19 January 2015: Lab/in Vitro Research
Association between CYP1B1 Gene Polymorphisms and Risk Factors and Susceptibility to Laryngeal Cancer
Peng-Ju Yu ACDE , Wei-Guan Chen ABCF , Quan-Lin Feng BCF , Wei Chen BCDE , Man-Jie Jiang BCE , Ze-Qing Li BDF
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.893084
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:239-245
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between polymorphism of the cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) gene, a metabolic enzyme gene, and the susceptibility to laryngeal cancer among the Chinese Han population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a case-control study, we investigated polymorphisms in the CYP1B1 gene (rs10012, rs1056827, and rs1056836) with a real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (TaqMan). The study was conducted with 300 Chinese Han patients with laryngeal cancer and 300 healthy Chinese Han subjects in a control group. We also studied the interactions between genetic polymorphism and risk factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption in the pathogenesis of laryngeal cancer.
RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the distributions of the rs1056827 and rs1056836 genotypes between the 2 groups. Regarding rs1056827, carriers of the T allele had a significantly higher risk of laryngeal cancer than the G-allele carriers (OR=1.4339, 95% CI: 1.1268–1.8247; P=0.0034). The difference was still statistically significant after adjusting for factors such as age, sex, smoking, and drinking (adjusted OR=1.743, 95% CI: 1.124–3.743, P<0.001). However, regarding rs1056836, the G allele carriers had a significantly lower risk of laryngeal cancer than the C allele carriers (OR=0.5557, 95% CI: 0.3787–0.8154; P=0.0027). The difference was statistically significant even after adjusting for factors such as age, sex, smoking, and drinking (adjusted OR=0.5641, 95% CI: 0.3212–0.8121, P=0.001). Subjects who carry the C-T-C haplotype have a significantly increased incidence of laryngeal cancer. We also found that CYP1B1 rs1056827 polymorphism had synergistic effects with smoking or alcohol consumption regarding the risk of laryngeal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: CYP1B1 gene polymorphism is closely related to the onset of laryngeal cancer. There is a mutually synergistic effect between smoking, alcohol consumption, and CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms regarding laryngeal cancer.
Keywords: Alleles, Alcohol Drinking, Case-Control Studies, Cytochrome P-450 CYP1B1 - genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Haplotypes, Laryngeal Neoplasms - genetics, Mutation, Polymorphism, Genetic, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Risk Factors, Smoking - adverse effects
Background
Laryngeal cancer is a common type of malignant tumor in the head and neck, and the incidence of this type of tumor is increasing yearly [1]. The etiology of laryngeal cancer is not clear. It is believed that this cancer is the result of the combined effects of multiple factors, primarily environmental and genetic factors [2,3]. Studying the genetic factors associated with laryngeal cancer from the perspective of molecular genetics and screening possible susceptibility genes via relevance analysis are of great importance in discovering the pathogenesis of laryngeal cancer. The metabolism of pro-carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic amines, can be catalyzed by cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) [4–6], resulting in carcinogen activation and the formation of cytotoxic substances and DNA intermediates [7,8]. This action of CYP1B1 may be the mechanism responsible for the susceptibility to tumors. To date, more than 50 polymorphic
This study analyzed the relationship between the genetic variations in these 3
Material and Methods
SUBJECT SELECTION:
Three hundred patients who had been diagnosed with laryngeal cancer in Kunshan Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiangsu Province and the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nanjing General Hospital of the Nanjing Military Region from August 2001 through February 2014 were selected for the case group in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) the subject’s primary tumor was diagnosed as laryngeal squamous cell cancer by way of a histopathological examination; 2) the subject had not been treated with chemotherapy prior to acquiring blood samples; 3) the subject’s blood specimens were well preserved; 4) the subject had complete clinical data; and 5) the subject was of Han ethnicity, and there was no kinship with the other subjects. The 300 subjects in the control group were healthy people who had undergone a physical examination during the same period at the physical exam centers of the same hospitals. In addition to the criteria numbered 2)-5) mentioned above, the inclusion criteria for the control group included the following: 1) the subject had no history of tumor, and no tumor was found during the physical exam; 2) the subject had no genetic family history of tumors; and 3) the subject had no history of occupational exposure to carcinogenic substances such as radiation, toxic gases, etc. No significant differences in gender or age were identified between the control and case groups according to frequency pairing. This study was approved by the academic ethics committee of Jiangsu Province Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine. An informed consent form was signed by each subject.
GENOMIC DNA EXTRACTION:
For all of the subjects, 4-ml samples of venous blood were placed in tubes with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulant for cryopreservation at −70°C. The DNA extraction was performed using the AxyPrep whole blood genomic DNA kit (Axygen Biosciences, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
GENOTYPING:
The genotyping was performed with the 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System and TaqMan genotyping kits manufactured by Applied Biosystems (CA, USD), as described previously [14]. Briefly, The TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays were performed using the method of Taq amplification. In the 5′ nuclease assay, discrimination occurs during the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) because of allele-specific fluorogenic probes that, when hybridized to the template, are cleaved by the 5′ nuclease activity of Taq polymerase. The probes contain a 3′ minor groove-binding group (MGB) that hybridizes to single-stranded targets with greater sequence specificity than ordinary DNA probes. This reduces nonspecific probe hybridization and results in low background fluorescence in the 5′ nuclease PCR assay (TaqMan, ABI). Cleavage results in increased emission of a reporter dye. Each 5′ nuclease assay requires 2 unlabeled PCR primers and 2 allele-specific probes. Each probe is labeled with 2 reporter dyes at the 5′ end. In the present study, VIC® and FAM™ were used as the reporter dyes. The primers and probes used in the TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (ABI) were chosen based on information available at the ABI website (http://myscience.appliedbiosystems.com). Polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed using 6 mL of TaqMan Universal Master Mix, No AmpErase UNG (2×; ABI) in a 12-mL final reaction volume containing 2 ng of DNA, 0.22 uL of TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay Mix (20× or 40×) primers at a concentration of 900 nmol/L each, and probes at a final concentration of 200 nmol/L each.
Thermal cycling conditions were as follows: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, and 62°C for 1 minute. Thermal cycling was performed using the GeneAmp 9700 system. Each 96-well plate contained 80 DNA samples of an unknown genotype and 4 reaction mixtures containing reagents but no DNA (control). The control samples without DNA are a necessary part of the Sequence Detection System (SDS) 7700 signal processing, as outlined in the TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Guide (ABI). The plates were read on the
SDS 7700 instrument with the end-point analysis mode of the SDS version 1.6.3 software package (ABI). The genotypes were determined visually based on the dye-component fluorescent emission data depicted in the x-y scatterplot of the SDS software. The genotypes were also determined automatically by the signal processing algorithms of the software. The results of each scoring method were saved in 2 separate output files for later comparison.
ASSESSMENT OF SMOKING AND ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION:
Cigarette smoking was assessed using a smoking index (SI) defined as follows: SI=number of cigarettes per day/20× number of years of smoking. A light smoker is a subject with an SI equal to or below 20, while a heavy smoker is a subject with an SI greater than 20 [15]. A drinking index (DI) was used to assess alcohol consumption and was calculated as follows: DI=daily alcohol consumption (ml)× number of years of drinking. Subjects were categorized as light drinkers (DI≤60) or heavy drinkers (DI>60) [16].
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
The SPSS 17.0 statistical software was used for statistical analyses. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test was used to test the group representation of the CYP1B1 genotype and determine the allele frequency distribution in the case and control groups. SHEsis software was used for the haplotype analysis, including haploid construction and linkage disequilibrium. A 4-fold table test was used to assess the differences between the genotype and allele frequencies. An unconditional logistic regression model was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) values and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each genotype and the risk of laryngeal cancer. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. To assess the association of each SNP with laryngeal cancer, we used a Bonferroni correction to control for the number of variants tested; this was 3, so the probability value, 0.017, was considered to be significant.
Results
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Table 1 has the distribution of risk factors for the case and control groups. There were significantly higher proportions of subjects who smoked and consumed alcohol in the case group than in the control group (Both P<0.05).
DISTRIBUTIONS OF ALLELES AND GENOTYPES:
Table 2 displays the genotype and allele frequencies of the 3 polymorphic loci. All the samples were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05), and the selected sample was representative of the group. Statistically significant differences were found between the case and control groups when comparing the distributions of polymorphisms for rs1056827 and rs1056836. Regarding rs1056827, carriers of the T allele had a significantly higher risk of laryngeal cancer than the G-allele carriers (OR=1.4339, 95% CI: 1.1268–1.8247; P=0.0034). The difference was still statistically significant after adjusting for factors such as age, gender, smoking and drinking (adjusted OR=1.743, 95% CI: 1.124–3.743, P<0.001). However, regarding rs1056836, the G allele carriers had a significantly lower risk of laryngeal cancer than the C allele carriers (OR=0.5557, 95% CI: 0.3787–0.8154; P=0.0027). The difference was statistically significant even after adjusting for factors such as age, gender, smoking and drinking (adjusted OR=0.5641, 95% CI: 0.3212–0.8121, P=0.001). A comparison of the polymorphism distribution for rs10012 between the case and control groups showed no significant difference (P=0.2043), and there was no significant correlation with the risk of laryngeal cancer.
HAPLOTYPE ANALYSIS:
As shown in Table 3, 7 haplotypes were constructed from the 8 possible haplotype configurations, and only 2 of these haplotypes were associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer. The most common haplotype was C-G-C (constructed by rs10012, rs1056827, and rs1056836), which accounted for 60.3% and 65.0% of the subjects in the case and control groups, respectively, indicating that C-G-C was a low risk factors for laryngeal cancer (P=0.002). Compared to carriers of the C-G-C haplotype, C-T-C haplotype carriers had a significantly higher risk of laryngeal cancer (OR=3.017, 95% CI: 1.869–4.868, P<0.001).
THE SYNERGISTIC EFFECT OF RS1056827, SMOKING AND DRINKING ON LARYNGEAL CANCER:
Table 4 describes the influence of the combined effects of the 3 polymorphic loci with smoking and drinking on the risk of laryngeal cancer. In the non-smoking group, the OR for the risk of laryngeal cancer was 1.7902 (95% CI: 0.8123–3.9453) for carriers of CYP1B1 rs1056827 GT + TT, while in the smoking group, the corresponding OR was 6.3465 (95%CI: 3.1243–12.8920), which was significantly different (P<0.001); Furthermore, in carriers of T allele with SI>20, the OR was 12.648 (95%CI: 6.0136–26.6026), which indicated that there was a significant interaction between smoking and rs1056827 polymorphism for the risk of the laryngeal cancer. In the non-drinking group, the OR for the risk of laryngeal cancer was 2.2609 (95% CI: 1.2846–3.9790) for carriers of CYP1B1 rs1056827 GT + TT; however, in the drinking group, the corresponding OR was 4.8038 (95%CI: 2.7631–8.3516 P<0.001), which was significantly higher than the OR value obtained by multiplying the risks of laryngeal cancer associated with alcohol consumption and genetic polymorphism obtained in the univariate analyses. These data indicated that CYP1B1 rs1056827 polymorphism had any synergistic effects with smoking or alcohol consumption regarding the risk of laryngeal cancer. However, neither of the other 2 loci had synergistic effects with smoking and drinking (data not shown).
Discussion
This case-control study of the Han Chinese population demonstrates that the CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms rs1056827 and rs1056836 are closely related to the risk of laryngeal cancer. The mutant T allele of the CYP1B1 rs1056827 polymorphism is positively correlated with the risk of laryngeal cancer, while the mutant G allele of CYP1B1 rs1056836 has a protective effect by reducing the risk of laryngeal cancer.
The CYP1B1 rs1056827 polymorphism locus is located in the second exon of chromosome 2p21.22. A mutation of this allele can cause a corresponding change in the amino acid from Ala to Ser. Singh et al. [17] reported a CYP1B1 rs1056827 mutation that was associated with head and neck cancer, and the mutant genotype increased the risk of head and neck tumors. Jawarowska et al. [18] also found a CYP1B1 rs1056827 mutant allele that can increase the risk of laryngeal cancer. This study also found that carriers of the CYP1B1 rs1056827 mutant allele had a significantly higher risk of laryngeal cancer compared with carriers of the wild type gene. All of the above indicate that CYP1B1 rs1056827 is a gene associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer, and a mutant genotype of CYP1B1 rs1056827 can increase the risk of laryngeal cancer. However, the mechanism of action involved in CYP1B1 gene polymorphism regarding laryngeal cancer is not yet clear.
The CYP1B1 gene rs1056836 polymorphism locus is located in the third exon of chromosome 2p21-22. A mutation of this allele can cause a corresponding change in the amino acid from Leu to Val. Church et al. [19] found that smokers who carried the mutant allele had a significantly higher risk of lung cancer. However, the relationship between genetic polymorphisms at this locus and lung cancer susceptibility is not clear. Tai et al. [15] reported that CYP1B1 gene rs1056836 polymorphism was irrelevant to the susceptibility to hypopharyngeal cancer and laryngeal cancer. However, Trubicka et al. [12] reported that expression levels of the mutant G genotype in colorectal cancer patients were significantly lower than those in the control group, which indicated that the presence of the mutant allele may have a protective function by reducing the risk of colorectal cancer in susceptible populations. This finding is consistent with the results of our study: the expression of the CYP1B1 rs1056836 heterozygous genotype was significantly reduced in the patient group, suggesting that the C>G allele mutation has a protective effect by reducing the risk of laryngeal cancer. Possible reasons contributing to these different results include the difference in the genetic constitution of different races, other confounding factors such as the effects of other polymorphic
Our haplotype analysis indicated that C-G-C is the most common haplotype configuration. The C-T-C haplotype confers a significantly higher risk of laryngeal cancer than the other haplotypes. This result suggests that the risk of laryngeal cancer will increase with an increased number of risk
Epidemiological data indicate that environmental factors, especially tobacco and alcohol use, are important causes of laryngeal cancer [20,21]. The CYP1B1 metabolic enzymes can metabolize the pro-carcinogens in tobacco (such as aromatic ring hydrocarbons, heterocyclic amines, aromatic amines, and polycyclic hydrocarbons) and the alcohol metabolite acetaldehyde into carcinogens [22], which in turn may activate oncogenes. Our results indicate that subjects who smoke or consume alcohol, especially heavy smokers and heavy drinkers, had a significantly increased risk of laryngeal cancer. This further confirms that smoke and alcohol are risk factors for laryngeal cancer. Furthermore, in our study on the combined effects of gene polymorphisms and the environment on the risk of laryngeal cancer, we found that combined effects increased the risk of laryngeal cancer. However, Soucek et al. [23] found no synergistic effects of tobacco or alcohol with genetic factors regarding head and neck cancer. These analyses and data indicate that tobacco or alcohol and CYP1B1 polymorphisms are associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer. In addition, when the genetic factors are combined with the environmental factors, there are significant synergistic effects of tobacco or alcohol and CYP1B1 polymorphisms.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that CYP1B1 gene polymorphism is closely associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer. Combined single-gene and multi-gene analyses further confirmed that the CYP1B1 rs1056827 mutant gene is a risk factor for laryngeal cancer, while the CYP1B1 rs1056836 mutant gene is a protective factor for laryngeal cancer. The risk of laryngeal cancer increases with an increased number of cancer risk alleles. Environmental factors (alcohol and tobacco) play a significant role in the incidence of laryngeal cancer. Exposure to alcohol and tobacco increases the risk of laryngeal cancer, and the combined effects of the environment and CYP1B1 gene polymorphism further increase the risk of laryngeal cancer.
References
1. Markou K, Christoforidou A, Karasmanis I, Laryngeal cancer: epidemiological data from Northern Greece and review of the literature: Hippokratia, 2013; 17(4); 313-18, pmid: 25031508
2. Burduk PK: Med Sci Monit, 2013; 19; 584-91, pmid: 23860397
3. Jaworowska E, Trubicka J, Lener MR: PLoS One, 2011; 6(9); e25057, pmid: 21966413
4. Azarpira N, Ashraf MJ, Khademi B: Mol Biol Rep, 2011; 38(8); 5443-48, pmid: 21380731
5. Tai J, Yang M, Ni X, Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes are associated with an increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx in a Chinese population: Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 2010; 196(1); 76-82, pmid: 19963139
6. Jaworowska E, Masojć B, Tarnowska C, Association between early-onset breast and laryngeal cancers: Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2006; 97(2); 215-19, pmid: 16331346
7. Cavalieri E, Rogan E, Catechol quinones of estrogens in the initiation of breast, prostate, and other human cancers: keynote lecture: Ann NY Acad Sci, 2006; 1089; 286-301, pmid: 17261777
8. Hanna IH, Dawling S, Roodi N, Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYPlB 1) pharmacogenetics: association of polymorphisms with functional differences in estrogen hydroxylation activity: Cancer Res, 2000; 60(13); 3440-44, pmid: 10910054
9. Beuten J, Gelfond JA, Byrne JJ, CYP1B1 variants are associated with prostate cancer in non-Hispanic and Hispanic Caucasians: Carcinogenesis, 2008; 29(9); 1751-57, pmid: 18544568
10. Wang S, Chanock S, Tang D, Assessment of interactions between PAH exposure and genetic polymorphisms on PAH-DNA adducts in African American, Dominican, and Caucasian mothers and newborns: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2008; 17(2); 405-13, pmid: 18268125
11. Abnet CC, Fagundes RB, Strickland PT, The influence of genetic polymorphisms in Ahr, CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, GST M1, GST T1 and UGT1A1 on urine 1-hydroxypyrene glucuronide concentrations in healthy subjects from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: Carcinogenesis, 2007; 28(1); 112-17, pmid: 16864595
12. Trubicka J, Grabowska-Kłujszo E, Suchy J, Variant alleles of the CYP1B1 gene are associated with colorectal cancer susceptibility: BMC Cancer, 2010; 10; 420, pmid: 20701755
13. Xu W, Zhou Y, Hang X, Shen D, Current evidence on the relationship between CYP1B1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis: Mol Biol Rep, 2012; 39(3); 2821-29, pmid: 21674184
14. Xie Xiang, Ma YT, Fu ZY, Haplotype analysis of the CYP8A1 gene associated with myocardial infarction: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2009; 15(5); 574-80, pmid: 19147528
15. Tai J, Yang M, Ni X, Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes are associated with an increased risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx in a Chinese population: Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 2010; 196(1); 76-82, pmid: 19963139
16. Park B, Jung KW, Oh CM, Factors associated with alcohol consumption in hepatitis B carriers: a nationwide study in the republic of Korea: PLoS One, 2014; 9(11); e110144, pmid: 25387237
17. Singh AP, Shah PP, Mathur N, Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P4501B1 and susceptibility to head and neck cancer: Mutat Res, 2008; 639(1–2); 11-19, pmid: 18067928
18. Jaworowska E1, Masojć B, Tarnowska C, Association between early-onset breast and laryngeal cancers: Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2006; 97(2); 215-19, pmid: 16331346
19. Church TR, Haznadar M, Geisser MS, Interaction of CYP1B1, cigarette-smoke carcinogen metabolism, and lung cancer risk: Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet, 2010; 1(4); 295-309, pmid: 21532841
20. Khlifi R, Olmedo P, Gil F, Risk of laryngeal and nasopharyngeal cancer associated with arsenic and cadmium in the Tunisian population: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2014; 21(3); 2032-42, pmid: 24022098
21. Jayalekshmi PA, Nandakumar A, Akiba S, Associations of tobacco use and alcohol drinking with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer risks among men in Karunagappally, Kerala, India-Karunagappally cohort study: PLoS One, 2013; 8(8); e73716, pmid: 24015309
22. Wen X, Walle T, Preferential induction of CYP1B1 by benzo[a]pyrene in human oral epithelial cells: impact on DNA adduct formation and prevention by polyphenols: Carcinogenesis, 2005; 26(10); 1774-81, pmid: 15905203
23. Soucek P, Susova S, Mohelnikova-Duchonova B, Polymorphisms in metabolizing enzymes and the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Slavic population of the central Europe: Neoplasma, 2010; 57; 415-21, pmid: 20568895
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






