Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

26 October 2015: Clinical Research  

Serum VEGF Predicts Worse Clinical Outcome of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Therapy

Xia Han AB , Lili Liu CDE , Jiamin Niu CDF , Jun Yang BD , Zengtang Zhang EG , Zhiqiang Zhang DG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894803

Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:3247-3251

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. However, patients after PCI treatment often have ischemic events that result in poor prognosis. Our study aimed to investigate the effects of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level on the prognosis of CHD patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 114 CHD patients in the study. Serum VEGF level was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and Hs-CRP were also tested in patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the level of VEGF. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to observe the differences in survival situation of patients of the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was conducted to judge whether VEGF was an independent biomarker for prognosis in CHD.

RESULTS: We included 104 patients for survival analysis. VEGF level in CHD patients was significantly lower than that of healthy individuals (P<0.05). In the analysis of basic information, we found differences in sex distribution and hypertension between groups (P<0.05 for both). Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that patients with low expression of VEGF presented with poor prognosis. The mortality rate of the low-expression group was 37.71%, higher than that of the high-expression group (14.3%). Cox analysis suggested that VEGF could serve as a biomarker for prognosis in CHD (HR: 3.014, P: 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS: Low level of VEGF may predict poor clinical outcome of CHD patients after PCI treatment.

Keywords: C-Reactive Protein - metabolism, Biomarkers - blood, Case-Control Studies, Cholesterol, HDL - blood, Cholesterol, LDL - blood, Coronary Disease - therapy, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, percutaneous coronary intervention, Proportional Hazards Models, Triglycerides - blood, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A - blood

Background

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a complex cardiovascular disease. Both genetic and environmental factors are involved in its pathogenesis. The prognosis of most CHD patients is favorable; however, cardiovascular events and death often occur. Identification of biomarkers that could predict the clinical outcome of CHD patients will help in improving the survival of patients.

The genetic biomarkers for CHD prognosis have been extensively studied. PF-4var/CXCL4L1 levels were reported to be associated with poor prognosis of patients with stable CHD [1]. Li et al. concluded that miR-4513 rs2168518 and miR-499 rs3746444 had strong relationship with event-free survival (EFS) in CHD [2]. Another gene, FSAP was demonstrated to be related with clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [3]. Breitling et al. found that methylation of F2RL3 was strongly correlated with mortality among patients with stable CHD [4].

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective treatment for CHD patients, which could greatly improve the prognosis of patients; however, the occurrence of cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary restenosis after PCI, still is 20–40% [5]; therefore, it is crucial to investigate the clinical outcome of CHD patients after PCI therapy. Zhang et al. reported that F2R rs168753 minor allele could predict ischemic events in CHD patients after PCI therapy [6]. A recent study showed that VEGF expression was related with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in CHD patients treated by PCI, which suggests that VEGF expression might be important in CHD prognosis [7].

In our study, the expression of VEGF in CHD patients and healthy controls were investigated. We used Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox analysis to evaluate the significance of VEGF in prognosis of CHD patients.

Material and Methods

SUBJECTS:

We enrolled 114 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) from Laiwu People’s Hospital. The diagnosis of each patient was performed by 2 experienced physicians. Patients were scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) (n=58), unstable angina pectoris (SAP) (n=35) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (n=21). Patients with artery diseases, infectious diseases, tumor and inflammatory diseases were excluded from the study. We also included 56 healthy controls to test the serum level of VEGF. In the present study, we tested levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and Hs-CRP.

After PCI, the survival of patients was investigated for up to 5 years by telephone contact. We defined “endpoints” as cardiovascular death, recurrent acute coronary syndromes (ACS) for re-admission, and acute heart failure. Because 10 patients could not be contacted in follow-up, 104 patients were included for further analysis. Written consent was obtained from each subject before the study and the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the hospital.

SERUM VEGF LEVEL:

Peripheral blood collected from each patient and healthy control was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 10 min. Serum was obtained and stored at −80°C. VEGF level in serum was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The test was performed in duplicate and the average value was used for analysis.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

The patients were classified into 2 groups according to the level of VEGF: low expression and high expression. The differences in average age, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and Hs-CRP of the 2 groups were compared using the independent-samples t test. The variations in sex, diabetes, smoking, CHD in family, and medication treatment between groups were evaluated with the χ2 test. Patient survival was recorded and association between VEGF levels with clinical outcome was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curve. The log-rank test was used for evaluating the significance in survival situation of the 2 groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine if VEGF could serve as an independent prognostic biomarker of CHD patients after PCI therapy. All analyses were conducted in SPSS 18.0. The diagram was completed in GraphPad Prism 5.

Results

BASIC INFORMATION OF CHD PATIENTS:

CHD patients were divided into VEGF high-expression and VEGF low-expression groups (Table 1). The average age in the high-expression group was 66.74 years and in the low-expression group it was 67.87 years. There were no significant differences in age. In the high-expression group, there was 25 females, a significantly higher ratio than in the low-expression group (56.0% vs. 33.9%, P<0.05). There were also differences in hypertension ratio between the 2 groups (P<0.05). However, we found no differences in diabetes, smoking, CHD in family, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, medication treatment, or Hs-CRP level (P>0.05 for all).

VEGF LEVEL IN CHD PATIENTS AND HEALTHY CONTROLS:

We used ELISA technology to test serum level of VEGF. As shown in Figure 1, VEGF level in CHD patients was lower than that in healthy controls (18.88 pg/ml vs. 389.25 pg/ml, P<0.05).

KAPLAN-MEIER CURVE AND COX ANALYSIS:

In the 5-year follow-up, we found there were 24 deaths in the low-expression group (38.71%), significantly higher than in the high-expression group (6 deaths, 14.3%) (Figure 2). The patients with low expression of VEGF showed worse prognosis compared to those with high expression of VEGF (P<0.05). Further analysis indicated that VEGF could serve as a prognostic biomarker in CHD (HR: 3.014, P: 0.019, Table 2).

Discussion

As a type of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease is the primary cause of mortality in the world, especially in developing countries [8,9]. Much effort has been made to improve the treatments of cardiac diseases. Double infusion of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and 5-azacytidine was reported to improve the treatment efficacy on dilated cardiomyopathy [10]. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and PCI are effective treatments for CHD, both of which could greatly reduce the mortality rate of patients. PCI is now the most common technology used in myocardial revascularization [11]. PCI, also known as coronary angioplasty or simply angioplasty, is a non-surgical procedure used to treat the stenotic coronary arteries of the heart in CHD patients. CABG serves as another alternative treatment for CHD, which bypasses stenotic arteries via grafting vessels from elsewhere. However, CABG treatment may increase the risk of stroke [12]. Compared to CABG, PCI has been proven to be as effective and less costly in CHD patients [13,14]. As regard to the clinical outcome, CABG is has better long-term outcome and patients after PCI therapy showed relatively worse outcomes [15–17].

Great efforts have been made to prevent or treat adverse events after PCI to increase the survival time of CHD patients. One study demonstrated that Tong-xin-luo can prevent restenosis and recurrence of cardiovascular events in CHD patients after PCI [18]. Jones et al. found no relationship between manual thrombus aspiration and reduced mortality of patients treated by PCI [19]. Some studies tried to resolve the problem through investigating the situation of individuals. Zhang et al. reported that smoking was related with poor clinical outcomes after PCI or CABG therapy of CHD patients [20]. Further analysis indicated that non-access site-related bleeding complications were correlated with worse prognosis of patients after PCI therapy [21]. Another study suggested that serum apelin level could predict cardiac events in CHD patients receiving PCI therapy and that it was related with survival of patients [22]. Konishi et al. concluded that high levels of lipoprotein were associated with poor prognosis of patients after PCI [23]. VEGF was demonstrated to be related with MACE in CHD patients after PCI [7]. Based on the above reports, we decided to investigate whether VEGF is related with prognosis of CHD patients receiving PCI therapy, which will help improve survival of CHD patients.

Our study firstly analyzed the serum level of VEGF in CHD patients and healthy controls. The results indicated that VEGF level was significantly lower in CHD patients compared to controls. The outcome was consistent with previous studies [7,24,25]. However, Kazmierczak et al. found increased levels of VEGF in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris [26,27]. These inconsistent results may result from the variations in severity of CHD, onset period, pathogenesis, and population composition. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to VEGF levels. Further analysis showed that sex distribution and hypertension situation were related with VEGF expression level. Then, Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that VEGF level exerted strong effects on the survival of CHD patients. Patients with low-level VEGF were more likely to have poor prognosis. Cox regression results suggested that VEGF could serve as a promising prognostic biomarker in CHD.

The present study provides evidence for a potential treatment target for CHD after PCI to improve clinical outcome. However, we did not investigate the effects of VEGF level on potential adverse events caused by PCI, which may provide details of the association between VEGF and prognosis. Moreover, studies with larger sample sizes are needed to compare differences in effects of VEGF between PCI and CABG treatments, providing theoretical evidence for choosing PCI or CABG in clinical practice.

Conclusions

A low level of VEGF predicts worse clinical outcome of CHD patients receiving PCI treatment.

References

1. De Sutter J, Van de Veire NR, Struyf S, PF-4var/CXCL4L1 predicts outcome in stable coronary artery disease patients with preserved left ventricular function: PLoS One, 2012; 7(2); e31343, pmid: 22384011

2. Li Q, Chen L, Chen D, Influence of microRNA-related polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease: Am J Transl Res, 2015; 7(2); 393-400, pmid: 25901206

3. Parahuleva MS, Hölschermann H, Zandt D, Circulating factor VII activating protease (FSAP) is associated with clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome: Circ J, 2012; 76(11); 2653-61, pmid: 22850287

4. Breitling LP, Salzmann K, Rothenbacher D, Smoking, F2RL3 methylation, and prognosis in stable coronary heart disease: Eur Heart J, 2012; 33(22); 2841-48, pmid: 22511653

5. Pollack CV, Hollander JE, Chen AY, Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients who present during off hours have higher risk profiles and are treated less aggressively, but their outcomes are not worse: a report from Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress ADverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines CRUSADE initiative: Crit Pathw Cardiol, 2009; 8(1); 29-33, pmid: 19258835

6. Zhang JH, Wang J, Tang XF, Effect of platelet receptor gene polymorphisms on outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Platelets, 2015 [Epub ahead of print]

7. Ramos C, Napoleão P, Selas M, Prognostic value of VEGF in patients submitted to percutaneous coronary intervention: Dis Markers, 2014; 2014; 135357, pmid: 25110384

8. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data: Lancet, 2006; 367(9524); 1747-57, pmid: 16731270

9. Bolognese L, Changing patterns of ST elevation myocardial infarction epidemiology: Am Heart J, 2010; 160(6 Suppl); S1-3, pmid: 21147285

10. Yang S, Piao J, Jin L, Zhou Y, Does pretreatment of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with 5-azacytidine or double intravenous infusion improve their therapeutic potential for dilated cardiomyopathy?: Med Sci Monit Basic Res, 2013; 19; 20-31, pmid: 23314418

11. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, Prediction of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry: Circulation, 2012; 125(12); 1501-10, pmid: 22361329

12. Palmerini T, Biondi-Zoccai G, Riva DD, Risk of stroke with percutaneous coronary intervention compared with on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis: Am Heart J, 2013; 165(6); 910-17.e14, pmid: 23708161

13. Stroupe KT, Morrison DA, Hlatky MA, Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients: Circulation, 2006; 114(12); 1251-57, pmid: 16966588

14. Smit Y, Vlayen J, Koppenaal H, Percutaneous coronary invervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2015; 149(3); 831-38e1–13, pmid: 25467373

15. Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Furukawa Y, Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main coronary artery disease – 5-year outcome from CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2: Circ J, 2015; 79(6); 1282-89, pmid: 25818902

16. Biancari F, Gudbjartsson T, Heikkinen J, Comparison of 30-day and 5-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged

17. Javaid A, Steinberg DH, Buch AN, Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Circulation, 2007; 116(11 Suppl); I200-6, pmid: 17846304

18. Mao C, Fu XH, Yuan JQ, Tong-xin-luo capsule for patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015; 5; CD010237, pmid: 25994229

19. Jones DA, Rathod KS, Gallagher S, Manual thrombus aspiration is not associated with reduced mortality in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational study of 10,929 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from the London Heart Attack Group: JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2015; 8(4); 575-84, pmid: 25907084

20. Zhang YJ, Iqbal J, van Klaveren D, Smoking is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revascularization with PCI or CABG: the SYNTAX trial at 5-year follow-up: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2015; 65(11); 1107-15, pmid: 25790882

21. Kwok CS, Khan MA, Rao SV, Access and non-access site bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention and risk of subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events: systematic review and meta-analysis: Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2015; 8(4) pii: e001645

22. Liu HT, Chen M, Yu J, Serum apelin level predicts the major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: Medicine (Baltimore), 2015; 94(4); e449, pmid: 25634182

23. Konishi H, Miyauchi K, Kasai T, Impact of lipoprotein(a) as residual risk on long-term outcomes in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Am J Cardiol, 2015; 115(2); 157-60, pmid: 25476560

24. Amoli MM, Amiri P, Alborzi A, VEGF gene mRNA expression in patients with coronary artery disease: Mol Biol Rep, 2012; 39(9); 8595-99, pmid: 22711306

25. Kim SY, Lee SH, Park S, Vascular endothelial growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1, and the severity of coronary artery disease: Angiology, 2011; 62(2); 176-83, pmid: 20498143

26. Kazmierczak E, Grajek S, Kowal J, Prognostic usefulness of IL-6 and VEGF for the occurrence of changes in coronary arteries of patients with stable angina and implanted stents: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2014; 18(15); 2169-75, pmid: 25070823

27. Konopka A, Janas J, Piotrowski W, Stępińska J, Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Cytokine, 2013; 61(2); 664-69, pmid: 23313225

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750