Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

25 February 2015: Clinical Research  

Management of Toxoplasmic Retinochoroiditis during Pregnancy, Postpartum Period and Lactation: Clinical Observations

Joanna Brydak-Godowska ABCDEF , Joanna Moneta-Wielgoś CEF , Dariusz Kęcik DG , Piotr Karol Borkowski ABCDEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.892219

Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:598-603

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During pregnancy and labor, the immune response is physiologically impaired and women are more susceptible to infections. Since many drugs may have potentially adverse effects on the fetus and newborn, less aggressive treatment regimens should be considered in pregnant and lactating patients. The aim of our study was to present the management of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis during pregnancy, postpartum period, and lactation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of the clinical records of 24 women during pregnancy, postpartum period, and lactation who were referred in the years 1994–2014 to the Department of Zoonoses and Tropical Diseases or the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw for toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. The diagnosis was based on the typical ophthalmoscopic picture, confirmed by serological testing using an ELISA method.

RESULTS: A total of 28 attacks of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were observed in 24 patients during pregnancy, postpartum period, and lactation. The choice of treatment was guided by the character and location of the inflammatory lesion and the gestational age. Topical (steroidal/nonsteroidal eye drops) and systemic treatments with spiramycin or azithromycin, Fansidar (pyrimethamine 25 mg/sulfadoxine 500 mg), and prednisone were used.

CONCLUSIONS: Management of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis during pregnancy, postpartum period, or lactation must be individualized and guided by the gestational age and location of the active lesion. Women of childbearing age with toxoplasma ocular lesions should be informed by their doctors about possible active recurrences during pregnancy and followed carefully by an ophthalmologist when pregnant.

Keywords: Adolescent, Choroiditis - drug therapy, Lactation, Postpartum Period, Pregnancy, Recurrence, Retinal Diseases - drug therapy, Toxoplasmosis, Ocular - drug therapy, young adult

Background

Toxoplasmosis is the most common parasitic infection in humans and probably the most common zoonosis in Poland [1,2]. It is estimated that approximately 30% to 50% of the Polish population are infected with T. gondii, although over 80% of these are asymptomatic [3,4].

Inflammation in the posterior eye segment occurs much later than the primary infection and is caused by a local reactivation resulting from rupture of tissue cysts that release dormant bradyzoites. This is due to weakened host immunity with the resulting inability to clear tachyzoites effectively, and is not due to an increased activity of the parasite [3,5,6].

Świtaj et al., using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, demonstrated genetic material of T. gondii in peripheral blood samples from nearly all patients with reactivation of ocular toxoplasmosis [7]. Similar findings were reported by Silveira et al. [8] and Park et al. [9]. There is a potential risk to the fetus as there have been reports of mother-to-child transmission during reactivation of maternal ocular toxoplasmosis in pregnancy [10,11].

During pregnancy and postpartum period, the immune response is physiologically impaired and women are more susceptible to infections. Theoretically, this may predispose patients to reactivation of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis [12–16]. Focal retinochoroiditis usually occurs many years after primary infection. Retinochoroiditis developing at the time of primary infection is very rare [17,18].

The aim of this study was to present the management of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis during pregnancy, postpartum period, or lactation.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study was undertaken of the clinical records of 24 women, aged 15 to 39 years, during pregnancy, postpartum period, or lactation, who were treated at the Department of Zoonoses and Tropical Diseases and the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw in the years 1994–2014. The diagnosis was based on the typical ophthalmoscopic picture, confirmed by serological testing for anti-T. gondii IgG and IgM, based on the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. The choice of treatment was guided by the character and location of focal inflammation and the gestational age. Inflammation was considered to have been successfully treated when a scar was formed and the effusion resolved.

The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee at the Medical University of Warsaw.

Results

PREGNANT PATIENTS:

All pregnant patients, except 1 who first presented when the active lesion had already settled, received topical treatment. Of those patients, 11 patients received spiramycin at doses of 3 million IU TID usually for 10 days and in 9 patients the inflammation was successfully treated. The 2 patients who did not respond to spiramycin were additionally prescribed Fansidar (pyrimethamine 25 mg/sulfadoxine 500 mg) 2 tablets/day for 2 days as a loading dose followed by 1 tablet/day for 19 days. Fansidar was also used in another patient who was at a risk of permanent damage of the macula. All women treated with Fansidar were >12 weeks of pregnancy and were supplemented with 15 mg of folinic acid per a day.

Patient WJI (No. 10) was treated with spiramycin, Fansidar, azithromycin, and prednisone without folinic acid supplementation, because at the time of treatment she was not aware that she was pregnant. In 2 pregnant patients, topical treatment (steroidal/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops) only was used because the patients were referred at the time when the peripherally situated active lesion was already settling. Prednisone was used depending on the effusion level in the vitreous body at a starting dose of 40 mg, which was then gradually tapered.

NON-PREGNANT PATIENTS:

Two episodes of retinochoroiditis reactivation were observed in the postpartum period and 11 episodes occurred during lactation. In all cases topical treatment (steroidal/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops) was given and in 12 cases the patients were treated with a multidrug regimen including Fansidar, spiramycin (at a doses of 3 million IU TID for 10 days), and azithromycin (at a dose of 0.5g/day for 6 days). Prednisone was used depending on the effusion level in the vitreous body at a starting dose of 40 mg, which was then gradually tapered.

Fansidar was used after suppressing lactation. The patients took 1 tablet BID for 2 days, followed by 1 tablet QD for 19 days and 1 tablet twice a week for 6 months. The aim was to achieve permanent remission of recurrent retinochoroiditis. Platelet depletion as an adverse effect of anti-folinic drugs (Fansidar) was not observed.

The offspring of both pregnant and non-pregnant patients were not included in the present study.

Discussion

In pregnancy, the immune responses are physiologically impaired to prevent the rejection of the fetus and this weakening of the immune system may continue in the postpartum period and during lactation. Reactivation of inflammation associated with infectious disease is not infrequent and higher rates of ocular toxoplasmosis recurrence may be expected [5,12]. Our literature search yielded only a few reports of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis in pregnant patients [12–14,18–20].

It is generally acknowledged that primary T. gondii infection in pregnancy carries a risk of transplacental infection with potentially serious neurological and ocular complications in the newborn. The risk increases with the gestational age, with the highest rate in the third trimester and the lowest rate in the first trimester, the average transmission rate being 30% [14,17,18]. A review of the literature covering the last 30 years revealed no evidence of a reduction in transplacental transmission rates of T. gondii resulting from the treatment of active toxoplasmosis in pregnancy, although decreased severity of congenital toxoplasmosis symptoms has been observed [21,22]. Thus, treatment does not have any effect on the potential disease in the offspring, but it may be effective in the mother. However, potential adverse effects in the fetus are a considerable concern [21]. Generally, spiramycin is a first-choice drug in toxoplasmosis in pregnancy and it can prevent transplacental transmission of T. gondii.

Importantly, toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis is a self-limiting condition and may resolve without treatment within 6 to 8 weeks [23,24]. In his report, Holland found spontaneous resolution of active inflammation with a resulting scar in patients with peripheral, not sight-threatening, locations of the active lesion [17]. According to Rothova et al., in cases of peripheral lesions or when there are contraindications for treatment (e.g., pregnancy), ocular toxoplasmosis does not require treatment [24].

In the reported series of female patients we did not find any massive inflammation in the vitreous and retina or related complications as described by Kump et al. [12]. The course of retinochoroiditis did not differ from that in non-pregnant women or in men.

The question of whether to treat ocular toxoplasmosis has been disputed for many years because the therapy is expensive and may be associated with adverse events, and when the lesions are peripheral and not sight-threatening it may offer no benefits to the patients.

Transplacental transmission of T. gondii is potentially possible in mothers with focal retinitis that occurred after remote primary infection. Treatment that is safe for the fetus should be instituted in each case to decrease the likelihood of maternofetal transmission [7–11,18].

In pregnancy the management of toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis should be individualized. It is necessary to consider a possible threat to sight in the mother, protection of the fetus against potential risk of transplacental transmission, and potential adverse effects of the treatment to the fetus, which is very susceptible to the effects of medication during organogenesis and then less so in the second and third trimesters.

Nowadays, specific treatments for T. gondii infection include products belonging to the classes of macrolide antibiotics, sulfonamides, and pyrimethamine [1,25–27].

Spiramycin was prescribed in pregnant women treated at our institutions as a first-choice drug because it is effective against T. gondii, and although it crosses the placental barrier in small amounts, it is not teratogenic. Spiramycin was given until focal retinochoroiditis resolved.

Treatment with the anti-folinic product (pyrimethamine 25 mg/sulfadoxine 500 mg), which is considered to be the most effective, was prescribed to pregnant women in the case of vision-threatening lesions or when there was no response to spiramycin, and only in late pregnancy. During lactation, the patients were advised to discontinue breast-feeding and then they were treated with anti-folinic products.

Fansidar, a very potent drug, is a combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine, which suppress the synthesis of folic acid in protozoa, thus blocking cell division. Fansidar crosses the placental barrier and in animal studies (rat) it was embryotoxic, but no teratogenic effects have been reported in humans [28–30]. However, it produces folic acid deficiency in patients, with subsequent bone marrow suppression. Pregnant women treated with Fansidar were advised to take folinic acid, which is converted in the body to active folate, to prevent folate deficiency [1,27].

When there is no response to spiramycin, it is usually substituted with azithromycin, which has a much greater capacity to cross biological barriers, with effective intraocular penetration when the inflammation is settling. Azithromycin crosses the placental barrier easily, which is why its use is avoided it during pregnancy.

WJI (No. 10) was not aware of her pregnancy when treatment was initiated with Fansidar and spiramycin (swiched after 10 days for azitromycin for 6 days), followed by Fansidar alone, which she discontinued at 17 Hbd. She did not recive any folinic acid supplementation. However, she gave birth to a baby who had no signs of folate deficiency and whose further growth and development were normal.

Although the patients’ offspring were not included in this study, obstetricians and perinatologists were informed about maternal toxoplasma reactivation and the potential risk for placental transmission. To the best of our knowledge, none of newborns had any clinical signs of congenital toxoplasmosis, which was additionally confirmed by serologic testing.

Conclusions

The importance of secondary prophylaxis should be borne in mind, and Fansidar (pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine) may be administered at low doses for 6 months after recurrent toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis has resolved. Ocular toxoplasmosis may be in remission for many months or even years and then become reactivated, which must be always considered, especially in women of childbearing age [31].

References

1. Flegr J, Prandota J, Sovičková M, Israili ZH, Toxoplasmosis – a global threat. Correlation of latent toxoplasmosis with specific disease burden in a set of 88 countries: PLoS One, 2014; 9(3); e90203, pmid: 24662942

2. Sroka J, Wojcik-Fatla A, Szymanska J: Ann Agric Environ Med, 2010; 17(1); 125-32, pmid: 20684490

3. Foster CS, Vitale AT, Diagnosis and Treatment of Uveitis: Toxoplasmosis, 2013; Chapter 35, Jaypee-Highlights Medical Publishers, INC

4. Paul M, Petersen E, Szczapa J: J Clin Microbiol, 2001; 39(5); 1912-16, pmid: 11326012

5. Dubey JP, Jones JL: Int J Parasitol, 2008; 38(11); 1257-78, pmid: 18508057

6. Mc Hugh TD, Bathgate T, Mangan J, Recognition of tissue cyst-specific antigens in reactivating toxoplasmosis: J Med Microbiol, 1997; 46(7); 587-95, pmid: 9236743

7. Świtaj K, Master A, Borkowski PK: J Clin Microbiol, 2006; 44(11); 4262-64, pmid: 17005742

8. Silveira C, Vallochi AL, Rodrigues da Silva U: Br J Ophthalmol, 2011; 95; 396-400, pmid: 20601663

9. Park YH: Br J Ophthalmol, 2012; 96; 766, pmid: 22096145 author reply 766

10. Silveira C, Ferreira R, Muccioli CR, Belfort R, Toxoplasmosis transmitted to a newborn from the mother infected 20 years earlier: Am J Ophthalmol, 2003; 136(2); 370-71, pmid: 12888070

11. Andrade GM, Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Carellos EV, Congenital toxoplasmosis from a chronically infected woman with reactivation of retinochoroiditis during pregnancy: J Pediatr (Rio J), 2010; 86(1); 85-88, pmid: 19918624

12. Kump LI, Androudi SN, Foster CS, Ocular toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: Clin Experiment Ophthalmol, 2005; 33(5); 455-60, pmid: 16181268

13. Bosch-Driessen LE, Berendschot TT, Ongkosuwito JV, Rothova A, Ocular toxoplasmosis: clinical features and prognosis of 154 patients: Ophthalmology, 2002; 109; 869-78, pmid: 11986090

14. Garweg JG, Scherrer J, Wallon M, Kodjikian L, Peyron F, Reactivation of ocular toxoplasmosis during pregnancy: BJOG, 2005; 112; 241-42, pmid: 15663591

15. Montoya JG, Remington JS: Clin Infect Dis, 2008; 47(4); 554-66, pmid: 18624630

16. Braakenburg AM, Crespi CM, Holland GN, Recurrence Rates of Ocular Toxoplasmosis During Pregnancy: Am J Ophthalmol, 2014; 157(4); 767-73, pmid: 24412127

17. Holland GN, Reconsidering the pathogenesis of ocular toxoplasmosis: Am J Ophthalmol, 1999; 128(4); 502-5, pmid: 10577593

18. Ramchandani M, Weaver JB, Joynson DH, Murray PI, Acquired ocular toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: Br J Ophthalmol, 2002; 86(8); 938-39, pmid: 12140226

19. Friedman CT, Knox DL, Variations in recurrent active retinochoroiditis: Arch Ophthalmol, 1969; 81; 481-93, pmid: 5777756

20. Braakenburg AM, Rothova A, Clinical features of ocular toxoplasmosis during pregnancy: Retina, 2009; 29(5); 627-30, pmid: 19262434

21. Wallon M, Liou C, Garner P, Peyron F, Congenital toxoplasmosis: systematic review of evidence of efficacy of treatment in pregnancy: BMJ, 1999; 318(7197); 1511-14, pmid: 10356003

22. Peyron F, Wallon M, Liou C, Garner P, Treatments for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy: Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000(2); CD001684, pmid: 10796268

23. Guex-Crosier Y, Auer C, Bernasconi O, Herbort CP, Toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis: resolution without treatment of the perilesional satellite dark dots seen by indocyanine green angiography: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 1998; 236(6); 476-78, pmid: 9646094

24. Rothova A, Meenken C, Buitenhuis HJ, Therapy for ocular toxoplasmosis: Am J Ophthalmol, 1993; 115; 517-23, pmid: 8470726

25. Balaskas KJ, Vaudaux J, Boillat-Blanco N, Guex Y, Azithromycin versus Sulfadiazine and Pyrimethamine for non-vision-threatening toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis: a pilot study: Med Sci Monit, 2012; 18(5); CR296-302, pmid: 22534709

26. Kodjikian L, Toxoplasmose et grossesse: J Fr Ophthal, 2010; 33; 362-67 [in French]

27. McLeod R, Kieffer F, Sautter M, Why prevent, diagnose and treat congenital toxoplasmosis?: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, 2009; 104(2); 320-44, pmid: 19430661

28. Holland GN, Lewis KG, An update on current practices in the managment of ocular toxoplasmosis: Am J Ophtalmol, 2002; 134(1); 102-14

29. Luntamo M, Kulmala T, Mbewe B, Effect of repeated treatment of pregnant women with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and azithromycin on preterm delivery in Malawi: a randomized controlled trial: Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2010; 83(6); 1212-20, pmid: 21118924

30. Deloron P, Bertin G, Briand V, Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy: Emerg Infect Dis, 2010; 16(11); 1666-70, pmid: 21029522

31. Borkowski PK, Współczesne poglądy na toksoplazmozę narządu wzroku: Przegląd Epidemiologiczny, 2001; 55; 483-93 [in Polish]

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750