Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

A comparative study of cefaclor vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in tonsillopharyngitis

Józef Haczyński, Jan Bardadin, Danuta Gryczyńska, Maciej Gryczyński, Wiesław Gołąbek, Henryk Kawalski, Henryk Kaźmierczak, Tomasz Kręcicki, Paweł Kubik, Grzegorz Namysłowski, Lesław Popiel

Med Sci Monit 2001; 7(5): PI1016-1022 :: ID: 509270

Abstract

Background: Acute pharyngotonsillitis (APT) is one of the most common inflammatory processes of adults and children in an outpatient setting. Increasing failure rates, hypersensitivity to penicillin, the required multiple daily doses and common side effects lead to poor patients compliance and thus inadequate treatment duration, providing therefore ground for considering alternative antimicrobial agents.
Material/Methods: This multicenter, randomized, single blind study was undertaken in order to compare efficacy and safety of cefaclor (375 mg BID) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (625 mg BID) in 10 days treatment regiment of ambulatory patients with APT. A total of 200 patients (age range between 12-65 years) with symptoms of APT and positive antigen strep test were enrolled into the study. Clinical and bacteriological responses were assessed after the end of treatment (14th-18th day) and at the follow-up visit (38th-45th day). All GABHS strains, isolated from throat cultures, were tested for in vitro sensitivity to the antibiotics used in the study and no strain was found resistant to both antibiotics.
Results: The results indicated that both antibiotics had high - almost 99&percnt; effectiveness at the post therapy visit. On the follow up visit an increased tendency of relapses was observed in the amoxicillin/clavulanate treated group, compared to cefaclor treated group (8.33&percnt; vs 3.29&percnt;). Relative risk of relapse in patients treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate was 2.6 greater compared to cefaclor. There were significantly higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events in group treated with amoxicillin/clavulanate (29/97 patients; 29.89&percnt;) compared to cefaclor (16/95 patients; 16.84&percnt;) - p< 0.03. Frequency of other adverse events did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusions: Cefaclor and amoxicillin/clavulonate provide a clinically and bacteriologically effective treatment for patients with pharyngotonsillitis caused by GABHS, but cefaclor treatment is significantly safer in regard to gastrointestinal side effects.

Keywords: Cefaclor, amoxicillin/clavulanate acid, tonsillopharyngitis, adults, Safety, efficacy, Streptococcus pyogenes, GABHS

0 Comments

Editorial

01 January 2023 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Two Adjuvanted Malaria Vaccines and the World Health Organization (WHO) Strategy to Eradicate Malaria by 2030

Dinah V. Parums
Science Editor, Medical Science Monitor, International Scientific Information, Inc., Melville, NY, USA

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939357

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e939357

SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

26 January 2023 : Editorial  

Editorial: The XBB.1.5 (‘Kraken’) Subvariant of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and its Rapid Global Spread

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939580  

19 January 2023 : Clinical Research  

Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health in 729 Medical Students in Indonesia During ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938892  

27 December 2022 : Clinical Research  

Effect of Physiotherapy to Correct Rounded Shoulder Posture in 30 Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in ...

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938926

In Press

27 Jan 2023 : Database Analysis  

Association Between Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and All-Cause Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Chr...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938554  

27 Jan 2023 : Clinical Research  

Proposal for a Simple Equation for Limb Muscle Weight Calculation

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938606  

26 Jan 2023 : Editorial  

Editorial: The XBB.1.5 (‘Kraken’) Subvariant of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and its Rapid Global Spread

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939580  

20 Jan 2023 : Clinical Research  

A Study of 42 Partially Edentulous Patients with Single-Crown Restorations and Implants to Compare Bone Los...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939225  

Most Viewed Current Articles

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research  

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research  

Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379

08 Mar 2022 : Review article  

A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750