Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

13 June 2026: Lab/In Vitro Research  

Evaluation of Time-Dependent Chemical Alterations in Sodium Hypochlorite Solution Kept on the Unit Tray During an Average Root Canal Treatment Period

Elıf Bastug Guven BCDEF 1*, Ozgur Genc Sen ABCDEF 1

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952416

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952416

0 Comments

Abstract

0:00

BACKGROUND: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the most commonly used irrigant in root canal treatment because of its antimicrobial activity and tissue-dissolving capacity. Since these properties are related to its physicochemical characteristics, changes during chairside handling may be clinically relevant. This study aimed to evaluate time-dependent changes in pH, active chlorine content, and surface tension of NaOCl kept in transparent, open-lid containers during a typical chairside root canal treatment period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A commercially available 5% NaOCl solution was tested under 3 conditions: fresh (T₀), after 1 hour (T₁), and after 2 hours (T₂) of exposure in standardized transparent, open-lid containers under ambient clinic conditions (≈22°C). For each outcome (pH, active chlorine content, and surface tension), 3 groups were evaluated (n=10 per group), yielding 90 measurements in total (3 outcomes×3 groups×n=10). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s multiple-comparison test (P<0.05).

RESULTS: pH decreased significantly after 1 hour and further decreased after 2 hours, compared with fresh NaOCl (P<0.05). Surface tension did not differ significantly among groups (P>0.05). Active chlorine values did not differ between T₀ and T₁ (P>0.05), whereas T₂ showed significantly higher measured active chlorine than both T0 and T1 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: In this in vitro study, leaving NaOCl in transparent, open-lid containers for up to 2 hours was associated with decreased pH and increased measured active chlorine values, while surface tension remained unchanged. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of these physicochemical changes.

Keywords: Chlorine, pH, Sodium Hypochlorite, Surface Tension

Introduction

Given the irregular and complex structure of the root canal system, effective irrigation using a suitable solution is necessary to remove pulp, microorganisms, and dentin residues in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation. An ideal irrigation agent should dissolve vital and necrotic pulp tissue while neutralizing microorganisms and their byproducts [1,2]. Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), with its exceptional tissue-dissolving properties, antimicrobial efficacy, and ability to neutralize toxic by-products, stands as the cornerstone of irrigation solutions in endodontics [3]. The effectiveness of this solution is influenced by various factors, including concentration, active chloride content, pH, and surface tension [4–6].

NaOCl demonstrates its antibacterial and tissue-dissolving activity by engaging the active chlorine in its content with bacteria, biofilm, and the organic contents of pulp tissue [7]. It has been observed that the available chlorine level in the solution can decrease when exposed to air, light, certain temperatures, and organic and inorganic pollutants [8]. Similarly, a change in pH value can lead to significant changes in the chemical properties of the solution by altering the ratio of hypochlorite (OCl−) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl−) in the NaOCl solution [9]. A decrease in pH value enhances the antibacterial activity of the solution by increasing the ratio of HOCl−, a potent antiseptic. However, it can also lead to a significant decrease in the solution’s tissue-dissolving capacity, which can impact the thorough cleaning of the root canal system, thereby emphasizing the importance of maintaining a balanced pH value of the solution [10–12]. Conversely, an increase in the pH value can have the opposite effect [13]. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain the pH level of the solution at values that can provide this balance, to ensure both the antibacterial and tissue-dissolving effects.

Another factor that influences the effectiveness of irrigation solutions is the solution’s surface tension and contact angle properties, which determine its penetration into the dentin surface and tubules [14]. Research has revealed that reducing the surface tension of NaOCl can increase its penetration into irregular areas of the root canal system and tubule depths [15]. This significant finding emphasizes the need for further research on the environmental factors that may affect the surface tension value of NaOCl. While there are numerous studies in the literature on the chemical stability and shelf life of NaOCl solutions [16–21], to the best of our knowledge, there is no study that evaluates the changes that can occur depending on the conditions under and duration for which the solution remains on the unit table. Chairside time for a typical non-surgical root canal appointment commonly falls within 60 to 120 minutes, with clinical studies reporting approximately 60 to 75 minutes for single-sitting procedures and up to approximately 112.5 minutes total treatment time in randomized trials [22–24]. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine changes in pH, active chlorine amount, and surface tension of NaOCl solutions stored in transparent open-lid containers over 1- and 2-hour intervals.

Material and Methods

PREPARATION OF NAOCL SAMPLES:

A commercially available 5% NaOCl solution (Mikrovem AF, Istanbul, Türkiye) for dentistry was used for this study. To minimize batch-related variability, all samples were prepared from a single bottle (same batch/lot) opened at the beginning of the experiment. Three experimental groups were established: fresh NaOCl analyzed immediately (T0), NaOCl exposed to ambient conditions for 1 hour (T1), and NaOCl exposed to ambient conditions for 2 hours (T2). Each group consisted of 10 independent samples (20 mL per sample) placed in standardized, unused transparent polyethylene terephthalate (PET) cups with open lids.

Environmental conditions during exposure were those of a typical endodontic operatory. Room temperature was maintained at approximately 22 °C (air-conditioned clinical room). Light intensity (lux), relative humidity, and airflow were not instrumentally recorded. No direct sunlight was allowed on the samples.

PH MEASUREMENTS:

The pH values of NaOCl samples were measured using a digital pH meter (HANNA Instruments, Romania) (Figure 1). To ensure homogeneity, each sample was placed on a magnetic stirrer in a beaker. The pH meter was calibrated for accuracy prior to measurement. While the stirrer was operating, the pH probe was immersed in the solution, and readings were recorded after 1 minute of stabilization. All measurements were performed by a single trained operator. Each sample was measured once. This process was systematically applied to all 3 sample groups: fresh NaOCl (n=10), NaOCl stored for 1 hour (n=10), and NaOCl stored for 2 hours (n=10).

SURFACE TENSION MEASUREMENTS:

The density of NaOCl solutions was determined using a precision 10-mL pycnometer (Çalışkan LG025.31.0010, Ankara, Türkiye). After thorough cleaning with ethyl alcohol, the pycnometer was dried and weighed with its stopper on a Denver Instrument SI 234 balance. Then, the tare weight was recorded. The pycnometer was filled with freshly prepared distilled water, ensuring no air gaps, and the stopper was secured. Thereafter, the exterior was dried, and the combined mass of the filled and empty pycnometer was recorded. The difference between these 2 weightings was the mass of distilled water. Subsequently, the volume of the pycnometer was computed by dividing the mass of the water by its density, taken as 0.997 g/cm3 at approximately 25°C [25]. After rinsing and drying the pycnometer, it was filled with the NaOCl solution, and the mass was rerecorded. Density was calculated as the difference in mass between the full and empty pycnometer divided by the pycnometer’s volume. This process was replicated for all NaOCl samples, including fresh samples (n=10) and those kept open for 1 hour (n=10) and 2 hours (n=10).

For measuring the surface tension of NaOCl samples, a 3.5-mL Traube stalagmometer (Çalışkan, LG028.20.00, Ankara, Türkiye) and the drop counting method were used. All stalagmometric measurements were performed by a single calibrated operator to minimize operator-dependent variability. Measurements were conducted at room temperature (≈22 °C). Each sample was measured once. The surface tension was calculated based on the number of drops falling from the stalagmometer, the density of the NaOCl samples measured with a pycnometer, and the surface tension of the reference liquid.

In addition, freshly prepared distilled water was used as the reference liquid for this study. Before beginning the experiment with the prepared NaOCl solutions, the number of drops formed by the distilled water with known surface tension in the determined volume V was counted and noted (Figure 2). The drop-counting process began when the liquid level reached point A. The last drop was taken at point B to determine the number of drops counted in the total volume, V. First, the number of drops of water was determined; thereafter, the number of drops of NaOCl solutions in fresh, 1-hour, and 2-hour samples were determined and noted, respectively.

The surface tension of water was taken as approximately σW: 72 dyn/cm at around 25°C [26]. Since the surface tension is directly proportional to the drop mass and inversely proportional to the number of drops, the surface tension of the NaOCl solution in the samples was calculated using the following formula:

where σL=surface tension of the liquid, σW=surface tension of water, ρL=density of the liquid, ρW=density of water, Nw=number of drops in water, and NL=number of drops in liquid.

ACTIVE CHLORINE MEASUREMENTS:

Purified water (1 L) was boiled for 5 minutes and then allowed to cool. Thereafter, 12 g of sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate (Na2S2O3·5H2O; molar mass: 248 g/mol) was dissolved in the water, followed by the addition of 0.01 g of sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). The mixture was stirred until fully dissolved and then transferred to an opaque bottle for storage.

Thereafter, a 2% starch solution was prepared. Approximately 0.32 g of dried potassium iodate (KIO3) was dissolved in a 250 mL graduated flask. To 50 mL of this solution, 2 g of potassium iodide (KI) and 10 mL of hydrochloric acid (HCl) were added. This mixture was titrated with the standardized sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) solution until a light-yellow endpoint was reached. Following this, 3 mL to 5 mL of starch solution was added, and titration was continued until the blue color disappeared (Figure 3). The concentration of the Na2S2O3 solution was calculated using the following relevant reactions and equations:

At the equivalence point, 6*moles of iodate=mole Na2S2O3.

A graduated burette was filled with Na2S2O3 solution, and the initial volume was recorded. Approximately 10 mL of NaOCl was measured into a tared 50 mL beaker, weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg, and then transferred to a 250-mL conical flask. After adding 5 mL of glacial acetic acid, approximately 2 g of KI was introduced and mixed. The solution was allowed to stand for approximately 5 minutes in the dark to ensure reaction completion. Once a brown color developed, titration with the Na2S2O3 solution was conducted using a magnetic stirrer until the color transitioned to light yellow. Upon adding 3 mL of starch solution to this solution, a blue-colored complex was formed. This solution was then titrated with sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) until it became colorless, thus marking the endpoint. The final volume of thiosulfate utilized was recorded, and the active chlorine (AC) percentage was calculated using the specified formula [AC% = (V1 × M1 × 3.546*)/m, where V1: volume of standardized sodium thiosulphate solution; M1: molar concentration of standardized sodium thiosulphate solution; and m: weight of the sample analyzed (*1 mL of 0.1 mol/L sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate equals 3.546 mg active chlorine)]. The data obtained were documented for statistical analysis. All titrations were performed by a single trained operator. Evaporation during the 1- to 2-hour exposure period was not directly quantified.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Descriptive statistics for continuous variables, which are among the characteristics under consideration, were expressed as median, mean, standard deviation (SD), minimum (min), and maximum (max) values. For continuous variables, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normality, and the Levene test was used to assess homogeneity of variances. Following these tests, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare group means for normally distributed characteristics. Duncan’s multiple-comparison test was used to identify differences among groups after the ANOVA. The statistical significance level was set at 5%, and the SPSS (version 21) statistical package program was used for the calculations.

Results

The mean, SD, min, max, and P values of the pH levels of fresh, 1-hour, and 2-hour NaOCl samples are presented in Table 1. A statistically significant difference was determined between the pH values of the groups (P<0.05). The pH value of the T1 samples was significantly lower than that of the T0 samples (P<0.05), while the pH value of the T2 samples was significantly lower than that of the T0 and T1 samples (P<0.05).

Table 2 presents the mean, SD, min, max, and P values of the surface tension values determined by the Traube stalagmometer for the 3 NaOCl groups. No statistically significant difference was observed among the surface tensions of the T0, T1 and T2 solution groups (P>0.05).

The mean, SD, min, max, and P values of the active chlorine percentages of NaOCl samples determined by iodometric titration are presented in Table 3. The mean active chlorine percentages of the NaOCl solution groups revealed a statistically significant difference. According to the paired comparisons, no statistically significant difference was found between the active chlorine contents of the T0 and the T1 samples (P>0.05). In contrast, the active chlorine percentage in the T2 group was significantly higher than that in the T0 and T1 groups (P<0.05).

Discussion

LIMITATIONS:

This in vitro study evaluated physicochemical parameters (pH, active chlorine, and surface tension) and did not directly assess antimicrobial efficacy or pulp tissue dissolution under clinical conditions. Organic load (eg, dentin or pulp tissue), canal anatomy, irrigation dynamics, and clinically relevant interactions with other irrigants were not simulated. Environmental parameters that can affect evaporation and degradation (light intensity, relative humidity, and airflow) were not instrumentally quantified. In addition, evaporation (mass/volume loss) during the exposure of 1 and 2 hours was not measured, so the mechanism underlying the observed change in active chlorine percentage cannot be confirmed. Moreover, stalagmometry and iodometric titration are manual, operator-dependent methods; therefore, although measurements were performed by a single trained operator using a standardized protocol, some degree of operator-related variability cannot be excluded. Finally, measurements were performed without technical replication per sample and only 1 commercial NaOCl product was tested, which may limit generalizability. The relatively small sample size (n=10 per group) may have limited statistical power to detect small between-group differences.

Conclusions

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, keeping NaOCl in transparent open-lid containers for 1 to 2 hours was associated with a decrease in pH and a statistically significant increase in the measured active chlorine percentage at 2 hours (compared with fresh and 1-hour samples), while no statistically significant change was observed in surface tension. Because the present study did not compare container opacity or different dispensing bottles, conclusions should be limited to the tested condition (transparent open-lid cups). From a practical standpoint, clinicians may consider minimizing unnecessary open-tray exposure time and using dispensing practices that reduce air and light contact (eg, smaller aliquots and light-protective storage) to help limit time-dependent physicochemical changes. Future ex vivo and in vivo studies incorporating organic load and direct testing of antimicrobial and tissue-dissolving efficacy are needed to clarify the clinical relevance of these changes.

References

1. Haikel Y, Gorce F, Allemann C, Voegel JC, In vitro efficiency of endodontic irrigation solutions on protein desorption: Int Endod J, 1994; 27(1); 16-20

2. Senia ES, Marshall FJ, Rosen S, The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971; 31(1); 96-103

3. Mohammadi Z, Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: An update review: Int Endod J, 2008; 58(6); 329-41

4. Camps J, Pommel L, Aubut V, Shelf life, dissolving action, and antibacterial activity of a neutralized 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009; 108(2); e66-e73

5. Mercade M, Duran-Sindreu F, Kuttler S, Antimicrobial efficacy of 4.2% sodium hypochlorite adjusted to pH 12, 7.5, and 6.5 in infected human root canals: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009; 107(2); 295-98

6. Sirtes G, Waltimo T, Schaetzle M, Zehnder M, The effects of temperature on sodium hypochlorite short-term stability, pulp dissolution capacity, and antimicrobial efficacy: J Endod, 2005; 31(9); 669-71

7. Macedo R, Wesselink P, Zaccheo F, Reaction rate of NaOCl in contact with bovine dentine: Effect of activation, exposure time, concentration and pH: Int Endod J, 2010; 43(12); 1108-15

8. Clarkson R, Moule A, Podlich H, The shelf-life of sodium hypochlorite irrigating solutions: Aust Dent J, 2001; 46(4); 269-76

9. Rossi-Fedele G, Guastalli AR, Doğramacı E, Influence of pH changes on chlorine-containing endodontic irrigating solutions: Int Endod J, 2011; 44(9); 792-99

10. Aubut V, Pommel L, Verhille B, Biological properties of a neutralized 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010; 109(2); e120-e25

11. Christensen CE, McNeal SF, Eleazer P, Effect of lowering the pH of sodium hypochlorite on dissolving tissue in vitro: J Endod, 2008; 34(4); 449-52

12. Zehnder M, Kosicki D, Luder H, Tissue-dissolving capacity and antibacterial effect of buffered and unbuffered hypochlorite solutions: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2002; 94(6); 756-62

13. Jungbluth H, Marending M, De-Deus G, Stabilizing sodium hypochlorite at high pH: Effects on soft tissue and dentin: J Endod, 2011; 37(5); 693-96

14. Buyukozer Ozkan H, Terlemez A, Batibay AB, Evaluation of surface tensions and root-dentin surface contact angles of different endodontic irrigation solutions: BMC Oral Health, 2024; 24(1); 681

15. Rossi-Fedele G, Prichard J, Steier L, De Figueiredo J, The effect of surface tension reduction on the clinical performance of sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: Int Endod J, 2013; 46(6); 492-98

16. Fabian TM, Walker SE, Stability of sodium hypochlorite solutions: Am J Hosp Pharm, 1982; 39(6); 1016-17

17. Gambarini G, De Luca M, Gerosa R, Chemical stability of heated sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigants: J Endod, 1998; 24(6); 432-34

18. Gerhardt DE, Williams HN, Factors affecting the stability of sodium hypochlorite solutions used to disinfect dental impressions: Quintessence Int, 1991; 22(7); 587-91

19. Johnson BR, Remeikis NA, Effective shelf-life of prepared sodium hypochlorite solution: J Endod, 1993; 19(1); 40-43

20. Pappalardo G, Tanner F, Roussianos D, Pannatier A, Efficacy and stability of two chlorine-containing antiseptics: Drugs Exp Clin Res, 1986; 12(11); 905-9

21. Pişkin B, Türkün M, Stability of various sodium hypochlorite solutions: J Endod, 1995; 21(5); 253-55

22. Verma J, Verma S, Margasahayam SV, Comparison of pretreatment gabapentin and pregabalin to control postoperative endodontic pain – A double-blind, randomized clinical trial: J Dent Anesth Pain Med, 2022; 22(5); 377-85

23. Wong AW, Zhu X, Zhang S, Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe: BMC Oral Health, 2015; 15; 40

24. Zhu L, Liu W, Deng X, Full pulpotomy versus root canal therapy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis: A randomized controlled trial: BMC Oral Health, 2024; 24(1); 1231

25. Tanaka M, Girard G, Davis R, Recommended table for the density of water between 0°C and 40°C based on recent experimental reports: Metrologia, 2001; 38(4); 301

26. Dilmohamud B, Seeneevassen J, Rughooputh S, Ramasami P, Surface tension and related thermodynamic parameters of alcohols using the Traube stalagmometer: Eur J Phys, 2005; 26(6); 1079

27. Braitt GR, de Almeida Rodrigues E, da Silveira Bueno CE, Braitt AH, Evaluation of active chlorine releasing of sodium hypochlorite during seven days, stored at different temperatures: RSBO, 2013; 10(2); 143-48

28. Frais S, Ng YL, Gulabivala K, Some factors affecting the concentration of available chlorine in commercial sources of sodium hypochlorite: Int Endod J, 2001; 34(3); 206-15

29. Gomes BP, da Costa SL, Gonçalves Dutra H, Surface tension of root canal irrigants used in endodontics practice: Int J Clin Dent, 2018; 11(2); 586-87

30. Machado CML, Braitt AH, Braitt GR, Analysis of active chlorine releasing and pH of sodium hypochlorite solutions used in Endodontics: RSBO, 2014; 11(3); 252-59

31. Taşman F, Çehreli ZC, Oğan C, Etikan İ, Surface tension of root canal irrigants: J Endod, 2000; 26(10); 586-87

32. Van der Waal SV, van Dusseldorp NE, de Soet JJ, An evaluation of the accuracy of labeling of percent sodium hypochlorite on various commercial and professional sources: Is sodium hypochlorite from these sources equally suitable for endodontic irrigation?: J Endod, 2014; 40(12); 2049-52

33. Oliveira HXP: Stability of sodium hypochlorite solution in different storage mediums: An in vitro study:, 2021, Universidade de Lisboa (Portugal)

34. Cárdenas-Bahena Á, Sánchez-García S, Tinajero-Morales C, Use of sodium hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products: Rev Odont Mex, 2012; 16(4); 252-58

35. Dumitriu D, Dobre T, Effects of temperature and hypochlorite concentration on the rate of collagen dissolution: J Endod, 2015; 41(6); 903-6

36. Krah-Sinan AA, Adou-Assoumou M, Djolé SX, Diemer F, Gurgel M, The effects of sodium hypochlorite on organic matters: Influences of concentration, renewal frequency and contact area: Iran Endod J, 2020; 15(1); 18

37. Zollinger A, Mohn D, Zeltner M, Zehnder M, Short-term storage stability of NaOCl solutions when combined with Dual Rinse HEDP: Int Endod J, 2018; 51(6); 691-96

38. van der Waal S, Connert T, Laheij A, Free available chlorine concentration in sodium hypochlorite solutions obtained from dental practices and intended for endodontic irrigation: Are the expectations true?: Quintessence Int, 2014; 45(6); 467-74

39. Çiçek DE, Bodrumlu E, Yeni geliştirilen irrigasyon solüsyonunun ve farklı irrigantların yüzey gerilimlerinin: J Dent Fac Ataturk Univ, 2013; 23(3); 318-23 [in Turkish]

40. Palazzi F, Blasi A, Mohammadi Z, Penetration of sodium hypochlorite modified with surfactants into root canal dentin: Braz Dent J, 2016; 27(2); 208-16

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750