22 December 2015: Clinical Research
Correlation of ADRB1 rs1801253 Polymorphism with Analgesic Effect of Fentanyl After Cancer Surgeries
Wei Wei AB , Yanli Tian AB , Chunlei Zhao BD , Zhifu Sui CD , Chang Liu EF , Congmin Wang DE , Rongya Yang AG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894060
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:4000-4005
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our study aimed to explore the association between β1-adrenoceptor (ADRB1) rs1801253 polymorphism and analgesic effect of fentanyl after cancer surgeries in Chinese Han populations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Postoperative fentanyl consumption of 120 patients for analgesia was recorded. Genotype distributions were detected by allele specific amplification-polymerase chain reaction (ASA-PCR) method. Postoperative pain was measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) method. Differences in postoperative VAS score and postoperative fentanyl consumption for analgesia in different genotype groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Preoperative cold pressor-induced pain test was also performed to test the analgesic effect of fentanyl.
RESULTS: Frequencies of Gly/Gly, Gly/Arg, Arg/Arg genotypes were 45.0%, 38.3%, and 16.7%, respectively, and passed the Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) test. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the heart rate (HR) had no significant differences at different times. After surgery, the VAS score and fentanyl consumption in Arg/Arg group were significantly higher than in other groups at the postoperative 2nd hour, but the differences were not obvious at the 4th hour, 24th hour, and the 48th hour. The results suggest that the Arg/Arg homozygote increased susceptibility to postoperative pain. The preoperative cold pressor-induced pain test suggested that individuals with Arg/Arg genotype showed worse analgesic effect of fentanyl compared to other genotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese Han populations, ADRB1 rs1801253 polymorphism might be associated with the analgesic effect of fentanyl after cancer surgery.
Keywords: Analgesics, Opioid - pharmacology, Fentanyl - pharmacology, Neoplasms - surgery, Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy, Polymorphism, Genetic, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-1 - genetics, young adult
Background
Postoperative pain is a kind of physiological reaction of the human body to the disease itself and to the operation wound, and is reflected in acute physical pain as well as severe mental pain. A good postoperative analgesic effect is significant to the recovery from diseases [1]. Postoperative pain is an important postoperative complication which can cause great sufferings to patients. Fentanyl has obvious analgesic effect, and has little influence on visceral functions, so it is widely used for postoperative analgesia in patients after abdominal surgeries [2]. However, there are significant individual differences in the postoperative consumption and analgesic effect of fentanyl [3]. Pain perception is a complex physiological regulation process which is affected by various factors such as environmental and genetic factors [4]. The influences of genetic factors on the analgesic effect of fentanyl are still not very clear.
Fentanyl is a kind of opioid analgesic widely used in clinic. Due to high lipophilicity, low molecular weight, and optimal skin flux, it could be absorbed easily through skin. It is commonly thought that the metabolism of fentanyl is controlled by CYP3A [5,6]. To date, extensive efforts have been taken to clarify how the genetic factors regulate the analgesic effects of fentanyl. It has been reported that CYP3A5 polymorphisms could results in the adverse effects of fentanyl: delirium, gastrointestinal dysfunction and respiratory depression [6]. Additionally, the passage of fentanyl through blood-brain barrier is regulated by ABCB1 [7]. Further study showed ABCB1 genetic mutations could brings about respiratory suppression of patients with intravenous fentanyl therapy [8]. CYP3A4 is the main enzyme in the metabolism of fentanyl [9,10]. The activity of it determines the interindividual variability in clinical effects of fentanyl.
Previous studies indicated that adrenergic system plays an important role in the pain mechanism and analgesic mechanism of the human body [11]. In 1948, the adrenergic receptor theory was reported [12]. The adrenergic receptor, located in the cell membrane of the sympathetic nerve postganglionic fiber effector, can combine with adrenalin and norepinephrine [13]. Multiple species identification results have revealed that the adrenergic receptor has 9 different subtypes: α1A, α1B, α1D, α2A–2C, and β1–3 [5]. β1-adrenoceptor (
Therefore, we conducted this study to investigate the relationship between
Material and Methods
GENERAL MATERIALS:
We randomly selected 120 patients (63 males and 57 females) who had undergone cancer operations. The involved cancers were lung cancer (14), esophageal cancer (18), tongue cancer (33), gastric cancer (20), pancreatic cancer (11), and prostatic cancer (24). They were aged 21~73 years old, at American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I~II grade, had a body mass index (BMI) of 21~25 kg/m2, and an operation duration of 1~3 h.
The patients had all accepted training about how to use the visual analogue scale (VAS) method (0: painlessness; 10: severe pain) and the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device. Patients who had the following characteristics were precluded: drinking and smoking a (≥80 g/day for >10 years; 20 cigarettes/day for >3 months), medical histories of hepatic and renal dysfunction (hepatic adipose infiltration, alcoholic liver disease, pathogen infection and cirrhosis; uremia, nephrophthisis, glomerular nephritis and pyelonephritis), severe cardiovascular disease (coronary heart disease, cerebral thrombosis, hyperlipemia, angina pectoris and myocardial infarction), diabetes (Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus), psychosis (schizophrenia, depression, obsession, phobia and personality disturbance), epilepsy (all types), opiate addiction (1 time/week for 3 weeks), and vomiting (1 time/day) or using antiemetics (thiadiazide and antihistamine drugs) within 24 h before the surgery.
PREOPERATIVE COLD PRESSOR-INDUCED PAIN TEST:
In a 26°C operating room, the patients were treated with an intravenous bolus injection of fentanyl at 2 μg/kg, then the cold pressor-induced pain test was conducted before and 3 min after the treatments, according to previous studies [19,20]. Firstly, the dominant hand of each patient was immersed in the ice-cold water. According to the instructions, the patients keep the hand in the water calmly until they felt some pain. The duration to pain perception (PPLpre) was measured as the immersion time of the hand in the water before fentanyl injection. To avoid tissue damage, the cut-off time was set as 150 s. The following test was conducted until the hand was warmed, along without any sensation of cold. Three minutes after the fentanyl injection, pain perception latency of the dominant hand (PPLpost) was tested. The difference between PPLpost and PPLpre (PPLpost -PPLpre) represent the analgesic effect of fentanyl in the preoperative cold pressor-induced pain test.
PREOPERATIVE ANESTHESIA:
Seventy patients all received general anesthesia; 2 mg of midazolam, 0.2 mg of fentanyl, and 70~120 mg of propofol were intravenously injected. After the patients became unconscious, 20 mg of cisatracurium was intravenously injected. Mechanical ventilation was performed after tracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained as follows: propofol, fentanyl, and cisatracurium were continuously pumped in by a micro-pump; then sevoflurane was inhaled in; the pumping speed and the inhaling speed of drugs were adjusted according to changes of hemodynamics during the surgery; after the skin was sutured, the use of anaesthetic was stopped and 0.5 mg of atropine and 1 mg of neostigmine were intravenously injected; and after the patients became awake, the tracheal tube was pulled out and the patients were sent to the post-anesthesia care units (PACUs) for observation.
POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA:
Basic physiological parameters (including blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation and consciousness) of the patients were assessed immediately after they entered in the PACUs. Then VAS was performed to assess the pain of the patients (0: painlessness; 10: severe pain). If the patients could not stand the severe pain, then fentanyl was intravenously injected to control the VAS score at below 3. In this case, the PCA pump was connected to achieve electronic intravenous injection of fentanyl for 48 h. If the analgesic effect was not good (VAS>3 in resting state), then an extra 50 mg of fentanyl was intravenously injected 1 time. The patients and family members were told to control the pump for analgesia by themselves to maintain the VAS score below 3. Postoperative follow-ups continued for 48 h, and the fentanyl consumption for analgesia at 2, 4, 24, and 48 h was recorded.
GENOTYPE ANALYSES:
After the anesthesia induction ended, 2 ml of blood was collected, and then it was treated with ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), and finally stored in a −80°C refrigerator. DNA was extracted via phenol/chloroform extracting method. Reagents and instruments were respectively as follows: Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), dNTP (Beijing Nobleryder Biotech Cor., Ltd.), PCR instrument (Perkin Elmer, USA), high-speed and low-temperature centrifuge (Sigma, Germany), and electrophoresis apparatus (Pharmacia, Italy); and agarose gel, loading buffer, and ethidium bromide. Allele specific primers were designed by using the strictest principle of 3′-terminal base matching between primers in PCR amplification. There were 3 amplification results: the wild allele was obtained when the wild allele specific primer was amplified; the mutant allele was carried when the ordinary primer obtained amplification product; and the heterozygote was carried when the wild allele specific primer and the ordinary primer both obtained amplification product.
OBSERVATION INDEX:
The pain degree (VAS), blood pressure, heart rate, finger pulse, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) in resting state at 2, 4, 24, and 48 h after the surgery were assessed. VAS method was adopted to assess the degree and frequency of pain during the 48 h after the surgery.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES:
All the analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0. The measurement data are represented by χ̄±s. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was checked by χ2 test [21,22]. Differences in postoperative VAS score and postoperative fentanyl consumption for analgesia among different genotype groups were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) [23–25]. Comparisons of the fentanyl consumption between different genotype groups during the 48 h after the surgery were made through variance analysis. The VAS was checked with non-parametric test (Kruskall-Wallis H test). The differences were statistically significant only when P<0.05.
Results
GENOTYPE GROUPS:
According to the genotypes of
GENERAL CLINICAL FEATURES:
Distributions of age, sex, operation duration, height, and weight among the 3 genotype groups had no statistical significance differences (P>0.05, Table 1). To clarify the association of each genotype with analgesic effect of fentanyl, we performed the preoperative cold pressor-induced pain test. The results indicated that the patients with Arg/Arg genotype showed better analgesic effect of fentanyl (P<0.05, Table 1). Therefore, we concluded that ADRB1 rs1801253 polymorphism was correlated with analgesic effect of fentanyl.
INTRAOPERATIVE CIRCULATORY STATE:
As shown in Table 2, the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the heart rate (HR) of patients in the 3 groups were measured and recorded at different times, at the very moments the patients entered in the operating room, when surgery ended, and before extubation. The changes of MAP and HR had no significant differences in the 3 groups during different periods (P>0.05). During the CO2 pneumoperitoneum, there were still no significant differences in the 2items between the 3 groups (P>0.05).
FENTANYL CONSUMPTION:
At 4, 24, and 48 h after the surgery, the differences in fentanyl consumption among the 3 groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). At 2 h after the surgery, the fentanyl consumption of the Arg/Arg group was significantly higher than that of the Gly/Gly group and Gly/Arg group (P<0.05), but the difference in fentanyl consumption between the Gly/Arg group and Gly/Gly group had no statistical significance (P>0.05, Table 3).
POSTOPERATIVE VAS SCORE:
Compared with Gly/Gly group, postoperative VAS score of Arg/Arg group was significantly higher (P<0.05) at 2 h after surgery. There was no significant difference in VAS scores at 4, 24, and 48 h after the surgery among the 3 groups (P>0.05, Table 4).
Discussion
Fentanyl is currently the most commonly used opioid drug, and is often used for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative analgesia, as well as the treatment of terminal cancer. However, there are significant differences in sensitivities to fentanyl in clinical use between patients due to individual differences. Individual difference is mainly reflected in the different demands for drugs, as well as the different incidences of adverse reactions [26]. In recent years, many scholars have found that the individual differences in fentanyl use are closely associated with human genes [27]. With the development in genomic sequencing, it has become possible to comprehensively and thoroughly explore the genomic mutations and polymorphisms of different individuals and groups. Furthermore, genetic characteristics are expected to become guidance for preventive measures of diseases in clinic. Currently, the association of sympathetic nerves in the automatic nervous system (ANS) with the analgesic effect of fentanyl has become a research hotspot.
We performed this study to determine the relationship between
Conclusions
This result might provide guidance for the clinic treatment of postoperative pain, and supply evidence for researching and developing new treatment medicines.
Our study had many limitations, such as the small sample size and few measurement parameters. The study was conducted only based on 6 cancers without considering the variances in postoperative pain of all cancer types. The result was insufficient to clarify the mechanism of the analgesic effect of fentanyl. To clarify the possible mechanism or characteristics of the analgesic effect of fentanyl from the level of molecular genetics, further research with a large sample and containing more genes, SNPs, and measure parameters should be carried out.
References
1. Raeder J, Opioids in the treatment of postoperative pain: old drugs with new options?: Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2014; 15; 449-52, pmid: 24437530
2. Doi K, Yamanaka M, Shono A, Preoperative epidural fentanyl reduces postoperative pain after upper abdominal surgery: J Anesth, 2007; 21; 439-41, pmid: 17680204
3. Kim MK, Nam SB, Cho MJ, Shin YS, Epidural naloxone reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients receiving epidural sufentanil for postoperative analgesia: Br J Anaesth, 2007; 99; 270-75, pmid: 17561515
4. Schutz M, Oertel BG, Heimann D, Consequences of a human TRPA1 genetic variant on the perception of nociceptive and olfactory stimuli: PLoS One, 2014; 9; e95592, pmid: 24752136
5. Labroo RB, Paine MF, Thummel KE, Kharasch ED, Fentanyl metabolism by human hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4: implications for interindividual variability in disposition, efficacy, and drug interactions: Drug Metab Dispos, 1997; 25; 1072-80, pmid: 9311623
6. Guitton J, Buronfosse T, Desage M, Possible involvement of multiple cytochrome P450S in fentanyl and sufentanil metabolism as opposed to alfentanil: Biochem Pharmacol, 1997; 53; 1613-19, pmid: 9264313
7. Henthorn TK, Liu Y, Mahapatro M, Ng KY, Active transport of fentanyl by the blood-brain barrier: J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1999; 289; 1084-89, pmid: 10215691
8. Park HJ, Shinn HK, Ryu SH, Genetic polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene and the effects of fentanyl in Koreans: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2007; 81; 539-46, pmid: 17192767
9. Tateishi T, Krivoruk Y, Ueng YF, Identification of human liver cytochrome P-450 3A4 as the enzyme responsible for fentanyl and sufentanil N-dealkylation: Anesth Analg, 1996; 82; 167-72, pmid: 8712396
10. Feierman DE, Lasker JM, Metabolism of fentanyl, a synthetic opioid analgesic, by human liver microsomes. Role of CYP3A4: Drug Metab Dispos, 1996; 24; 932-39, pmid: 8886601
11. Smith HS, Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV, Combining opioid and adrenergic mechanisms for chronic pain: Postgrad Med, 2014; 126; 98-114, pmid: 25141248
12. Ahlquist RP, A study of the adrenotropic receptors: Am J Physiol, 1948; 153; 586-600, pmid: 18882199
13. Adler-Graschinsky E, Langer SZ, Possible role of a beta-adrenoceptor in the regulation of noradrenaline release by nerve stimulation through a positive feed-back mechanism: Br J Pharmacol, 1975; 53; 43-50, pmid: 164967
14. Philipp M, Hein L, Adrenergic receptor knockout mice: distinct functions of 9 receptor subtypes: Pharmacol Ther, 2004; 101; 65-74, pmid: 14729393
15. Frielle T, Collins S, Daniel KW, Cloning of the cDNA for the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987; 84; 7920-24, pmid: 2825170
16. Davidson EM, Doursout MF, Szmuk P, Chelly JE, Antinociceptive and cardiovascular properties of esmolol following formalin injection in rats: Can J Anaesth, 2001; 48; 59-64, pmid: 11212051
17. Chia YY, Chan MH, Ko NH, Liu K, Role of beta-blockade in anaesthesia and postoperative pain management after hysterectomy: Br J Anaesth, 2004; 93; 799-805, pmid: 15377583
18. Lamothe-Molina PJ, Lamothe-Molina PA, Lopez-Avila ABeta-1 adrenoceptor blockade decreases the firing rate to painful stimuli in spinal wide-dynamic range neurons in rats: Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc, 2014; 52; 494-501, pmid: 25301123 [in Spanish]
19. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Pain, 2001; 90; 261-69, pmid: 11207398
20. Martikainen IK, Narhi MV, Pertovaara A, Spatial integration of cold pressor pain sensation in humans: Neurosci Lett, 2004; 361; 140-43, pmid: 15135913
21. Zhu X, Zhang J, Fan W, MAPKAP1 rs10118570 polymorphism is associated with anti-infection and anti-hepatic fibrogenesis in schistosomiasis japonica: PLoS One, 2014; 9; e105995, pmid: 25153992
22. Kuang D, Chen W, Song YZ, Association between the HSPA1B +/–1267A/G polymorphism and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 14 case-control studies: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014; 15; 6855-61, pmid: 25169537
23. Jing W, Chen Y, Lu L, Human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells producing IL15 eradicate established pancreatic tumor in syngeneic mice: Mol Cancer Ther, 2014; 13; 2127-37, pmid: 24928851
24. Hu YC, Wu L, Yan LF, Predicting subtypes of thymic epithelial tumors using CT: new perspective based on a comprehensive analysis of 216 patients: Sci Rep, 2014; 4; 6984, pmid: 25382196
25. Hu YC, Yan LF, Wu L, Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: efficacy in preoperative grading: Sci Rep, 2014; 4; 7208, pmid: 25434593
26. Ikeda K, Ide S, Han W, How individual sensitivity to opiates can be predicted by gene analyses: Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2005; 26; 311-17, pmid: 15925706
27. Sweeney BP, Pharmacogenomics and anaesthesia: explaining the variability in response to opiates: Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2007; 24; 209-12, pmid: 17378023
28. Maqbool A, Hall AS, Ball SG, Balmforth AJ, Common polymorphisms of beta1-adrenoceptor: identification and rapid screening assay: Lancet, 1999; 353; 897, pmid: 10093986
29. Kang S, Hong X, Ruan CW, Effects of GRK5 and ADRB1 polymorphisms influence on systolic heart failure: J Transl Med, 2015; 13; 44, pmid: 25638254
30. Lanfear DE, Jones PG, Marsh S, Beta2-adrenergic receptor genotype and survival among patients receiving beta-blocker therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: JAMA, 2005; 294; 1526-33, pmid: 16189366
31. Brodde OE, Beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptor polymorphisms: functional importance, impact on cardiovascular diseases and drug responses: Pharmacol Ther, 2008; 117; 1-29, pmid: 17916379
32. Leineweber K, Buscher R, Bruck H, Brodde OE, Beta-adrenoceptor polymorphisms: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol, 2004; 369; 1-22, pmid: 14647973
33. Bruck H, Leineweber K, Temme T, The Arg389Gly beta1-adrenoceptor polymorphism and catecholamine effects on plasma-renin activity: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005; 46; 2111-15, pmid: 16325050
34. Zill P, Baghai TC, Engel R, Beta-1-adrenergic receptor gene in major depression: influence on antidepressant treatment response: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet, 2003; 120B; 85-89, pmid: 12815745
35. Aleong RG, Sauer WH, Murphy GA, Prevention of atrial fibrillation by bucindolol is dependent on the beta(1)389 Arg/Gly adrenergic receptor polymorphism: JACC Heart Fail, 2013; 1; 338-44, pmid: 24159564
36. McLean RC, Hirsch GA, Becker LC, Polymorphisms of the beta adrenergic receptor predict left ventricular remodeling following acute myocardial infarction: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther, 2011; 25; 251-58, pmid: 21626217
37. Burguete-Garcia AI, Martinez-Nava GA, Valladares-Salgado A, Association of beta1 and beta3 adrenergic receptors gene polymorphisms with insulin resistance and high lipid profiles related to type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome: Nutr Hosp, 2014; 29; 1327-34, pmid: 24972470
38. Ohlin B, Berglund G, Nilsson PM, Melander O, Job strain, job demands and adrenergic beta1-receptor-polymorphism: a possible interaction affecting blood pressure in men: J Hypertens, 2008; 26; 1583-89, pmid: 18622236
39. Jeff JM, Donahue BS, Brown-Gentry K, Genetic variation in the β1-adrenergic receptor is associated with the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: Am Heart J, 2014; 167(1); 101-8.e1, pmid: 24332148
40. Liggett SB, Mialet-Perez J, Thaneemit-Chen S, A polymorphism within a conserved beta(1)-adrenergic receptor motif alters cardiac function and beta-blocker response in human heart failure: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006; 103; 11288-93, pmid: 16844790
41. Beitelshees AL, Zineh I, Yarandi HN, Influence of phenotype and pharmacokinetics on beta-blocker drug target pharmacogenetics: Pharmacogenomics J, 2006; 6; 174-78, pmid: 16402084
42. Liu J, Liu ZQ, Yu BN, beta1-Adrenergic receptor polymorphisms influence the response to metoprolol monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2006; 80; 23-32, pmid: 16815314
43. Amanfu RK, Saucerman JJ, Modeling the effects of beta1-adrenergic receptor blockers and polymorphisms on cardiac myocyte Ca2+ handling: Mol Pharmacol, 2014; 86; 222-30, pmid: 24867460
44. Moriyama A, Nishizawa D, Kasai S, Association between genetic polymorphisms of the beta1-adrenergic receptor and sensitivity to pain and fentanyl in patients undergoing painful cosmetic surgery: J Pharmacol Sci, 2013; 121; 48-57, pmid: 23257656
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






