01 January 2011: Product Investigation
Direct inhibitory effects of Ganciclovir on ICAM-1 expression and proliferation in human coronary vascular cells (SI/MPL-ratio: >1)
Rainer Voisard AEF , Ulrike Münder ABC , Lutz von Müller BC , Regine Baur ABC , Vinzenz Hombach EFG
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.881310
Med Sci Monit 2011; 17(1): PI1-6
Background
The initiation of atherosclerosis results from a complex interaction of circulating factors and various cell types in the vessel wall, including endothelial cells (EC), lymphocytes, monocytes, and smooth muscle cells (SMC). Interactions of monocytes with cells of the vascular wall allows these cells to move from the bloodstream into the intima where they differentiate into macrophages. This process is mediated by a variety of adhesion molecules on EC and SMC, including the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) [1]. Excessive reactive cell proliferation of smooth muscle cells in the vessel wall has been recognized as key component following the initial inflammatory response [2].
The importance of HCMV as a pathogen has increased over the last decades, with the escalation in the number of immunosuppressed patients. Moreover infection with HCMV is at least linked with atherosclerosis, transplant vascular sclerosis, and coronary restenosis [3]. On the other hand conflicting data have been reported concerning the clinical relevance of HCMV-infection: both a clear correlation [4,5] and no correlation at all have been reported in medium sized clinical studies [6,7]. For the time being it is consensus that experimental and clinical data are not strong enough to support an antiviral therapy to prevent the vascular reactions following arterial injury.
Recently a direct antiproliferative effect of the antiviral agent ganciclovir was reported by Battiwalla et al. [8] in human T-lymphocytes
The current study hypothesized that ganciclovir might as well inhibit ICAM-1 expression and cell proliferation in human coronary vascular cells. A possible clinical relevance of the data has been evaluated by calculation of a SI/MPL-ratio [11,12], characterizing the relation between the concentration of an agent with a siginificant inhibitory effect
Material and Methods
CELL CULTURE:
Endothelial cells from human umbilical veins (HUVEC) were isolated after vaginal delivery by enzymatic disaggregation with collagenase/dispase as described previously [XX 10]. Endothelial cells from human coronary arteries (HCAEC) were purchased at Lonza (Vervier, B). Cells were cultured in Endothelium Growth Medium (Lonza) and identified by the typical “cobble stone” growth pattern and positive reaction against von Willebrand factor (Dakopatts, Hamburg, D). Smooth muscle cells from the human coronary media (HCMSMC) were purchased at Lonza. HCMSMC were grown in Smooth Muscle Cell Growth Medium (Lonza). For identification of HCMSMC antibodies against smooth muscle α-actin (Sigma, Taufkirchen, D) were used.
GANCICLOVIR:
Ganciclovir: Cymeven®, Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Grenzach-Wyhlen, D, 0.05–5000 μg/mL, dilution: aqua ad injectionem; MPL: 9 μg/mL [13].
FLOW CYTOMETRY:
For flow cytometry analysis of the expression of ICAM-1 in HCAEC, HUVEC, and HCMSMC cells were trypsinized and seeded into 6-well dishes (5×104 cells). Ganciclovir (0.05, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/mL) was added to the cultures for a period of 18 h. During the last 6h of Ganciclovir incubation, the expression of adhesion molecules was stimulated by adding of TNF-α (20 ng/mL).
After Ganciclovir/TNF-α treatment, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) and trypsinized. Cells were resuspended in 100 μL of a FITC-conjugated monoclonal antibody directed against ICAM-1 (clone 84H10, Dianova Immunotech; final concentration 10 μg/mL) and incubated for 20min at 4°C. A total of 1×104 cells (100% gated) were analyzed immediately with a flowcytometer (BD FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, D).
The effects of Ganciclovir (0.05–5000 μg/mL) on vitality of HCAEC, HUVEC, and HCMSMC was analyzed with propidium iodide using a flowcytometer.
PROLIFERATION STUDIES:
HUVEC, HCAEC, and HCMSMC in passages 3–5 were seeded in a density of 3–5×103 cells × cm–2 in 6-well dishes. 24h after seeding the corresponding culture medium was renewed and the number of adherent cells was analyzed in a cell counter (CASY TTC®, Innovatis AG, Reutlingen, D). Subsequently Ganciclovir was added in concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/mL for another five days. Culture medium and ganciclovir were renewed at day three after seeding. Cell number after incubation with ganciclovir was calculated as relative cell number in comparison to untreated controls with the concerning solvent. Taking into account that not all cells could be successfully cultured, cell numbers of untreated controls were calculated as:
VITALITY OF CELLS:
In a luminescent cell viability assay (CellTiter-Glo™, Promega, Mannheim, D) the effects of ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/mL (HUVEC, HCAEC, and HCMSMC) were analyzed for a period of five days in 96 well dishes (Nunc, Roskilde, DK). Luminescence of luciferase reaction as a marker of cell viability was measured in a CentroLB960 (Berthold, Technologies, Bad Wildbad, D).
SI/MPL-RATIO:
The SI/MPL-ratio was calculated in order to describe the relation between a significant inhibitory effect in vitro and the maximal plasma level after systemic administration in vivo [11,12].
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data of cytoflow and proliferation studies are presented as mean ±S.D. Statistical significance of differences between controls and drug-treated cells was determined by paired Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was accepted for
Results
IDENTIFICATION OF CELLS:
Monocultures of HUVEC and HCAEC were identified by positive reaction with antibodies directed against von Willebrand factor and by the typical “cobblestone” growth pattern in culture. Monocultures of HCMSMC exhibited the “hill and valley” growth pattern and reacted positively with antibodies against smooth muscle α-actin.
EFFECTS OF GANCICLOVIR ON ICAM-1 EXPRESSION:
The effects of ganciclovir (0.05, 0.5, 5, 50, 500, 5000 μg/mL) on TNF-α induced expression of ICAM-1 are demonstrated in Figure 1. A small significant inhibition of ICAM-1 expression was detected in HUVEC (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 0.005), HCAEC (p<0.01, SI/MPL-ratio: 555) and HCMSMC (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 5.55).
In HUVEC, treatment with TNF-α increased the mean fluorescence levels (%) of ICAM-1 expression 23.26-fold from 4.3% to 100%. Incubation of HUVEC with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL caused a small significant inhibition of ICAM-1 expression by 10.1% (p≤0.01), 6.3% (p<0.05), and 5.9% (p≤0.01), corresponding to SI/MPL-ratio’s of 0.005, 0.05, and 0.5. Ganciclovir in a concentration of 50 μg/mL and 500 μg/mL caused a minimal inhibitory effect by 1.2% (n.s.), respectively a small stimulatory effect of 8% (n.s.). An inhibition of ICAM-1 expression by 25.5% was detected after incubation of HUVEC with ganciclovir in a concentration of 5000 μg/mL (p≤0.01; SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
In HCAEC, treatment with TNF-α increased the mean fluorescence levels (%) of ICAM-1 expression 6.06-fold from 16.5% to 100.00%. After incubation of HCAEC with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 mg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, and 500 μg/mL no significant effects were detected, ICAM-1 expression was 97.3±4.3%, 98.3±3.6%, 104.4±1.9%, 101.6±2.2%, and 101.3±3.3%. Ganciclovir in the maximal concentration of 5000 μg/mL resulted in an inhibition of ICAM-1 expression by 25.4% (p=0.01, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
In HCMSMC, treatment with TNF-α increased the mean fluorescence levels (%) of ICAM-1 expression 1.74-fold from 57.6% to 100.00%. Incubation of HCMSMC with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 mg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, and 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL caused small inhibitory effects of ICAM-1 expression by 8.5%, 6.9%, 14.2%, 12.5%, 14.2%, and 15% reaching statistical significance at the concentration of 50 μg/mL (p<0.05, SIMPL-ratio: 5.55) and 5000 μg/mL (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
EFFECTS OF GANCICLOVIR ON CELL PROLIFERATION:
The effects of ganciclovir (0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, 5000 μg/mL) on proliferation of HUVEC, HCAEC, and HCMSMC are demonstrated in Figure 2. After incubation with ganciclovir dose dependent significant antiproliferative effects were detected. Second, strong dose dependent significant antiproliferative effects were detected after incubation of HUVEC (p<0.05, SIMPL-ratio: 5.55), HCAEC (p<0.05, SIMPL-ratio: 5.55), and HCMSMC (p<0.01, SIMPL-ratio: 55.5).
In HUVEC incubation with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 5 μg/mL caused stimulatory effects on cell proliferation by 44.8% (n.s.), 11.3% (n.s.), and 2% (n.s.). Strong dose dependent inhibitory effects were detected following incubation of HUVEC with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL, cell proliferation was reduced by 74.5% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 5.55, 89.3% (p=0.01, SI/MPL-ratio: 55.5, and 100% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
In HCAEC (Figure 2B) incubation of HCAEC with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL caused small stimulatory effects on cell proliferation, significance was not achieved. Dose dependent inhibitory effects by 8.3% (n.s.), 49.6% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 5.55), 95.9% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 55.5), and 100% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 555) were detected after incubation of HCAEC with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL.
After incubation of HCMSMC (Figure 2C) with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 5 μg/mL stimulation of cell proliferation by 16.6%, 17.9%, and 11% was detected, statistical significance was not achieved. Ganciclovir in the concentrations of 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL resulted in dose depending inhibitory effects by 16.7% (n.s.), 41.8% (p=0.01, SI/MPL-ratio: 55.5), and 100% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
EFFECTS OF GANCICLOVIR ON CELL VITALITY:
Cell vitality of HUVEC, HCAEC, and HCMSMC was analyzed after incubation with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL,0.50 μg/mL, 5 μg/ml, 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL. Parts of the inhibitory effects of ganciclovir were caused by cytotoxic effects (Figure 3).
In HUVEC (Figure 3A) cell vitality was slightly decreased by 6.8% (n.s.), 3.5% (n.s.), and 6.9% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 0.55) following incubation with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 5 μg/mL. Strong inhibitory effects on cell proliferation by 24.3% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 5.55), 53.2% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 55.5), and 95.4% (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 555) were detected after incubation of HUVEC with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 50 μg/mL, 500 μg/mL, and 5000 μg/mL.
In HCAEC (Figure 3B) cell vitality was both significantly stimulated and inhibited. Ganciclovir in the concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, and 50 μg/mL caused significant stimulatory effects on cell vitality by 27.6% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 0.005), 37.4% (p<0.01, SI/MPL-ratio: 0.05), 21.7% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 0.5), and 22.7% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 5). Strong inhibitions of cell vitality were detected after incubation with ganciclovir in the concentration of 500 μg/mL (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 55.5) and 5000 μg/mL (p<0.001, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
In HCMSMC (Figure 3C) small stimulatory (n.s.) and inhibitory effects (n.s.) on cell vitality were detected after incubation with ganciclovir in concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, 5 μg/mL, and 50 μg/mL. After incubation with ganciclovir in the concentrations of 0.05 μg/mL, 0.5 μg/mL, and 50 μg/mL cell vitality was increased by 14.2% (n.s.), 5.6% (n.s.), and 4.6% (n.s.). A small inhibitory effect by 6.6% (n.s.) was found after incubation of HCMSMC with ganciclovir in a concentration of 5 μg/mL. After incubation of HCMSMC with ganciclovir in concentrations of 500 μg/mL and 5000 μg/mL cell vitality was inhibited by 25.8% (n.s.) and 88.5% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
Discussion
The present
At present time the data are not strong enough to support an antiviral therapy with e.g. ganciclovir in patients suffering from vascular injury. Ganciclovir is a nucleoside analog of guanosine that competitively inhibits the incorporation of dGTP by viral DNA polymerase [17]. However, this effect is only partially specific for the viral polymerase, because ganciclovir also inhibits DNA synthesis in hematopoietic progenitors [10]. Recently Battiwalla et al. [8] noticed that although cytopenia following ganciclovir administration
ICAM-1, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is involved in atherosclerosis through the regulation of monocyte recruitment into atherosclerosis-prone areas [81, review]. Recently our group has demonstrated in a threedimensional model of monocyte attack that TNF-α induced upregulation of ICAM-1 increases adhesion and chemotaxis of human monocytes [18]. Expression of ICAM-1 has also been detected in human smooth muscle cells, indicating that these cells are as well capable of interacting with leukocytes [19]. The present data demonstrate in HCMSMC a slight significant inhibition after administration of ganciclovir in concentrations of 5000 μg/mL in HCAEC and 50 μg/mL and 5000 μg/mL. In HCAEC a slight inhibitory effect on ICAM-1 expression was detected after incubation with ganciclovir in a concentration of 5000 μg/mL. Both in HCMSMC and HCASEC the corresponding SI/MPL-ratio’s were >1, indicating that the effects can’t be expected
Recently Battiwalla et al. [8] reported on a direct inhibitory effect of ganciclovir in a concentration of 10 μg/mL and 50μg/mL in human T-cell proliferation, no effect was detected after incubation with ganciclovir in a concentration of 2 μg/mL. These data are in accordance with the current data demonstrating significant antiproliferative effects of ganciclovir in concentrations of ≥50 μg/mL in HCAEC and ≥500 μg/mL in HCMSMC. Partially the antiproliferative effects of ganciclovir were caused by cytotoxic effects. After incubation of HCMSMC with ganciclovir in concentrations of 500 μg/mL and 5000 μg/mL cell vitality was inhibited by 25.8% (n.s.) and 88.5% (p<0.05, SI/MPL-ratio: 555).
Conclusions
In comparison to the strong antiproliferative effects in human vascular smooth muscle cells described earlier by our group after administration of cytostatic agents [23], steroid agents [24], and immunosuppressive agents [25] the antiproliferative effects of ganciclovir are comparable with inhibitory effects of 41.8% (500 μg/mL) and 100% (5000 μg/mL), respectively.
However, in contrast to these agents the antiproliferative effects in HCMSMC were detected with concentrations of ganciclovir 55.5 times and 555 times the maximal plasma level, resulting in SI/MPL-ratio’s of 55.5 and 555. Therefore this effect can’t be expected after systemic administration. Local high dose administration of ganciclovir, however, may be however possible with e.g. drug eluting stents (DES’s) or other local devices [26,27]. Recently our group has suggested to calculate a SI/DES ratio [12] for appropriate dosing in DES’s. Due to the fact that agents are commonly underdosed after systemic administration [11] and overdosed in DES’s [12], we would like to suggest SI/MPL- and SI/DES-ratio’s of 1/100 as an orientation.
References
1. Doran AC, Meller N, McNamara CA, Role of smooth muscle cells in the initiation and early progression of atherosclerosis: ATVB, 2008; 28; 812
2. Fuster JJ, Fernández P, González-Navarro H, Control of cell proliferation in atherosclerosis: insights from animal models and human studies: Cardiovasc Res, 2010; 86(2); 254-64, pmid: 19900964
3. Streblow DN, Dumortier J, Moses AV, Mechanisms of cytomegalovirus-accelerated vascular disease: induction of paracrine factors that promote angiogenesis and wound healing: Human cytomegalovirus. Current topics in microbiology and Immunology, 2008; 325, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag
4. Zhou YF, Leon MB, Waclawiw MA, Association between prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of restenosis after coronary atherectomy: N Engl J Med, 1996; 335; 624-30, pmid: 8687516
5. Mueller C, Hodgson JM, Bestehorn HP, Previous cytomegalovirus infection and restenosis after aggressive angioplasty with provisional stenting: J Interv Cardiol, 2003; 16; 307-13, pmid: 14562670
6. Tiran A, Tio RA, Oostenveld E, Prior cytomegalo infection does not predict clinical outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Cardiology, 1998; 90; 263-68, pmid: 10085487
7. Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Miethke T, Previous cytomegalovirus infection and restenosis after coronary stent placement: Circulation, 2001; 104; 1135, pmid: 11535569
8. Battiwalla M, Wu YW, Bajwa RPS: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2007; 13; 765-70, pmid: 17580254
9. Andrei G, de Clercq E, Snoeck R, Drug targets in cytomegalovirus infection: Infect Disord Drug Targets, 2009; 9; 201-22, pmid: 19275707
10. Sommdossi JP, Carlisle R: Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 1987; 31; 452-54, pmid: 3495235
11. Voisard R, Baur R, Herter T: Perfusion, 2004; 17; 186-97
12. Voisard R, Zellmann S, Müller F: BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2007; 7; 15, pmid: 17498286
13. Jung D, Griffy K, Dorr A, Effect of high-dose oral ganciclovir on didanosine disposition in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients: J Clin Pharmacol, 1998; 38; 1057-62, pmid: 9824788
14. Spier E, Modali R, Huang ES, Potential role of human cytomegalovirus and p53 interaction in human coronary restenosis: Science, 1994; 255; 391-94
15. Ohno T, Gordon D, San H, Gene therapy for vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation after arterial imjury: Science, 1994; 265; 781-84, pmid: 8047883
16. Voisard R, Krügers T, Reinhardt B, HCMV-infection in a human arterial organ culture model: effects on cell proliferation and neointimal hyperplasia: BMC Microbiol, 2007; 7; 68, pmid: 17659083
17. Cheng YC, Huang ES, Lin JC: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1983; 80; 2767-70, pmid: 6302704
18. Voisard R, Voglic S, Baur R: Coron Artery Dis, 2001; 12; 401-11, pmid: 11491206
19. Braun M, Pietsch P, Schror K, Cellular adhesion molecules on vascular smooth muscle cells: Cardiovascular Res, 1999; 41; 395-401
20. Brand K, Page S, Walli AK, Role of NF-κB in atherogenesis: Exp Physiol, 1997; 82; 297-304, pmid: 9129944
21. Voisard R, Huber N, Baur R, Different effects of antisense RelA p65 and NF-κB mediated expression of ICAM-1 in human coronary endothelial and smooth muscle cells: BMC Molecular Biology, 2001; 2; 7, pmid: 11532196
22. Sponza S, de Andrea M, Mondini M, Role of the interferon-inducible IFI16 gene in the induction of ICAM-1 by TNF-alpha: Cell Immunol, 2009; 257; 55-60, pmid: 19338980
23. Voisard R, Dartsch PC, Seitzer U: Coron Artery Dis, 1993; 4; 935-42, pmid: 8269201
24. Voisard R, Seitzer U, Baur R: Int J Cardiol, 1994; 43; 257-67, pmid: 8181884
25. Voisard R, Gecgüner L, Baur R, Antiproliferative profile of sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil: impact of the SI/MPL-ratio: Int J Cardiol, 2005; 102; 435-42, pmid: 16004888
26. Milewski K, Zurakowski A, Pajak J, Comparison of thin-strut cobal-chromium stents and stainless steel stents in a porcine model of neointimal hyperplasia: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(1); BR40-44, pmid: 20037484
27. Krejca M, Plewka A, Szmagala P, Outside stenting of vein graft deseases VEGF-A expression and induces significant down-regulation of VEGFR-1 in the intimal and medial layers after the reendothelialization period: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(3); BR89-96, pmid: 20190677
28. Coats AJ, Ethical authorship and publishing: Int J Cardiol, 2009; 131; 149-50, pmid: 19046787
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






