01 January 2008
Intraobserver and interobserver variability of measuring waist circumference
Judit NadasABCDEF, Zsuzsanna PutzABCDEF, Gabriella KolevB, Sandorne NagyB, Gyorgy JermendyABCDEFGMed Sci Monit 2008; 14(1): CR15-18 :: ID: 636056
Abstract
Background
The measurement of waist circumference for assessing abdominal obesity has become widely accepted.
Material and Method
To evaluate the reliability of measuring waist circumference, anthropometric parameters were measured in 150 adult patients by two diabetes educators on two consecutive days. The intraobserver difference was defined as the difference in the measurements made by the same educator on different days and the interobserver difference as the difference in the measurements made by the two educators on the same days.
Results
The correlation coefficients (r values) of the measurements were >0.99 for the educators and days. The interobserver difference was statistically significant for waist circumference (96.23 cm vs. 97.08 cm, p<0.0001). Although the %Delta values (percent difference in the two means) for waist circumference proved to be 2.5-6.3 times higher and the% absolute Delta values (percent average difference) 1.5-2.8 times higher than those for body mass index, the absolute values of the differences (Delta, the difference of the two means, and absolute delta, the average difference) were small (waist circumference Delta: 0.17 cm and 0.85 cm, absolute Delta: 1.51 cm and 2.15 cm; body mass index Delta: 0.02 kg/m(2) and 0.04 kg/m(2), absolute Delta: 0.292 kg/m(2) and 0.226 kg/m(2); intraobserver and interobserver differences, respectively).
Conclusions
The intraobserver and interobserver variability for waist circumference were higher than those for body mass index. Nevertheless, the differences in repeated measurements of waist circumference were small when expressed in absolute values. The reliability of waist circumference should be considered in the clinical practice.
Keywords: Waist-Hip Ratio, Obesity - diagnosis, Observer Variation, Body Mass Index, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Adiposity, Abdominal Fat - pathology
Editorial
15 August 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: The Metabolic (Dysfunction) Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD)-Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Debate: A Forced Consensus and The Risk of a World DivideDOI: 10.12659/MSM.938080
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938080
In Press
12 Aug 2022 : Clinical Research
Risk Factors and Pathogen Spectrum in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: A S...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937112
11 Aug 2022 : Meta-Analysis
Optimal Surgical Treatment Method for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Results from a Network Meta-AnalysisMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937118
10 Aug 2022 : Review article
Programmed Cell Death in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Review of Apoptosis, Autophagy, and NecroptosisMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937766
10 Aug 2022 : Database Analysis
Use and Effects of Augmentation of Labor with Oxytocin: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.937557
Most Viewed Current Articles
30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research
Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
08 Mar 2022 : Review article
A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292
01 Nov 2020 : Review article
Long-Term Respiratory and Neurological Sequelae of COVID-19DOI :10.12659/MSM.928996
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e928996