01 September 2011: Public Health
Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus in Tehran
Marzieh Aligholi ABG , Akbar Mirsalehian AD , Shahnaz Halimi BEF , Hossein Imaneini DE , Morovat Taherikalani CEG , Fereshteh Jabalameli ABG , Parisa Asadollahi EF , Babak Mohajer B , Alireza Abdollahi B , Mohammad Emaneini ACDEFG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.881920
Med Sci Monit 2011; 17(9): PH71-74
Background
Despite the high incidence of fluoroquinolones resistance among staphylococci, especially among MRSA, there is currently little information available on the incidence and the types of these resistances in many countries. This lack of information is of particular concern in the Persian Gulf region, where the prevalence of MRSA is high [9,11]. The aim of the present study was to provide information regarding the prevalence of fluoroquinolones resistance among
Material and Methods
BACTERIAL STRAINS:
A total of 165 S. aureus clinical isolates were cultured from patients attending 2 teaching hospitals of Tehran University of Medical Sciences between April 2009 and September 2010 (155 isolates from Imam Khomeini hospital and 10 isolates from Amir Alam hospital). They were cultured from wounds, blood, CSF, body fluid, and urine. Only 1 isolate per patient was included. Isolates were identified to species level using standard biochemical methods including Gram stain, catalase test, tube coagulase, DNase, and fermentation of mannitol [12,13].
ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY TEST:
Antibiotic-containing disks (Mast, UK) were used to determine the susceptibility of S. aureus isolates to several antibiotics according to the criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [14]. The antibiotics tested were ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, and oxacillin. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and oxacillin were determined using the microbroth dilution method as recommended by the CLSI guidelines. S. aureus (ATCC 29213) was used as control.
:
Chromosomal DNA was extracted from the clinical S. aureus isolate as previously described [2]. The mecA, grlA, and gyrA genes were amplified by PCR-based methods, using specific primers [10,15,16]. PCR reactions were performed in a 50 μL volume consisting of 1X PCR buffer, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.4 μg/mL of each primer, 1.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 0.2 mM dNTP Mix and 5 μL of DNA template. The PCR conditions consisted of a pre-denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of at 94°C for 40 sec, 51°C for 40 sec and 72°C for 45 sec. A final extension step was performed at 72°C for 5 min. To determine the QRDRs sequences, the PCR products of grlA and gyrA genes were sequenced with both forward and reverse strands at Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). Sequences were compared with wild-type sequences of grlA and gyrA genes with no mutations [17].
PULSED FIELD GEL ELECTROPHORESIS (PFGE):
All fluoroquinolone-resistant S. aureus isolates were analyzed by PFGE. The entire genomic DNA was prepared as described previously [15]. After digestion with Sma I endonuclease, DNAs were separated by PFGE (APZoha, Tehran, Iran) for 24 h at 15°C, with an electric field of 6 V/cm3 in 0.5× TBE buffer. The pulse time increased from 1 to 30 sec for 11 h and 1 to 3 sec for 13 h. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (1 μg/ml) and visualized by UV illumination. DNA from S. aureus NCTC8325 was prepared in the same way and run as molecular size standard.
Results
Out of the 165
The results of mutations in the QRDRs of the
Among the 69 fluoroquinolone-resistant
Discussion
The spread of antimicrobial resistance among
The high prevalence rate of MRSA (52.7%) in the present study is alarming and indicates an increase in the prevalence of MRSA isolates in Tehran. The previous prevalence rate reported in Tehran teaching hospitals in 2008 was 36% [15]. This finding highlights the importance of modified empiric therapy and infection control policies among hospitals in Iran.
The results of this study show a fluoroquinolone resistance rate of 41.8% among
Our results are consistent with those of others who found that the same mutations in the QRDRs were detected in different PFGE types, and different combinations of mutations were also found in the isolates of the same PFGE type [10,16,25].
Conclusions
In conclusion, our findings show that fluoroquinolone-resistant
References
1. Brumfitt W, Hamilton-Miller JM: Drugs Exp Clin Res, 1990; 16; 205-14, pmid: 2078988
2. Emaneini M, Taherikalani M, Eslampour MA, Phenotypic and genotypic evaluation of aminoglycoside resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococci in Tehran, Iran: Microb Drug Resist, 2009; 15; 129-32, pmid: 19432516
3. Nicholas BD, Bhargave G, Hatipoglu A: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(8); CR365-68, pmid: 20671612
4. Chambers HF, Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications: Clin Microbiol Rev, 1997; 10; 781-91, pmid: 9336672
5. Hooper DC, Fluoroquinolone resistance among Gram-positive cocci: Lancet Infect Dis, 2002; 2; 530-38, pmid: 12206969
6. Schmitz FJ, Higgins PG, Mayer S, Activity of quinolones against gram-positive cocci: mechanisms of drug action and bacterial resistance: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2002; 21; 647-59, pmid: 12373497
7. Horii T, Suzuki Y, Takeshita A, Maekawa M: Chemotherapy, 2007; 53; 104-9, pmid: 17202817
8. Tanaka M, Wang T, Onodera Y, Mechanism of quinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: J Infect Chemother, 2000; 6; 131-39, pmid: 11810552
9. Tanaka M, Onodera Y, Uchida Y, Sato K: Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1998; 42; 3044-46, pmid: 9797253
10. Iihara H, Suzuki T, Kawamura Y: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2006; 56; 297-303, pmid: 16769192
11. Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G: Microb Drug Resist, 2008; 14; 217-20, pmid: 18694326
12. Mahon CR, Lehman DC, Manuselis G: Text book of diagnostic microbiology, 2007, Philadelphia, PA, USA
13. Reisner SB, Woods GL, Thomson RP, Specimen collection: Manual of clinical microbiology, 1999; 64-76, Washington, DC, American Society for Microbiology
14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-First Informational Supplement, 2011; 31; M100-S21
15. Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Aligholi M: Jpn J Infect Dis, 2009; 62; 309-11, pmid: 19628913
16. Horii T, Suzuki Y, Monji A, Detection of mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions in levofloxacin- and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: effects of the mutations on fluoroquinolone MICs: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2003; 46; 139-45, pmid: 12812718
17. Schmitz FJ, Jones ME, Hofmann B: Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1998; 42; 1249-52, pmid: 9593159
18. Emaneini M, Aligholi M, Hashemi FB: J Hosp Infect, 2007; 66; 92-93, pmid: 17428579
19. Blumberg HM, Rimland D, Carroll DJ: J Infect Dis, 1991; 163; 1279-85, pmid: 2037793
20. Marangon FB, Miller D, Muallem MS: Am J Ophthalmol, 2004; 137; 453-58, pmid: 15013867
21. Coskun-Ari FF, Bosgelmez-Tinaz G: Eur J Med Res, 2008; 13; 366-70, pmid: 18952518
22. Takahata M, Yonezawa M, Kurose S: J Antimicrob Chemother, 1996; 38; 543-46, pmid: 8889728
23. Yoon EJ, Lee CY, Shim MJ: Chemotherapy, 2010; 56; 153-57, pmid: 20407243
24. Wang T, Tanaka M, Sato K: Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1998; 42; 236-40, pmid: 9527766
25. Noguchi N, Okihara T, Namiki Y: Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2005; 25; 374-79, pmid: 15848290
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






