22 December 2006
Combined spinal epidural analgesia for labor with and without 3 ml of 1.5% epidural lidocaine
Yvonne Lim, Alex T Sia, Kok Yuen Ho, Alvin TeoMed Sci Monit 2007; 13(1): CR9-13 :: ID: 470142
Abstract
Background: Lidocaine is used as a ‘test dose’ to detect misplacement of epidural catheters. When administered immediately after the initiation of a combined spinal epidural for labor analgesia, it was found to interfere with motor function. The authors hypothesized that an epidural test dose of 3 ml of 1.5% lidocaine injected immediately after the initiation of combined spinal epidural analgesia and followed by a continuous epidural infusion would prolong the duration of analgesia and decrease the incidence of breakthrough pain.
Material/Methods: Sixty nulliparous parturients were recruited for this randomized controlled trial. Combined spinal epidural analgesia was performed with intrathecal levobupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg. The
patients were randomized into three groups: group L receiving 3 ml of 1.5% epidural lidocaine, group S 3 ml of normal saline, and group C the control group receiving no test solution. An epidural infusion of 0.1% levobupivacaine and 2 μg of fentanyl/ml at 10 ml/hr was initiated immediately.
Their need for supplementary analgesia, duration of analgesia, sensory block, motor block, side-effects, and overall satisfaction were recorded.
Results: The breakthrough pain rate in all groups were similar. Their mean duration of analgesia (mean survival times) were not signifi cantly different. Group C had the lowest incidence of lower limb motor block. The satisfaction scores were signifi cantly highest in group L.
Conclusions: The administration of epidural lidocaine and saline immediately after intrathecal levobupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg did not reduce the incidence of breakthrough pain in combined spinal epidural labor.
Keywords: Analgesia, Epidural, Analgesia, Obstetrical, Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology, Injections, Spinal, Labor, Obstetric - drug effects, Lidocaine - pharmacology, Pain Measurement, Pregnancy
Editorial
01 January 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: Increasing Awareness of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers and Never-Smokers Challenges Current Approaches to Prevention and ScreeningDOI: 10.12659/MSM.952454
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952454
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






