Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

26 February 2010

Comparison of arterial pressure cardiac output monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution in septic patients

Simon F. BoettgerBCDEF, Dragan PavlovicCDE, Matthias GrundlingABC, Michael WendtADG, Orlando HungCDE, Dietrich HenzlerCDE, Hartmut Richard KernCDE, Christian LehmannABCDEFG

Med Sci Monit 2010; 16(3): PR1-7 :: ID: 878443

Abstract

Background
The measurement of cardiac output in critically ill patients is complicated by rapid pathophysiological changes. The aim of this study was to compare the recently developed Arterial Pressure Cardiac Output algorithm (APCO) with transpulmonary thermodilution (TDCO). Clinical and hemodynamic parameters were tested for their impact on the measurements.
Material and Method
Twenty septic patients were examined. Cardiac output measurements were performed simultaneously on 3 consecutive days. The data were evaluated using regression analysis and the Bland Altman approach.
Results
Bland Altman analysis presented a bias of 0.72 L/min and limits of agreement of 2.16 to 3.61 L/min for TDCO vs. APCO. Statistically significant covariables in the regression analysis were systemic vascular resistance (p<0.001), mean arterial pressure (p<0.001), cardiac function index (p=0.01), global end-diastolic index (p=0.02) and stroke volume index (p=0.005). Multiple linear regression analysis showed the residual percentage error decreased from 49.1% to 21.5%.
Conclusions
The APCO algorithm provides a broad range of hemodynamic measurements with a minimally invasive approach and simple access to the patient's hemodynamic state. However, an underestimation at high cardiac output and an overestimation at low cardiac output relative to transpulmonary thermodilution were observed in septic patients. Therefore, the APCO algorithm in its current state cannot be substituted for transpulmonary thermodilution.

Keywords: Monitoring, Physiologic - methods, Lung - physiopathology, Linear Models, Cardiac Output - physiology, Blood Pressure - physiology, Aged, 80 and over, Sepsis - physiopathology, Thermodilution - methods

Add Comment 0 Comments

Editorial

01 February 2025 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Approaches to Screening for Lung Cancer in Smokers and Non-Smokers

Dinah V. Parums

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.948255

Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e948255

0:00

In Press

Clinical Research  

Pre- and Post-Surgical MRI Analysis of Levator Ani in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Patients: A Single-Center Study

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945993  

Clinical Research  

Comparative Impact of Kinesio Taping and Post-Isometric Muscle Relaxation on Pain and Myofascial Mechanics ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945376  

Clinical Research  

Surgical Efficacy in Varicocele Ligation with Ephedrine-Assisted Blood Pressure Control

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946234  

Clinical Research  

Retrospective Study to Compare Injury Patterns and Associations in 170 Patients Following Electric Scooter ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947155  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   6,968,277

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   701,791

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

01 Mar 2024 : Editorial   25,442

Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204

0:00

28 Jan 2024 : Review article   20,020

A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and Future

DOI :10.12659/MSM.943912

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750