25 February 2003
Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement in patients over 55 years old with different valve types.
Mehmet Ali Özatik, Mehmet Kamil Göl, Ulkü Yildiz, Sabahattin Göksel, Okan Yurdakök, Soner Yavas, Omac Tüfekcioğlu, Erol Sener, Oğuz TasdemirMed Sci Monit 2003; 9(2): CR55-60 :: ID: 4761
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We planned a prospective study to evaluate the regression of left ventricular mass one year after surgery in older patients (<or=55 years) who have undergone aortic valve replacement with stentless bioprostheses or mechanical valve. MATERIAL/METHODS: Between 1998 and 2000, 54 patients had aortic valve replacement with stentless bioprostheses (14 CryoLife-O'Brien, 40 Medtronic Freestyle), and 62 patients had aortic valve replacement with St. Jude Medical mechanical valve. In preoperative echocardiographic evaluation, the St. Jude group had the highest left ventricular mass (LVM). The difference between groups was significant (O'Brien group: 329+/-75 g, Medtronic group: 382+/-116 g, St. Jude group: 445+/-138 g, p=0.006). The same level of statistical significance was achieved when LVM indexes were compared (LVMI; 192+/-39 g/m2, 217+/-65 g/m2, 255+/-78 g/m2, respectively, p=0.008). All the surviving patients were evaluated echocardiographically one year after surgery. RESULTS: Regression of LVM occurred in all patients after aortic valve replacement: 26% in the O'Brien group, 37% in the Medtronic group and 32% in the St. Jude group. The difference between the groups was not significant. LVM and LVMI's were significantly lower when compared with preoperative values, but the degree of regression was not different between groups one year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Regression of left ventricular mass after aortic valve replacement is directly related to the preoperative ventricular mass and independent of the valve type in older patients. The choice of prosthesis should be based on patient characteristics.
Keywords: Aortic Valve - surgery, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - physiopathology
Editorial
01 January 2025 : Editorial
Editorial: The Human Cell Atlas. What Is It and Where Could It Take Us?DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947707
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947707
In Press
Clinical Research
Impact of Periodontal Treatment on Early Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Role of Porphyromonas gingivalis Anti...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947146
Clinical Research
C-Reactive Protein, Uric Acid, and Coronary Artery Ectasia in Patients with Coronary Artery DiseaseMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947158
Clinical Research
Effects of Remote Exercise on Physical Function in Pre-Frail Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled TrialMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947105
Database Analysis
Development and Validation of a Competitive Risk Model in Elderly Patients with Transitional Cell Bladder C...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946332
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,964,204
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 700,526
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Mar 2024 : Editorial 24,009
Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204
28 Jan 2024 : Review article 18,806
A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and FutureDOI :10.12659/MSM.943912
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912