27 September 2014: Animal Study
Effect of Nitric Oxide Pathway Regulation on Water/Sodium Balance and Renal Function in a Rodent Model of Acute Liver and Renal Failure
Marek Saracyn ABCDEFG , Tomasz Ząbkowski BCEF , Robert Zdanowski BCDE , Marek Brytan BCE , Janusz Patera BCD , Zbigniew Nowak ADEF , Grzegorz Kade ADEF , Zofia Wańkowicz ADFG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890757
Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:1735-1744
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pathomechanism of acute hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a particular form of acute renal failure that occurs in the course of acute liver injury, is still poorly understood. The aim of our study was to estimate the influence of the activation and inhibition of the nitric oxide pathway on the water/sodium balance and development of acute renal failure in the course of HRS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used male Sprague-Dawley rats in the acute galactosamine (Ga1N) model of HRS. The nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitors L-NAME and L-arginine were administered intraperitoneally before and after liver damage.
RESULTS: HRS developed in all tested groups. L-NAME increased osmotic clearance and urine volume more effectively before liver injury. Furthermore, administration of L-NAME increased creatinine clearance both before and after Ga1N injection. A double dose of L-NAME did not yield further improvement before Ga1N injection, but improved creatinine clearance after Ga1N intoxication. Injection of L-arginine increased sodium excretion and urine volume, but only after liver injury. Moreover, L-arginine injected after Ga1N caused significant improvement of the creatinine clearance in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that inhibition of the nitric oxide pathway improves parameters of water and sodium balance and prevents development of acute renal failure in the course of acute liver injury and liver failure. Activation of the nitric oxide system also has a favorable influence on water/sodium balance and renal failure, but only after liver injury.
Keywords: Creatinine - metabolism, Acute Kidney Injury - physiopathology, Kidney - physiopathology, Kidney Function Tests, Liver - pathology, Liver Failure, Acute - physiopathology, NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester - administration & dosage, Nitric Oxide - metabolism, Osmolar Concentration, Water-Electrolyte Balance
Background
Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is defined as functional renal failure in the course of an acute liver injury and liver failure [1–3]. Liver disease is the only etiological factor in this syndrome, and a peculiar form of renal failure characterized by oliguria, hyperazotemia, and hyponatremia develops without clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features of any known kidney disease causing its failure [4,5]. In clinical practice, HRS often develops in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, ascites, and portal hypertension, and rarely in the course of acute viral hepatitis or primary biliary cirrhosis [6,7]. This syndrome usually has a difficult clinical course, negative prognosis, and high mortality rate. Among patients with cirrhosis and ascites, HRS occurs after 1 year in approximately 20% and after 5 years in 40% of the patients [8]. The median survival time is approximately 2 weeks in patients with the rapidly progressive type 1 HRS and approximately 4–6 months in patients with the slower progressive type 2 HRS [9]. This dramatic prognosis results from a lack of efficient and specific treatment, due to the still poorly understood pathogenesis of the disease and its basic mechanisms.
In 1863, Austin Flint first described the relationship between the prevalence of oliguria and cirrhosis, and ascites, underlying a lack of proteinuria and histopathological changes in kidneys, which suggested the functional character of HRS [10]. Although many previous studies have clarified several issues regarding HRS, the exact mechanism underlying the development of renal failure due to liver injury is not completely known. A recent study reported that hemodynamic disturbances are a major pathomechanism of HRS [11]. Chronic liver disease and the subsequent portal hypertension cause a dilatation of the splanchnic vascular bed, which leads to a reduction in the effective plasma volume in systemic circulation, and the stimulation of vascular baroreceptors activates the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic nervous system, or arginine vasopressin system. These mechanisms lead to vasoconstriction and renal hypoperfusion [12,13]. Some studies have shown that the above-mentioned vasocontractile factors only slightly affect the splanchnic vascular bed. This happens because of an increased production of local splanchnic vasodilatory substances [14]. Some other studies have confirmed that endogenous nitric oxide (NO) plays a key role in this process, although prostaglandins or vascular peptides may also be important [15,16].
However, the pathomechanism of acute renal failure due to liver injury and liver failure is not yet well known [17]. A few studies have suggested that acute liver injury leads to the rapid development of portal hypertension, opening of arteriovenous anastomoses, and increase in the portal venous flow. As a result of dilatation of the splanchnic vascular bed, there is a decrease in the effective plasma volume in systemic circulation, and hyperdynamic circulation develops [18,19]. These mechanisms might be responsible for the above-described phenomena, leading to hydro-electrolyte disorders and renal failure.
The significance of the endogenous NO pathway in models of chronic liver diseases, especially cirrhosis, has been relatively well documented [19–21]. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the role of NO in the development of HRS in acute liver disease models. Our previous studies showed that the congenital factors (i.e., the specific strain of experimental animal) are reliable for development of acute renal failure in the course of an acute liver injury experimental model of HRS induced by galactosamine (Ga1N) [22]. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of stimulation and inhibition of the endogenous NO pathway on 2 factors: (1) the water and sodium balance and (2) the development and degree of renal failure in an animal model of acute HRS induced by Ga1N.
Material and Methods
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Statistical analysis was performed using the
Results
EXPERIMENTAL HRS:
The biochemical parameters for the development of acute HRS in the experimental animals are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Ga1N administration at a dose of 1.1 g/kg of b.w. caused serious liver injury leading to liver failure, and a statistically significant increase in the blood serum concentrations of bilirubin (p<0.004), ALT (p<0.001), and ammonia (p<0.005) was observed in Group 2, in comparison with the control group (Group 2 vs. Group 1). In the same study Group 2, besides liver injury, the acute renal failure occurred with a significant increase in the serum concentrations of creatinine (p<0.001) and urea (p<0.001) and a significant decrease in creatinine clearance (p<0.0012) (Tables 1 and 2; Figures 1 and 2) and the 24-h urine volume (p<0.003) in Group 2 (Group 2 vs. Group 1). A significant decrease in the hydro-electrolyte balance parameters typical for HRS such as osmotic clearance (p<0.001) (Tables 1 and 2; Figures 3 and 4), fraction of ejected sodium (p<0.016) (data not shown), and 24-h diuresis (p<0.003) was observed in Group 2, in comparison with Group 1. Furthermore, a decrease in 24-h natriuresis and increase in urine osmolality were observed in Group 2; however, these differences were not statistically significant (Group 2 vs. Group 1).
Histopathological examination of the liver (Figures 5 and 6) showed generalized necrosis of hepatocytes in all study groups that received Ga1N, as compared with the sham group, which received saline and in which no changes were observed (Groups 2, 4–7, 9–12 vs. Group 1). On the other hand, on histopathological examination of the kidneys (Figures 7 and 8), no changes were observed in any study groups or in the sham group (Groups 2, 4–7, 9–12 vs. Group 1).
INHIBITION OF THE ENDOGENOUS NO PATHWAY AND WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE AND RENAL FAILURE:
No significant differences in the hepatic and renal parameters following only L-NAME administration were observed between Group 3 and the control group (Group 3 vs. Group 1). Administration of the single dose of L-NAME before Ga1N injection caused a significant decrease in the concentrations of creatinine (p<0.001) and urea (p<0.001) and a significant increase in creatinine clearance (p<0.0017) in Group 4, as compared with Group 2 (Table 1; Figure 1) (Group 4 vs. Group 2). Furthermore, a significant decrease in urine osmolality (p<0.004) and significant increase in osmotic clearance (p<0.023) and 24-h diuresis (p<0.0005) were observed in Group 4 (Table 1; Figure 3). Administration of the double dose of L-NAME did not cause any further improvement in GFR, although the blood serum concentration of creatinine significantly decreased (p<0.002) in Group 5 (Group 5 vs. Group 4). Furthermore, urine osmolality significantly decreased (p<0.001), whereas the 24-h urine volume did not change significantly.
Inhibition of the endogenous NO pathway after Ga1N injection showed other effects. Administration of a smaller dose of L-NAME after Ga1N injection also improved the parameters of kidney function; the concentrations of creatinine (p<0.0003) and urea (p<0.001) significantly decreased, whereas the creatinine clearance (p<0.0095) significantly increased in Group 6 (Group 6 vs. Group 2) (Table 1; Figure 1). Moreover, L-NAME administration after Ga1N injection significantly decreased urine osmolality (p<0.0074) and increased the 24-h urine volume (p<0.046), free water clearance (p<0.032) (data not shown), and osmotic clearance (albeit in an insignificant manner); however, it did not show any effect on 24-h natriuresis (Table 1; Figure 3). Administration of a double dose of L-NAME insignificantly increased GFR, and significantly decreased creatinine concentration (p<0.0036) (Group 7 vs. Group 6). Moreover, as compared to the single dose, administration of the double dose of L-NAME caused a further significant decrease in urine osmolality (p<0.041) and an insignificant increase in 24-h natriuresis (p<0.053). It had no effect on osmotic clearance or 24-h urine volume.
It should be noted that as compared to L-NAME administration after Ga1N injection, L-NAME administration before Ga1N injection, at both the smaller as well as the larger doses, more effectively improved the parameters of kidney function and hydro-electrolyte balance. In the smaller dose, the urea concentrations were significantly lower (p<0.022), the creatinine concentrations were lower, and GFR was higher, but not significantly (Group 4 vs. Group 6) (Table 1; Figure 1). Urine osmolality was significantly lower (p<0.0087) and osmotic clearance was higher, but this difference was not significant (Table 1; Figure 3). In the larger dose of L-NAME, the creatinine and urea concentrations were significantly lower (p<0.0075 and p<0.048, respectively) and the GFR was insignificantly higher (Group 5 vs. Group 7). Urine osmolality was also significantly lower (p < 0.001) and 24-h diuresis was higher (not significantly). No difference was observed in osmolality clearance (Group 5 vs. Group 7, respectively).
STIMULATION OF THE NO PATHWAY AND WATER-ELECTROLYTE BALANCE AND RENAL FAILURE:
In comparison with the sham animals, L-ARG administration did not cause any significant changes in the hepatic or renal parameters. L-ARG administration at the smaller dose before Ga1N injection did not affect any of the renal efficiency parameters and did not affect most of the hydro-electrolyte balance parameters. It did not affect the creatinine and urea concentrations, GFR, 24-h natriuresis, diuresis, or osmolality clearance; it only decreased urine osmolality (p<0.0017) (Group 9 vs. Group 2) (Table 2; Figures 2 and 4). Similarly, a double dose of L-ARG did not cause changes in the renal efficiency or water/sodium balance parameters (Group 10 vs. Group 2).
Stimulation of the endogenous NO pathway after Ga1N injection showed other effects. Administration of a smaller dose of L-ARG after Ga1N injection did not cause changes in the creatinine and urea concentrations; however, the creatinine increased 2-fold, although insignificantly (p<0.058) (Group 11 vs. Group 2) (Table 2; Figure 2). Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in urine osmolality (p<0.003) and an increase in the 24-h diuresis (p<0.006), fraction of ejected sodium (p<0.027) (data not shown), and natriuresis (p<0.056), whereas there was no change in the osmotic clearance rates (Table 2; Figure 4). The double dose of L-ARG improved the creatinine clearance and 24-h sodium excretion (p<0.018 and p<0.002, respectively) (Group 12 vs. Group 2). No differences in other renal function parameters or hydro-electrolyte balance parameters were observed.
Discussion
Many different experimental HRS models were used in experimental studies; these included models of toxic liver injury induced by CCl4, ligation of bile tract, partial ligation of portal vein, and partial hepatectomy and galactosamine-intoxicated experimental animals [24–27]. Some of these were chronic HRS models in which liver failure and consequent renal failure develop within a few weeks or months. The remaining models were acute models in which the HRS symptoms occurred within a few hours or days. An example of such models is the galactosamine intoxication model, in which Ga1N has been intraperitoneally administered at a dose of 1.1 g/kg b.w. Ga1N inhibits the hepatic RNA synthesis through the formation of UDP hexosamines, thus leading to hepatocyte necrosis. The kidneys are intact both in histological and electron microscopy examination and a renal tubular cell line incubated with Ga1N did not show any nephrotoxic effect [23]. Within 24–48 h of GalN administration, acute liver injury, acute liver failure, and the resultant acute functional renal failure develop in the experimental animals [22]. Liver injury and liver failure manifest by accumulation of bilirubin, aminotransferase, and ammonia and decrease in albumin levels. Renal failure characterizes an increase of urea and creatinine and a decrease of renal blood flow (RBF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Decrease of RBF and GFR resulted from contraction of renal vessels, especially within the cortical vessels. Arterial blood pressure, effective plasma volume, and peripheral vascular resistance are lowered, thereby increasing cardiac output and leading to hyperkinetic circulation [28].
In the present study, acute HRS developed typically. Within 48 h of liver injury, the animals exhibited clinical and biochemical characteristics of acute liver failure and the resultant acute functional renal failure accompanied by decreases in 24-h diuresis, natriuresis, osmotic clearance, and urine concentration. Anand et al. [23] presented a model of acute liver and renal failure after Ga1N administration to Sprague-Dawley rats in a standard and repeated manner. The findings of our previous study [22] also showed that acute functional renal failure can occur as a result of acute liver injury and liver failure after Ga1N administration, despite the absence of any histopathological features of renal injuries. We showed there that the development and the grade of renal failure in experimental HRS models may depend on the genetics of the experimental animals [22].
The role of endogenous NO in HRS pathogenesis is well studied, but the majority of these studies were conducted using chronic HRS models, in particular, cirrhosis models [29–31]. Increased cGMP concentrations by the secondary messenger NO was reported in the mesenteric vessels of rats with portal hypertension and in cell lines incubated with the splanchnic vessels of these animals [32,33]. NO exerts a relaxing effect directly on vessels via an alternative pathway such as potassium channel [34]. Pizcuet et al. [35] and Casadevall et al. [36] confirmed that fast inhibition of NO synthesis in splanchnic vessels caused near total normalization of hemodynamic disorders (i.e., decrease of venous blood flow from portal vein and increase of resistance of splanchnic vessels). They proved that extended splanchnic vessels do not respond to the constrictive activity of any known vasoconstrictors; however, prior inhibition of endogenous NO synthesis in animals with portal hypertension restores the original constrictive property of the splanchnic vessels [37,38]. Total removal of vascular endothelium (a source of NO biosynthesis) repairs impaired vascular reactivity to the above-mentioned vasoconstrictors [39]. In a recent study, Sharma et al. [40] showed that the total NO production in the first hours of acute liver ischaemia in large experimental animals is similar to that in the sham group. However, this finding was based on models of acute liver failure, not typical HRS, observed only during the first 6 h after induction of liver injury; moreover, the animal species used in that study was different from those used in our study [40].
In our study, in an acute model of HRS, after Ga1N intoxication of rats, the kidneys preserved the capability to concentrate urine and to retain sodium and other osmotically active substances. Inhibition of endogenous NO synthesis increased 24-h sodium excretion and 24-h diuresis significantly after Ga1N administration of the NOS inhibitor in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, inhibition of the NO system led to improvement in renal efficiency (also in dose-independent manner); this improvement was more pronounced when L-NAME was administered before liver injury.
Disorders of water-electrolyte balance, especially water and sodium excretion, are typical for HRS [41]. Enhanced sodium and water retention mediated by activation of the sympathetic, renin-angiotensin, and arginine-vasopressin systems results mainly from decreased effective plasma volume in systemic circulation [42]. Excessive sodium retention is a result of increased tubule re-absorption due to stimulation of angiotensin, aldosterone, and α1-adrenergic receptors [43]. Decreased excretion of water results from increased secretion of antidiuretic hormone and increased renal synthesis of prostaglandin [44]. Atucha et al. [45] showed that inhibition of NO synthesis in a cirrhosis model increased 24-h diuresis and 24-h natriuresis. However, Martin et al. [46] showed that chronic inhibition of NOS led to increase in 24-h sodium excretion and 24-h urine volume and normalization of decreased blood sodium concentration and serum osmolality. Our findings are in concordance with those of Martin et al., but they are probably the first in the available literature to consider the influence of the NO system on hydro-electrolyte balance in an acute HRS model. Inhibition of NO synthesis increased 24-h natriuresis, 24-h diuresis, and the fractional excretion of sodium and free water clearance. Therefore, a change in the hemodynamic conditions as a result of inhibition of endogenous NO system led to improvement of water and sodium balance in this experimental model.
The role of endogenous NO in renal failure in HRS has been determined only in cirrhosis models [47,48]. Ros et al. studied rats with cirrhosis and showed that inhibition of the NO system influenced RBF and increased GFR [49]. In contrast, Atucha et al. [45] and Martin et al. [50] did not observe any significant changes in GFR following NO inhibition in cirrhosis models. In addition, Atucha et al. showed that the inhibitory effect is dependent on the time of administration of the NOS inhibitor, but not on the dose. We believe our study is probably the first to use a model of acute liver injury. We showed that although the improvement in renal function was dose-independent, inhibition of NO synthesis significantly improved glomerular filtration, and administration of the NOS inhibitor before liver injury results in better improvement of GFR than treatment after.
On the other hand, activation of the endogenous NO system increased 24-h sodium excretion and 24-h diuresis in Ga1N-intoxicated animals independently of the dose of the NO system donor. Furthermore, NO system activation after liver injury by using a small dose of the donor slightly increased renal efficiency, while administration of twice the original dose significantly increased the GFR. Importantly, L-ARG administered at the same time did not change the concentration of bilirubin and ALT; therefore, it had no influence on degree of liver injury.
All previous studies on the use of an NO donor and its influence on renal function in HRS were conducted using models of cirrhosis.
Conclusions
Our study showed that inhibition of the endogenous NO system increased osmotic clearance, 24-h diuresis, and natriuresis and this effect was stronger when the NOS inhibitor was administered before liver injury. Furthermore, administration of the NOS inhibitor improved GFR in a dose-independent manner. In this case, pre-treatment also turned out to be better than treatment after liver injury.
On the other hand, activation of the NO system increased 24-h diuresis and 24-h natriuresis independently of the dose of the NO system donor, but this effect was better when the donor was administered after liver injury. Finally, activation of the NO system only after liver injury improved GFR in dose-independent manner.
The nitric oxide pathway plays a significant role in development of water-electrolyte disorders and acute renal failure in the course of acute liver injury and liver failure.
References
1. Mindikoglu AL, Weir MR, Current concepts in the diagnosis and clarification of renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: Am J Nephrol, 2013; 38; 345-54, pmid: 24107793
2. Moore CM, Van Thiel DH, Cirrhotic ascites review: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management: World J Hepatol, 2013; 5; 251-63, pmid: 23717736
3. Biecker E, Diagnosis and therapy of ascites in liver cirrhosis: World J Gastroenterol, 2011; 17; 1237-48, pmid: 21455322
4. Fagundes C, Barreto R, Guevara M, A modified acute kidney injury classification for diagnosis and risk stratification of impairment of kidney function in cirrhosis: J Hepatol, 2013; 59; 474-81, pmid: 23669284
5. Wonq F, Nadim NK, Kellum JA, Working party proposal for a revised classification system of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis: Gut, 2011; 60; 702-9, pmid: 21325171
6. Prakash J, Mahapatra AK, Gosh B, Clinical spectrum of renal disorders In patients with cirrhosis of liver: Ren Fail, 2011; 33; 40-46, pmid: 21219204
7. Venkat D, Venkat KK, Hepatorenal syndrome: South Med J, 2010; 103; 654-61, pmid: 20531067
8. Lata J, Hepatorenal syndrome: World J Gastroenterol, 2012; 18; 4978-84, pmid: 23049205
9. Sussman AN, Boyer TD, Management of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome: Curr Gastroenterol Rep, 2011; 13; 17-25, pmid: 21080246
10. Flint A, Clinical report on hydro-peritoneum, based on an analysis of forty-six cases: Am J Med Sci, 1863; 45; 306-39
11. Ruiz-del-Arbol L, Urman J, Fernandez J, Circulatory function and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: Hepatology, 2005; 42; 439-47, pmid: 15977202
12. Mazur JE, Cooper TB, Dasta JF, Terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: Ann Pharmacoter, 2011; 4; 380-87
13. Rahimi RS, Rockey DC, Complications and outcomes in chronic liver disease: Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2011; 27; 204-9, pmid: 21451410
14. Kayali Z, Herring J, Baron P, Increased plasma nitric oxide, L-arginine, and arginase-1 in cirrhotic patients with progressive renal dysfunction: J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009; 24; 1030-37, pmid: 19226382
15. Richir MC, Bouwman RH, Teerlink T, The prominent role of the liver in the elimination of asymmetric dimethyloarginine (ADMA) and consequences of impaired hepatic function: J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2008; 32; 613-21
16. Nickovic V, Kocic G, Bjalakovic G, Diagnostic significance of nitrates and nitrites and L-arginine in development of hepatorenal syndrome in patients with end stage alcoholic liver cirrhosis: Ren Fail, 2013; 35; 633-39, pmid: 23651488
17. Moore JK, Love E, Craig DG, Acute kidney injury in acute liver failure: a review: Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2013; 7; 701-12, pmid: 24134153
18. Ytrebø LM, Sen S, Rose C, Systemic and regional hemodynamics in pigs with acute liver failure and the effect of albumin dialysis: Scand J Gastroenterol, 2006; 41; 1350-60, pmid: 17060130
19. Rivera-Huizar S, Rincón-Sánchez AR, Covarrubias-Pinedo A, Renal dysfunction as a consequence of acute liver damage by duct ligation in cirrhotic rats: Exp Toxicol Pathol, 2006; 58; 185-95, pmid: 16829063
20. Islas-Carbajal MC, Covarrubias A, Grijalva G, Nitric oxide synthase inhibition results in renal failure improvements in cirrhotic rats: Liver Int, 2005; 25; 131-40, pmid: 15698410
21. Martell M, Coll M, Ezcurdia N, Physiopathology of splanchnic vasodilation in portal hypertension: World J Hepatol, 2010; 2; 208-20, pmid: 21160999
22. Saracyn M, Patera J, Kocik J, Strain of experimental animals and modulation of nitric oxide pathway: their influence on development of renal failure in an experimental model of hepatorenal syndrome: Arch Med Sci, 2012; 8; 555-62, pmid: 22852015
23. Anand R, Harry D, Holt S, Endothelin is an important determinant of renal function in a rat model of acute liver and renal failure: Gut, 2002; 50; 111-17, pmid: 11772977
24. Ragimbeau JM, Fuks D, Kohneh-Shahri N, Restrictive model of compensated carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis in rats: World J Gastroenterol, 2008; 14; 6943-47, pmid: 19058329
25. Fujii T, Fuchs BC, Yamada S, Mouse model of carbon tetrachloride induced liver fibrosis: Histopathological changes and expression of CD 133 and epidermal growth factor: BMC Gastroenterol, 2010; 10; 79-90, pmid: 20618941
26. Assimakopoulos SF, Vagianos CE, Bile duct ligation in rats: a reliable model of hepatorenal syndrome?: World J Gastroenterol, 2009; 15; 121-23, pmid: 19115478
27. Fu JL, Wang ZH, Li GZ, Decreased IgA+ plasma cells and IgA expression in acute liver necrosis mice: World J Gastroenterol, 2010; 16; 3827-33, pmid: 20698046
28. Tuñón MJ, Alvarez M, Culebras JM, González-Gallego J, An overview of animal models for investigating the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies in acute hepatic failure: World J Gastroenterol, 2009; 15; 3086-98, pmid: 19575487
29. Xu J, Cao H, Liu H, Wu ZY, Role of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase in hyperdynamic splanchnic circulation of portal hypertension: Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 2008; 7; 503-8, pmid: 18842497
30. Epstein M, Goligorsky MS, Endothelin and nitric oxide in the hepatorenal syndrome: a balance reset: J Nephrol, 1997; 10; 120-35, pmid: 9238620
31. Biecker E, Trebicka J, Kanq A, Treatment of bile duct-ligated rats with the nitric oxide synthase transcription enhancer AVE 9488 ameliorates portal hypertension: Liver Int, 2008; 28; 331-38, pmid: 18290775
32. Cahil PA, Redmond EM, Hodges R, Increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity in the hyperemic vessels of portal hypertensive rats: J Hepatol, 1996; 25; 370-78, pmid: 8895017
33. Ros J, Jimenez W, Lamas S, Nitric oxide production in arteria vessels of cirrhotic rats: Hepatology, 1995; 21; 554-60, pmid: 7843730
34. Bolotina VM, Najibi S, Palacino JJ, Nitric oxide directly activates calcium-depemdent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle: Nature, 1994; 368; 850-53, pmid: 7512692
35. Pizcueta MP, Pique JM, Fernandez M, Modulation of the hyperdynamic circulation of cirrhotic rats by nitric oxide inhibition: Gastroenterology, 1992; 103; 1909-15, pmid: 1451984
36. Casadevall M, Pique JM, Cirera J, Increased blood hemoglobin attenuates splanchnic vasodilation in portal – hypertensive rats by nitric oxide inactivation: Gastroenterology, 1996; 110; 1156-65, pmid: 8613005
37. Castro A, Jimenez W, Claria J, Impaired responsiveness to angiotensin II in experimental cirrhosis: role of nitric oxide: Hepatology, 1993; 18; 367-72, pmid: 8340065
38. Murray BM, Paller MS, Decreased pressor reactivity to angiotensin II in cirrhotic rats. Evidence for a postreceptor defect in angiotensin action: Circ Res, 1985; 57; 424-31, pmid: 2992836
39. Atucha NM, Shah V, Garcia-Gardena G, Role of endothelium in the abnormal response of mesenteric vessels in rats with portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis: Gastroenterology, 1996; 111; 1627-32, pmid: 8942743
40. Sharma V, Ten Have GAM, Ytrebo L, Nitric oxide and L-arginine metabolism in a devascularized porcine model of acute liver failure: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2012; 303; G435-41, pmid: 22421619
41. Garcia-Tsao G, Parikh CR, Viola A, Acute kidney injury in cirrhosis: Hepatology, 2008; 48; 2064-77, pmid: 19003880
42. Colombato LA, Albillos A, Groszmann RJ, The role of central blood volume in the development of sodium retention in portal hypertensive rats: Gastroenterology, 1996; 110; 193-98, pmid: 8536856
43. Epstein M: The Kidney and Liver Disease, 1988; 1-656, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins
44. Schrier RW, De Wardener HE, Tubular reabsorption of sodium ion: influence of factors other than aldosterone and glomerular filtration rate: N Engl J Med, 1971; 285; 1231-43, pmid: 4939799
45. Atucha NM, Garcia-Estan J, Ramirez A, Renal effects of nitric oxide synthesis inhibition in cirrhotic rats: Am J Physiol, 1994; 267; R1454-60, pmid: 7529002
46. Martin PY, Ohara M, Gines P, Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition for one week improves renal sodium and water excretion in cirrhotic rats with ascites: J Clin Invest, 1998; 101; 235-42, pmid: 9421486
47. Anegawa G, Kawanaka H, Yoshida D, Defective endothelial nitric oxide synthase signaling is mediated by rho-kinase activation in rats with biliary cirrhosis: Hepatology, 2008; 47; 966-77, pmid: 18167063
48. Laleman W, Omasta A, Van de Casteele M, A role for asymmetric dimethylorginine in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension in rats with biliary cirrhosis: Hepatology, 2005; 42; 1382-90, pmid: 16317694
49. Ros J, Claria J, Jimenez W, Role of nitric oxide and prostacyclin in the control or renal perfusion in experimental cirrhosis: Hepatology, 1995; 22; 915-20, pmid: 7657300
50. Martin PY, Gines P, Schrier RW, Nitric oxide as a mediator of hemodynamic abnormalities and sodium and water retention in cirrhosis: N Engl J Med, 1998; 339; 533-41, pmid: 9709047
51. Zhang JX, Pegoli W, Clemens MG, Endothelin-1 induces direct constriction of hepatic sinusoids: Am J Physiol, 1994; 226; G624-32, pmid: 8179001
52. Kawada N, Tran-Thi TA, Decker K, The contraction of hepatic stellate cells (Ito) stimulated with vasoactive substances. Possible involvement of endothelin 1 and nitric oxide in the regulation of sinusoidal tonus: Eur J Biochem, 1993; 213; 815-23, pmid: 7682947
53. Edwards C, Feng HQ, Reynolds C, Effect of the nitric oxide donor V-Pyrro/NO on portal pressure and sinusoidal dynamics in normal and cirrhotic mice: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, 2008; 294; G1311-17, pmid: 18356534
54. Shah V, Lyford G, Gores G, Farrugia G, Nitric oxide in gastrointestinal health and disease: Gastroenterology, 2004; 126; 903-13, pmid: 14988844
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






