Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

15 May 2014: Human Anatomy  

Anatomical study of suboccipital vertebral arteries and surrounding bony structures using virtual reality technology

Wenbo Ha EF , DeLin Yang BD , Shixin Gu AG , Qi-Wu Xu DE , Xiaoming Che BF , Jin-Song Wu DF , Wensheng Li AG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890840

Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:802-806

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This work aimed to evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality (VR) technology in neurosurgical anatomy through a comparison of the virtual 3D microanatomy of the suboccipital vertebral arteries and their bony structures as part of the resection of tumors in the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) of 20 patients compared to the actual microanatomy of the vertebral arteries of 15 cadaveric headsets.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted with 2 groups of data: a VR group composed of 20 clinical cases and a physical body group (PB group) composed of 15 cadaveric headsets. In the VR group, the dissection and measurements of the vertebral arteries were simulated on a Dextroscope. In the PB group, the vertebral arteries in the cadaver heads were examined under a microscope and anatomical measurements of VA and bony structures were performed. The length and course of the vertebral arteries and its surrounding bony structures in each group were compared.

RESULTS: The distances from the inferior part of the transverse process foramen (TPF) of C1 to the inferior part of TPF of C2 were 17.68±2.86 mm and 18.4±1.82 mm in the PB and VR groups, respectively. The distances between the middle point of the posterior arch of the atlas and the medial intersection of VA on the groove were 17.35±2.23 mm in the PB group and 18.13±2.58 mm in the VR group. The distances between the middle line and the entrance of VA to the lower rim of TPF of Atlas were 28.64±2.67 mm in PB group and 29.23±2.89 mm in VR group. The diameters of the vertebral artery (VA) at the end of the groove and foramen of C2 transverse process were 4.02±046 mm and 4.25±0.51 mm, respectively, in the PB group and 3.54±0.44 mm and 4.47±0.62 mm, respectively, in VR group. The distances between the VA lumen center and midline of the foramen magnum at the level of dural penetration was 10.4±1.13 mm in the PB group and 11.5±1.34 mm in the VR group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: VR technology can accurately simulate the anatomical features of the suboccipital vertebral arteries and their bony structures, which facilitates the planning of individual surgeries in the CVJ.

Keywords: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, Neurosurgical Procedures - methods, Occipital Lobe - blood supply, Spine - anatomy & histology, User-Computer Interface, Vertebral Artery - anatomy & histology

Background

The term craniovertebral junction (CVJ) refers to an area comprising the inferior portion of the occipital bone surrounding the foramen magnum and the first 2 cervical vertebrae. Knowledge on the bony configuration, vascular supply, and the courses of suboccipital vertebral arteries, as well as the kinetic anatomy of the craniocervical junction, is essential for successful skull base surgery. Owing to the variations and pathological anatomy alteration of suboccipital vertebral arteries (VAs), surgeries in the CVJ remain challenging for neurosurgeons [1].

Virtual reality (VR) is a multidisciplinary technology that has various uses and has also been applied to human body anatomical research such as in the case of the USA Visible Human Project (VHP), education in medicine [2–5], and clinical practice [6,7]. Although more anatomical studies of vertebral arteries have been conducted on topics such as corpus microsurgical anatomy or images [8–19], few individual anatomical studies on the occipital VAs have used the VR technique with a Dextroscope, especially those on the application of VA to CVJ surgery. We hypothesized that VR technology can demonstrate the individual anatomy of the occipital VAs and surrounding bony structure in 3D before CVJ tumor surgery.

Material and Methods

GROUPS:

The study was performed on 2 groups of data: a Virtual Reality Group (VR Group) composed of 20 clinical cases with tumors that were confined to the CVJ, and a Physical Body Group (PB Group) that included 15 cadaveric headsets.

Twenty patients underwent imaging protocols with a 3D whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, GE Signa VH/i) and a SOMATOM Sensation 64-slice computerized tomography (CT) scanner (Siemens AG). The imaging data were then loaded into the Dextroscope surgical planning workstation (Bracco Group, Milan, Italy) using RadioDexter software Version 1.0 R2, after which these data were processed.

The 15 cadaveric adult headset specimens were dissected using a microsurgical anatomy equipment set.

DEXTROSCOPE HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE:

The Dextroscope is a surgical planning system that provides both 2D and 3D image processing environments. The 2D environment enables the loading of DICOM data using the standard mouse and keyboard approach. In a 3D environment, the Dextroscope creates a stereoscopic 3D virtual workspace in which the user works with both hands to manipulate the patient-specific multimodal 3D imaging data using various image processing and surgical planning tools. A natural 3D user interface is created by reflecting the computer-generated 3D scenario by a mirror into the user’s eyes. Wearing liquid-display shutter glasses synchronized with the time-split display, the user reaches with both hands behind the mirror into the “floating” 3D data.

The Dextroscope provides the tools necessary for 3D data exploration and surgical planning. By touching the physical bottom base of the workspace inside the Dextroscope with a hand-held pen, a “virtual tool rack” automatically appears. This tool provides access to virtual buttons and sliders and can be activated with the virtual pen instrument [7]. Software tools are available for color and transparency coding; manual and semi-automatic segmentation; image fusion; curved, linear, and volumetric measurements; cropping and cutting in any angle; virtual tissue removal (virtual “drilling” or “suctioning”) and reconstruction; as well as photograph and video reporting tools [7].

IMAGE DATA ACQUISITION:

The scanning of patients was scheduled 1–3 days before surgery, and the imaging data were transferred to a Dextroscope in the laboratory by using a CD-ROM. MRI studies were performed on a GE 3.0 Tesla Signal Horizon Magnetic Resonance Scanner using Neuronavigation mode with the following imaging parameters: T1WI FSPGR for the General Electric unit, TR/TE=9/2 ms; flip angle=25°; slice thickness=2 mm; interval=0; matrix size=256×256; field of view (FOV)=240×240 mm; and horizontal scanning range from the second cervical vertebrate body to the cranial top. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was intravenously injected into the enhancement films. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was performed in 3D time-of-flight mode and set with the following parameters: slice thickness=1.5 mm; interval=0; FOV=240×240 mm; and matrix size=256×256. Computerized tomography angiography (CTA) was performed on the 256-slice CT scanner following the intravenous contrast agent injection. CTA images were obtained contiguously as axial 1-mm slices (FOV=240×240 mm; matrix size=256×256) with horizontal scanning range from the third cervical vertebrate body to the cranial top.

VR ANATOMY AND TOPICAL ANATOMY:

In the Dextroscope, co-registration was performed between the cranium, segmented from the head CTA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and the MRI. The virtual anatomical dissections of the vertebral arteries and bony skull base were accomplished through the segmentation of the MRA or CTA of the head on the Dextroscope workstation for all the clinical patients. This process involved the measurement of the length and diameters of each part of suboccipital VAs in CVJ and the distance between bony structures, as well as the data on occipital condyle and magnum foramen.

Actual anatomical dissections of the VAs and measurement of bony structures were performed on the corresponding cadaveric specimens.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

SPSS12.0 software was used in this stage. The paired t-test was used to examine quantitative data and RIDIT analysis was used to process numerical data. A P value less than 0.05 denotes a significant difference in the test.

Results

COURSES AND MEASUREMENT OF VAS:

The suboccipital VA (V3 segment) extends from the C2 transverse foramen to the dura mater of the foramen magnum. The V3 initially courses vertically between the C2 and C1 transverse foramens, then runs horizontally over the C1 groove, and finally obliquely upward before piercing the dura mater. The VAs in the CVJ are divided into 3 parts. The first part corresponds to the course in the foramen of the transverse process of the C1–2 and is called the vertical segment of V3 (V3V). The second part courses in the bony groove of C1 and is called the horizontal segment of V3 (V3H). The third segment, which leaves the groove and travels up the dura mater is called an oblique portion (V3O). One case with the bony ring was found on the C1 in the PB group, and 2 cases were found in the VR group.

The V3 segment has 4 vascular loops. The first loop, known as the inferior medial loop, which directs the artery laterally and slightly posteriorly, occurs at the transverse foramen of the C2. The next loop, the inferior lateral loop, continues immediately, directing the artery upward and slightly anterior toward the transverse foramen of the C1. The third loop, the superior lateral loop, is located at the point where the V3V segment turns inferiorly into a horizontal position (V3H) in the groove of the posterior arch of the C1. Finally, the fourth loop, the superior medial loop, surrounds the condyle of the C1 and brings the V3 segment to its dural foramen. The distances of the VA and surrounding structures were measured (Table 1).

MEASUREMENT OF BONY STRUCTURES:

The measurement of bony structures in the CVJ includes the occipital condyle, foramen magnum, and foramen of transverse process of the C1. The measurement results are shown in Table 2.

Discussion

The suboccipital segment of the VA is the third part of the VA, which varies significantly because of pathological changes resulting from the local tumor and its own variation features [20]. According to Abd El-Bary et al. [21] the V3 enters the transverse foramen of the C2, where it runs in a vertical, slightly anterior direction. Just above the transverse foramen of the C1, the artery changes direction dorsally and runs further in the sagittal plane. In most cases, this change in direction is associated with an acute angle, but in some cases the change is in a posteromedial direction. The artery then changes its direction again and runs transversely above the posterior arch of the C1, and goes upward by the atlanto-occipital membrane penetrating the dura into the posterior fossa. The course of the VA V3 is divided into 3 portions: a vertical portion between the transverse processes of C2 and C1; a horizontal portion (V3h) in the groove of the posterior arch of the atlas; and an oblique portion where it leaves this groove and travels up to the dura mater.

This study focused on the anatomy of the suboccipital segment in the CVJ. In this study, 4 vascular loops of the V3 were found in the 2 groups, as mentioned by Duan [20]. Lang [22] found that the distance between the middle line of the entrance of the VA to the lower rim of the TPF of the atlas was 27.78 mm (22–27). Our measurement yielded 28.64±2.67 mm in the PB group and 29.23±2.89 mm in the VR group. Lang measured the outer diameter of the VA in the middle region of the atlantal part to be 4.20 mm (2.5–6). In our study, the diameters of the VA at the end of the groove and the foramen of the C2 transverse process were 4.02±046 mm and 4.25±0.51 mm, respectively, in the PB group and 3.54±0.44 mm and 4.47±0.62 mm, respectively, in the VR group. No significant difference was found between the groups (P>0.05).

The other measurements of distance between the VAs and surrounding structures indicated no significant difference between the 2 groups. These results were similar to those of Lang [22].

Acquiring full and individual information about the anatomy of VAs before surgery in the CVJ is urgently needed. The VAs can be imaged with a variety of techniques. Moniz was credited with the first cerebral angiogram. Since then, various techniques have been developed for imaging the anatomy of the Vas [1,10,20,23]. However, physicians needed to put these images together in the brain before surgery to ascertain relationship between the VAs and tumors, and virtual reality technology combined these pictures together.

Conclusions

In summary, VR technology can demonstrate the anatomical structures of the vertebral arteries and their bony structures intuitively and individually in 3 dimensions. VR can provide valuable individual anatomical information for resection surgeries on tumors in the CVJ.

References

1. Govsa F1, Ozer MA, Celik S, Ozmutaf NM, Three-dimensional anatomic landmarks of the foramen magnum for the craniovertebral junction: J Craniofac Surg, 2011; 22(3); 1073-76, pmid: 21586947

2. Ackerman MJ, Yoo T, Jenkins D, From data to knowledge – the Visible Human Project continues: Stud Health Technol Inform, 2001; 84(Pt 2); 887-90, pmid: 11604860

3. Deutsch JC, Applications of the Colorado Visible Human Project in gastroenterology: Clin Anat, 2006; 19(3); 254-47, pmid: 16302236

4. Shi P1, Wang Y, Zhao HHeart segmentation based on mathematical morphology And Otsu in visible human project images: Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi, 2007; 24(5); 996-1000, pmid: 18027683

5. Stern M, Dystopian anxieties versus utopian ideals: medicine from Frankenstein to The Visible Human Project and Body Worlds: Sci Cult (Lond), 2006; 15(1); 61-84, pmid: 16832964

6. Yang de L1, Xu QW, Che XM, Clinical evaluation and follow-up outcome of presurgical plan by Dextroscope: a prospective controlled study in patients with skull base tumors: Surg Neurol, 2009; 72(6); 682-89, pmid: 19850330 discussion 689

7. Kockro RA1, Serra L, Tseng-Tsai Y, Planning and simulation of neurosurgery in a virtual reality environment: Neurosurgery, 2000; 46(1); 118-35, pmid: 10626943 discussion 135–37

8. Tubbs RS1, Shah NA, Sullivan BP, Surgical anatomy and quantitation of the branches of the V2 and V3 segments of the vertebral artery. Laboratory investigation: J Neurosurg Spine, 2009; 11(1); 84-87, pmid: 19569947

9. Thiel HW, Gross morphology and pathoanatomy of the vertebral arteries: J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 1991; 14(2); 133-41, pmid: 2019822

10. Tay KY1, U-King-Im JM, Trivedi RA, Imaging the vertebral artery: Eur Radiol, 2005; 15(7); 1329-43, pmid: 15968519

11. Sylla SThe cervicothoracic ganglion and segments V1, V2 and V3 of the vertebral artery: Dakar Med, 1979; 24(4); 328-40, pmid: 544213

12. Rickenbacher JThe Suboccipital and Intracranial Segment of the Vertebral Artery: Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch, 1964; 124; 171-78, pmid: 14248904

13. Muralimohan S, Pande A, Vasudevan MC, Ramamurthi R, Suboccipital segment of the vertebral artery: a cadaveric study: Neurol India, 2009; 57(4); 447-52, pmid: 19770546

14. Kiresi D1, Gumus S, Cengiz SL, Cicekcibasi A, The morphometric analysis of the V2 and V3 segments of the vertebral artery: normal values on MDCT: Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2009; 33(5); 399-407, pmid: 19394795

15. Gupta T, Quantitative anatomy of vertebral artery groove on the posterior arch of atlas in relation to spinal surgical procedures: Surg Radiol Anat, 2008; 30(3); 239-42, pmid: 18253689

16. George B, Extracranial vertebral artery anatomy and surgery: Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg, 2002; 27; 179-216, pmid: 11887579

17. Castillo C1, Viñas FC, Gutikhonda M, Diaz FG, Microsurgical anatomy of the suboccipital segment of the vertebral artery: Neurol Res, 1998; 20(3); 201-8, pmid: 9583580

18. Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, George B, Anterolateral approach to the V2 segment of the vertebral artery: Neurosurgery, 2005; 57(4 Suppl); 262-67, pmid: 16234673 discussion 262–67

19. Akar ZC1, Dujovny M, Slavin KV, Microsurgical anatomy of the intracranial part of the vertebral artery: Neurol Res, 1994; 16(3); 171-80, pmid: 7936084

20. Duan S, Lv S, Ye F, Lin Q, Imaging anatomy and variation of vertebral artery and bone structure at craniocervical junction: Euro Spine J, 2009; 18(8); 1102-8

21. Abd el-Bary TH, Dujovny M, Ausman JI, Microsurgical anatomy of the atlantal part of the vertebral artery: Surg Neurol, 1995; 44(4); 392-400, pmid: 8553261 discussion 400–1

22. Lang J, Kessler B, About the subclinical part of the vertebral artery and the neighboring bone-joint and nerve relationships: Skull Base Surge, 1991; 1(1); 64-72

23. Lévy C, Laissy JP, Raveau V, Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography: Radiology, 1994; 190(1); 97-103, pmid: 8259436

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750