01 April 2025: Clinical Research
Association of Sex with Survival and Adverse Events in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Single-Center Experience in Türkiye
Melike Yüksel Yavuz







DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947817
Med Sci Monit 2025; 31:e947817
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study conducted in a single center in Türkiye, we aimed to investigate the effect of sex differences on survival and treatment adverse effects in 100 patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. All 100 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma admitted to the Pulmonary and Medical Oncology Department of a Training and Research Hospital between January 2018 and March 2024 were evaluated. Demographic data, cancer characteristics, overall survival, and adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors were investigated in the male and female patient groups. Patients were treated with nivolumab and atezolizumab as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
RESULTS: This study included 100 patients, with 88 (88%) men and 12 (12%) women. The average age of the patients was 64.3±8.5 years, 63% had adenocarcinoma, and 80.6% of all patients were stage 4. Although overall survival was significantly lower in women compared to men in univariate analysis (P=0.047), this difference disappeared in multivariate analysis (P=0.168). Adverse effects were observed in 91% of the patients. Pleural effusion (P=0.040), hypothyroidism (P=0.003), and rash (P<0.001) were more common in women, whereas tiredness (P=0.804), pneumonitis (P=0.097), and hyperthyroidism (P=0.507) were not significantly different according to sex. The average follow-up period was 33.8±22.6 months, and 25% of patients died.
CONCLUSIONS: The association of sex differences with adverse effects and survival in patients with NSCLC receiving ICI treatment is not fully understood. Further studies are needed to support this area of interest.
Keywords: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Sex Factors, Survival Rate
Introduction
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80–85% of all lung cancers. Despite surgical, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy options, survival rates in advanced lung cancer are still poor [1]. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have also been used in these patients because of the search for new targeted therapies. ICIs promote the autoimmune function of cancer cells by blocking the expression of immune checkpoint antibodies, programmed death 1 (PD-1), programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) pathways, which play an important role in the immune escape of tumor cells. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab for patients with NSCLC [2]. Nivolumab, a PD-1 antibody, restores the function of existing anti-cancer T cells and strengthens anti-cancer immunity through immune system activation [3]. The PD-L1 monoclonal antibody atezolizumab resulted in significantly longer overall survival compared to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, regardless of histological type [4]. While the common adverse effects of ICIs are anorexia, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, skin rashes, less frequent but important immune-related adverse effects such as pneumonitis, thyroiditis, hepatitis, vitiligo, and diarrhea also occur [5].
Although NSCLC is not a sex-specific cancer, there are sex differences in incidence, survival, and treatment response. For example, adenocarcinomas are more common in women, and small cell and squamous cell lung cancers (scc) are more common in men, even though they are associated with smoking [6]. Although overall survival is longer in women than in men, even when adjusted for age, smoking status, and stage, it remains to be seen how the global increase in the incidence of lung cancer in women will affect these results. In addition, among people who consumed the same amount of tobacco, women have a higher risk of developing lung cancer than men. Some risk factors vary according to sex, including biomass exposures, indoor cooking fumes, passive smoking, and hormone replacement therapy [7].
They are 2 times more likely to have CYP1A1 expression levels associated with lung cancer and 2 times more likely to have an S-transferase M1 mutation, which inactivates toxic products [8]. Overall mortality, tumor grade at diagnosis, and response to ICIs were higher in men [9]. Since there are differences in the adaptive and innate immune response between men and women, there are also differences in PD-1 and PDL-1 levels. One study revealed that female patients had higher levels of sPD-1 and PD-1 expression on CD4+T cells than male patients [10].
Another view is that sex is not an independent prognostic factor for ICI. However, several factors affect the ICI response, such as high PD-L1 expression, which is more common in men [11]. The relationship between the role of sex hormones and the immune system in facilitating this difference and the potential biological reason behind this difference remain unclear [9]. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, adverse effects, and overall survival (OS) status of 100 patients with NSCLC from a single center in Türkiye receiving ICI and their association with sex.
Material and Methods
STUDY DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION:
This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. All 100 NSCLC patients admitted to the Pulmonary and Medical Oncology Department of a training and research hospital between January 2018 and March 2024 were evaluated. All patients admitted between these dates were evaluated, and all patients had complete data.
ETHICS APPROVAL:
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics committee approval was obtained from Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2024l19-20, 8756-GoA). Consent was obtained from all patients.
DEPENDENT AND INDEPENDENT VARIABLES:
The independent variables of the study were sociodemographic data (age, sex, occupation, comorbidities, smoking status), clinical and physical examination findings, lung carcinoma pathology, and treatment modalities such as conventional chemotherapy, ICI, and radiotherapy.
Patients had received nivolumab or atezolizumab treatments and there was no other ICI use. According to the reimbursement conditions in our country, atezolizumab is covered as the first-line treatment and nivolumab is covered as the second-line treatment. In ICI selection, the appropriate treatment modality within the scope of reimbursement is selected in consultation with the patient.
Serum albumin and lactate dehydrogenase levels were measured in whole blood. The neutrophil/leukocyte ratio (NLR) was determined based on the complete blood count. Physical activity status was determined using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale [12]. The TNM clinical staging system score was NSCLC 8 [13]. PDL-1 levels were determined according to the tumor proportion score (TPS). Accordingly, TPS <1% was PDL-1-negative, TPS 1–49% was weakly positive, and TPS ≥50% was strongly positive [14]. Smoking status was based on the CDC definitions of smoking status [15]: current smokers are defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes during their lifetime and who currently smoke cigarettes; former smokers are defined as having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but had quit smoking by the time of the interview; and never smokers are defined as never smoked or smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Dependent variables were observed adverse effects and OS status. The most common adverse effects documented in patient files were also investigated and included tiredness, pneumonitis (including drug-related), pleural effusion, hypothyroidism, rash, and hyperthyroidism.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
The data obtained were evaluated using the software package SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac OS, Version 27.0. Armonk, NY). The conformity of continuous variables to a normal distribution was examined visually (through histograms and probability plots) and statistically (through Kolmogorov-Smirnov/Shapiro-Wilk tests). Descriptive statistics are presented as numbers and percentages for categorical variables and medians (IQR) for continuous variables. The
Results
BASELINE DATA OF PATIENTS:
This study included 100 patients, with 88 (88%) men and 12 (%12) women. The average age of the patients was 64.3±8.5 years. The patients had been smoking for a mean of 41.1±22.8 package years. Ten percent of patients were never smokers, 55% were former smokers, and 35% were current smokers. The demographic data of the patients are shown in Table 1.
CANCER-RELATED DATA OF PATIENTS:
NSLC subtypes were 63% adenocarcinoma, 33% scc and 4% other. The other group consisted of large-cell carcinoma and those for which the exact subtype could not be determined. The stages of the patients were stage 4, stage 3c, stage 3b, stage 3a and stage 2b (80.6%, 9.2%, 7.1%, 2%, and 1%, respectively). The ECOG scores of 0, 1, and 2 were 43.4%, 34.3%, and 21.2%, respectively. Nivolumab was by far the most frequently used ICI agent (99%). PDL-1 levels were reached in 54% of the patients. Of these patients, 34% were negative, 8% were weakly positive, and 12% were strongly positive. First-line chemotherapy was administered to 98% of patients, radiotherapy was administered to 83%, and 99% received nivolumab as ICI. The histology, cancer stage, ECOG, ICI agents and PDL-1 levels of patients are shown in Table 2.
EVALUATION OF ICI-RELATED ADVERSE EFFECTS AND LABORATORY VALUES ACCORDING TO SEX:
Adverse effects were observed in 91% of the patients. Pleural effusion (P=0.040), hypothyroidism (P=0.003), and rash (P<0.001) were more common in women, whereas tiredness (P=0.804), pneumonitis (P=0.097), and hyperthyroidism (P=0.507) were not significantly different according to sex. Albumin, LDH, and PDL-1 levels did not differ significantly according to sex (P=0.098, P=0.663, P=0.552). Tumor histology was not significantly associated with sex (P=0.557) (Table 3).
UNIVARIATE SURVIVAL ANALYSIS OF PATIENTS ACCORDING TO SEX:
The average follow-up period was 33.8±22.6 months, and 25% of patients died. OS was significantly lower in women than in women (P=0.047) (Figure 1). OS did not differ according to sex in stage 4 patients (P=0.087) (Table 4). Among men, survival was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group (P=0.004). OS could not be determined based on NLR. There was no distinct predictive value for men (AUC: 0.628, P=0.088) or women (AUC: 0.583, P=0.631). The NLR levels in women (P=0.800) and men (P=0.226) were not significantly different in terms of OS. NLR levels were not significantly different according to sex between living (P=0.777) and dead (P=0.877) patients. The lowest OS was observed in the M1c group (P=0.035). OS was lowest among those with an ECOG performance score of 2 (P=0.030). OS was higher in those who received RT (P=0.024). No significant difference was found in OS among the other compared variables (P>0.05).
MULTIVARIATE COX REGRESSION ANALYSIS TO PREDICT MORTALITY BY CREATING A MODEL ACCORDING TO ALL VARIABLES:
Cox regression analysis was performed to predict mortality. Multivariate analyses showed that sex was not a predictor of mortality (P=0.168). According to the multivariate analysis, the risk of death increased 3.3-fold in those who did not receive RT (OR, 3.311; 95% CI: 1.291–8.492, P=0.013). A 1-unit increase in the ECOG score increased the risk of death by 1.7-fold (OR, 1.744; 95% CI: 3.311–1.291, P=0.036). A 1-unit increase in albumin level reduced the risk of death by 10% (OR, 0.907; 95% CI: 0.841–0.977, P=0.010) (Table 5).
Discussion
STUDY LIMITATIONS:
The main limitations of this study were its retrospective design, the different follow-up periods of the patients, and the relatively small number of women. In addition, the disease-free survival and PFS rates could not be analyzed. Familial history, socioeconomic status, education level, and working status were not included in our data; therefore, it was not possible to analyze the effects of these factors on the prognosis of lung cancer according to sex. Nevertheless, the results of our study are still important because sex can be an important factor in individualized treatments for NSCLC patients.
Conclusions
Sex was not shown to significantly predict mortality in women with NSCL receiving ICI, but there are differences between female and male in some adverse effects of ICI treatment. Our results may be useful for future individualized treatment based on sex. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand these relationships.
Tables
Table 1. Demographic data of the patients.




References
1. Lahiri A, Maji A, Potdar PD, Lung cancer immunotherapy: Progress, pitfalls, and promises: Mol Cancer, 2023; 22(1); 40
2. Lu Y, Zhang X, Ning J, Zhang M, Immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis: Hum Vaccin Immunother, 2023; 19(1); 2169531
3. Forde PM, Spicer J, Lu S, Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable lung cancer: N Engl J Med, 2022; 386(21); 1973-85
4. Herbst RS, Giaccone G, de Marinis F, Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of PD-L1-selected patients with NSCLC: N Engl J Med, 2020; 383(14); 1328-39
5. Ganta N, Alnabwani D, Keating S, Rare adverse events related to nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor: A case series: Cureus, 2022; 14(2); e22070
6. Ruano-Ravina A, Provencio M, Calvo de Juan V, Are there differences by sex in lung cancer characteristics at diagnosis? -a nationwide study: Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2021; 10(10); 3902-11
7. Ragavan M, Patel MI, The evolving landscape of sex-based differences in lung cancer: A distinct disease in women: Eur Respir Rev, 2022; 31(163); 210100
8. Florez N, Kiel L, Riano I, Lung cancer in women: The past, present, and future: Clin Lung Cancer, 2024; 25(1); 1-8
9. May L, Shows K, Nana-Sinkam P, Sex differences in lung cancer: Cancers (Basel), 2023; 15(12); 3111
10. Gu Y, Tang YY, Wan JX, Sex difference in the expression of PD-1 of non-small cell lung cancer: Front Immunol, 2022; 13; 1026214
11. Choi MG, Choi CM, Lee DH, Impact of gender on response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing second- or later-line treatment: Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2022; 11(9); 1866-76
12. : The ECOG Performance Status Scale [Online] https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status/
13. Matilla JM, Zabaleta M, Martínez-Téllez E: J Clin Transl Res, 2020; 6(4); 145-54
14. Takamochi K, Hara K, Hayashi T, Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and its associations with clinicopathological features, prognosis, and driver oncogene alterations in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: Lung Cancer, 2021; 161; 163-70
15. : Adult tobacco use information [Online] https://wwwcdcgov/nchs/nhis/tobacco/tobacco_glossary.htm
16. Jeon DS, Kim JW, Kim SG, Sex differences in the characteristics and survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective analytical study based on real-world clinical data of the Korean population: Thorac Cancer, 2022; 13(18); 2584-91
17. Zhong S, Borlak J, Sex disparities in non-small cell lung cancer: Mechanistic insights from a cRaf transgenic disease model: EBioMedicine, 2023; 95; 104763
18. Pinto JA, Vallejos CS, Raez LE, Gender and outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: An old prognostic variable comes back for targeted therapy and immunotherapy?: ESMO Open, 2018; 3(3); e000344
19. West H, McCleod M, Hussein M, Atezolizumab in combination with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower130): A multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial: Lancet Oncol, 2019; 20(7); 924-37
20. Barquín M, Calvo V, García-García F, Sex is a strong prognostic factor in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients and should be considered in survival rate estimation: Cancer Epidemiol, 2020; 67; 101737
21. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater: J Clin Oncol, 2019; 37(7); 537-46
22. Wang S, Cowley LA, Liu XS, Sex differences in cancer immunotherapy efficacy, biomarkers, and therapeutic strategy: Molecules, 2019; 24(18); 3214
23. Unger JM, Vaidya R, Albain KS, Sex differences in risk of severe adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy in cancer clinical trials: J Clin Oncol, 2022; 40(13); 1474-86
24. Duma N, Abdel-Ghani A, Yadav S, Sex differences in tolerability to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer: Are we all equal?: Oncologist, 2019; 24(11); e1148-e55
25. Metzenmacher M, Griesinger F, Hummel HD, Prognostic factors in nonsmall cell lung cancer: insights from the German CRISP registry: Eur Respir J, 2023; 61(2); 2201336
26. Yao Y, Zhao M, Yuan D, Elevated pretreatment serum globulin albumin ratio predicts poor prognosis for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: J Thorac Dis, 2014; 6(9); 1261-70
27. Fiala O, Pesek M, Finek J, Serum albumin is a strong predictor of survival in patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib: Neoplasma, 2016; 63(3); 471-76
28. Nieder C, Aanes SG, Dalhaug A, Haukland EC, Sex differences in presentation, treatment, and survival in patients receiving palliative (chemo)radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Anticancer Res, 2024; 44(1); 301-5
29. Gee K, Yendamuri S, Lung cancer in females-sex-based differences from males in epidemiology, biology, and outcomes: A narrative review: Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2024; 13(1); 163-78
30. Pasli M, Kannaiyan R, Namireddy P, Impact of race on outcomes of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: Curr Oncol, 2023; 30(4); 4208-21
31. Shankar B, Zhang J, Naqash AR, Multisystem immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: JAMA Oncol, 2020; 6(12); 1952-56
Tables










In Press
Review article
Global Guidelines and Trends in HPV Vaccination for Cervical Cancer PreventionMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947173
Clinical Research
Serum Prolidase and Ischemia-Modified Albumin Levels in Neural Tube Defects: A Comparative Study of Myelome...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947873
Clinical Research
Impact of Depression, Fatigue, and Pain on Quality of Life in Slovak Multiple Sclerosis PatientsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947630
Clinical Research
Longitudinal Evaluation of Metabolic Benefits of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccination in Diabetic Patients in T...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.947450
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 7,960,158
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 702,953
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
01 Mar 2024 : Editorial 29,945
Editorial: First Regulatory Approvals for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutic Gene Editing for Sickle Cell Disease and ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.944204
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e944204
28 Jan 2024 : Review article 23,915
A Review of IgA Vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein Purpura) Past, Present, and FutureDOI :10.12659/MSM.943912
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e943912