerbation of demyelinating disorders. Moreover, the induction of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia can occur [6–8]. It is also possible to induce the production of various types of antibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) or double-stranded DNA autoantibodies (dsDNA). Treatment with biological agents like infliximab can additionally induce synthesis of anti-drug antibodies, such as the human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) or human anti-chimera antibodies (HACA) [9].

The pathogenetic mechanism that changes the humoral response leading to development of autoimmunity during anti-TNF inhibitors therapy is unknown. A possible mechanism leads through the binding of infliximab to the transmembrane and soluble TNF, rapidly lowering TNF level and enhancing apoptotic cell death, which triggers the development of autoantibodies [10,11]. The other possible mechanisms that may result in autoantibodies production are: a) TNF-alpha inhibition that causes B-cell activation and production of autoantibodies through the upregulation of interleukin-10 [12], b) an increase in Th2 activity [13], and c) an increase in bacterial infections, which leads to the production of antibodies through molecular mimicry [6,14–17].

Only limited data have been published about the induction of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) during treatment using TNF inhibitors [18–20]. The stimulation mechanisms of its synthesis and role still remain unclear.

Antiphospholipid antibodies target phospholipid-binding proteins, and may cause a prolongation of phospholipid-dependent coagulation assays, although patients are at risk for thromboembolic rather than bleeding complications. The most often recognized antibodies from this group are now anti-cardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and the recently recognized antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) criteria anti-B2GP-I antibodies (B2GP-I). The aCL that are detected in patients with RA and other autoimmune diseases are directed against negatively charged phospholipids associated with B2-glycoprotein, whereas aCL are associated with infection are directed against negatively charged phospholipids alone [21,22].

In normal populations (healthy blood donors), aCL are found in 2–6% of people, and in an aging population are found in up to 12% and have been associated with the symptoms of APS such as recurrent thromboembolism and fetal loss [23,24]. In RA patients, the incidence of aCL may be even higher [25]. Their clinical significance in RA is uncertain and their presence has been considered to be a non-specific marker of activation of the immune system [26].

Material and Methods

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 7.0 PL software. Differences between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

We observed 4 aCL IgM-positive (12.5%) patients before the beginning of infliximab treatment. In these cases, we found no changes after 3 and 6 months of observation. There were no aCL IgG-positive patients at the beginning and after 3 months, but 1 case (3.12%) of seroconversion was observed after 6 months in aCL IgG class. During the whole study, we did not observe any B2GP-I IgG-positive patients. Otherwise, we noticed a statistically important increase in the group of B2GP-I IgM-positive patients (p<0.05) (Figure 1). There were 2 (6.25%) seropositive patients before the start of the treatment, 1 (3.33%) after 3 months, and the next 3 (10.3%) after 6 months. Totally, we observed 4 (13.3%) new B2GP-I IgM-positive patients, which was statistically significant.

Discussion

Elliott et al. found aCL in 1 out of 20 patients with RA treated with anti-TNF (cA2) in the first 8-week open trial on humans [18]. These preliminary findings were confirmed by subsequent observations [14,17,27,28]. Rankin et al. measured the serological effects of repeated doses of the humanized anti-TNF antibody CDP 571 in patients with RA and found that some patients develop positive aCL (IgG) [29]. Ferraccioli et al. showed variations in aCL titers over time in etanercept-treated patients with concomitant bacterial infection, where lowering of titers was seen after the treatment with antibiotics [17].

Many studies have confirmed induction of ANA and anti-dsDNA in patients treated with infliximab [10,30–33]. Anti-dsDNA antibodies are usually IgM isotype [10] or IgM and IgA isotypes together [32].

Our results showed statistically significant changes only in B2GP-I IgM class. However, the period of our observation was short and subsequent seroconversions are possible in the near future. We were not able to find an association between new B2GP-I IgM and thromboembolism risk. A similar observation was presented by Jonsdottir et al., who noted a statistically significant increase in aCL IgM positivity after 3 and 6 months of infliximab treatment. This increase was seen in both aCL IgG and IgM classes. Another important observation was the worse clinical presentation in aCL-positive patients [34].

If aPL are not involved in APS, their role is difficult to explain. They may be nonspecific markers of the immune system activation and may vanish without a trace [25,26]. There are some reports that RA is associated with an increased frequency of aCL positivity [13,35,36]; the de novo production of aPL, especially aCL IgM, is associated with APS signs, such as thrombosis [37] or vasculitis [38].

According to Jonsdottir et al., a statistically significant increase in frequency of aCL IgM and IgG was induced in patients with RA at 3 months of treatment with infliximab [34].

The ASPIRE trial reported no statistically significant differences in aCL IgG and IgM classes between infliximab + MTX and MTX + placebo groups before or after treatment. Fewer than 3% of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and who had negative findings for IgG aCL at baseline were found to have positive results at week 30 or 54. For IgM aCL, a slightly higher proportion of patients who received infliximab plus MTX and had negative findings at baseline were found to have positive results at week 30 or week 54 (11.6%), as compared with the proportion of patients who received placebo plus MTX (7.6%) [39].

In the Ferraro-Peyret et al. study, the researchers found 21% of new aCL IgM antibodies [14].

Some authors suggest that the induction of aPL appears usually at the beginning of treatment, but Morris et al. demonstrated that it is important to check the aCL appearance even between the 30th and 54th weeks of observation [28]. Similarly, Visvanathan et al. emphasize that it is important to obtain serial samples over at least 1 year to ascertain a patient’s aPL status [40].

Further investigations are needed to determine if the new aPL appears in patients with β2-GPI gene polymorphisms, such as leucine-to-valine substitution at position 247, which can lead to conformational changes in β2-GPI protein, leading to aPL synthesis [41,42].

Conclusions

The role of aPL in the pathogenesis of APS is still unclear but we should remember the immunogenic aspect of TNF antagonist treatment. Therefore, we recommend early detection of aPL and observation of the patient, paying special attention to signs and symptoms of thromboembolism. A possible preventive treatment should be discussed in certain patients.

References

1. Bathon J, Martin R, Fleischmann R, A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: N Engl J Med, 2000; 343(22); 1586-93, pmid: 11096165

2. Elliott M, Maini R, Feldmann M, Randomised double-blind comparison of chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha (cA2) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis: Lancet, 1994; 344(8930); 1105-10, pmid: 7934491

3. Illei G, Lipsky P, Novel, non-antigen-specific therapeutic approaches to autoimmune/inflammatory diseases: Curr Opin Immunol, 2000; 12(6); 712-18, pmid: 11102777

4. Lipsky PE, van der Heijde DM, StClair EW, Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group: N Engl J Med, 2000; 343(22); 1594-602, pmid: 11096166

5. Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Updated consensus statement on biological agents for the treatment of rheumatic diseases, 2006: Ann Rheum Dis, 2006; 65(Suppl 3); iii 2-15

6. Antoni C, Braun J, Side effects of anti-TNF therapy: current knowledge: Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2002; 20(6 Suppl 28); S152-57, pmid: 12463468

7. Vidal F, Fontova R, Richart C, Severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia associated with infliximab: Ann Intern Med, 2003; 139(3); W-W63, pmid: 12899609

8. Day R, Adverse reactions to TNF-alpha inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: Lancet, 2002; 359(9306); 540-41, pmid: 11867103

9. Mirick GR, Bradt BM, Denardo SJ, Denardo GL, A review of human anti-globulin antibody (HAGA, HAMA, HACA, HAHA) responses to monoclonal antibodies. Not four letter words: Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004; 48(4); 251-57, pmid: 15640788

10. Charles PJ, Smeenk RJT, De Jong J, Assessment of antibodies to double stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor: Findings in open label and randomized placebo controlled trials: Arthritis Rheum, 2000; 43(11); 2383-90, pmid: 11083258

11. Aringer M, Steiner G, Graninger WB, Effects of short term infliximab therapy on autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: Arthritis Rheum, 2007; 56(1); 274-79, pmid: 17195231

12. Isomäki P, Punnonen J, Pro-and anti-inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: Ann Med, 1997; 29(6); 499-507, pmid: 9562516

13. Seriolo B, Cutolo M, Fasciolo D, Anticardiolipin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: Ann Rheum Dis, 1992; 51(9); 1100, pmid: 1417149

14. Ferraro-Peyret C, Coury F, Tebib JG, Infliximab therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis-induced specific antinuclear and antiphospholipid autoantibodies without autoimmune clinical manifestations: a two-year prospective study: Arthritis Res Ther, 2004; 6(6); R535-43, pmid: 15535831

15. De Miguel S, Jover J, Vadillo C, B cell activation in rheumatoid arthritis patients under infliximab treatment: Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2003; 21(6); 726-32, pmid: 14740451

16. Via CS, Shustov A, Rus V: J Immunol, 2001; 167(12); 6821-26, pmid: 11739498

17. Ferraccioli G, Mecchia F, Di Poi E, Fabris M, Anticardiolipin antibodies in rheumatoid patients treated with etanercept or conventional combination therapy: direct and indirect evidence for a possible association with infections: Br Med J, 2002; 61(4); 358-61

18. Elliott M, Maini R, Feldmann M, Repeated therapy with monoclonal antibody to tumour necrosis factor alpha (cA2) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Lancet, 1994; 344(8930); 1125-27, pmid: 7934495

19. Galli M, Barbui T, Prevalence of different anti-phospholipid antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and their relationship with the antiphospholipid syndrome: Clin Chem, 2001; 47(6); 985-87, pmid: 11375281

20. Sinico R, Bollini B, Sabadini E, The use of laboratory tests in diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus: J Nephrol, 2002; 15(Suppl 6); S20-27, pmid: 12515370

21. Hunt J, McNeil H, Morgan G, A Phospholipid-{beta} 2-Glycoprotein I Complex Is an Antigen for Anticardiolipin Antibodies Occurring in Autoimmune Disease But Not with Infection: Lupus, 1992; 1(2); 75-81, pmid: 1301967

22. McNeil H, Chesterman C, Krilis S, Immunology and clinical importance of antiphospholipid antibodies: Adv Immunol, 1991; 49; 193-280, pmid: 1853785

23. Shi W, Krilis S, Chong B, Prevalence of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies in a healthy population: Aust N Z J Med, 1990; 20(3); 231-36, pmid: 2115326

24. Fields R, Toubbeh H, Searles R, Bankhurst A, The prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies in a healthy elderly population and its association with antinuclear antibodies: J Rheumatol, 1989; 16(5); 623-25, pmid: 2787862

25. Wolf P, Gretler J, Aglas F, Anticardiolipin antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: their relation to rheumatoid nodules and cutaneous vascular manifestations: Br J Dermatol, 1994; 131(1); 48-51, pmid: 8043421

26. Kapiotis S, Speiser W, Pabinger-Fasching I, Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with venous thrombosis: Haemostasis, 1991; 21(1); 19-24, pmid: 1907589

27. Jonsdottir T, Bratt J, Klareskog L, Van Vollenhoven R, Development of ACLA (anti-cardiolipin antibodies) in patients treated with infliximab (Remicade): Arthritis Rheum, 2001; 44; 373-75

28. Morris A, Morris C, Hernandez C, Anticardiolipin antibodies developing during infliximab therapy: Arthritis Rheum, 2001; 44; S373

29. Rankin E, Choy E, Kassimos D, The therapeutic effects of an engineered human anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha antibody (CDP571) in rheumatoid arthritis: Rheumatology (Oxford), 1995; 34(4); 334-42

30. Bobbio-Pallavicini F, Alpini C, Caporali R, Autoantibody profile in rheumatoid arthritis during long-term infliximab treatment: Arthritis Res Ther, 2004; 6(3); R264-72, pmid: 15142273

31. De Rycke L, Baeten D, Kruithof E, Infliximab, but not etanercept, induces IgM anti-double-stranded DNA autoantibodies as main antinuclear reactivity: biologic and clinical implications in autoimmune arthritis: Arthritis Care Res, 2003; 52(7); 2192-201

32. De Rycke L, Kruithof E, Van Damme N, Antinuclear antibodies following infliximab treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathy: Arthritis Rheum, 2003; 48(4); 1015-23, pmid: 12687543

33. Comby E, Tanaff P, Mariotte D, Evolution of antinuclear antibodies and clinical patterns in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with longterm infliximab therapy: J Rheumatol, 2006; 33(1); 24-30, pmid: 16395746

34. Jonsdottir T, Forslid J, van Vollenhoven A, Treatment with tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis induces anticardiolipin antibodies: Ann Rheum Dis, 2004; 63(9); 1075-78, pmid: 15066863

35. Fort J, Gowchoc S, Abruzzo J, Anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with rheumatic disease: Arthritis Care Res, 1987; 30(7); 752-60

36. Merkel P, Chang Y, Pierangeli S, The prevalence and clinical associations of anticardiolipin antibodies in a large inception cohort of patients with connective tissue diseases: Am J Med, 1996; 101(6); 576-83, pmid: 9003103

37. Seriolo B, Accardo S, Garnero A, Anticardiolipin antibodies, free protein S levels and thrombosis: a survey in a selected population of rheumatoid arthritis patients: Rheumatology (Oxford), 1999; 38(7); 675-78, pmid: 10461484

38. Vereckei E, Kriván G, Réti M, Anti-TNF-alpha-induced anti-phospholipid syndrome manifested as necrotizing vasculitis: Scand J Rheumatol, 2010; 39(1); 175-80, pmid: 20337548

39. St Clair EW, Van Der Heijde D, Smolen JS, Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized, controlled trial: Arthritis Rheum, 2004; 50(11); 3432-43, pmid: 15529377

40. Visvanathan S, Wagner C, Smolen J, IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies following treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: Arthritis Rheum, 2006; 54(9); 2840-44, pmid: 16948115

41. Pernambuco Climaco JM, Brochado MJF, Freitas MVC, Val/Leu247 Polymorphism of 2 glycoprotein I in Brazilian Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome – A Genetic Risk Factor?: Ann NY Acad Sci, 2009; 1173(1); 509-14, pmid: 19758193

42. von Scheven E, Elder M, Association between 2-glycoprotein I gene polymorphisms and pediatric SLE and antiphospholipid antibodies: Lupus, 2005; 14(6); 440-44, pmid: 16038107

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750