25 September 2016 : Meta-Analysis
Diagnostic Value of Methylated Septin9 for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Meta-Analysis
Shirong YanBCDEF, Zijing LiuBCF, Shuang YuBE, Yixi BaoABCDEFGDOI: 10.12659/MSM.900590
Med Sci Monit 2016; 22:3409-3418
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Septin9 is a member of GTP-binding protein family, and is used as a predictive diagnostic index. However, it has not been widely adopted due to inconsistent results reported in the literature. The present study was performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of methylated Septin9 (mSEPT9) for colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate its utility in CRC screening.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: After reviewing relevant studies, accuracy measures (pooled sensitivity and specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio [PLR/NLR], and diagnostic odds ratio [DOR]) were calculated for mSEPT9 in the diagnosis of CRC. Overall test performance was summarized using summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Potential between-study heterogeneity was explored by use of a meta-regression model. We divided included studies into Epi proColon test and non-Epi proColon test subgroups. We compared the effects of mSEPT9 and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) for CRC screening.
RESULTS: A total of 9870 subjects in 14 studies were recruited. Pooled sensitivity and specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mSEPT9 for CRC diagnosis were 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64–0.69), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90–0.91), 5.59 (95% CI: 4.03–7.74), 0.37 (95% CI: 0.29–0.48), and 16.79 (95% CI: 10.54–26.76), respectively. The area under the summary ROC curve (AUC) was 0.8563. The AUCs in the Epi proColon test and non-Epi proColon test for CRC diagnosis were 0.8709 and 0.7968, respectively. In head-to-head comparison, AUC of mSEPT9 and FOBT for CRC diagnosis were 0.7857 and 0.6571, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that mSEPT9 can be a good diagnostic biomarker complementary to FOBT as a screening tool for CRC.
Keywords: Colorectal Neoplasms, Septins, Sunscreening Agents
Editorial
01 September 2024 : Editorial
Editorial: Reasons for Increasing Global Concerns for the Spread of MpoxDOI: 10.12659/MSM.946343
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e946343
In Press
Clinical Research
Comparison of Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Sedation in Awake Endotracheal Intubation in Scoliosis Su...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.944632
Database Analysis
Knowledge, Awareness, and Use of Stainless-Steel Crowns Among Dental Professionals in Sana'a City, YemenMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945948
Clinical Research
Disability Assessment with WHODAS 2.0 of People with Fibromyalgia in Poland: A Cross Sectional-StudyMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945450
Clinical Research
Enhanced Differentiation of Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis Types Using Semi-Quantitative 99mTc-MIBI Upta...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945444
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 6,054,137
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 1,840,956
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 693,106
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387
07 Jan 2022 : Meta-Analysis 257,521
Efficacy and Safety of Light Therapy as a Home Treatment for Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Parkinson Dise...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935074
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935074