01 January 2019 : Clinical Research
A Quantitative Method to Measure Skin Thickness in Leg Edema in Pregnant Women Using B-Scan Portable Ultrasonography: A Comparison Between Obese and Non-Obese Women
Nami Yanagisawa1ABCDEF, Masafumi Koshiyama1ACDEF*, Yumi Watanabe1AEF, Shigeyasu Sato2ABE, Shin-ichi Sakamoto3ADEDOI: 10.12659/MSM.911799
Med Sci Monit 2019; 25:1-9
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to use a portable ultrasound method to quantitatively measure skin thickness and to compare leg edema in obese and non-obese pregnant women.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six pregnant women (17 primiparas and 19 multiparas) at 27/28 and 37/38 weeks of pregnancy, with and without leg edema, had their lower leg skin thickness measured using a B-scan portable ultrasonography device (72 legs and maximum of 98 measurements). Measurements were compared between women who were obese prior to pregnancy, with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² and non-obese with a BMI <25 kg/m².
RESULTS: Skin thickness of the legs in pregnant women with edema was significantly increased compared with that in pregnant women without edema (6.4±0.3 mm vs. 4.6±0.4 mm) (p=0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the degree of pitting edema and skin thickness in all edematous legs (r=0.56; n=98; p<0.0001). The cutoff level of edema measured by portable ultrasound in non-obese pregnant women was 4.7 mm (sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 66.7%) and was 7.5 mm in obese pregnant women. Obese pregnant women with edema had a significantly increased leg skin thickness compared with non-obese pregnant women with edema (11.3±1.3 mm vs. 5.7±0.2 mm) (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Portable ultrasonography is a reliable method of quantitatively measuring skin thickness of the lower leg in edema associated with pregnancy. The thickness of the skin in obese pregnant women with edema can be expected to be significantly increased compared with non-obese pregnant women with edema.
Keywords: Edema, Leg, subcutaneous fat, Ultrasonography, Body Mass Index, Obesity, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Skin
Editorial
01 February 2025 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Approaches to Screening for Lung Cancer in Smokers and Non-SmokersDOI: 10.12659/MSM.948255
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e948255
In Press
Clinical Research
Procedure Dynamics in Transfemoral vs Transradial Cerebral Angiography: A Retrospective StudyMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947603
Clinical Research
Predicting Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Burden Based on Thromboelastography in Patients with Acute Ischemi...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946303
Clinical Research
Long-Term Outcomes of Implanon in Managing Adenomyosis: A 3-Year Prospective StudyMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945972
Laboratory Research
Linear Dimensional Accuracy in Maxillomandibular Records: A Comparative Study of Scannable and Transparent ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947265
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,969,459
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 701,879
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Mar 2024 : Editorial 25,628
Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204
28 Jan 2024 : Review article 20,173
A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and FutureDOI :10.12659/MSM.943912
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912