Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 April 2012: Special Report  

Prevention of communication disorders – screening pre-school and school-age children for problems with hearing, vision and speech: European Consensus Statement

Henryk Skarżyński AEG , Anna Piotrowska AEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.882603

Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(4): SR17-21

0 Comments

Background

Communication is a complex human skill that combines physical and mental elements. Language and communication are crucial to all children and young people [1]. Modern society requires a high level of communication skills; speech, language, vision, and literacy are the foundation skills that are needed to meet these demands [2]. Dysfunction in one or more of these areas, for example, caused by various medical conditions, may lead to communication disorders. Communication disorders can involve impairment in hearing, vision and/or speech, which influences the ability to receive, comprehend, produce, and express verbal, nonverbal, and graphic information.

When untreated, communication disorders in childhood can result in further negative consequences, such as developmental delay in communication abilities and the normal acquisition of language. In turn, this can lead to limited educational achievement, reduced employment opportunities, and problems with social adaptation. Hence, early identification and intervention are essential [1] so that effective treatments can be undertaken before significant limitations develop. Effective and directed early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, as well as promotion, prevention, and education, can create better opportunities for children with communication disorders. Children who face difficulties in acquiring the ability to communicate require appropriate support to allow them to interact socially, to participate fully in education, and to lead safe, healthy lives [1]. High levels of communicative competence are essential for progress at school and work.

Hearing Disorders

The prevalence of hearing loss increases with age and may involve conductive hearing loss, acquired and delayed onset sensorineural hearing loss and/or auditory processing disorders that cannot be identified by neonatal hearing screening (NHS) [3,4]. Children with conductive hearing impairment can have either congenital or acquired middle ear pathology. Some forms of middle ear pathology, such as subtle middle ear abnormality with no apparent hearing loss and otitis media with effusion, are usually insidious and difficult for parents or care givers to detect. Sensorineural loss can result from inner ear defects or auditory nerve damage. Known causes of acquired sensorineural hearing loss include viral and bacterial infections, ototoxicity, and head trauma. Noise-related hearing impairment can also pose a serious health problem to children [5]. Auditory processing disorders seen in children can result from neuromorphological disorders, maturational delay of the central auditory nervous system, and neurological disorders [6].

It is estimated that 9–10 per 1000 children will have identifiable permanent hearing loss in one or both ears by school age [7]. Moreover, there is evidence that children with unrecognized and unmanaged unilateral hearing loss or minimal bilateral hearing loss have significant speech-language delays, negative educational consequences, and behavioural problems [8–12]. Thus far, screening programmes for hearing at schools have been offered mostly as local initiatives in the USA [13,14], Australia [15], China [16], and some European countries [17–19].

Vision Disorders

According to the World Health Organization, approximately 153 million people worldwide are visually impaired as a result of uncorrected refractive errors. This population includes children [20,21]. There is no doubt that problems with visual ability have considerable impact on a child’s learning potential, and that severe uncorrected refractive errors affect general development, resulting in lower educational achievement and impairing learning ability [22]. Normal visual acuity is of particular importance, especially at the beginning of school education. Given the number of visual activities that are performed at close range at school and at home, the assessment of near and distance vision is critical. Refractive errors – hyperopia and myopia – are age-dependent. Hyperopia is typical of infants, and decreases gradually towards emmetropia [23]. Early development of emmetropia is a risk factor for the occurrence of myopia. Significant uncorrected refractive errors in childhood can result in amblyopia, developmental delays, and problems with spatial orientation [24]. Significant hyperopia in toddlers and schoolchildren may lead to educational difficulties and problems with mobility [22,25,26]. In cases of severe hyperopia, the constant accommodation effort that is required to overcome uncorrected hyperopia in near vision activities can result in strabismus at any age [27], together with headache and eye discomfort [28].

Information is not available in the literature on the screening programmes for vision that are offered in schools in Europe. Data from the USA indicate the need for interventions to correct decreased visual acuity in students in the first grade [29].

Speech/Language Disorders

Speech and language development should be consistent with a child’s overall development and is related to success at school [30,31]. Speech and language difficulties and abnormalities cover a wide range of childhood conditions. Speech disorders refer to difficulties in the expression of speech sounds or problems with voice quality. Language disorders are impaired ability to understand and/or to use words in context, both verbally and nonverbally. Speech and language problems can result from global developmental conditions, or they can occur in a normal developmental course and have no obvious cause [32]. Although speech and language disorders are differentiated, they are highly comorbid [33], and children with speech disorders often have complex health and developmental needs [34]. The prevalence of childhood speech disorders varies, depending on the methodology used to measure it [35]. Shriberg et al. [36] reported that approximately 15% of children with persistent speech disorders also have a language disorder, and approximately 5% of children with specific language impairment experience difficulties with speech. Early identification and intervention in children with speech/language disorders assist with educational planning and are often associated with better long-term outcomes [37,38]. However, it is not clear how consistently clinicians screen for speech and language disorders in primary care practice [39], and there is no uniformly accepted screening technique [40].

Paediatric Health Programmes

Paediatric health programmes are intended to provide equal opportunities for children to develop [41]. The major purpose of a paediatric health programme is to provide primary care for sick children, as well as preventive care, by maintaining, improving, and promoting the health of the child [42,43]. One of the fundamental health services in paediatric care is the appraisal of health by routine evaluation at specified intervals, at specific stages of growth and development, such as before beginning school [44]. Screening for problems with hearing, vision and speech/language functions, and associated conditions, throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence, should be recommended as a part of preventive paediatric health care [45]. The objective of screening programmes for hearing, vision, and speech impairment is to identify communication disorders, which in many cases are not obvious or apparent, but may hinder a child’s ability to communicate and which can be treated more effectively when detected at an early stage. This is particularly crucial for children, whose good health is fundamental for their proper development and influences their quality of life and social and economic situation in the future. In a child, a breakdown in communication may cause the development of abnormal social growth and behaviour, interfere with education and human potential, and lead to the development of adjustment problems in children and their families. Hence, the impaired child’s requirements for adequate health care, whether physical, developmental, emotional or social, should be identified as promptly as possible. Such needs should be brought to the attention of the parents and other care givers [46].

Communication disorders in children should be identified by screening as early as possible. Entry into school is the last opportunity to detect the problem in order to avoid or reduce its negative impact on language and the cognitive development of children. This is endorsed by the fact that hearing, vision, and speech disorders are significant reasons for delay in learning and for difficulties in the acquisition of language skills, which are crucial for children if they are to communicate effectively. Given that a child develops particular skills and abilities gradually through their entire childhood in physiological steps and in a defined order, this process should be controlled and checked periodically. Hence, hearing, vision, and speech/language should be screened at critical stages of development [47]. Furthermore, a health-promoting elementary school environment was recognized as one of four targets for preventive environment, as an outcome of the European Community Health Indicators (ECHI) Project supported by the European Commission [48].

Screening Programmes for Communication Disorders

As with any mass-screening programme, there are many challenges that can affect the success of a programme of screening for communication disorders. These challenges may be related to the physical characteristics of the screening facility, the methodological factors used (procedures, tools, methods), the agency that requests the services (staff cooperation, state regulations), and administrative constraints (availability of personnel, budgetary factors). Success will be strongly influenced by the logistics and quality of the testing system, as well as the competence of the personnel who perform the screening procedures. Another critical issue is the follow-up system for those who are positive on screening. It is very important to organize the programme in a way that does not result in large numbers of repeat screens and referrals, owing to the costs involved in conducting large-scale screening projects. An appropriate tracking system must be implemented to secure an adequate follow-up rate.

Public Health Services in Europe

Health is central to people’s lives and needs to be supported by effective policies and actions at the European Community and global levels [49]. Public health services have a vital role to play in meeting the health challenges that Europe faces. The governance of public health in Europe is complex and multifaceted. The organization and delivery of public health services involves many distinct institutions and professions within the health sector. There are also differences in general health within and between EU Member States, which are related to various factors, including differences in education, socioeconomic situation, living and working conditions, health-related behaviour, and health care. Furthermore, there have been significant changes in health care systems during recent years, in part as a result of the rapid development of new technologies such as information and communication technologies (ITC) and the E-health strategy [49]. This dynamic situation requires the continued interest and commitment of EU Member States, as well as the maintenance of an expert facility linked to the Commission that can coordinate and guide the process. For these reasons, the European Commission’s Health Monitoring Programme [50] was established to:

According to a set of specific guidelines formulated by the Child Health Indicators of Life and Development (CHILD) project and the (ECHI) project [48,51], which were developed under the Health Monitoring Programme, cooperation among European countries is essential in order to apply new methods of assessment of child health in screening programmes for pre-school and school-age children and to ensure the appropriate adjustment of public health services.

Conclusions

In the context of the above statements, the representatives of the European societies of audiologists and phoniatricians, ENT (ear-nose-throat) physicians, ophthalmologists, psychologists, and speech therapists endorsed the European Consensus Statement and presented the following opinions. The European Consensus Statement on Hearing, Vision and Speech Screening in Pre-School and School-Age Children determined that:

References

1. , The Bercow Report: A review of services for children and young people (0–19) with speech, language and communication needs, 2008 DCSF-00632-2008

2. Ruben RJ: Laryngoscope, 2000; 11; 241-45, pmid: 10680923

3. White KR, Munoz K, Screening: Seminars in Hear, 2008; 29(2); 149-58

4. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs: Pediatrics, 2007; 120(4); 898-21, pmid: 17908777

5. Niskar AS, Kieszak SM, Holmes AE, Estimated Prevalence of Noise-Induced Hearing Threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994, United States: Pediatrics, 2001; 108(1); 40-43, pmid: 11433052

6. Chermak GD, Musiek FE, Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New perspectives, 1997, San Diego, California, Singular Publishing Group

7. White KR, Twenty years of early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI): Where we’ve been and what we’ve learned, 2010

8. Cho Lieu J, Speech-language and educational consequences of unilateral hearing loss in children: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004; 130; 524-30, pmid: 15148171

9. Tharpe AM, Unilateral and mild bilateral hearing loss in childred: past and current perspectives: Trends Amplif, 2008; 12(1); 7-15, pmid: 18270174

10. Bess FH, The minimally hearing impaired child: Ear Hear, 1985; 6; 43-47, pmid: 4038669

11. Bess FH, The unilaterally hearing impaired child. A final comment: Ear Hear, 1986; 7; 52-54, pmid: 3949101

12. Bess FH, Dood-Murphy J, Parker RA, Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status: Ear Hear, 1998; 19(5); 339-54, pmid: 9796643

13. Krueger W, Ferguson L, A comparison of screening methods in school-aged children: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2002; 127(6); 516-19, pmid: 12501102

14. Sabo MP, Winston R, Macias JD, A comparison of pure tone and transient otoacoustic emissions screening in a grade school population: Am J Otol, 2000; 21; 88-91, pmid: 10651440

15. Rosen J, Johnson C, Wilkinson H, School-entry hearing screening: an audit of referrals in a three year period: Australian New Zeland J Audiol, 2004; 26(2); 142-47

16. Siqing F, Chen G, Dong J, Zhang L, Prevalence and etiology of hearing loss in primary and middle school students in the Hubei Province of China: Audiol Neurotol, 2010; 15; 394-99

17. Skarzynski PH, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H, Hearing Screening Program in School-Age Children in Western Poland: Int Adv, 2011; 7(2); 194-200

18. Skarzynski H, Kochanek K, Senderski A, Organization of the Hearing Screening Examinations in Polish Schools in Rural Areas and Small Towns: Cochlear Implants Int, 2010; 11(1); 143-47, pmid: 21756600

19. Bristow K, Fortnum H, Fonseca S, Bamford J, United Kingdom school-entry hearing screening: current practice: Arch Dis Child, 2008; 93; 232-35, pmid: 18039746

20. Dandona L, Dandona R, What is the global burden of visual impairment?: BMC Med, 2006; 4; 6, pmid: 16539747

21. Resnikoff S, Pasconlini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP, Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004: Bull World Health Organ, 2008; 86(1); 63-70, pmid: 18235892

22. Williams WR, Latif AHA, Hannington L, Watkins DR, Hyperopia and educational attainment in a primary school cohort: Arch Dis Child, 2005; 90; 150-53, pmid: 15665167

23. Gordon RA, Donzis PB, Refractive development of the human eye: Arch Ophthalmol, 1985; 103; 785-89, pmid: 4004614

24. Adams AJ, Infants, toddlers, children and hyperopia: is it all clear?: Optom Vis Sci, 2007; 84(2); 79

25. Roch-Levecq AC, Brody BL, Thomas RG, Brown SI, Ametropia, preschoolers’ cognitive abilities and effects of spectacle correction: Arch Ophthalmol, 2008; 126(2); 252-58, pmid: 18268218

26. Atkinson J, Anker S, Bobier W, Normal emmetropization in infants with spectacle correction for hyperopia: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2000; 41(12); 3726-31, pmid: 11053269

27. Hendricks TJ, Brabander J, Van Der Horst FG, Relationship between habitual refractive errors and headache complaints in school children: Optom Vis Sci, 2007; 84(2); 137-43, pmid: 17299344

28. Robaei JM, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P, Prevalence of eye disorders in young children with eyestrain complaints: Am J Ophthalmol, 2006; 142; 495-97, pmid: 16935600

29. Kodjebacheva G, Brown ER, Estrada L, Uncorrected refractive error among first-grade students of different racial/ethnic groups in Southern California: results a year after school-mandated vision screening: Jour Pub Health Managment Practice, 2011; 17(6); 499-505

30. Catts HW, Fey ME, Tomblin JB, Zhang X, A longitudinal investigation of reading outcomes in children with language impairments: J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2002; 45; 1142-57, pmid: 12546484

31. Scarborough HS, Dobrich W, Development of children with early language delay: J Speech Hear Res, 1990; 33; 70-83, pmid: 2314086

32. Bishop DV, Is specific language impairment a valid diagnostic category? Genetic and psycholinguistic evidence: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Bio Sci, 1994; 346; 105-11, pmid: 7886145

33. Newbury DF, Monaco AP, Genetic advences in the study of speech and language disorders: Neuron, 2010; 68(2); 309-20, pmid: 20955937

34. Keating D, Turrell G, Ozanne A, Childhood speech disorders: reported prevalence, comorbidity and socioeconomic profile: J Paediatr Child Health, 2001; 37; 431-36, pmid: 11885704

35. Blum-Harasty JA, Rosenthal JBM, The prevalence of Communications disorders in children: a summary and critical review: Aust J Human Comm Disorders, 1992; 20; 63-80

36. Shriberg LD, Tomblin JB, McSweeny JL, Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment: J Speech Lang Hear Res, 1999; 42; 1461-81, pmid: 10599627

37. Sharp HM, Hillenbrand K, Speech and language development and disorders in children: Pediatric Clinics of North America, 2008; 55(5); 1159-73, pmid: 18929058

38. Rigby MJ, Chesham I, A trial speech screening test for school entrants: British Med J, 1981; 282; 449-51

39. Law J, Boyle J, Harris F, Screening for primary speech and language delay: a systematic review of the literature: Health Technol Assess, 1998; 2; 1-200, pmid: 9728296

40. Nelson HD, Nygren P, Walker M, Panoscha R, Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force: Pediatrics, 2006; 117; 298-319

41. United Nations: Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989, New York, United Nations

42. Van Esso D, del Torso S, Hadjipanayis A, Paediatric primary care in Europe: variation between countries: Arch Dis Child, 2010; 95; 791-95, pmid: 20403821

43. , The World Health Report 2008: Primary health care – now more than ever, 2008, World Health Organization

44. Rigby MJ, Köhler LI, Blair ME, Metchler R, Child Health Indicators for Europe. A priority for a caring society: Eur J Public Health, 2003; 13(3 Suppl); 38-46, pmid: 14533747

45. Bamford J, Davis A, Boyle J, Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening: Qual Health Care, 1998; 7(4); 240-47, pmid: 10339028

46. Committee on School Health, School Health Policies: Pediatrics, 1959; 24; 672, pmid: 13858122

47. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care: Pediatrics, 2000; 105; 645-46

48. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM): Design for a Set of European Community Health Indicators: final report of the ECHI Project, 2001, Bilthoven, Netherlands, RIVM

49. , White Paper: Together for Health: A strategic Approach for the EU 2008–2013, 2007, Commission of the European Communities

50. : The European Commission’s Health Monitoring Programme, 1997 Decision No 1400/97/EC

51. Rigby MJ, Köhler LI: Child Health Indicators of Life and Development (CHILD): report to the European Commission, 2002, European Commission

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750