01 January 2008
Intraobserver and interobserver variability of measuring waist circumference
Judit NadasABCDEF, Zsuzsanna PutzABCDEF, Gabriella KolevB, Sandorne NagyB, Gyorgy JermendyABCDEFGMed Sci Monit 2008; 14(1): CR15-18 :: ID: 636056
Abstract
Background
The measurement of waist circumference for assessing abdominal obesity has become widely accepted.
Material and Method
To evaluate the reliability of measuring waist circumference, anthropometric parameters were measured in 150 adult patients by two diabetes educators on two consecutive days. The intraobserver difference was defined as the difference in the measurements made by the same educator on different days and the interobserver difference as the difference in the measurements made by the two educators on the same days.
Results
The correlation coefficients (r values) of the measurements were >0.99 for the educators and days. The interobserver difference was statistically significant for waist circumference (96.23 cm vs. 97.08 cm, p<0.0001). Although the %Delta values (percent difference in the two means) for waist circumference proved to be 2.5-6.3 times higher and the% absolute Delta values (percent average difference) 1.5-2.8 times higher than those for body mass index, the absolute values of the differences (Delta, the difference of the two means, and absolute delta, the average difference) were small (waist circumference Delta: 0.17 cm and 0.85 cm, absolute Delta: 1.51 cm and 2.15 cm; body mass index Delta: 0.02 kg/m(2) and 0.04 kg/m(2), absolute Delta: 0.292 kg/m(2) and 0.226 kg/m(2); intraobserver and interobserver differences, respectively).
Conclusions
The intraobserver and interobserver variability for waist circumference were higher than those for body mass index. Nevertheless, the differences in repeated measurements of waist circumference were small when expressed in absolute values. The reliability of waist circumference should be considered in the clinical practice.
Keywords: Waist-Hip Ratio, Obesity - diagnosis, Observer Variation, Body Mass Index, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Adiposity, Abdominal Fat - pathology
Editorial
01 November 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Digital Image Analysis, and the Future of Cancer Diagnosis and PrognosisDOI: 10.12659/MSM.947038
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e947038
In Press
Clinical Research
Clinical Outcomes of Talus Bone Marrow Edema: Comparing Plaster Cast, Crutches, and Walking Boot TreatmentsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946072
Review article
Comprehensive Insights into Arecoline Hydrobromide: Pharmacology, Toxicity, and PharmacokineticsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945582
Clinical Research
Iliac Periosteal Bone Autografting vs Talus Non-Weight-Bearing Surgery in Hepple V Talus Osteochondral Inju...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944912
Clinical Research
Impact of Different Orthodontic Appliances on Mandibular Condyle, Anterior Region of Mandibular, and Maxill...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946265
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,335,406
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 1,908,931
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 695,409
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
07 Jan 2022 : Meta-Analysis 260,542
Efficacy and Safety of Light Therapy as a Home Treatment for Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Dise...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935074
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935074