22 December 2011
Cranioplasty prosthesis manufacturing based on reverse engineering technology
Robert ChrzanABCEF, Andrzej UrbanikABCEFG, Krzysztof KarbowskiABCF, Marek MoskałaABCF, Jarosław PolakABCF, Marek PyrichABCFDOI: 10.12659/MSM.882186
Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(1): MT1-6
Abstract
Background: Most patients with large focal skull bone loss after craniectomy are referred for cranioplasty. Reverse engineering is a technology which creates a computer-aided design (CAD) model of a real structure. Rapid prototyping is a technology which produces physical objects from virtual CAD models. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness of these technologies in cranioplasty prosthesis manufacturing.
Material/Methods: CT was performed on 19 patients with focal skull bone loss after craniectomy, using a dedicated protocol. A material model of skull deficit was produced using computer numerical control (CNC) milling, and individually pre-operatively adjusted polypropylene-polyester prosthesis was prepared. In a control group of 20 patients a prosthesis was manually adjusted to each patient by a neurosurgeon during surgery, without using CT-based reverse engineering/rapid prototyping. In each case, the prosthesis was implanted into the patient. The mean operating times in both groups were compared.
Results: In the group of patients with reverse engineering/rapid prototyping-based cranioplasty, the mean operating time was shorter (120.3 min) compared to that in the control group (136.5 min). The neurosurgeons found the new technology particularly useful in more complicated bone deficits with different curvatures in various planes.
Conclusions: Reverse engineering and rapid prototyping may reduce the time needed for cranioplasty neurosurgery and improve the prosthesis fitting. Such technologies may utilize data obtained by commonly used spiral CT scanners. The manufacturing of individually adjusted prostheses should be commonly used in patients planned for cranioplasty with synthetic material.
Keywords: Prostheses and Implants, Craniotomy - adverse effects, Computer-Aided Design, Bone Resorption - surgery, Biomedical Engineering - methods, Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods, Skull
895 6
Editorial
01 June 2023 : Editorial
Editorial: Infectious Disease Surveillance Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its Role in Epidemic and Pandemic PreparednessDOI: 10.12659/MSM.941209
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e941209
In Press
05 Jun 2023 : Clinical Research
Comparison of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging with White Light Imaging in 52 Patients with Short-Segm...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940249
05 Jun 2023 : Laboratory Research
Comparison of Composite Resin (Duo-Shade) Shade Guide with Vita Ceramic Shades Before and After Chemical an...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940949
02 Jun 2023 : Database Analysis
The COVID-19 Crisis and the Incidence of Alcohol-Related Deaths in PolandMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940904
01 Jun 2023 : Clinical Research
Root Canal Numbers and Configurations in 1080 Permanent Canine Teeth in 270 Saudi Subjects Using Cone-Beam ...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940472
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research
Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379
08 Mar 2022 : Review article
A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952