02 April 2015: Clinical Research
Clinical Application of Antenatal Genetic Diagnosis of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type IV
Jing Yuan ACE , Song Li F , YeYe Xu B , Lin Cong B
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.892786
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:964-969
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical analysis and genetic testing of a family with osteogenesis imperfecta type IV were conducted, aiming to discuss antenatal genetic diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta type IV.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Preliminary genotyping was performed based on clinical characteristics of the family members and then high-throughput sequencing was applied to rapidly and accurately detect the changes in candidate genes.
RESULTS: Genetic testing of the III5 fetus and other family members revealed missense mutation in c.2746G>A, pGly916Arg in COL1A2 gene coding region and missense and synonymous mutation in COL1A1 gene coding region.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of antenatal genetic diagnosis provides fast and accurate genetic counseling and eugenics suggestions for patients with osteogenesis imperfecta type IV and their families.
Keywords: Base Sequence, Amino Acid Substitution, DNA - genetics, DNA Mutational Analysis, Extracellular Matrix Proteins - genetics, genetic testing, Genotype, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Missense, Osteogenesis Imperfecta - genetics, Pedigree, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Silent Mutation
Background
Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), also known as brittle bone disease, is a rare connective tissue disease characterized as increased bone brittleness and collagen metabolic disorder. OI is mainly caused by the gene mutation in COL1A1or COL1A2 of coding type I collagen a chain [1]. Typical clinical manifestations of OI include multiple fracture, short stature, blue sclera, loss of hearing, and dentinogenesis imperfecta (DI) with hereditary and familial features. The incidence of DI ranges from 1/100 000 to 1/25 000 [2,3]. Most OI cases have autosomal dominant inheritance (AD) and others result from autosomal recessive inheritance (AR) [4].
The severity of OI varies greatly, even within families who share a common genetic mutation. Optimal management of OI requires a multidisciplinary approach involving pediatrician, rehabilitation specialist, orthopedic surgeon, dentist, geneticist, social worker/psychologist, and occupational therapist. Bisphosphonate therapy remains the mainstay of medical treatment in OI and has been shown to decrease bone pain, improve muscle strength and mobility, and decrease fracture incidence. Novel therapies are gradually emerging as more evidence reported about the signaling pathways involved in bone formation [5]. This study was designed to advance the antenatal genetic diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta type IV within a family.
Material and Methods
CLINICAL DATA:
The patient (III3) was admitted to our hospital due to complaints about 2 abnormal pregnancies. She received antenatal ultrasonic diagnosis at 30-week pregnancy in 2010. Ultrasonic examination revealed bilateral femur shortness of the fetus (left 40 mm and right 46 mm). Left femur deformity was observed. In 2012, ultrasonic examination at 24-week pregnancy showed that the femur length was 36 mm and 37 mm for humerus, with slight curving, considered as achondroplasia. Karyotype analysis of the amniotic fluid revealed no significant abnormality. DNA detection demonstrated no G→A heterozygous mutation at nucleotide 1138 in exon 10 of FGFR3, a candidate gene of congenital achondroplasia. She chose to terminate the pregnancy during twice visits in the years of 2010 and 2012. The husband of the patient (III4) (body height 175 cm) had a suspected bone fracture before age 1 year. The father-in-law of the patient (II8) had spinal deformity, repeated femur fractures, femur shortness, normal lower extremity, and was unable to walk. He suffered from blue sclera at a young age and was fully recovered now. The sister-in-law of the patient (III5) was of small stature and had a 3-cm difference in leg lengths. No intermarriage was reported in this family. Other family members presented with no skeletal deformity, blue sclera, DI, or hearing loss.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
The peripheral blood (5 ml) was sampled from the subjects I2, II2, II5, II8, III3, III4, and III5 and transferred to the laboratory under freezing condition.
Results
No loss or repetition of large-size fragment was observed in the coding region of genes (COL1A1, COL1A2 and CRTAP) related to osteogenesis imperfecta types I, II, III, IV, and VII in this studied family. No gene mutation was found in the coding region of
Genetic testing of the fetus of III5, III4, and II8 revealed a missense mutation of c.2746G>A, pGly916Arg in
One missense mutation (p.Pro549Ala) and 4 samesense mutations (p.Thr29Thr, p.Asp82Asp, p.Pro482Pro, and p.Val626Val) were observed in the coding region of
The family tree was illustrated based on the clinical analysis and genetic testing outcomes, as illustrated in Figure 3
Discussion
Patients diagnosed with OI present with significant genetic heterogeneity. Different gene mutations-induced OI patients have continuous varying interval in phenotype. OI patients are characterized as having normal features, short stature, severe deformity, multiple fracture or progressiveness fracture, and even fetus death during the perinatal period [6]. Therefore, it is a challenging task to classify OI based on symptom and signs. Analysis of OI-related gene mutations plays a pivotal role in the classification and diagnosis of OI. In 1979, Sillence classified OI into 4 types according to the severity of phenotype: type I (slight OI accompanied with blue sclera) <type IV (normal sclera and mild deformity) <type III (progressive fracture) <(perinatal death). Type I OI results from COL1A1 mutation and types II–IV from COL1A1 or COL1A2 mutations [4,7,8]. Recently, mutant genes of types V–XIV have been described, including
In this study, the subjects III5, III4, and II8 carried c.2746G>A (p.Gly916Arg) mutation. The mutational site has not been reported to be pathogenic and the incidence of this mutation is extremely low. SIFT (sorting intolerant from tolerant) and Polyphen (polymorphism phenotyping) calculation methods were conducted to predict protein function and revealed the harmful outcomes. It is speculated that c.2746G>A (p.Gly916Arg) mutation probably acts as the pathogenic mutation within this family.
Over 1000 types of gene mutations have been reported to result in OI. The type and site of gene mutations could affect phenotype and even genotype and phenotypic relation to a certain extent [17]. Especially for familial OI, OI induced by the same type and even same mutation may present with phenotypes of different severities [18]. The family members received clinical tests, as well as genetics and molecular analysis aiming to elucidate the underlying mechanism: subject II8 had severe phenotype and was unable to walk; subject III3 twice experienced induced labor due to skeletal deformity of the fetus; and subjects III4 and III5 presented with relatively mild phenotype. This evidence shows that c.2746G> A mutation in the coding region of
The members of this family show the clinical characteristics of
As this study proceeded, subject III5 had been pregnant. Genetic testing showed c.2746G>A (p.Gly916Arg) mutation in the coding region of
Conclusions
At present, antenatal diagnostic procedures of OI mainly proceed during the secondary prevention stage of birth defects, which cannot fundamentally solve the problems of patients and their family members. PGD, as the primary preventive means, could be applied in termination of inheritance of pathogenic genes or selection of embryonic implantation without OI-related gene mutations. In this study, subject III3 twice experienced adverse pregnancy. Therefore, PGD was considered to provide more evidence to another pregnancy.
References
1. Rauch F, Glorieux FH, Osteogenesis imperfect: Lancet, 2004; 363(9418); 1377-85, pmid: 15110498
2. Van Dijk FS, Cobben JM, Kariminejad A, Osteogenesis imperfecta: a review with clinical examples: Mol Syndromology, 2011; 2(1); 1-20
3. Xu Z, Li Y, Zhang X, Identification and molecular characterization of two novel mutations in COL1A2 in two Chinese families with osteogenesis imperfecta: J Genet Genomics, 2011; 38(4); 149-56, pmid: 21530898
4. Sillence DO, Senn A, Danks DM, Genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfect: J Med Genet, 1979; 16(2); 101-16, pmid: 458828
5. Biggin A, Munns CF, Osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnosis and treatment: Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2014; 12(3); 279-88, pmid: 24964776
6. Chen CP, Lin SP, Su YN, Osteogenesis imperfecta type IV: Prenatal molecular diagnosis and genetic counseling in a pregnancy carried to full term with favorable outcome: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2012; 51(2); 271-75, pmid: 22795107
7. Stephen J, Shukla A, Dalal A, Mutation spectrum of COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes in Indian patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: Am J Med Genet A, 2014; 164(6); 1482-89, pmid: 24668929
8. Chen CP, Lin SP, Su YN, Prenatal diagnosis of a missense mutation of c. 2279G> A, Gly760Glu in exon 37 of COL1A2 in a fetus with familial osteogenesis imperfecta type IV and favorable outcome: Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2013; 52(1); 152-53, pmid: 23548243
9. Bishop N, Characterising and treating osteogenesis imperfect: Early Hum Dev, 2010; 86(11); 743-46, pmid: 20846798
10. Valadares ER, Carneiro TB, Santos PM, What is new in genetics and osteogenesis imperfecta classification?: J Pediatr (Rio J), 2014; 90(6); 536-41, pmid: 25046257
11. Glorieux FH, Ward LM, Rauch F, Osteogenesis imperfecta type VI: a form of brittle bone disease with a mineralization defect: J Bone Miner Res, 2002; 17(1); 30-38, pmid: 11771667
12. Van Dijk FS, Pals G, Van Rijn RR, Classification of osteogenesis imperfecta revisited: Eur J Med Genet, 2010; 53(1); 1-5, pmid: 19878741
13. Morello R, Bertin TK, Chen Y, CRTAP is required for prolyl 3-hydroxylation and mutations cause recessive osteogenesis imperfecta: Cell, 2006; 127(2); 291-304, pmid: 17055431
14. Pyott SM, Schwarze U, Christiansen HE, Mutations in PPIB (cyclophilin B) delay type I procollagen chain association and result in perinatal lethal to moderate osteogenesis imperfecta phenotypes: Hum Mol Genet, 2011; 20(8); 1595-609, pmid: 21282188
15. Marini JC, Cabral WA, Barnes AM, Chang W, Components of the collagen prolyl 3-hydroxylation complex are crucial for normal bone development: Cell Cycle, 2007; 6(14); 1675-81, pmid: 17630507
16. Becker J, Semler O, Gilissen C, Exome sequencing identifies truncating mutations in human SERPINF1 in autosomal-recessive osteogenesis imperfecta: Am J Hum Genet, 2011; 88(3); 362-71, pmid: 21353196
17. Van Dijk FS, Sillence DO, Osteogenesis imperfecta: Clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity assessment: Am J Med Genet A, 2014; 164(6); 1470-81, pmid: 24715559
18. Trummer T, Brenner R, Just W, Recurrent mutations in the COL1A2 gene in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta: Clin Genet, 2001; 59(5); 338-43, pmid: 11359465
19. Witecka J, Augusciiak-Duma AM, Kruczek A, Two novel COL1A1 mutations in patients with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) affect the stability of the collagen type I triple-helix: J Appl Genet, 2008; 49(3); 283-95, pmid: 18670065
20. Marini JC, Forlino A, Cabral WA, Consortium for osteogenesis imperfecta mutations in the helical domain of type I collagen: regions rich in lethal mutations align with collagen binding sites for integrins and proteoglycans: Hum Mutat, 2007; 28(3); 209-21, pmid: 17078022
21. Van Dijk FS, Byers PH, Dalgleish R, EMQN best practice guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta: Eur J Hum Genet, 2012; 20(1); 11-19, pmid: 21829228
22. Pepin M, Atkinson M, Starman BJ, Byers PH, Strategies and outcomes of prenatal diagnosis for osteogenesis imperfecta: a review of biochemical and molecular studies completed in 129 pregnancies: Prenat Diagn, 1997; 17(6); 559-70, pmid: 9203215
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






