19 November 2015: Clinical Research
Effects of VKORC1 Genetic Polymorphisms on Warfarin Maintenance Dose Requirement in a Chinese Han Population
Xiaojuan Yan ABCD , Feng Yang ABC , Hanyun Zhou BCD , Hongshen Zhang DEF , Jianfei Liu BEF , Kezhong Ma AEF , Yi Li ABC , Jun Zhu BCD , Jianqiang Ding DEF
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894414
Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:3577-3584
Abstract
BACKGROUND: VKORC1 is reported to be capable of treating several diseases with thrombotic risk, such as cardiac valve replacement. Some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VKORC1 are documented to be associated with clinical differences in warfarin maintenance dose. This study explored the correlations of VKORC1–1639 G/A, 1173 C/T and 497 T/G genetic polymorphisms with warfarin maintenance dose requirement in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 298 patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement were recruited. During follow-up, clinical data were recorded. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method was applied to detect VKORC1–1639 G/A, 1173 C/T and 497 T/G polymorphisms, and genotypes were analyzed.
RESULTS: Correlations between warfarin maintenance dose and baseline characteristics revealed statistical significances of age, gender and operation methods with warfarin maintenance dose (all P<0.05). Warfarin maintenance dose in VKORC1–1639 G/A AG + GG carriers was obviously higher than in AA carriers (P<0.001). As compared with patients with TT genotype in VKORC1 1173 C/T, warfarin maintenance dose was apparently higher in patients with CT genotype (P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that gender, operation method, method for heart valve replacement, as well as VKORC1–1639 G/A and 1173 C/T gene polymorphisms were significantly related to warfarin maintenance dose (all P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: VKORC1 gene polymorphisms are key genetic factors to affect individual differences in warfarin maintenance dose in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement; meanwhile, gender, operation method and method for heart valve replacement might also be correlate with warfarin maintenance dose.
Keywords: Anticoagulants - administration & dosage, Asian Continental Ancestry Group - genetics, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ethnic Groups - genetics, Gene Frequency, Genetic Association Studies, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Maintenance, Polymorphism, Genetic, Vitamin K Epoxide Reductases - genetics, Warfarin - administration & dosage, young adult
Background
Warfarin, as an anticoagulant, is frequently applied to prevent thromboembolism in cases of deep vein thrombosis, atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiac valve replacement [1]. Warfarin is a racemic mixture of R-warfarin and S-warfarin, the pharmacologically active enantiomer of which are metabolized by the CYP3A4 and CYP1A2 systems and the
VKORC1 functions to recycle vitamin K 2, 3-epoxide, activating vitamin K hydroquinone, which plays a vital role in the activation of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors [13]. In addition, VKORC1 is reported to be the target of vitamin K anticoagulants, and is capable of treating several diseases with thrombotic risk, such as AF, myocardial infarction, cardiac valve replacement, stroke and venous thrombosis [14]. Some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in
While rare, clinically significant prolonged prothrombin time and potentially life threatening bleeding can occur when amoxicillin/clavulanate is concomitantly administered with warfarin; therefore, prompt recognition and intervention is necessary to avoid life threatening complications from warfarin-amoxicillin/clavulanate interaction [20]. In our present study, we explored the correlations of
Material and Methods
SUBJECTS:
A total of 298 patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement were recruited at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei College of Arts and Science between June 2010 and June 2014. All patients were required to receive warfarin anticoagulation therapy. Inclusion criteria for the patients were as follows: (1) Chinese Han patients treated with cardiac valve replacement and long-term warfarin anticoagulation therapy; (2) patients with age ≥18 years; (3) patients administrated with stable dose of warfarin for ≥3 months; (4) patients with normal liver and kidney function; (5) patients with an INR of 2.0–3.0; (6) patients without complications such as hemorrhage and embolism; (7) patients without abnormal prosthetic valves after the surgery by cardiac ultrasonography; (8) no sibship or history of intermarriage among all patients. Exclusion criteria included: (1) patients with abnormal liver, kidney and thyroid function; (2) patients with an allergy to warfarin; (3) patients administrated with amiodarone, rifampin, or barbitone which may influence the pharmacokinetic effect of warfarin; (4) patients administrated with aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, or vitamin K which may influence INR value; (5) patients with miocardial infarction, infective endocarditis, or active peptic ulcer within 1 month after the surgery; (6) patients with malignant tumors or hematological diseases, or during gestation period. This study was approved by the Xiangyang Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Hubei College of Arts and Science. All eligible participants provided written informed consent for individual drug testing of warfarin.
DATA COLLECTION:
During the first follow-up, clinical data including gender, age, body mass index (BMI, classified into low BMI group, normal BMI group, and high BMI group according to the guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults) [21], body surface area (BSA), operation method, method for heart valve replacement (biological valve or mechanical valve), prescribed dosage of warfarin and combined medication were recorded. Subsequently, follow-up was conducted once a month. Average daily warfarin dose and average INR value were recorded. Warfarin maintenance dose refers to the mean dose of warfarin with INR value ranging from 2.0 to 3.0 2–3 times in a row, which was recorded every ≥7 days.
SAMPLE COLLECTION:
Fasting venous blood (5 mL) was obtained from each patient 15 h after medicine taking, and drawn into ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulant. Two mL of the venous blood was utilized to measure INR values; and the left 3 mL was centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 15 min, with upper plasma collected and preserved at −80°C. Genomic DNA samples for genotyping were fast extracted by using a DNA extraction kit (Beijing SBS Genetech Co., Ltd., China), and preserved at −20°C.
GENOTYPING:
The genotyping was performed by using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method, and the primers for VKORC1 were provided by Invitrogen Trading Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China (Table 1). The reaction system (25 μl) included 2.0 μl template DNA, 0.5 μl 100 μmol/L upstream and downstream primers for −1639 G/A (1μl 100 μmol/L upstream and downstream for 1173 C/T and 497 T/G), 2.5 μl 10×PCR buffer (containing Mg2+), 2 μl 2.5 mmol/L dNTP, 0.25 μl TaqDNA polymerase and double distilled water with a pH value of 8.2. PCR started with initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min and 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s (annealing at 55°C for 30 s for 1173 C/T) and extension at 72°C for 45 s, followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products of −1639 G/A, 1173 C/T and 497 T/G were digested by Msp I, Hinf I and Hph I restriction enzyme, respectively. PCR product (8 μl), 2 μl buffer, 8.5 μl dH2O and 1.5 μl 10 U/μl restriction enzymes were incubated at 37 °C overnight. The digested products (9 μl) were added in the sample wells of the negative-pole end of the 2.5% w/v agarose gel electrophoresis and electrophoresed at 120V for 30 min (Bromophenol blue as an indicator and ethidium bromide as a staining agent), and observed under an ultraviolet light.
GENOTYPE ANALYSIS:
The length of PCR amplification products of
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Measurement data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and enumeration data were presented as frequency. The χ2 test was used to detect if the gene distribution accorded with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and to compare genotype and allele frequency between groups. The comparisons of clinical characteristics and warfarin maintenance dose between different genotypes were conducted by using the
Results
BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS:
A total of 278 patients who underwent cardiac valve replacement were enrolled to this study, including 117 males and 161 females, with age ranging from 18 to 75 years (mean age, 42.50±13.89 years). Among them, 100 patients (35.97%) aged ≥50 years and 178 patients (64.03%) aged <50 years. Average BMI was 18.37±3.59 kg/m2 for all the enrolled patients, with 217 patients (78.06%) in the low BMI group, 41 patients (14.75%) in the normal BMI group, and 20 patients (7.19%) in the high BMI group. Average BSA was 1.54±0.15 m2, with 171 patients (61.51%) with BSA ≥1.5 m2, and 107 patients (38.49%) <1.5 m2. Seventeen patients (6.12%) underwent Bentall surgery, 60 patients (21.58%) underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR), 86 patients (30.94%) underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR), and 115 patients (41.37%) underwent double valve replacement (DVR). On the other hand, 21 patients (7.55%) received biological valve replacement, and 257 patients (92.45%) revived mechanical valve replacement. Average warfarin maintenance dose was 3.20±1.08 mg.
GENOTYPE AND ALLELE FREQUENCIES:
The genotype and allele frequencies of VKORC1–1639 G/A, 1173 C/T, and 497 T/G showed no deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (all P>0.05), suggesting the representativeness of all samples. The distribution frequencies of genotype AA, AG and GG in VKORC1–1639 G/A were 85.25% (237/278), 13.67% (38/278) and 1.08% (3/278), respectively, and the frequencies of allele A and G in VKORC1–1639 G/A were 91.37% and 8.63%. The distribution frequencies of genotype TT, CT and CC in VKORC1 1173 C/T were 83.09% (231/278), 16.91% (47/278) and 0.00% (0/278), respectively and the frequencies of allele C and T in VKORC1 1173 C/T were 7.91% and 92.09%. The distribution frequencies of genotype TT, TG and GG in VKORC1 497 T/G were 98.92% (275/278), 1.08% (3/278) and 0.00% (0/278), respectively and the frequencies of allele T and G in VKORC1 497 T/G were 97.84% and 2.16% (Table 2).
GENOTYPE AND ALLELE FREQUENCIES AND ETHNICITY:
Results of genotyping demonstrated that genotype AA (TT) in VKORC1–1639 G/A displayed the highest frequency, which was in line with the results of the distribution of genotype and allele frequencies in VKORC1–1639 G/A by Miao et al. in the Chinese population [22]; while different from the results in the foreign populations, such as European populations [23,24] and Caucasian populations [25]. In addition, compared with the distribution frequencies of genotype AA, AG and GG in VKORC1–1639 G/A in the Chinese Uygur population, which showed a higher frequency of genotype AG [26], our results displayed an obvious ethnic difference (Table 3). As for the distribution frequencies of genotype in VKORC1 1173 C/T, the genotyping results in our study revealed the highest frequency of genotype TT, which was consistent to the results of Yang et al. who also evaluated the distribution frequencies of genotype in VKORC1 1173 C/T in the Chinese population [27,28]; while obviously different from the results in the foreign populations, such as Caucasian populations [28], African Americans, and European Americans [29], which showed a higher frequency of genotype CT and CC, suggesting an apparent ethnic difference, and a low warfarin maintenance dose requirement in Chinese Han population (Table 4). The VKORC1 497 T/G is non-polymorphic (497TT) in all the populations except for the Indian population, in which 20% of the population has 497 T/G genotype. The 497G allele is very rare in the East-Asian populations (frequency <1%) [30]. The transitions at 497 T/G in intron 1 appeared to be present in Caucasians at a low frequency, and significant differences in allelic frequencies of 497 T/G were found between the Caucasian and Japanese groups, as well as between the Caucasian and African-American groups [31]. However, we failed to obtain the original data about the genotype and allele frequencies; therefore, the distribution frequencies of genotype and allele in VKORC1 497 T/G still required supports from studies with large sample size.
WARFARIN MAINTENANCE DOSE AND BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS:
Results showed statistical difference in warfarin maintenance dose between patients with age ≥50 years and patients with age <50 years (2.98±1.09 vs. 3.32±1.05, P=0.010). Compared with female patents, warfarin maintenance dose in male patients was evidently higher (3.42±1.02 vs. 3.04±1.09, P=0.003) (Figure 1A). Warfarin maintenance dose requirement in groups with different operation methods also showed statistical differences (MVR vs. AVR vs. DVR: 3.26±1.07 vs. 2.82±1.12 vs. 3.36±0.01, all P<0.05) (Figure 1B). No statistical significance existed in warfarin maintenance dose among patients with different BMI, BSA, as well as methods for heart valve replacement (all P>0.05).
WARFARIN MAINTENANCE DOSE AND GENOTYPES:
In patients with VKORC1–1639 G>A polymorphism, warfarin maintenance dose in AG + GG carriers was obviously higher than that in AA carriers (3.92±0.83 vs. 3.07±1.06, P<0.001). As compared with patients with TT genotype in VKORC1 1173 C/T, warfarin maintenance dose was apparently higher in patients with CT genotype in VKORC1 1173 C/T (3.81±0.92 vs. 3.07±1.07, P<0.001). There was no statistical significance in warfarin maintenance dose between patients with TT genotype in VKORC1 497 T/G and patients with TG genotype in VKORC1 497 T/G (3.19±1.08 vs. 3.87±0.44, P>0.05) (Figure 2).
LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR WARFARIN MAINTENANCE DOSE:
Linear regression method was used to analyze the correlations of gender, age, BMI, BSA, operation method, method for heart valve replacement, genotypes in VKORC1 with mean warfarin maintenance dose requirement. Gender, operation method, method for heart valve replacement, as well as VKORC1–1639 G/A and 1173 C/T gene polymorphisms were significantly related to the warfarin maintenance dose requirement (all P<0.05). However, no correlations of age, BMI, BSA, or VKORC1 497 T/G gene polymorphism with warfarin maintenance dose requirement were detected (all P>0.05) (Table 5).
Discussion
The most important results in our present study showed significant correlations of
The results of our linear regression analysis further confirmed the importance of
In addition, our study further extends the current observation that ethnicity affects warfarin maintenance dose requirements independent of previously identified variables. The causes of the observed difference in warfarin maintenance dose requirements among the ethnic groups have several possible explanations. Differential protein binding has been proposed to contribute to the variability in drug response [7,8,39]. Moreover, genetic differences in drug-metabolizing capacity across ethnic groups may account for the variable response observed with warfarin [6,40]. Dang et al. also documented that warfarin dose maintenance requirements vary across ethnic groups, even when adjusted for confounding factors, suggesting that genetic variation contributes to inter-patient variability [41].
Our study also has several limitations. First, the genotype distribution in
Conclusions
References
1. Lee MT, Klein TE, Pharmacogenetics of warfarin: challenges and opportunities: J Hum Genet, 2013; 58; 334-38, pmid: 23657428
2. Taki Y, Yokotani K, Yamada S, Ginkgo biloba extract attenuates warfarin-mediated anticoagulation through induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes by bilobalide in mice: Phytomedicine, 2012; 19; 177-82, pmid: 21802929
3. Neidecker M, Patel AA, Nelson WW, Reardon G, Use of warfarin in long-term care: a systematic review: BMC Geriatr, 2012; 12; 14, pmid: 22480376
4. Fung E, Patsopoulos NA, Belknap SM: Semin Thromb Hemost, 2012; 38; 893-904, pmid: 23041981
5. Jacobson A, Is there a role for warfarin anymore?: Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program, 2012; 2012; 541-46, pmid: 23233632
6. Jorgensen AL, Fitzgerald RJ, Oyee J: PLoS One, 2012; 7; e44064, pmid: 22952875
7. Liang R, Li L, Li C: J Thromb Thrombolysis, 2012; 34; 120-25, pmid: 22528326
8. Nakamura K, Obayashi K, Araki T, CYP4F2 gene polymorphism as a contributor to warfarin maintenance dose in Japanese subjects: J Clin Pharm Ther, 2012; 37; 481-85, pmid: 22172097
9. Lu Y, Yang J, Zhang H, Yang J, Prediction of warfarin maintenance dose in Han Chinese patients using a mechanistic model based on genetic and non-genetic factors: Clin Pharmacokinet, 2013; 52; 567-81, pmid: 23515956
10. El Din MS, Amin DG, Ragab SB: Int J Lab Hematol, 2012; 34; 517-24, pmid: 22533669
11. Biss TT, Avery PJ, Brandao LR: Blood, 2012; 119; 868-73, pmid: 22010099
12. Moreau C, Bajolle F, Siguret V: Blood, 2012; 119; 861-67, pmid: 22130800
13. Lee SC, Ng SS, Oldenburg J: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2006; 79; 197-205, pmid: 16513444
14. Matagrin B, Hodroge A, Montagut-Romans A: FEBS Open Bio, 2013; 3; 144-50
15. Ragia G, Marousi S, Ellul J: Dis Markers, 2013; 35; 641-46, pmid: 24288433
16. Cini M, Legnani C, Cosmi B: Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2012; 68; 1167-74, pmid: 22349464
17. Ma C, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Influence of warfarin dose-associated genotypes on the risk of hemorrhagic complications in Chinese patients on warfarin: Int J Hematol, 2012; 96; 719-28, pmid: 23104259
18. Lenzini P, Wadelius M, Kimmel S, Integration of genetic, clinical, and INR data to refine warfarin dosing: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2010; 87; 572-78, pmid: 20375999
19. Sagreiya H, Berube C, Wen A: Pharmacogenet Genomics, 2010; 20; 407-13, pmid: 20442691
20. Larsen TR, Gelaye A, Durando C, Acute warfarin toxicity: An unanticipated consequence of amoxicillin/clavulanate administration: Am J Case Rep, 2014; 15; 45-48, pmid: 24494060
21. Chen C, Lu FCDepartment of Disease Control Ministry of Health PRC, The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults: Biomed Environ Sci, 2004; 17(Suppl); 1-36, pmid: 15807475
22. Miao L, Yang J, Huang C, Shen Z: Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2007; 63; 1135-41, pmid: 17899045
23. Sconce EA, Khan TI, Wynne HA: Blood, 2005; 106; 2329-33, pmid: 15947090
24. Bodin L, Verstuyft C, Tregouet DA: Blood, 2005; 106; 135-40, pmid: 15790782
25. Yuan HY, Chen JJ, Lee MT: Hum Mol Genet, 2005; 14; 1745-51, pmid: 15888487
26. Tang HN, Zhang ZG, Du YK, Polymorphism of VKORCl-1639A/G in healthy people of Han and Uygur population in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region: Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity, 2007; 15; 16-18
27. Yang J, Huang C, Shen Z, Miao L: Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2011; 49; 23-29, pmid: 21176721
28. Larramendy-Gozalo C, Yang JQ, Verstuyft C: Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol, 2006; 98; 611-13, pmid: 16700826
29. Limdi NA, McGwin G, Goldstein JA: Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2008; 83; 312-21, pmid: 17653141
30. Takahashi H, Wilkinson GR, Nutescu EA: Pharmacogenet Genomics, 2006; 16; 101-10, pmid: 16424822
31. Lee MT, Chen CH, Chuang HP: Pharmacogenomics, 2009; 10; 1609-16, pmid: 19842934
32. Solvik UO, Roraas T, Petersen PH, The influence of coagulation factors on the in-treatment biological variation of international normalized ratio for patients on warfarin: Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 2014; 74; 470-76, pmid: 24724577
33. Cabral KP, Fraser GL, Duprey J, Prothrombin complex concentrates to reverse warfarin-induced coagulopathy in patients with intracranial bleeding: Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2013; 115; 770-74, pmid: 22835715
34. de Visser MC, Roshani S, Rutten JW: Thromb Haemost, 2011; 106; 563-65, pmid: 21800014
35. Harrington DJ, Siddiq S, Allford SL: J Thromb Haemost, 2011; 9; 1093-95, pmid: 21362126
36. D’Andrea G, D’Ambrosio RL, Di Perna P: Blood, 2005; 105; 645-49, pmid: 15358623
37. Kabagambe EK, Beasley TM, Limdi NA, Vitamin K intake, body mass index and warfarin maintenance dose: Cardiology, 2013; 126; 214-18, pmid: 24052022
38. Wright DF, Duffull SB, A Bayesian dose-individualization method for warfarin: Clin Pharmacokinet, 2013; 52; 59-68, pmid: 23329393
39. Liang R, Wang C, Zhao H, Influence of CYP4F2 genotype on warfarin dose requirement-a systematic review and meta-analysis: Thromb Res, 2012; 130; 38-44, pmid: 22192158
40. Bazan NS, Sabry NA, Rizk A, Factors affecting warfarin dose requirements and quality of anticoagulation in adult Egyptian patients: role of gene polymorphism: Ir J Med Sci, 2014; 183; 161-72, pmid: 23800980
41. Dang MT, Hambleton J, Kayser SR, The influence of ethnicity on warfarin dosage requirement: Ann Pharmacother, 2005; 39; 1008-12, pmid: 15855242
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






