29 January 2020 : Meta-Analysis
Fetal and Maternal Responses to Dexmedetomidine Intrathecal Application During Cesarean Section: A Meta-Analysis
ShuJun Sun1ADE, JiaMei Wang2BC, JingXu Wang1B, FuQuan Wang1C, HaiFa Xia1AB*, ShangLong Yao1ADOI: 10.12659/MSM.918523
Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e918523
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine (DEX) can improve the blockade of spinal anesthesia, but there is no clear conclusion on whether it has an effect on the fetus during cesarean section. Our meta-analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of intrathecal DEX in cesarean delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, and CBM for eligible studies, and used the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2.0) to assess the risk of bias of each study. RevMan was used for statistical analyses. We have registered this meta-analysis on PROSPERO (CRD42019120995).
RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 10 RCTs, but only 5 were prospectively registered. The results of preregistration studies, including the 1- or 5-min Apgar score (mean difference [MD], –0.03; 95% confidence intervals [CI], –0.16 to 0.10; P=0.64 or MD, 0.00; 95% CI, –0.09 to 0.09; P=1), the umbilical arterial oxygen or carbon dioxide partial pressure (MD, 0.90; 95% CI, –4.92 to 6.72; P=0.76 or MD, 1.20; 95% CI, –2.06 to 4.46; P=0.47), and the cord blood pH (MD, –0.01; 95% CI, –0.05 to 0.03; P=0.72), showed that intrathecal DEX had no significant difference in neonatal outcomes compared with placebo. In maternal outcomes, intrathecal DEX significantly prolonged postoperative pain-free period and reduced the incidence of postoperative shivering, which did not increase spinal anesthesia-associated adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Intrathecal DEX is safe for the fetus during cesarean section and can improve the blockade effects of spinal anesthesia on puerperae.
Keywords: Adjuvants, Anesthesia, Anesthesia, Spinal, Dexmedetomidine, Fetus, Randomized controlled trial, Apgar Score, Cesarean Section, Infant, Newborn, Postoperative Period, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Publication Bias, Risk, Shivering, visual analog scale
Editorial
01 December 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: The 2024 Revision of the Declaration of Helsinki and its Continued Role as a Code of Ethics to Guide Medical ResearchDOI: 10.12659/MSM.947428
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e947428
In Press
Clinical Research
Cost Reduction in Blood Transfusions After Implementation of Decision Protocol Based on Hemoglobin and Anem...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945854
Clinical Research
Impact of Comprehensive Preoperative Assessments on Gynecological Ambulatory Surgery Outcomes in a Chinese ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945771
Animal Research
Histological Evaluation of the Effects of Intra-Articular Injection of Caffeic Acid on Cartilage Repair in ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946845
Clinical Research
Impact of Clear Aligners vs Conventional Brackets on Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels: A Case-Control StudyMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946419
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,956,331
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 1,951,447
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 696,757
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
07 Jan 2022 : Meta-Analysis 262,783
Efficacy and Safety of Light Therapy as a Home Treatment for Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Dise...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935074
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935074