01 July 1997
Comparative evaluation of commonly used in vitro tests in screening of thyroid function
Dariusz Sitkiewicz, Maria F. Puławska, Jadwiga Janas, Dariusz Pączkowski, Ewa MatraszakMed Sci Monit 1997; 3(4): PI594-598 :: ID: 501456
Abstract
In view of the increasing number of in vitro tests of thyroid function standardization of the biochemical assessment of patients with suspected thyroid disease was attempted. In 145 patients, measurements were made of serum total triiodothyronine (T3), tyroxine (T4) and thyrotropin (TSH) by the highly sensitive methods using the Delfia system. For comparative purposes, Delfia results were compared with those obtained by three different immunoassays: RIA, LIA and FPIA. The correlation between all tested methods over a wide range of concentrations was good, indicating very close agreement in the ranking of results. Correlation coefficients in all cases were higher than 0.90 and the intercepts did not differ significantly from zero. On the basis of the obtained results, the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic power of the total T3, total T4 and TSH measurements for discrimination between euthyroid, hypothyroid and hyperthyroid patients was determined. TSH assay showed the highest sensitivity and diagnostic power as compared to total T3 and T4 assays. A significant, negative correlation was found in all studied patients population between TSH and T3 and TSH and T4 (r = -0.564 and r -0.695 respectively). These results seems to suggest that: 1) a detectable, normal TSH level indicates that the patient is euthyroid, and 2) a raised or lowered TSH level should be followed by measurement of T4 rather than T3 to distinguish between euthyroism and hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism. This study also suggests that for practical purposes the best single screening test of thyroid function is TSH measured with a sensitive immunometric assay.
Keywords: Thyroid function, in vitro thyroid testing, immunoassays
Editorial
01 January 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: Increasing Awareness of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers and Never-Smokers Challenges Current Approaches to Prevention and ScreeningDOI: 10.12659/MSM.952454
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952454
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






