23 September 2024: Database Analysis
Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Stainless-Steel Crowns Among Dental Professionals in Sana’a City, Yemen
Saleh Ali Mohammed Al-Arwali 1ABCDEF*, Khaled Al-Haddad 1ABCEF, Abdul Qader Mohammed Q. Zabara 1ABE, Abdulhamid Al Ghwainem 2EFG, Adel S. Alqarni3DEG, Muadh A. AlGomaiah4DFG, Khalid K. Alshamrani 5CFG, Mohammed M. Al Moaleem 6DEF, Hussein Shoga Al-Deen1BCD, Jamal H. Al-Nomair1BDDOI: 10.12659/MSM.945948
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e945948
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) have been the most effective and efficient methods of tooth restoration in pediatric dentistry, and they have shown consistently high success rates. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, and practice of SSCs among dental professionals in Sana’a City, Yemen.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A modified questionnaire was prepared from previous similar studies and distributed to 700 participants. It consisted of 3 parts: the first was related to participant characteristics; the second consisted of questions related to knowledge and awareness of SSCs such as indications, advantages, challenges, and parent’s rejection to SSCs; and the third part was correlated to questions related to the use and practice of SSCs, number of children treated, and SSCs cemented per week. Statistical significance was determined using a chi-square test, and the P value was set at <0.05 for statistical significance.
RESULTS: A total of 604 dental professionals answered the questionnaire, 159 (26.3%) had used SSC restoration, and 12 (80.0%) of them had a degree in pediatric dentistry, with significant differences among participants (P<0.000). Respondents with higher academic qualifications recorded higher percentages in using SSCs during their clinics, with significant differences (P<0.005). A significant difference was detected between general practitioners and pedodontists in practice questions (P=0.000). Most of the respondents (78.8%) indicated a desire for more practice and hands-on training in use of SSCs.
CONCLUSIONS: General dentists in Sana’a City, Yemen, do not frequently use SSCs. Most of the respondents stated that they lacked practical training and expressed a need for further knowledge and continuing education.
Keywords: Crowns, Knowledge, practice guideline
Introduction
Dental caries is a common disease among young children [1]. According to the World Health Organization, dental caries affects 60–90% of schoolchildren in developed and developing countries [2–4]. Dental caries remains a chief health issue in Yemen, as it is in other developing countries, and its incidence continues to increase [2,5].
Primary teeth play an important role in chewing and speaking and act as a natural space maintainer in the dental arch, so taking care of decayed teeth is important [6]. The treatment of extensively decayed primary teeth involves various challenges for pediatric dentists, such as saving remaining tooth structure, and obtaining parent approval [7].
Stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) are among the most durable, retentive, and inexpensive restorative supplies now available [8]. In general, SSCs are the first choice for restoration of caries-related defects in primary teeth, and they have been the most effective and efficient method of tooth restoration in pediatric dentistry [9,10]. SSCs are also considered as a favorable restoration method for primary molars with 2 surface lesions and larger carious lesions because of their notable clinical success [11–13]. In addition, they are utilized to restore fractured teeth, multi-surface caries, and post-endodontic restoration in young permanent and pediatric dentition [14–19]. Despite their full coronal coverage [20], the main disadvantage of SSCs is their silvery metallic appearance [20–22].
Traditionally, full caries removal and tooth preparation were regarded as necessary before fitting SSC, typically requiring local anesthesia [8,23,24]. Subsequently, the Hall technique was introduced, which involves placement of SSC over carious primary molars without the injection of local anesthesia, tooth reduction, or caries removal [25]. This technique can be used for treating young children with limited attention spans or as a way to improve patient cooperation [24,26].
SSCs has better durability and longevity than amalgam and tooth-colored restorations in primary dentition [27]. Recently, Joshi et al and Alqadi et al (2023) reported that SSCs showed better longevity [28] and radiographical outcomes [29] than the other restorative materials on primary molars. Cementing of SSCs on permanent molars is an extremely effective long-term temporary restorative dental treatment that conserves severely damaged molars in adolescents until definitive prosthetic treatment [30].
Overall, SSCs have shown consistently high success rates during clinical and questionnaire-based studies [20,31], as mentioned in studies used conventional or Hall techniques [8,26,32,33], or in retrospective, prospective, observational, or randomized control studies [13,24,34]. However, despite approval and indication for clinical use, SSCs are rarely utilized by general dentists [34–41].
Many studies have assessed knowledge, awareness, and use of SSCs globally [21,22,35,38,42,43]. Other studies have used SSCs clinically to restore primary and permanent molars and have compared the performance of SSCs with that of other restorative materials [23,36–38,40,41]. All of the abovementioned studies concluded that SSCs are effective for restoring molar teeth.
A school-based survey conducted in the Sana’a governorate of Yemen discovered that schoolchildren in Yemen had a high incidence of dental caries and a huge number of untreated decayed deciduous teeth [44]. Also, there is little information available on success rates of SSCs as a restorative treatment for primary teeth, their use in clinical practice, and the reasons for parents’ unwillingness to have SSCs used in their children. Therefore, the current survey study aimed to assess the knowledge, awareness, and use of SSCs by dental professionals in children in Sana’a City, Yemen.
Material and Methods
STUDY DESIGN AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATION:
The present cross-sectional study was designed to assess the knowledge and practice of dental practitioners in the use of SSCs in Sana’a City, Yemeni. Ethics approval was gained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of at Sana’a University (PE: 05/05/2024). Participants were provided with a summary of the study’s objectives along with the questionnaires to obtain their consent. The study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines [45].
INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
This study included both genders of Yemeni dental professionals practicing dentistry in government hospitals or private dental clinics in Sana’a, Yemen. We excluded non-Yemeni dental professionals and dentists who do treat primary teeth.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION:
The sample size for the current study was determined on the basis of the number of dental practitioners in Sana’a City, Yemen, with the effect sample calculated at 95% power and a significance level of α=0.05 [46]. A total of 604 dental professionals were randomly selected from dental clinics, dental colleges, and government and private hospitals.
STUDY SETTING AND POPULATION:
A cross-sectional, face-to-face questionnaire study was performed for dental professionals from September 2023 to May 2024. Copies of questionnaires were sent through WhatsApp to different groups at different clinics and colleges. A simple random sampling technique was used to obtain samples from different geographical areas in Sana’a City by utilizing a computer and software.
QUESTIONNAIRE TOOLS AND DATA COLLECTION:
A questionnaire survey was modified from previous similar studies [21,22,35,38,43]. It was used as an instrument for data collection, and the participants were assured that all information was confidential and protected. The questionnaire was translated into Arabic with the assistance of a native Arabic speaker, and then the questions were exposed to forward and backward translation into English [46].
The validity, reliability, and clarity of the questionnaire was confirmed by administering it to 20 volunteers from different dental professions who were asked to respond to the questionnaire and to comment on its clarity, content, and brevity. The participants could select more than 1 answer for each question, could only complete the questionnaire once, and all questions had to be answered. The answers were directly documented and collected from the respondents.
QUESTIONNAIRE PARTS:
The questionnaire was anonymous and had 3 parts. The first part was related to the characteristics of participants, such as gender (male and female), academic qualification (BDS, MSs, and PhD), specialty (general dentist, pedodontics, prosthodontist, and other specialty), working experience (up to 5 years, 6–10 years, 11–20 years, and ≥21 years), and type of work place (private, general, or specialized public hospital).
The second part was related to knowledge and awareness of SCC questions and consisted of 7 questions: “Which indications would oblige you to use SSCs in primary teeth?”, “Which indications would oblige you to use SSCs in permanent teeth?”, “What are the most important advantages of the use of SSCs in your opinion?”, “Have you faced challenges related to the use of SSCs?”, “What are the main barriers to your use of SSC”, “Why would the parents of your patients reject the use of SSCs”, and “How do you know about SSC restorative technique”.
The third part included questions related to SSC practice and consisted of 3 questions regarding the “use of SSCs in clinical practice,” “number of children treated per week,” and “number of SSCs used per week.”
In addition, there was a question related to mode of education and gaining information related to SSCs (lecture, illustrated guidelines, hands-on course, video demonstration, and webinar). There was also a question regarding to the age range of children receiving SSC restorations (>3 years, between 3–6 years, and <6 years). To obtain more information on the practice of participants in the use of SSCs, question related to type of education were asked. After collecting the answered questionnaires, the answers were numbered and arranged in an Excel sheet for statistical analysis.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data were manipulated using SPSS version 25. Incidence distributions were utilized for descriptive statistics. The confidence interval (95% confidence level was used) and chi-square test were used to test the associations between dentists’ demographic characteristics and the use of preformed metal crowns (PMCs), as well as to compare general versus pediatric dentists with regard to the number of children treated and SSCs used per week. Statistical significance was set at
Results
PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS:
Of the 700 questionnaires distributed, 627 responses were received, and 23 respondents were excluded because of incomplete answers. A total of 604 questionnaires were completed, with a response rate of 86.3%. Of the participants, 229 (37.9%) were male, 494 (81.8%) had bachelor’s degrees, 110 (18.2%) were dental specialists (MSc or PhD), and only 15 (2.5%) were pedodontists. Of the respondents, 17 (2.8%) had more than 20 years of professional experience and 347 (57.5%) had less than 5 years of experience, 228 (74.2%) of the participants were working in private dental clinics or hospitals, and only 49 (8.1%) were working in specialized hospitals (Figure 1).
Most respondents (73.7%; n=445) did not use PMCs in their clinical practice, and only 26.3% (n=159) of the dental professionals reported using readymade SSCs in their clinical practice. The use of PMCs was significantly linked with having a dedicated degree in pediatric dentistry, whereas only 120 (24.3%) of general dental practitioners reported using SSCs, and more than three-quarters of pedodontist used SSCs (80.0%, P<0.05). In addition, this study showed a statistically significant relationship (P<0.05) between the academic qualifications of dentists and use of SSCs in daily dental practice. Dentists with a PhD were more likely to use SSCs than dental professionals with other qualifications such as MSC and BDS (Table 1).
KNOWLEDGE- AND AWARENESS-RELATED QUESTIONS:
Of the 159 SSC users, 100 (62.9%) indicated they used SSCs in primary molars after pulp therapy, followed by deep multi-surface caries (75, 47.2%), while 72 (45.3%) and 71 (44.7%) stated that they used SSCs in permanent teeth, endodontically-treated molars, and deep multi-surface caries. The most common challenge of use of PMCs in clinical practice was problems in crown alteration (109, 68.6%), followed by aesthetic appearance (61, 38.4%) and crown detachment (23, 14.5%). In addition, among those who reported using SSCs, 127 (79.9%) learned this restorative technique at college, 21 (13.2%) were self-taught, and only 8.8% learned this restorative technique through media programs (Table 2).
Among the 604 contributors, maintaining function and occlusion (454, 75.2%) was the most frequently reported advantage of readymade SSCs, followed by long durability and a good prognosis (268, 44.4%). In response to the question “What are the main barriers to use of preformed metal crowns,” among the 445 respondents who reported not using SSCs, 141 (31.7%), 130 (29.2%), 128 (28.8%), 118 (26.5%), 95 (21.3%), 80 (18.0%), and 42 (9.4%) answered lack of practical training in the use of performed SSCs, non-compliance by children, aesthetic concerns, lack of knowledge of SSCs, unawareness of SSCs, lack of materials and equipment, and low charge/low input–output ratio, respectively. In relation to the problems associated with parents’ refusal to use SSCs, of the 604 participants, 223 (60.9%), 155 (42.3%), 100 (27.3%), and 56 (15.3%) answered that parental rejection was due to a deficiency of understanding of the benefits, price and cost, an aesthetic reason, and non-compliance of children, respectively (Table 2).
PRACTICE-RELATED QUESTIONS:
In this study, 12 (80.0%) out of 15 pediatric dentists and 120 (24.3%) out of 494 general dentists used the SSC restorative technique. The number of children per week who received SCC services by pediatric dentists was higher than that of general dentists, whereas more than two-thirds of general dentists treated less than 5 children per week. In addition, most pediatric dentists treated 4 or more children per week, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Moreover, the number of SSCs used per week by pediatric dentists was higher than that used by general practitioner dentists. Half of pediatric dentists used more than 5 SSCs per week, whereas 87 (72.5%) of the general dentists used less than 2 SSCs per week (P<0.05) (Table 3).
With regard to multiple-response questions, of the 604 respondents who indicated that they would like additional training material and practical courses on using SSCs, 209 (43.9%) and 196 (41.2%) selected video demonstrations and hands-on courses as the preferred type of education or training, respectively (Table 4). Table 5 shows that most children (86, 54.1%) who received SSC restorations were 3–6 years of age.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first to assess knowledge about and clinical practice using SSCs among a group of dental professionals in Sana’a City, Yemen. The outcomes of this survey showed that SSCs are not widely used among Yemeni dental practitioners, with 26.3% of the respondents using SSCs in their practice. This finding is consistent with the earlier studies [22,34,35,38]. In a study conducted among dentists in Norway and Finland, only 12.0% and 12.9%, respectively, reported using readymade SSCs in their clinical practice [35]. By contrast, a study conducted in Chengdu City, China, found that most dentists (69.6%) did not use readymade SSCs to restore decayed primary molars [22,36]. Among dentists in Germany, 34% regularly used readymade SSCs [34], whereas only 3.0% of participants in the United Kingdom routinely used SSCs, 15% used them infrequently, and 82% never used them [38].
Table 1 shows a significant difference (
We found that pediatric dentists used SSCs to treat more children per week than general dentists (
In the present study, the main barrier to use of readymade SSCs among dentists was the lack of practical training (31.7%). This finding is consistent with the result of Uhlen et al (2021) [35] but not with the other results [22,34]. This result could be due to the limited clinical practice of undergraduate students in the use of PMCs, the low number of suitable pediatric patient cases that the dental students treated, and the lack of interest by general dentists in continuing education programs that provide practical training in the use of readymade SSCs. Threlfall et al (2005) reported that some dentists feel they have not received enough training during their undergraduate studies to perform SSCs [38]. Kowolik et al (2007) showed that general dentists are not interested in continuing education courses on use of PMCs [42].
Non-compliance by children was stated as the second barrier against SSC in this study, with 29.2% of dentist believing that it was a cause for their reluctance to use this technique. A similar issue was analyzed in a previous study, which examined dental practitioners’ views on using SSCs [38]. In addition, many of the dentists who did not use SSCs believed that a child would find it difficult to tolerate the procedure [38,47]. A further restriction to the use of SSCs was aesthetic concerns (28.8%), in comparison with the study carried by Santamaria et al (2018), in which the lack of aesthetics was the main reason for use of SSCs (43.5%) [34]. This result may be due to the lack of acceptance by the parents and their children of the appearance of metal crowns, which was one of the reasons for the parents’ refusal to use readymade SSCs in this study. In a study conducted by Threlfall et al (2005), the participating dentists mentioned that the parents did not like the appearance of the SSC; thus, SSC was not used [38].
A secondary care-based study also examined parents’ and children’s acceptance of SSCs. However, very few complaints (<6%) concerning the crowns’ look were made [48]. Maciel et al (2017) revealed that children seem to like the appearance of SSCs and tend to prefer a crown over other commonly used restorative materials [49]. Santamaria et al showed a good level of acceptance of crowns, with 88% of parents expressing satisfaction with the procedure [34]. Therefore, the appearance of metal crowns might be of more concern to aesthetically-oriented dentists than to parents or children.
In addition, the deficiency of knowledge about SSCs was reported as another barrier against SSC by 26.5% of respondents in this study, although 80% of the participating dentists said that they learned this restorative technique in college. The same barrier (lack of knowledge) was also the main barrier to use of readymade SSCs among dental practitioners in China, accounting for 41.7% [22], and only 10.9% of them learned this restorative technique in college. On the contrary, according to Santamaria et al, only 14.5% of German dentists thought the absence of knowledge about SSCs prevented them from using it [34]. These results emphasized the need for learning how to fit SSC restorations. The importance and knowledge of the SSCS technique should be taught during undergraduate education to facilitate its implementation. This will encourage dental undergraduates to acquire and apply the technique methodically during resident training in pediatric dentistry.
This study found that the main reason for parents’ rejection of using SSCs was the understanding of the benefits (60.9%), followed by prices (42.3%). This finding is in parallel with the outcome of a previous study [22]. Therefore, before beginning treatment, dentists should emphasize to parents the basis for the SSC restorative approach. Gaining the trust and understanding of children and their guardians is largely dependent on the attitudes and actual statement of dentists [50]. Furthermore, increasing public awareness of the value of pediatric dental health and disseminating children’s oral health knowledge are of great importance. The cost was the second most common reason (42.3%) for parents rejecting SSC restoration because of the financial difficulties faced by parents caused by the low per capita income and poor economic situation in Yemen. Of the participating dentists in this study, 62.9% thought primary molars after pulp therapy were the main indication for using PMCs, followed by deep multi-surface caries (47.2%). This result is inconsistent with the outcome of studies carried out earlier in other countries [22,34,35].
On the contrary, Bedre and Gurunathan (2019) found that 60.7% of dentists agreed that restoring primary teeth with crowns after pulpal treatment is necessary [43]. In permanent molars, endodontically-treated molars and deep multi-surface caries were frequently selected by dentists as main indications for using readymade SSCs in the current study, accounting for 45.3% and 44.7%, respectively, which is in contrast to that of Uhlen et al [2021], who found that among dentists in Norway and Finland, dental developmental defects were the most often chosen indication for PMCs (85.5% and 70.7%, respectively) [35].
We found that 68.6% of respondents indicated that the difficulty of crown adjustment was a major challenge. This result was consistent with other research [35]. This result may be due to the lack of practical experience with the use of SSCs among general dentists, as the results of this study indicated that most general dentists treated fewer children and used fewer crowns per week compared with pediatric dentists. The second most commonly mentioned challenge with the use of PMCs was aesthetic concerns (38.4%), which is consistent with the study of Uhlen et al [35]. Aesthetic concerns have been reported as a barrier to the use of readymade SSCs by dentists and parents, as parents desire a better aesthetic appearance. Similarly, other studies have reported that poor esthetics hinders the use of performed SSC [34,38].
However, a study found that most children and their parents viewed SSC positively and expressed slight or no concern about their color and appearance. The authors suggested that these results may inspire dentists who have been reluctant to use preformed SSCs because of aesthetic concerns [48]. As shown in Table 2, the most frequently reported advantage of SSCs among dentists was maintaining function and occlusion (75.2%). This finding is consistent with the results of the previous study conducted in Norway and Finland [35,36].
Most of the participants indicated that they would like more material and practical training courses on how to use SSCs. The results obtained from this study are consistent with those found by Uhlen et al. [35]. As shown in Table 2, the lack of practical hands-on courses was the most common reason for dentists not using SSCs. In addition, this finding shows the motivation and interest of dentists. The most popular type of education or training preferred by respondents in this study was video demonstrations, accounting for 43.9% of dentists, followed by a hands-on course (42.2%). These findings are inconsistent with those of the study conducted in Norway and Finland, with the majority choosing hands-on training as their chosen education format, accounting for 56.6% and 43.4%, respectively [35]. These findings support the lack of adequate clinical training. Thus, few children received SSC restorations (Table 5).
Children aged 3–6 years received SSC restorations, which accounts for 54.1% participants, with just 6.3% being younger than age 3. This result is similar to the findings obtained earlier [22]. SSC restoration is effective in crowning of primary molars for children under age 3 years [51], but the conventional way of placing SSCs is more difficult than the Hall technique, which requires more cooperation from young patients [38]. This limitation prevents children under age 3 from receiving SSC restorations.
This study has also some limitations. First, it focused on different dental professionals at Sana’a City, Yemen, and it did not include dentists from another governorate. Second, no comparative studies from neighboring countries were included to assess societal differences in knowledge, mentalities, and awareness. In addition, the questionnaire did not have open-ended questions. Finally, the questions did not cover all aspects of the knowledge, awareness, and practice of SSC use.
Conclusions
We found that SSCs are not widely used by general dental practitioners in Sana’a City, Yemen. The main barrier to SSC use among dentists was insufficient training, whereas parents’ rejection of SSCs was due to the absence of understanding of the benefits.
Most participants in this study were interested in getting more evidence and education about the use of preformed metal crowns. Therefore, dental education should have more emphasis on SSCs, and there is a need for practical courses for general dentists, reinforced by continuing education programs.
Tables
Table 1. Association between dentist’s demographic characteristics and the use of SSCs (chi-square test). Table 2. Knowledge and awareness response to questions related to the use of SSCs among participants. Table 3. Comparison between pedodontist and general practitioners in relation to use of SSCs per week. Table 4. What is your preferred means of education if you need more information and practice in use of SSCs? Table 5. Age range of patients receiving SSC restorations.References
1. Kopczynski K, Meyer BD, Examining parental treatment decisions within a contemporary pediatric dentistry private practice: Patient Prefer Adherence, 2021; 15; 645-52
2. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health: Bull World Health Organ, 2005; 83(9); 661-69
3. Prasai Dixit L, Shakya A, Dental caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang school children of Nepal: BMC Oral Health, 2013; 13; 20
4. Van Chuyen N, Van Du V, Van Ba N, The prevalence of dental caries and associated factors among secondary school children in rural highland Vietnam: BMC Oral Health, 2021; 21(1); 349
5. Al-Haddad KA, Al-Hebshi NN, Al-Ak’hali MS, Oral health status and treatment needs among school children in Sana’a City, Yemen: Int J Dent Hyg, 2010; 8(2); 80-85
6. Kaptan A, Korkmaz E, Evaluation of success of stainless steel crowns placed using the hall technique in children with high caries risk: A randomized clinical trial: Niger J Clin Pract, 2021; 24(3); 425-34
7. Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective: Int J Paediatr Dent, 2019; 29(3); 238-48
8. Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth: Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 2015(12); CD005512
9. Georgieva M, Dimitrov E, Andreeva R, Indications for use of preformed crowns in pediatric dentistry: J Medi Dent Practice, 2016; 3(2); 439-45
10. Sztyler K, Wiglusz RJ, Dobrzynski M, Review on preformed crowns in pediatric dentistry-the composition and application: Materials (Basel), 2022; 15(6); 2081
11. Seale NS, The use of stainless-steel crowns: Pediatr Dent, 2002; 24(5); 501-5
12. Amlani DV, Brizuela M, Stainless steel crowns in primary dentition: StatPearls, 2023, Treasure Island (FL), StatPearls Publishing
13. Randall RC, Vrijhoef MM, Wilson NH, Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs. amalgam restorations in primary molars: A systematic review: J Am Dent Assoc, 2000; 131(3); 337-43
14. Govindaraju L, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG, Comparison of quality of obturation and instrumentation time using hand files and two rotary file systems in primary molars: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial: Eur J Dent, 2017; 11(3); 376-79
15. Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L, Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: A double blinded randomised clinical trial: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2018; 19(4); 273-78
16. Rajain T, Tsomu K, Namdev R, Evaluation and comparison of effectiveness of Kedo-S pediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal treatment in primary molars: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2023; 16(1); 22-29
17. Nair M, Jeevanandan G, Vignesh R, Subramanian EM, Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain after pulpectomy with k-files, kedo-s files and mtwo files in deciduous molars-a randomized clinical trial: Braz Dent Sci, 2018; 21(4); 411-17
18. Panchal V, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian E, Comparison of instrumentation time and obturation quality between hand K-file, H-files, and rotary Kedo-S in root canal treatment of primary teeth: A randomized controlled trial: J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 2019; 37(1); 75-79
19. Ravikumar D, Jeevanandan G, Subramanian EMG, Evaluation of knowledge among general dentists in treatment of traumatic injuries in primary teeth: A cross-sectional questionnaire study: Eur J Dent, 2017; 11(2); 232-37
20. Randall RC, Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: Review of the literature: Pediatr Dent, 2002; 24(5); 489-500
21. Santamaría RM, Pawlowitz L, Schmoeckel J, Use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars in Germany: Questionnaire-based cross-sectional analysis: Int J Paediatr Dent, 2018; 28(6); 587-94
22. Jiang Q, Zeng X, Wang Y, Dentists’ perception and clinical use of preformed metal crowns to restore primary molar defects in Chengdu City, China: A cross-sectional study: Biomed Res Int, 2021; 2021; 6200083
23. Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol RBritish Society of Paediatric Dentistry, UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: Stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars: Int J Paediatr Dent, 2008; 18(Suppl 1); 20-28
24. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR, The Hall Technique; A randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: Acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months: BMC Oral Health, 2007; 7; 18
25. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR, Sealing caries in primary molars: Randomized control trial, 5-year results: J Dent Res, 2011; 90(12); 1405-10
26. Innes N, Evans D, Hall N, The Hall Technique for managing carious primary molars: Dent Update, 2009; 36(8); 472-74
27. Seale NS, Randall R, The use of stainless steel crowns: A systematic literature review: Pediatr Dent, 2015; 37(2); 145-60
28. Joshi RS, Gokhale NS, Hugar SM, Longevity of stainless steel crowns on primary molars A systematic review and meta analysis: J Sci Soc, 2023; 50; 28-38
29. Alqadi S, Aljehani O, Kurdi YE, Clinical and radiographical outcomes of restorative treatment with stainless steel crowns performed by undergraduate dental students in Medina, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Cureus, 2023; 15(12); e49906
30. Felemban O, Alagl H, Aloufi W, El Meligy O, Success rate of stainless-steel crowns placed on permanent molars among adolescents: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2021; 14(4); 488-91
31. Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G, Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: Pediatr Dent, 2002; 24(1); 69-71
32. Boyd DH, Thomson WM, Leon de la Barra S, A primary care randomized controlled trial of hall and conventional restorative techniques: JDR Clin Trans Res, 2021; 6(2); 205-12
33. Ludwig KH, Fontana M, Vinson LA, The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: A retrospective study: J Am Dent Assoc, 2014; 145(12); 1248-53
34. Santamaría RM, Innes NPT, Machiulskiene V, Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-year outcomes of a randomised clinical trial: Caries Res, 2017; 51(6); 605-14
35. Uhlen MM, Tseveenjav B, Wuollet E, Stainless-steel crowns in children: Norwegian and Finnish dentists’ knowledge, practice and challenges: BMC Oral Health, 2021; 21(1); 190
36. Uhlen MM, Valen H, Karlsen LS, Treatment decisions regarding caries and dental developmental defects in children – a questionnaire-based study among Norwegian dentists: BMC Oral Health, 2019; 19(1); 80
37. Wuollet E, Tseveenjav B, Furuholm J, Restorative material choices for extensive carious lesions and hypomineralisation defects in children: A questionnaire survey among Finnish dentists: Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2020; 21(1); 29-34
38. Threlfall AG, Pilkington L, Milsom KM, General dental practitioners’ views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars: Br Dent J, 2005; 199(7); 453-55 discussion 441
39. Tseveenjav B, Furuholm J, Mulic A, Survival of extensive restorations in primary molars: 15-year practice-based study: Int J Paediatr Dent, 2018; 28(2); 249-56
40. Barker AM, Mathu-Muju KR, Nash DA, Practice patterns of general dentists treating children in Kentucky: implications for access to care: Pediatr Dent, 2012; 34(3); 220-25
41. Lee GH, McGrath C, Yiu CK, The care of the primary dentition by general dental practitioners and paediatric dentists: Int Dent J, 2013; 63(5); 273-80
42. Kowolik J, Kozlowski D, Jones JE, Utilization of stainless steel crowns by general dentists and pediatric dental specialists in Indiana: J Indiana Dent Assoc, 2007; 86(2); 16-21
43. Bedre AS, Gurunathan D, Knowledge and awareness among general dental practitioners in Chennai regarding rehabilitation with full coverage restoration in children: Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2019; 12(6); 590-94
44. Al-Akwa AA, Al-Maweri SA, Dental caries prevalence and its association with fluoride level in drinking water in Sana’a, Yemen: Eur J Dent, 2018; 12(1); 15-20
45. World Medical Association, World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects: JAMA, 2013; 310(20); 2191-94
46. Al Moaleem MM, Al Ahmari NM, Alqahtani SM, Unlocking endocrown restoration expertise among dentists: Insights from a multi-center cross-sectional study: Med Sci Monit, 2023; 29; e940573
47. Shelton A, Yepes JF, Vinson LA, Utilization of stainless steel crowns by pediatric and general dentists: Pediatr Dent, 2019; 41(2); 127-31
48. Bell SJ, Morgan AG, Marshman Z, Rodd HD, Child and parental acceptance of preformed metal crowns: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2010; 11(5); 218-24
49. Maciel R, Salvador D, Azoubel K, The opinion of children and their parents about four different types of dental restorations in a public health service in Brazil: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 2017; 18(1); 25-29
50. BaniHani A, Deery C, Toumba J, Duggal M, Effectiveness, costs and patient acceptance of a conventional and a biological treatment approach for carious primary teeth in children: Caries Res, 2019; 53(1); 65-75
51. Zahdan BA, Szabo A, Gonzalez CD, Survival rates of stainless steel crowns and multi-surface composite restorations placed by dental students in a pediatric clinic: J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018; 42(3); 167-72
Tables
In Press
Clinical Research
Predicting Neonatal Hypoglycemia Using AI Neural Networks in Infants from Mothers with Gestational Diabetes...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944513
Clinical Research
Minimally Invasive Combined Medial and Lateral Approach for Treating Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fract...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945535
Clinical Research
Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff® on the Lower Leg and TOF-Scan® on th...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945227
Clinical Research
Acupuncture Enhances Quality of Life and Disease Control in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Patients on Omali...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI:
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,057,055
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 1,850,400
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 693,819
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
07 Jan 2022 : Meta-Analysis 258,107
Efficacy and Safety of Light Therapy as a Home Treatment for Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Dise...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935074
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935074