29 August 2008
Use and overuse of proton pump inhibitors in cirrhotic patients
Norberto C. Chavez-TapiaBCDEF, Felix I. Tellez-AvilaBCDEF, Jorge Garcia-LeivaEF, Miguel Angel ValdovinosACDEMed Sci Monit 2008; 14(9): CR468-472 :: ID: 867964
Abstract
Background
There are several indications for the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) but little evidence to support their use in patients with chronic liver disease. Moreover, the pattern of clinical use is unknown. The aim of the present study was to analyze the use of PPIs in patients with chronic liver disease in an ambulatory setting.
Material and Method
This was a retrospective study in a clinical setting. Clinical variables, severity indexes, and endoscopic findings were assessed. Management of PPIs was classified according to proven indication as: G1, proven indication and a prescription; G2, no proven indication and prescription; G3, proven indication and no prescription; and G4, no proven indication and no prescription. G1+G4 were considered proper use of PPIs. The classification was used to identify variables associated with proper use.
Results
The study included 243 patients (mean age: 55.82+/-12.9 years). The most common etiologies of chronic liver disease were hepatitis C virus infection and chronic alcoholic liver disease. PPIs were indicated in 46.1% patients. Multivariate analysis showed that a MELD score < or =8 points (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.3-5.3), esophageal varices (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.90), and previous in-hospital use of PPIs (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9) were associated with G1+G4.
Conclusions
Clinical use of PPIs in chronic liver disease was inappropriate in nearly one half of all patients. A less severe disease was associated with proper use and previous in-hospital use was associated with inappropriate use. Future research into the clinical use of PPIs in cirrhotic patients is mandatory.
Keywords: Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use, Liver Cirrhosis - physiopathology, Drug Utilization Review, Child, Blood Chemical Analysis, Analysis of Variance
Editorial
01 July 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: The WHO Identifies Ebola Disease Due to Bundibugyo Virus as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) as Vaccine Development AcceleratesDOI: 10.12659/MSM.954627
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e954627
In Press
Clinical Research
Comparative Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Care Model vs Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal C...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.953211
Clinical Research
Impact of Treatment Modality on Pain, Sexual Function, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Bartho...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952422
Clinical Research
Association Between Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis, Pre-Fracture Mobility, and Hip Fracture Patterns in O...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952678
Clinical Research
Association Between Total Cholesterol–to–High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Gestational Hypertension: A Cas...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952395
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 14,176,084
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,757,530
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,466,116
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 708,768
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






