28 August 2014: Lab/In Vitro Research
The OSR1 rs12329305 Polymorphism Contributes to the Development of Congenital Malformations in Cases of Stillborn/Neonatal Death
Bernarda Lozić ABCDEFG , Vjekoslav Krželj DEF , Ivana Kuzmić-Prusac BDE , Radenka Kuzmanić-Šamija DEF , Vesna Čapkun C , Ružica Lasan B , Tatijana Zemunik ABCDEFG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.890916
Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:1531-1538
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Involvement of development-related gene polymorphisms in multifactorial/polygenic etiology of stillborn/neonatal deaths due to malformations has been insufficiently tested. Since these genes showed evolutional stability and their mutations are very rare, we can assume that their polymorphic variants may be a risk factor associated with the occurrence of developmental disorders of unknown etiology or can enhance the phenotypic variability of known genetic disorders.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: To determine the association of 3 polymorphisms involved in the regulation of the early embryonic development of different organs, we conducted an association study of their relation to the particular malformation. We selected 140 samples of archived paraffin tissue samples from deceased patients in which fetal/neonatal autopsy examination had shown congenital abnormalities as the most likely cause of death. The polymorphisms of OSR1 rs12329305, rs9936833 near FOXF1, and HOXA1 rs10951154 were genotyped using the TaqMan allelic discrimination assay.
RESULTS: After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, significant allelic association with stillborn/neonatal deaths was observed for rs12329305 (p=7×10–4). In addition, association analysis for the same polymorphism was shown in the subgroup with isolated anomalies (1.25×10^–5), particularly in the subgroup of cases with kidney and heart anomalies (p=4.18×10^–5, p=5.12×10^–8, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the present study showed, for the first time, the role of the OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism in the development of congenital malformations in cases of stillborn/neonatal death, particularly in those with congenital kidney and heart developmental defects.
Keywords: Alleles, Congenital Abnormalities - genetics, Forkhead Transcription Factors - genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotyping Techniques, Infant, Newborn, perinatal death, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide - genetics, Stillbirth - genetics, Transcription Factors - genetics
Background
Congenital anomalies can be defined as a complex and heterogeneous group of embryonic and/or fetal development disorders. In developed countries, the incidence of congenital anomalies is 3–5% among neonates, and they are the main cause of infant mortality [1], in which perinatal autopsy often detects various types of congenital malformations involving 1 or more than 1 system, presenting multisystem malformations. Autopsy examination can certainly detect some potentially underestimated rare malformations of special interest in surgical medicine [2].
Most congenital malformations such as congenital heart disease (CHD), congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUTs), anomalies of the gut, lung, cleft lip, and palate have a multifactorial etiology, comprising both genetic and environmental factors [3]. Up to 20% of stillborn children with malformations have chromosomal aberrations [4]. Pathogenesis of congenital malformations in cases of chromosomal disorders is also poorly understood. An imbalance in the normal gene dosage (e.g., 3 copies of chromosome 21 in Down syndrome) itself is not sufficient to cause the most common congenital anomaly – CHD. Additional unidentified genetic variations in the rest of the genome and/or environmental factors probably contribute to the risk of CHD in Down syndrome [5].
By identification of some renal and heart developmental genes, several large studies have recently provided new insight into how the heart and the kidney develop [6,7]. In our study, we hypothesized that polymorphic variants of transcription factors that regulate morphogenesis and differentiation can have significant effects on occurrence of isolated or multiple organ defects.
We selected 3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of transcription factors genes regulating morphogenesis and differentiation – Odd-Skipped Related 1 (
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the
Material and Methods
SAMPLES/PATIENTS:
We selected total of 140 archived paraffin tissue samples in which fetal/neonatal autopsy examination had shown congenital abnormalities as the most likely cause of death. All perinatal deaths were at ≥28 weeks of gestation or ≤28 days at birth and were collected at the Department of Pathology, University Hospital Split, during a 12-year period from 2000 to 2011. Macerated stillborns; recognizable single-gene inherited disorders; and disorders caused by maternal diseases, nutritional deficiencies, or drug consumption were excluded from the study. All clinical data for 140 cases of stillborn/neonatal death were obtained from clinical medical records and autopsy examination reports performed or supervised by a specialist neonatologist and perinatal pathologist. Until recently, autopsy examination was obligatory in such cases in Croatia. Karyotypes for the most common chromosomal disorders were analyzed prenatally from amniotic fluid or immediately after delivery from the blood of the neonates. Sex distribution among cases was 55 (39.3%) females and 85 (60.7%) males. The control group consisted of 200 children who visited the hospital for follow-up medical examination after acute respiratory infection. Sex distribution among healthy controls was 98 (49.0%) males and 102 (51.0%) females.
Twenty of all 140 cases (24.3%) had the most common chromosomal disorders, and the remaining 120 (85.7%) cases had 1 or more malformations. Proportion of stillbirths and neonatal death was 30 (21.4%) versus 110 (78.6%), respectively. Neonatal death was defined as death in the first 4 weeks of life in liveborn neonates.
A group of cases (120) of stillborn/neonatal deaths due congenital malformations with an unknown genetic background was classified into the 2 following subgroups of cases: isolated and multiple. The first subgroup, with isolated anomalies, included 63 cases, while the second subgroup, with multiple anomalies, included 57 cases. Cases in the second subgroup had 2 or more malformations. In this group we included some recognizable malformation/dysplasia syndromes such as: VATER and VACTERL association (non-random co-occurrence of birth defects, vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheoesophageal fistula and/or esophageal atresia, renal and radial anomalies, and limb defects), different types of Potter’s syndrome, and prune belly syndrome (Table 1).
In addition, we classified in detail isolated malformation in the 4 following different subgroups: CHD; CAKUTs; gastrointestinal tract abnormalities (GTA); and central nervous system (CNS), including neural tube defects (NTDs), craniofacial structures, and others (Table 1).
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University Hospital Split, and informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents prior to blood sampling in the control group.
DNA EXTRACTION AND GENOTYPING:
Genomic DNA was extracted from the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues (different tissues were used) in cases and from peripheral blood leukocytes in the control group.
We extracted genomic DNA from FFPE using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, cat. no. 56404) and DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany, cat. no. 51104).
Genotyping of the 3 SNPs – rs12329305, rs9936833, and rs10951154 – within
Genotype call rate for SNP genotyping was 91.8%. After repeated genotyping with higher DNA concentrations, call rate was 95.6%. Call rate was limited because DNA isolated from FFPE tissue is often fragmented and cross-linked and is therefore difficult to genotype.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Prior to association analysis, we performed quality control of the obtained genotypes. We tested genotyping rate, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and minor allele frequencies (MAFs) for all samples using HaploView 4.1. MAFs of the 3 SNPs were compared with the National Center for Biotechnology Information SNP database (NCBI dbSNP) MAFs for the central European (CEU) population (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/). Association analyses were performed using implementations of the case-control single-point association test in HaploView 4.1 [22]. Haplotype frequencies were estimated using the expectation-maximization algorithm implemented in HaploView 4.1. After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, p-values less than 0.0166 were considered nominally significant.
Calculations of 80% power study at α=0.05 were performed using Quanto. The results are expressed as OR. When OR>1, genotype confers sensitivity to the effects of exposure [23].
Results
GENOTYPING:
Genotyping was performed on 140 cases and 200 control subjects. Genotype in cases and controls fit HWE, except for rs9936833, which deviated from HWE in cases of stillborn/neonatal death (p=4×10−6).
Allelic testing detected an association of the OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism with stillborn/neonatal death due to malformations/genetic disorders (χ2=11.454, p=7×10−4), while 2 other investigated polymorphisms – rs9936833 near FOXF1 and HOXA1 rs10951154 – did not show such association (χ2=1.462, p=0.2266 and χ2=1.267, p=0.2603, respectively) (Table 2). The OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism also showed genotyping association with stillborn/neonatal death due to malformations/genetic disorders (χ2=13.25, p=0.0013). In the group of cases, TT genotype was found more frequently than in controls (Figure 1). Two other analyzed SNPs did not show genotypic association (HOXA1 rs10951154 χ2=2.96, p=0.227; near FOXF1 rs9936833 χ2=5.15, p=0.076 (Figure 1).
Second-stage association analysis of the 2 subgroups of cases (with isolated and multiple anomalies) and controls showed allelic association of the OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism with isolated anomalies (χ2=19.092, p=1.25×10−5) (Table 3). Detailed analysis showed allelic association of the OSR1 rs12329305 polymorphism with kidney and heart anomalies (χ2=21.809, p=4.18×10−5; χ2=29.671, p=5.12×10−8, respectively) (Table 3).
Our study had 80% statistical power to detect (α=0.05) an effect with odds ratio (OR) = 2.1 for rs10951154 and OR=1.9 for rs9936833, assuming an additive model. The OR for rs12329305 is not presented because MAF for the general population is 2.2% and recessive homozygotes are not found in HapMap CEU population since it is a low-frequency functional variant (according NCBI dbSNP).
Discussion
This is the first study to investigate the role of the
The
To date, only 1 study has observed frequency of the rare T allele in 6% of white neonates, which is in accordance with our finding of 5.6% in the control group [14]. The NCBI dbSNP database reported a 2.2% MAF for rs12329305 in the HapMap CEU population with no recessive homozygous, and we found no recessive homozygous in our control group. Accordingly, rs12329305 is a low-frequency polymorphism, which showed large effect size to stillborn/neonatal death due to malformations, especially to the isolated malformations of the heart and kidneys. Some studies defined variants with MAFs between 0.1% and 3% as rare variants and concluded that rare variants associated with complex phenotypes sometimes have larger effect sizes to the trait than common variants [24]. Associations of rare variants with complex phenotypes, metabolic pathways, or polygenetic disease are under-investigated [25]. However, a recent study has shown that
We also speculate that the
It was shown that FOX proteins are transcription factors essential for gastrointestinal and lung organogenesis [11, 17, 32]. A recent study showed that heterozygous mutations in
A recent study indicated that
Conclusions
This study, for the first time, provides evidence implicating the
Studies using a large sample set are also required to elucidate the role of the
References
1. Turnpenny PD, Ellard S: Emery’s Elements of Medical Genetics, 2011, Philadelphia, Esevier – Health Sciences Division
2. Zetina-Mejía CA, Alvarez-Cosío JE, Quillo-Olvera J, Congenital absence of the cecal appendix. Case report: Cir Cir, 2009; 77; 407-10, pmid: 19944032
3. Strachan T, Read AP: Human Molecular Genetics, 1999, New York, Wiley-Liss
4. Korteweg FJ, Bouman K, Erwich JJ, Cytogenetic analysis after evaluation of 750 fetal deaths: proposal for diagnostic workup: Obstet Gynecol, 2008; 111; 865-74, pmid: 18378745
5. Sailani MR, Makrythanasis P, Valsesia A, The complex SNP and CNV genetic architecture of the increased risk of congenital heart defects in Down syndrome: Genome Res, 2013; 9; 1410-21, pmid: 23783273
6. Bruneau BG, The developmental genetics of congenital heart disease: Nature, 2008; 451; 943-48, pmid: 18288184
7. Weber S, Novel genetic aspects of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract: Curr Opin Pediatr, 2012; 24; 212-18, pmid: 22245908
8. Katoh M: Int J Mol Med, 2002; 10; 221-25, pmid: 12119563
9. Katoh M, Katoh M: Int J Oncol, 2004; 25; 1495-500, pmid: 15492844
10. Hong YS, Kim SY, Bhattacharya A: Gene, 1995; 159; 209-14, pmid: 7622051
11. Stankiewicz P, Sen PP, Bhatt SS: Am J Hum Genet, 2009; 84; 780-91, pmid: 19500772
12. Bosley TM, Alorainy IA, Salih MA: Am J Med Genet A, 2008; 146; 1235-40, pmid: 18412118
13. Tischfield MA, Bosley TM, Salih MA: Nat Genet, 2005; 37; 1035-37, pmid: 16155570
14. Zhang Z, Iglesias D, Eliopoulos N: Hum Mol Genet, 2011; 20; 4167-74, pmid: 21821672
15. Lan Y, Liu H, Ovitt CE, Jiang R: Genesis, 2011; 49; 419-22, pmid: 21462293
16. Wang Q, Lan Y, Cho ES, Maltby KM, Jiang R, Odd-skipped related 1 (Odd 1) is an essential regulator of heart and urogenital development: Dev Biol, 2005; 288; 582-94, pmid: 16223478
17. Larsson C, Hellqvist M, Pierrou S, Chromosomal localization of six human forkhead genes, freac-1, -3, -4, -5, -6 and -8: Genomics, 1995; 30; 464-69, pmid: 8825632
18. Mahlapuu M, Enerbäck S, Carlsson P: Development, 2001; 128; 2397-406, pmid: 11493558
19. Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C, Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology: Development, 1995; 121; 333-46, pmid: 7768176
20. Martinez P, Amemiya CT: Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol, 2002; 133; 571-80, pmid: 12470820
21. Chisaka O, Musci TS, Capecchi MR: Nature, 1992; 355; 516-20, pmid: 1346922
22. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ, Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps: Bioinformatics, 2005; 21; 263-65, pmid: 15297300
23. Gauderman WJ, Sample size requirements for matched case-control studies of gene-environment interaction: Stat Med, 2002; 21; 35-50, pmid: 11782049
24. Frazer KA, Murray SS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ, Human genetic variation and its contribution to complex traits: Nat Rev Genet, 2009; 4; 241-51, pmid: 19293820
25. Postula M, Janicki PK, Rosiak M, Effect of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in acetylsalicylic acid metabolic pathway genes on platelet reactivity in patients with diabetes: Med Sci Monit, 2013; 19; 394-408, pmid: 23715170
26. Gao Y, Lan Y, Ovitt CE, Jiang R: Dev Biol, 2009; 328; 200-9, pmid: 19389375
27. Lan Y, Kingsley PD, Cho ES, Jiang R: Mech Dev, 2001; 107; 175-79, pmid: 11520675
28. Kawai S, Kato T, Inaba H, Odd-skipped related 2 splicing variants show opposite transcriptional activity: Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005; 328; 306-11, pmid: 15670784
29. Xie J, Yoon J, Yang SS: J Biol Chem, 2013; 288; 8566-74, pmid: 23386621
30. Gloria-Bottini F, Banci M, Saccucci P: Med Sci Monit, 2012; 18(12); CR712-15, pmid: 23197232
31. Pac-Kożuchowska E, Krawiec P, Cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) gene polymorphism and selected parameters of lipid metabolism in children from families with history of cardiovascular system diseases: Med Sci Monit, 2013; 19; 818-25, pmid: 24091356
32. Sen P, Yang Y, Navarro C: Hum Mutat, 2013; 34; 801-11, pmid: 23505205
33. Agochukwu NB, Pineda-Alvarez DE, Keaton AA: Eur J Med Genet, 2011; 54; 323-28, pmid: 21315191
34. Su Z, Gay LJ, Strange A, Common variants at the MHC locus and at chromosome 16q24.1 predispose to Barrett’s esophagus: Nat Genet, 2012; 44; 1131-36, pmid: 22961001
35. Makki N, Capecchi MR: Hum Mol Genet, 2012; 21; 26-31, pmid: 21940751
36. Mark M, Lufkin T, Vonesch JL, Two rhombomeres are altered in Hoxa-1 mutant mice: Development, 1993; 119; 319-38, pmid: 8287791
37. Ingram JL, Stodgell CJ, Hyman SL: Teratology, 2000; 62; 393-405, pmid: 11091361
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






