Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

17 November 2015: Clinical Research  

Relation of Angiographic Thrombus Burden with Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Hakan Duman A , Mustafa Çetin F , Murtaza Emre Durakoğlugil E , Hüsnü Değirmenci C , Hikmet Hamur D , Mehmet Bostan B , Zakir Karadağ D , Yüksel Çiçek B

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.895157

Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:3540-3546

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We planned to investigate the relationship of thrombus burden with SYNTAX score in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 780 patients who underwent PPCI in our clinic due to STEMI. Clinical, laboratory, and demographic properties of the patients were recorded. Angiographic coronary thrombus burden was classified using thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) thrombus grades.

RESULTS: Patients with high thrombus burden were older, with higher diabetes prevalence longer pain to balloon time, higher leukocyte count, higher admission troponin, and admission CK-MB concentrations. SYNTAX score was higher and myocardial perfusion grades were lower in patients with high thrombus burden. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed SYNTAX score as the strongest predictor of thrombus burden. ROC analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.2%, and cut-off value of >14 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.702; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.773–0.874;P<0.001) for high thrombus burden.

CONCLUSIONS: SYNTAX score may have additional value in predicting higher thrombus burden besides being a marker of coronary artery disease severity and complexity.

Keywords: Biomarkers - blood, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease - surgery, Forecasting, Myocardial Infarction - surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, ROC Curve, Thrombosis - pathology

Background

ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is still an important cause of cardiovascular mortality, and morbidity. Without doubt, coronary thrombosis is the main physiopathologic mechanism of STEMI. Moreover, higher thrombotic burden in infarct related artery (IRA) is related to stent thrombosis, distal embolization, no-reflow phenomenon, and long-term mortality [1–4].

No-reflow phenomenon poses as a major problem in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (primary PCI, PPCI). Although the thrombotic lesion in IRA is successfully stented, tissue level perfusion remains low with increased cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality [5,6]. Thus, identification of factors that could increase no-reflow and potential remedies of this phenomenon is clinically significant.

SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score is an angiographic scoring system, which grades coronary artery disease severity and complexity [7]. Even though SYNTAX score is primary utilized for selection of elective revascularization strategies, there is growing data implicating additional clinical value in STEMI. Recent studies revealed that pre-PPCI SYNTAX score is associated with no-reflow phenomenon and long-term mortality in STEMI [8–11]. Moreover, SYNTAX score independently predicted angiographically visible distal embolization in patients undergoing PPCI [12]. These results implicate an association between pre-PPCI thrombus burden and SYNTAX score. Therefore, we planned to investigate this relationship in patients with STEMI.

Material and Methods

STUDY POPULATION:

We retrospectively enrolled 780 patients who underwent PPCI in our clinic due to STEMI between April 2009 and February 2015. Our study was approved by the local ethics board.

Our study included patients who had the diagnosis of STEMI according to recent STEMI guideline, and underwent PPCI [13]. The clinical, demographic, and laboratory data of the patients were obtained using patient records and registries. Heart rate, Killip class, previous medications, pain to balloon time and door to balloon time, serum creatinine, lipid panel, and hematological indices of all patients were recorded during hospital admission. Data regarding coronary angiography were gathered through re-evaluation of stored media. The patients were treated according to relevant guidelines [13,14]. Tirofiban was used at a dose of 10 mg/kg bolus and 0.15 mg/kg/min intravenous infusion if preferred by the physician. Experienced operators performed all PPCI procedures.

We excluded cases that underwent fibrinolytic therapy (n=15), emergent cardiovascular bypass surgery (n=18), and patients with end stage renal failure (n=11), malignancy (n=3), culprit left main coronary lesion (n=3), and spontaneous coronary dissection (n=1).

SYNTAX score was calculated using SYNTAX Score Calculator 2.11 software downloaded from http://www.syntaxscore.com [7,15].

CLINICAL DEFINITIONS:

Hypertension was defined as systemic blood pressure >140/90 mmHg or the use of antihypertensive medication. Hypercholesterolemia was accepted if a serum total cholesterol level >200 mg/dL, or with the use of a cholesterol lowering agent. Diabetes mellitus was acknowledged as an HbA1c >6.5%, a plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) after an overnight fast, or the use of antidiabetic medications. Positive family history of coronary artery disease was defined as documented evidence of premature coronary artery disease in a first degree relative (men <55 and women <65 years of age).

Killip Classification was noted as follows: Class I: No evidence of heart failure. Class II: Findings of mild to moderate heart failure (S3 gallop, rales < half-way up lung fields or elevated jugular venous pressure). Class III: Pulmonary edema. Class IV: Cardiogenic shock defined as systolic blood pressure <90 and signs of hypoperfusion such as oliguria, cyanosis, and sweating.

ANGIOGRAPHIC DEFINITIONS:

Three experienced investigators who were blinded to clinical parameters of the patients’ carefully reviewed coronary angiograms. The TIMI flow grades were determined by the consensus of the three investigators. Angiographic thrombus burden was classified as follows: Grade 0: no thrombus, Grade 1: Possible thrombus, Grade 2: the thrombus’ greatest dimension is <1/2 vessel diameter, Grade 3: Greatest dimension >1/2 to <2 vessel diameters, Grade 4: Greatest dimension >2 vessel diameters, Grade 5: total vessel occlusion due to thrombus [3]. The patients were stratified into low thrombus burden (Grades 1, 2 and 3) and high thrombus burden groups (4 and 5) according to final thrombus score.

Postprocedural final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), and TMPG were noted as previously defined. [16–18]. TIMI flow grade <3, and final myocardial blush grade <2 were described as angiographic no-reflow.[19].

STATISTICAL ANALYSES:

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, whereas categorical variables are expressed as percentage. Comparison between groups was made using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test or chi-square tests, as appropriate. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors of high thrombus burden using variables. Two-tailed P values <.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS, version 18.0 for Windows. In order to predict cutoff value of SYNTAX score, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed by MedCalc statistic software (version 13.2.0, Mariakerke, Belgium).

Results

The study population consisted of 780 patients with STEMI (mean age 56±11, 52.8% male). The mean SYNTAX score was 18±9.5. We formed two groups according to the final TIMI thrombus grade; 299 (%38.3) patients had low thrombus burden whereas 481 subjects (%61.7) had high thrombus burden. The comparisons of basic clinical and laboratory findings between groups thrombus burden were presented in Table 1. Patients with high thrombus burden were older (57.1 vs. 55.4 p=0.033), with higher diabetes prevalence (30.4% vs. 23.7% p=0.049), longer pain to balloon time (280±502 min vs. 220±121 min p=0.042), higher leukocyte count (9.7±2.5×103/μL vs. 9.2±2.5×103/μL p=0.013), higher baseline troponin (2.3±1.5 mg/L vs. 2.1±1.5 mg/L P=0.047), and baseline CK-MB concentrations (37.1±15.1 IU/L vs. 35±13.7 IU/L p=0.048). Comparison of the baseline angiographic characteristics and postprocedural findings of the groups based on thrombus burden were detailed in Table 2. Tirofiban administration (42.8% vs. %68.6%, p<.001), and direct stenting (8.9% vs. 12.4%, P=0.008) were less frequent, and SYNTAX score was higher (20.7± 9.1 vs. 13.8±8.6) in patients with high thrombus burden. Although epicardial perfusion parameters were better (82.1% vs. 72.9% for TIMI flow III, p=.003 and 25.2±21 vs. 22.1±6.2 for cTFC, p=.013), myocardial perfusion grades were lower (58% vs. 75.3%, p<0.001) in patients with high thrombus burden.

The discriminatory value of SYNTAX score for high thrombus burden was assessed by ROC analysis and revealed a sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.2%, and cut-off value of >14 (area under the curve (AUC): 0.702; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.773–0.874; P<0.001) (Figure 1).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed in order to determine the independent predictors of high thrombus burden. SYNTAX score (odds ratio: 2.45,95% confidence interval: 1.36–4.39, P <0.001), age (odds ratio: 1.01,95% confidence interval: 1.00–1.03, P <0.01), DM (odds ratio: 0.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.40, P <0.004), WBC (odds ratio: 1.11,95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.18, P<0.001), baseline troponin levels (odds ratio: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.29, P<0.004) were found as significant independent predictors for HTB in patients with STEMI (Table 3).

Discussion

LIMITATIONS:

The main limitation of our study is the retrospective design. We could not assess inflammation by using additional markers such as high-sensitive C reactive protein. Even though we utilized the TIMI thrombus grade, a well-known and widely used classification, this grading may not be the perfect and ideal. Lastly, we did not utilize thrombus aspiration in our study.

Conclusions

Age, diabetes mellitus, admission troponin and leukocyte concentrations, and SYNTAX score are independently associated with TIMI thrombus burden in patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI. Angiographic no-reflow is more frequent in patients with high thrombus burden. SYNTAX score may have additional value in predicting higher thrombus burden besides being a marker of coronary artery disease severity and complexity.

References

1. Iwakura K, Ito H, Kawano S, Predictive factors for development of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with reperfused anterior wall acute myocardial infarction: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2001; 38; 472-77, pmid: 11499740

2. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Daemen J, Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2007; 50; 573-83, pmid: 17692740

3. Sianos G, Papafaklis MI, Serruys PW, Angiographic thrombus burden classification in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: J Invasive Cardiol, 2010; 22; 6B-14B, pmid: 20048390

4. Fukuda D, Tanaka A, Shimada K, Predicting angiographic distal embolization following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Am J Cardiol, 2003; 91; 403-7, pmid: 12586252

5. Iijima R, Shinji H, Ikeda N, Comparison of coronary arterial finding by intravascular ultrasound in patients with “transient no-reflow” versus “reflow” during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: Am J Cardiol, 2006; 97; 29-33, pmid: 16377279

6. Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Fusaro M, 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2010; 55; 2383-89, pmid: 20488311

7. Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease: Eurointervention, 2005; 1; 219-27, pmid: 19758907

8. Capodanno D, Di Salvo ME, Cincotta G, Usefulness of the SYNTAX score for predicting clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2009; 2; 302-8, pmid: 20031732

9. Capodanno D, Capranzano P, Di Salvo ME, Usefulness of SYNTAX score to select patients with left main coronary artery disease to be treated with coronary artery bypass graft: JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2009; 2; 731-38, pmid: 19695541

10. Magro M, Nauta ST, Simsek C, Usefulness of the SYNTAX score to predict “no reflow” in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: AmJ Cardiol, 2012; 109; 601-6, pmid: 22177003

11. Brown AJ, McCormick LM, Gajendragadkar PR, Initial SYNTAX score predicts major adverse cardiac events after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Angiology, 2014; 65; 408-12, pmid: 23574751

12. Biyik I, Akturk IF, Ozturk D, Can syntax score predict angiographically visible distal embolization during primary percutaneous coronary intervention?: Minerva Cardioangiol, 2015 [Epub ahead of print]

13. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Circulation, 2013; 127; e362-425, pmid: 23247304

14. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, 2009 focused updates: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (updating the 2004 guideline and 2007 focused update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention (updating the 2005 guideline and 2007 focused update) a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009; 54; 2205-41, pmid: 19942100

15. Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the Syntax study: Eurointervention, 2009; 5; 50-56, pmid: 19577983

16. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow: Circulation, 1996; 93; 879-88, pmid: 8598078

17. Gibson CM, Murphy SA, Rizzo MJ, Relationship between TIMI frame count and clinical outcomes after thrombolytic administration. Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group: Circulation, 1999; 99; 1945-50, pmid: 10208996

18. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Relationship of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade to mortality after administration of thrombolytic drugs: Circulation, 2000; 101; 125-30, pmid: 10637197

19. Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction: Circulation, 2002; 105; 1909-13, pmid: 11997276

20. Davies MJ, Thomas A, Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death: N Engl J Med, 1984; 310; 1137-40, pmid: 6709008

21. Endemann DH, Schiffrin EL, Endothelial dysfunction: J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004; 15; 1983-92, pmid: 15284284

22. Woo JS, Jang WS, Kim HS, Comparison of peripheral arterial tonometry and flow-mediated vasodilation for assessment of the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease: Coron Artery Dis, 2014; 25; 421-26, pmid: 24584030

23. Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A, Inflammation and atherosclerosis: Circulation, 2002; 105; 1135-43, pmid: 11877368

24. Barlis P, Serruys PW, Devries A, Regar E, Optical coherence tomography assessment of vulnerable plaque rupture: predilection for the plaque ‘shoulder’: Eur Heart J, 2008; 29; 2023, pmid: 18337236

25. Katritsis DG, Pantos J, Efstathopoulos E, Hemodynamic factors and atheromatic plaque rupture in the coronary arteries: from vulnerable plaque to vulnerable coronary segment: Coron Artery Dis, 2007; 18; 229-37, pmid: 17429298

26. Wu AH, Early detection of acute coronary syndromes and risk stratification by multimarker analysis: Biomark Med, 2007; 1; 45-57, pmid: 20477460

27. Melamed KH, Goldhaber SZ, Inflammation and myocardial infarction: Circulation, 2014; 130; e334-36, pmid: 25602951

28. Barron HV, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Association between white blood cell count, epicardial blood flow, myocardial perfusion, and clinical outcomes in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 10 substudy: Circulation, 2000; 102; 2329-34, pmid: 11067784

29. Tanboga IH, Topcu S, Aksakal E, Determinants of angiographic thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Clin Appl Thromb Hemost, 2014; 20; 716-22, pmid: 23539672

30. Vazzana N, Ranalli P, Cuccurullo C, Davi G, Diabetes mellitus and thrombosis: Thromb Res, 2012; 129; 371-77, pmid: 22197180

31. Wang CH, Chen YD, Yang XC, A no-reflow prediction model in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and primary drug-eluting stenting: Scand Cardiovasc J, 2011; 45; 98-104, pmid: 21329416

32. De Luca G, Suryapranata H, Stone GW, Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials: JAMA, 2005; 293; 1759-65, pmid: 15827315

33. De Luca G, Navarese E, Marino P, Risk profile and benefits from Gp IIb-IIIa inhibitors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: a meta-regression analysis of randomized trials: Eur Heart J, 2009; 30; 2705-13, pmid: 19875386

34. Costopoulos C, Gorog DA, Di Mario C, Kukreja N, Use of thrombectomy devices in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Int J Cardiol, 2013; 163; 229-41, pmid: 22142529

35. Sebastianski M, Narasimhan S, Graham MM, Usefulness of the ankle-brachial index to predict high coronary SYNTAX scores, myocardium at risk, and incomplete coronary revascularization: Am J Cardiol, 2014; 114; 1745-49, pmid: 25306553

36. Magro M, Nauta S, Simsek C, Value of the SYNTAX score in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MI SYNTAXscore study: Am Heart J, 2011; 161; 771-81, pmid: 21473978

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750