Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

02 July 2004 : Original article  

New Perspective on the Management of Hyperlipidemia

Ebrahim A. Balbisi

Med Sci Monit 2004; 10(7): LE11-11 :: ID: 16397

Abstract

Dear Editor;
The results of the recently published study by Cannon and colleagues [1] and the previously published Effect of Intensive Compared With Moderate Lipid-Lowering Therapy on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis (REVERSAL) [2] provide strong evidence that intensive statin therapy produces superior protection for patients with coronary heart disease and those who have recently had an acute coronary syndrome than does a standard regimen.
Despite previous recommendations which considered an LDL-C level of less than 100 mg per deciliter optimal, [3,4] what is emerging is that the level of reduction is what influences clinical outcomes irrespective of plasma lipid levels. This premise is supported by the findings of The Heart Protection Study,[5] in which the authors concluded that adding a statin regimen to high-risk patients provides substantial benefits irrespective of baseline cholesterol levels. Other effects of statins, such as reductions in the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) may potentially be viewed as clinical markers for the beneficial effects of statins. However, additional studies are needed to establish the effects of statins on biologic inflammatory markers.
In light of forgoing uncertainties, what is an optimal LDLC level? I would attempt to maintain high-risk patients on intensive lipid-lowering regimen to achieve an LDL-C level below the current recommendations (~70 mg/dl), providing that such level could be achieved safely.
REFERENCES:
1. Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al: Comparison of Intensive and Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med, 2004; 350(15): 1495–504
2. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P et al: JAMA; 291(9): 1071–80
3. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel
on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA, 2001; 285(19): 2486–97
4. De Backer G, Ambrosioni E, Borch-Johnsen K et al: European guidelines on cardiovascular disease and prevention in clinical practice. Atherosclerosis, 2003; 171: 145–55
5. The Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group. MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet, 2002; 360: 7–22

Keywords: Cholesterol, HDL - blood, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - administration & dosage, Hyperlipidemias - blood, Hyperlipidemias - drug therapy, Cholesterol, HDL - blood, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors - administration & dosage, Hyperlipidemias - drug therapy

Add Comment 0 Comments

Editorial

01 January 2026 : Editorial  

Editorial: Increasing Awareness of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers and Never-Smokers Challenges Current Approaches to Prevention and Screening

Dinah V. Parums ORCID logo

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952454

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952454

0:00

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750