09 July 2015: Clinical Research
Association between RTEL1, PHLDB1, and TREH Polymorphisms and Glioblastoma Risk: A Case-Control Study
Bo Yang ADEF , Liang Heng ADEF , Shuli Du BCF , Hua Yang BCF , Tianbo Jin DG , Hongjun Lang ADF , Shanqu Li ADF
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.893723
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:1983-1988
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly invasive, aggressive, and incurable brain tumor. Genetic factors play important roles in GBM risk. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of gene polymorphism on GBM susceptibility.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this case-control study, we included 72 GBM patients and 320 healthy controls to analyze the association between 29 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and GBM cancer risk in the Chinese Han population. The single-nucleotide polymorphisms were determined by Sequenom MassARRAY RS1000 and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software and SNPStats software.
RESULTS: Using the χ2 test, we found that rs2297440 and rs6010620 in RTEL1 increased risk of GBM. In the recessive model, we also found that the genotypes “CC” of rs2297440 and “GG” of rs6010620 in RTEL1 significantly increased GBM risk. The variant TT genotype of TREH rs17748 and the variant TT genotype of PHLDB1 rs498872 decreased GBM risk in the recessive model. We also found that the TREH rs17748 variant C allele showed an increased risk in males in the dominant model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a significant association between the RETL1, TREH, and PHLDB1 genes and GBM development in the Han Chinese population.
Keywords: Case-Control Studies, Brain Neoplasms - genetics, DNA Helicases - genetics, Ethnic Groups - genetics, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Glioblastoma - genetics, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins - genetics, Nerve Tissue Proteins - genetics, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Trehalase - genetics
Background
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors, a grading scheme, which represents a malignancy scale and a key factor influencing the choice of therapies, has been successfully applied to astrocytomas, the most common type of glioma. The WHO defines glioblastoma as grade IV, the most malignant grade [1]. Glioblastoma is the most frequent type of brain tumor and the median survival time is 2 years after diagnosis [1,2]. At present, no effective treatment has been developed for glioblastoma patients.
Molecular epidemiology focuses on the use of biomarkers in epidemiologic research. Molecular biomarkers are typically indicators of exposure, effect, or susceptibility [3]. Known risk factors, high-dose ionizing radiation, and smoking, account for only a small proportion of cases. Recently, genome-wide association studies determined that inherited variants in some chromosomal regions, such as chromosomes 20q13.3, 5p15.3, and 11q23.3, have a significant association with the risk of glioma [4,5].
Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) found that some sites have relationships with glioma, these studies are mainly limited to the European populations [4,5] and there were significant differences between Europeans and Chinese in genetic background. Therefore, we investigated whether the gene polymorphisms contribute to glioblastoma risk in a Chinese Han population from northwestern China.
Material and Methods
STUDY PARTICIPANTS:
From October 2011 to September 2012 we recruited 72 GBM patients into an on-going molecular epidemiological study at the Department of Neurosurgery of the Tangdu Hospital affiliated with The Fourth Military Medical University in Xi’an, China. The patients were newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed. Tumor histological type and grade were determined based on the WHO criteria and we successfully genotyped 72 GBM cases for further study.
As controls we randomly selected 320 unrelated healthy individuals from the medical center of Tangdu Hospital from June 2011 to July 2012 according to standard recruitment and exclusion criteria. Detailed recruitment and exclusion criteria were used. Subjects with chronic diseases and conditions involving vital organs such as the heart, lung, liver, kidney, and brain, and/or had severe endocrinological, metabolic, or nutritional diseases were excluded from this study. All of the control subjects were generally healthy without diseases related to the vital organs and serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein and plasma carcinoembryonic antigen were within normal range. We excluded 18 samples because of missing information, resulting in successful genotyping of 302 healthy control subjects. All enrolled subjects were Chinese Han ethnicity genetically from Xi’an and the surrounding areas.
We obtained demographic and personal data through a face-to-face interview via a standardized epidemiological questionnaire, which including age, sex, ethnicity, residence, smoking status, alcohol drinking, education status, and family history of cancer. In addition, patient clinical information was obtained through a medical record review or consulting treating physicians to understand the patient’s condition.
The use of human blood sample and the protocol in this study strictly conformed to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the institutional ethics committees of Tangdu Hospital and Northwest University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before their participation in the study.
SNP SELECTION AND GENOTYPING:
According to the previous glioma association analysis and SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05 in the HapMap CHB (Han Chinese in Beijing, China) population, we picked 29 SNPs from 21 genes. In genome-wide association studies, the smaller MAF will decrease statistical power, resulting in false-negative results. If the MAF <5%, some loci variants could not be detected in the samples, so the SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05 were used. We isolated genomic DNA samples from the whole blood with GoldMag-Mini Purification Kit (GoldMag Co. Ltd. Xian City, China), and concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 device (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). MassARRAY Assay Design 3.0 Software (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to design the PCR assay and iPLEX single-base extension primers for the Multiplexed SNP MassEXTEND assay [6]. The SNP genotypes were obtained according to the iPLEX protocol provided by Sequenom MassARRAY RS1000 (Sequenom. San Diego, California, USA) and the Sequenom Typer 4.0 software was used for data analysis [6,7].
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc.) was used for statistical analyses. The chi-squared test was used to compare the differences in frequency distributions of genotypes and alleles between cases and controls [8]. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using a Pearson chi-squared test only among controls at the 1% level. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained by binary logistic regression analysis, which adjusted for age and sex [9]. The most common genotype in the controls was used as the reference group. The possibility of sex differences was evaluated by a genotype test for each tSNP in males and females separately. We adopted the SNP stats (website software from http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/snpstats/start.htm) to analyze the association of certain single-nucleotide polymorphism loci contributed to the glioblastoma risk under variant models [10]. We used the Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to select the best-fit model for each SNP. All p values presented were calculated based on a 2-sided test, and p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Table 1 shows the basic information of candidate SNPs in our study such as chromosome position and minor allele frequency in case and control groups. All
Genetic model analysis found that the variant genotype “TT” of rs17748 in
We further sought to determine whether any of the 29 SNPs had a sex-specific effect on GBM risk, and found that allele “C” of rs17748 in
Discussion
In this case-control study we genotyped 29 SNPs in the Han Chinese population and identified
The
Our results suggest that polymorphisms of the
rs498872 maps to the 5′ untranslated region of the
SNPrs17748 is located downstream of
Conclusions
Our findings and those of previous studies suggest that polymorphisms of particular genes play a role in GBM development. These findings should be taken into consideration in future research of genes causing disease susceptibility. Due to the low incidence, the sample size was insufficient. Based on the limitation of the present study, larger-sample studies are warranted to confirm our findings. The exact functions of these genes in GBM and the regulatory mechanisms for gene expression have not been elucidated and need to be further investigated.
References
1. Furnari FB, Fenton T, Bachoo RM, Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment: Genes Dev, 2007; 21; 2683-710, pmid: 17974913
2. Guan X, Vengoechea J, Zheng S, Molecular subtypes of glioblastoma are relevant to lower grade glioma: PloS One, 2014; 9; e91216, pmid: 24614622
3. Groopman JD, Kensler TW, Links JM, Molecular epidemiology and human risk monitoring: Toxicol Lett, 1995; 82–83; 763-69
4. Shete S, Hosking FJ, Robertson LB: Nat Genet, 2009; 41; 899-904, pmid: 19578367
5. Rajaraman P, Melin BS, Wang Z, Genome-wide association study of glioma and meta-analysis: Hum Genet, 2012; 131; 1877-88, pmid: 22886559
6. Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D, SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform: Curr Protoc Hum Genet, 2009; 2; 12, pmid: 19170031
7. Thomas RK, Baker AC, Debiasi RM, High-throughput oncogene mutation profiling in human cancer: Nat Genet, 2007; 39; 347-51, pmid: 17293865
8. Adamec C: Cesk Zdrav, 1964; 12; 613-19, pmid: 14246305 [in Czech]
9. Bland JM, Altman DG, Statistics notes. The odds ratio: BMJ, 2000; 320; 1468, pmid: 10827061
10. Solé X, Guinó E, Valls J, SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies: Bioinformatics, 2006; 22; 1928-29, pmid: 16720584
11. Li G, Jin T, Liang H, RTEL1 tagging SNPs and haplotypes were associated with glioma development: Diagn Pathol, 2013; 8; 83, pmid: 23683922
12. Ding H, Schertzer M, Wu X: Cell, 2004; 117; 873-86, pmid: 15210109
13. Uringa E-J, Lisaingo K, Pickett HA, RTEL1 contributes to DNA replication and repair and telomere maintenance: Mol Biol Cell, 2012; 23; 2782-92, pmid: 22593209
14. Liu Y, Shete S, Etzel CJ, Polymorphisms of LIG4, BTBD2, HMGA2, and RTEL1 genes involved in the double-strand break repair pathway predict glioblastoma survival: J Clin Oncol, 2010; 28; 2467-74, pmid: 20368557
15. Youds JL, Mets DG, McIlwraith MJ, RTEL-1 enforces meiotic crossover interference and homeostasis: Science, 2010; 327; 1254-58, pmid: 20203049
16. Wrensch M, Jenkins RB, Chang JS, Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility: Nat Genet, 2009; 41; 905-8, pmid: 19578366
17. Egan KM, Thompson RC, Nabors L, Cancer susceptibility variants and the risk of adult glioma in a US case–control study: J Neurooncol, 2011; 104; 535-42, pmid: 21203894
18. Song X, Zhou K, Zhao Y: Carcinogenesis, 2012; bgs117
19. Chen H, Sun B, Zhao Y, Fine mapping of a region of chromosome 11q23. 3 reveals independent locus associated with risk of glioma: PloS One, 2012; 7; e52864, pmid: 23300798
20. Zhou QL, Jiang ZY, Mabardy AS, A novel pleckstrin homology domain-containing protein enhances insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation and GLUT4 translocation in adipocytes: J Biol Chem, 2010; 285; 27581-89, pmid: 20587420
21. Rutherford S, Cai G, Lopez-Alvarenga JC, A chromosome 11q quantitative-trait locus influences change of blood-pressure measurements over time in Mexican Americans of the San Antonio Family Heart Study: Am J Hum Genet, 2007; 81; 744-55, pmid: 17846999
22. Schoemaker MJ, Robertson L, Wigertz A, Interaction between 5 genetic variants and allergy in glioma risk: Am J Epidemiol, 2010; 171; 1165-73, pmid: 20462933
23. Jenkins RB, Wrensch MR, Johnson D, Distinct germ line polymorphisms underlie glioma morphologic heterogeneity: Cancer Genet, 2011; 204; 13-18, pmid: 21356187
24. Katoh M, Katoh M, Identification and characterization of human LL5A gene and mouse Ll5a gene in silico: Int J Oncol, 2003; 23; 1477-83, pmid: 14532993
25. Li S, Jin T, Zhang J, Polymorphisms of TREH, IL4R and CCDC26 genes associated with risk of glioma: Cancer Epidemiol, 2012; 36; 283-87, pmid: 22369735
26. Elbein A, Pan YT, Pastuzak I, Carroll D, New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule: Glycobiology, 2003; 13(4); 17R-27R
27. Ouyang Y, Xu Q, Mitsui K, Human trehalase is a stress responsive protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2009; 379; 621-25, pmid: 19126402
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






