01 April 2011: Review Article
Toll-like receptor and its roles in myocardial ischemic/reperfusion injury
Yu Fang , Jianguo Hu
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.881709
Med Sci Monit 2011; 17(4): RA100-109
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The innate immune system, mediated via toll-like receptors (TLRs), represents the first line of defensive mechanisms that protects hosts from invading microbial pathogens. TLRs are a family of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), and are pathologically activated by a set of pathogen-associated microbial patterns (PAMPs) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). TLRs deliver signals via a specific intracellular signaling pathway involving distinctive adaptor proteins and protein kinases, and ultimately initiate transcriptional factors resulting in inflammatory responses. TLR4 is a paramount type of TLRs, located in the heart, and plays an important role in mediating myocardial ischemic reperfusion (I/R) injury. Loss-of-function experiments and animal models using genetic techniques have found that the MyD88-independent and the MyD88-dependent pathways together participate in the pathological process of myocardial I/R injury. Some other distinctive signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKt and AMPK/ERK pathways, interacting with the TLR4 signaling pathway, were also found to be causes of myocardial I/R injury. These different pathways activate a series of downstream transcriptional factors, produced a great quantity of inflammatory cytokines, such as IL, TNF, and initiate inflammatory response. This results in cardiac injury and dysfunction, such as myocardial stunning, no reflow phenomenon, reperfusion arrhythmias and lethal reperfusion injury, and other related complication such as ventricular remodeling. In the future, blockades aimed at blocking the signaling pathway could benefit developments in pharmacology.
Keywords: Myocardial Reperfusion Injury - physiopathology, Inflammation - pathology, Heart Function Tests, Cytokines - metabolism, Toll-Like Receptors - metabolism
Background
The innate immune system recognizes and eliminates specific invaders, maintaining tolerance to self-tissues and modulates adaptive immune responses [1,2]. It can sense pathologic organisms via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), recognizing diverse exogenous or endogenous molecules [3,4]. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), belonging to the PRRs family and located on cell surfaces or intracellular compartments, can recognize a number of molecules and promote initiation of immune responses [5]. TLRs are crucial for immune defense and host survival in chronic inflammation-mediated tissue damage [6–8]. In addition, TLRs are also capable of responding to stress and modulating tissue damage under “sterile inflammation” such as hypoxia or ischemia in the lungs, liver, brain and heart [9–12].
Ischemic heart disease is the primary cause of mortality and morbidity in most developed and in some developing countries [13–15]. Rapid reperfusion is critical in the treatment of unexpected myocardial ischemic incidents. Despite the use of effective reperfusion strategies, severe post-perfusion lesions still occur [16]. Therefore, it is necessary and urgent to understand the mechanisms of myocardial I/R injury and explore effective therapies to minimize the adverse effects. Recently published studies have documented that TLRs play an important role in myocardial I/R injury, but have only partially explained the injury mechanisms involved. We review the related literature to summarize the basic understanding of TLRs and their roles in myocardial ischemic/reperfusion injury.
TLRs
THE STRUCTURE AND LOCATION OF TLRS:
TLRs are type-I transmembrane proteins composed of 3 structural domains: a C-terminal leucine-rich repeat (LRR) as ligand recognition domain, a central transmembrane domain, and an N-terminal cytoplasmic toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) homologous signaling domain as an effector domain that mediates homotypic interactions facilitating downstream signaling or substrate processing [17,18].
The ectodomians of TLRs are mainly composed of LRRs of differing sizes and abundances and are considered to play a prominent role in the promotion of ligand-receptor interaction in a variety of biological settings. The LRR family, which are subdivided into 7 groups using LRR hybrid technology [19], share a highly conserved 11-residue tandem repeat modular sequence (L××L×L××N×L) and horseshoe-like 3D structures (Figure 1). The “×” residue in this sequence is exposed toward the concave surfaces of the horseshoe-like structure mediating interaction with ligands [19–32]. The “asparagines ladder” is another key characteristic of the LRR family [31–33]. The TLRs ectodomians form a relatively rigidly curved solenoid or spring shape, and gain flexibility to some degree by virtue of irregular loops (hinges) of the structure. The first several residues of each LRR form a short beta-strand, which is aligned in the overall structure to form a beta-sheet. The entire structure is bent, with the beta-sheet forming a concave surface, and stabilized by both an asparagines ladder and a hydrophobic interaction. The solenoid architecture that extends from the cell surface forms an arc in which the N-terminus bends back toward the membrane. The ends of the solenoid are capped with disulfide bond motifs that isolate the hydrophobic residues from the surrounding aqueous environment [20,21,24].
On the cytoplasmic side, TLRs have a specific domain called the TIR signaling domain, which contains 2 distinct sites: an oligomerization site for maintaining dimeric interactions between the TLRs subunits, and a site for recruiting cytoplasmic adapter proteins. The adaptor proteins also contain oligomerization sites and form extended chains in the cytoplasm of the cell following activation by “face-to-face” and “back-to-back” interactions [25].
In mammals, the TLR family, to our knowledge, is comprised of 11 members (TLRs 1–11), and most of the members are widely expressed in different cell types, either from the immune system, including dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages (Ms), natural killer cells (NKs), mast cells, neutrophils (N), B and T cells, or from the non-immune system, such as fibroblasts, epithelial cells (ECs) and myocardia. TLR1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 10 are primarily located on the cell surface, and recognize bacterial-related ligands; whereas TLR3, 7, 8 and 9 are located in the endocytic compartments and mainly recognize viral products. Recently, TLR11, as well as 2 new members –TLR12 and TLR13 – have been discovered in mice, and are believed to be plasma membrane localized [26–31].
LIGANDS RECOGNIZED BY TLRS:
TLRs enable the innate immune system to discriminate different pathogen-associated molecule patterns (PAMPs), which are unique to distinctive microbial classes. These PAMPs, of varying sizes, may originate from bacterial cell wall components, hydrophilic nucleic acids, small-molecule anti-viral molecules and immunomodulatory compounds, and consequently launch the specific immune defense response [32,33].
TLRs can identify various components of the bacteria [34,35]. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and lipotechoic acid (LTA) from Gram-negative bacteria can induce TLR4 activation [17,36,37]; peptidoglycans (PGNs) from Gram-positive bacteria, bacterial lipoproteins (BLP) and lipoarabinomannan (LAM) from mycobacteria are recognized by TLR2 [3,4,38–40]; diacyl and triacyl lipopeptides from bacteria, mycobacteria and mycoplasm can be sensed by TLR1/2 or TLR2/6 complex [41]; TLR5 is best known as a receptor for flagellin, a monomeric subunit of bacterial flagella [42]; and genomic DNA rich in unmethylated CpG from bacteria can be discriminated by TLR9. Bacterial RNA products in the lysosomal compartment can be discerned by TLR7 [43–64]. Spirochetes of Borrelia burgdorferi can be sensed by TLR1 and TLR2.
Viral products, composed of envelope proteins and nucleic acids, also activate TLRs. The envelope proteins from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) are recognized by TLR2, 4 and 6 [50,51,54]. TLR2/6 complex can bind diacylated mycoplasmal macrophage-activating lipopeptide (MALP2). Several DNA viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) encompassed by unmethylated CpG DNA motifs are activated by TLR9 [27,54,55,63]. The single strand (ss)/double strand (ds) RNA-containing viruses, which are rich in uridine or uridine/guanosine, can be recognized by TLR3 and TLR7/8 complex (in humans only) [17,34,35,44,45].
Some components of fungi and protozoa are also recognized by TLRs. Phospholipomannans and beta-glucans from fungi are recognized by TLR2, while glucuronoxylomannans are recognized by TLR4 [54,55]. TLR2 is also responsible for the recognition of the yeast cell-wall particle zyosam; glycoinlsitolphospholipids (GIPLs) and glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors (GPI-anchors) from Trypanosoma species, P. falciparum, and T. gondii are recognized by TLR2 and TLR4. Unsaturated alkylacylglycerol and lipophosphoglycan (LPG) from Trypanosoma species and Leishmania species are recognized by TLR9. Beta-hematin crystal made from hemin from P. falciparum is also identified by TLR9. Profilin-like protein from T. gondii is reported to be discerned by mouse TLR 11 [34,35,46,47].
TLRs can sense synthetic antiviral compounds, as well as endogenous tissue fragments. R848, imiquimod and some gyanine nucleotide analogs, such as loxoribine, are recognized by TLR7/8, and the synthetic analog of dsRNA, poly IC, is also recognized by TLR3 [17,34,35,43–45]. Some endogenous tissue fragments from injured and inflamed tissues, such as HMGB1, hyaluronan, S 100 proteins, heat shock protein (HSP), and the spliced extra domain A of fibronectin, can activate the TLR4 signaling pathway [33] (Table 1).
TLRS SIGNALING PATHWAY:
TLRs are capable of recognizing distinguishable ligands such as PAMPs and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which initiate TLRs activation and mediate intracellular signaling. TLRs activation entails the recruitment of various TIR domain-containing adaptors [17,34,35,48]. There are 5 TIR domain-containing adaptors: Myeloid Differentiation Primary-Response Protein 88 (MyD88), MyD88 adaptor-like protein (Mal), TIR-domain-containing adaptor protein inducing TNF-beta-mediated transcription factor (TRIF), TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), and a sterile-alpha and armadillo-motif-containing protein (SARM) [49]. TLRs1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 11 bind to their specific ligands produced downstream of TLRs signaling via MyD88, while TLRs1, 2, 4, 6, TLR1/2 and TLR2/6 recruit TIRAP (also known as MAL). Similarly, TLR3 and 4 uniquely and separately recruit TRIF and TRAM. TIRAP and TRAM serve as a “bridge” linking the TIR domain of TLRs to MyD88 and TRIF, respectively [17,34,35,48,50]. Docking studies can predict the mechanisms of interaction between MyD88 and TIR domains of TLRs. The first hypothesis, called “face-to-face” interaction, mediates receptor: adaptor binding and involves the BB loop and Poc site. The second hypothesis, named “back-to-back” interaction, mediates binding between 2 receptors or 2 adaptors, and is characterized by homotypic interactions between alphaE helices [51,52]. Dimerization of TLRs is mediated in “back-to-back” fashion, followed by recruitment of adaptor to receptor by “face to face” interaction. Signal amplification may be achieved by the subsequent recruitment of additional adaptors, which bind to each other with alternating “face to face” and “back to back” modes.
The TLRs signaling pathway is generally classified into MyD88-dependent pathway and TRIF-dependent pathway (MyD88-independent pathway) [49]. The former starts with activation of all the TLRs except TLR3. Upon recruitment of MyD88, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) family is activated, followed by production of TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6). TRAF6 induces activation of TNF receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family member-associated NF-κB activator binding kinase (TAK1), which consequently results in activation of the transcription factor NF-κB and the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs) p38 and c-jun kinase (JNK) [49,53–55]. The latter finally produces activation of NF-κB initiated by TLR3 and TLR4 recognition via 2 distinctive processes: N-terminal domain of TRIF interacts with TRAF6 and activates NF-κB directly; while the C-terminal domain of TRIF interacts with receptor-interacting protein (RIP1) and activates NF-κB indirectly. These 2 pathways both induce activation of NF-κB, which activates a cascade of inflammatory responses. Otherwise, the TRIF-dependent pathway also induces type 1 interferon (IFN-1) through Interferon Regulatory Factor-3 (IRF3), which is phosphorylated and activated by IKK-related kinase, Tank-Binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and Inhibitor of κ Light Polypeptide Gene Enhancer in B-Cell Kinase of ɛ (IKKɛ) [36,49,56].
TLR4, which is recognized by the bacterial LPS, LTA and endogenous molecules, signals via both MyD88-dependent and -independent pathways (Figure 2). TLR4 could directly bind to LTA through cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) and LPS through CD14 and LPS-Binding Protein (LBP). Upon formation and activation of TLR4/MD2/CD14 complex following TLR4-ligand interaction, the cytoplasm TIR domain recruits distinct adaptor proteins, activates the signaling cascade, and consequently produces diverse inflammatory mediators. In MyD88-dependent pathway, TLR4 recruits downstream IRAKs through adaptors Mal and MyD88, which both contain an N-terminal death domain (DD) and a C-terminal TIR domain. MyD88 binds to TLR4 through TIR-TIR interaction and binds to IRAKs via DD-DD interaction. MyD88 first recruits IRAK4, which is a multidomain protein consisting of a conserved N-terminal DD and a central kinase domain, permitting engagement of IRAK1 [57]. IRAK1 is phosphorylated by IRAK4 and further recruits Tumor Necrosis Factor-Receptor-Associated Factor-6 (TRAF6) [58]. Phosphorylated IRAK1 and TRAF6 together dissociate from cytoplasmic domain protein complex, and constitute a new complex with GTF-beta-Activated kinase 1 (TAK1), TAK1-Binding Protein-1 (TAB1) and TAK1-Binding Protein-2 (TAB2). TRAF6, TAK1, TAB1 and TAB2, binding to ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, lead to ubiquitylation of TRAF6 and activation of TAK1. Activated TAK1 phophorylates MAPKs, p38 and JNKs via Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase-3, 6, and 7 (MMKs3, 6 and 7). P38 and JNKs enter the cell nucleus and promote target genes expression. TAK1 also phophorylates the inhibitor of κ Light Polypeptide Gene Enhancer in B-Cell Kinase (IKK complex). The IKK complex degrades I-κB, resulting in NF-κB activation, transferring NF-κB into the nucleus and inducing expression of target genes [59,60]. In TRIF-dependent pathway, TLR4 signals via TRAM and TRIF, and activates NF-κB via direct and indirect mechanisms via interacting domains of TRIF with RIP1 and TRAF, respectively. This pathway also induces phophorylation of IRF3 and IFN-regulatory factor 7 (IRF7), which play key roles in initiating expression of type 1 IFN while translocation into nucleus occurs [61]. All the TLRs are listed in Table 1.
TLRs and Myocardial I/R Injury
The evidence of myocardial I/R leading to cardiac injury and dysfunction
THE EVIDENCE OF MYOCARDIAL I/R LEADING TO CARDIAC INJURY AND DYSFUNCTION:
Myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) injury was first discovered in 1960 by Jennings, who described the histological features of reperfused ischemic canine myocardium [62]. The process of restoring blood flow to the ischemic myocardium can induce myocardial injury and produce a spectrum of reperfusion-associated pathologies. This process is defined as myocardial I/R injury, which is characterized by an acute inflammatory process in which activated leukocytes and endothelial cells (EC) are primarily involved [63]. Myocardial I/R injury occurs in some conditions of cardiovascular diseases (e.g., arteriosclerosis, coronary artery spasm and thrombosis [64,65]) and therapeutic strategies (e.g., percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in cardiac operation and cardiac transplantation [66,67]). CPB and cardiomyocytes reperfusion are the leading causes of postoperative morbidity and mortality. A number of cardiac surgery-associated complications are often attributed to myocardial I/R injury [68]. A series of postoperative complications occur within patients who underwent CABG, including prolonged contractile dysfunction, low-output syndrome, perioperative myocardial infarction and heart failure. Restoration of blood flow achieved with PCI can result in an acute cardiac local inflammatory response and myocardial and endothelial cell damage [69–71].
I/R injury causes severe clinical symptoms, including cardiac contractile dysfunction, arrhythmias, cell death mediating heart failure, and sudden death. Myocardial I/R leads to 4 types of myocardial damage, with different magnitudes and patterns:
MYOCARDIAL STUNNING: After short episodes of myocardial I/R, prolonged mechanical dysfunction persists, although no prominent histological features of irreversible myocardial injury exist. The phenomenon was called “myocardial stunning” [72–74]. Myocardial stunning is characterized by reversible myocardial contractile dysfunction, within a prolonged period after reperfusion of ischemic myocardial tissue. The myocardiocytes are capable of recovering from this reversible form of injury after several days or weeks. The clinical symptoms of stunned myocardium range from cardiac arrest in open cardiac surgery and PCI, to thrombolysis, and unstable and stable angina [66,74,75].
NO-REFLOW PHENOMENON: Originally defined as “inability to reperfuse a previously ischemic region” [76]. It refers to myocardial I/R injury that obviously impairs EC function, which disturbs restoration of blood in microvasculature. This phenomenon is secondary to vasoconstriction, platelet and leukocyte activation, increased oxidant production, and increased fluid and protein extravasation [77–79]. No-reflow phenomenon usually occurs after more prolonged episodes of myocardial ischemia [66].
REPERFUSION ARRHYTHMIAS: This phenomenon is mediated by myocardial I/R injury, and is potentially harmful, but effective treatments are efficient [80].
LETHAL REPERFUSION INJURY:
Lethal reperfusion injury is defined as death (necrosis or apoptosis) of cardiomyocytes, which are viable at the end of ischemia. The process primarily occurs in severely ischemic myocardium and is regarded as severe, deadly and irreversible.
THE EVIDENCE OF INFLAMMATION LINKING TLRS TO MYOCARDIAL I/R INJURY:
It has been well established that the innate immune system plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of myocardial I/R injury. TLR is an important constitutive component of the innate immune system, and mediates a series of innate immune responses. Specifically, the best known TLR4 is central to early activation of the innate immune response in myocardial I/R injury. It was demonstrated that a number of endogenous molecules are released from ischemic, damaged, or dying cells and tissues, and can serve as triggers for activation of inflammatory response, and exacerbate tissue injury in myocardial I/R injury [81]. Kaozoroswki [82] and Aol [83] determined that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and 70-kD heat shock cognate protein (HSC70), which were considered to be endogenous molecules released from I/R cardiac myocytes, mediate the expression of cardiac depressants via TLR4-dependent inflammatory response. Zou [84] also reported that TLR4 were activated by HSC70, which were constitutively expressed in the myocardium and released from I/R myocardium, to mediate TLR4-dependent inflammatory response. These endogenous molecules produced in myocardial I/R are regarded as activators and triggers for cardiac and myocardial I/R injury.
TLR4 mediate myocardial I/R injury via multiple hierarchies of inflammatory response. Activated proinflammatory cytokines and chemoattractants are important factors for TLR4-mediated myocardial I/R injury. Yang and Cha [85–87] both reported that activated and up-regulated TLR4 play a role in myocardial I/R injury by increasing TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-1beta expression. Additionally, it was also reported that the TLR4 signaling pathway can mediate production of TNF-alpha and IL-1beta, contributing to cardiac dysfunction in global myocardial I/R. Kaczorowski et al. [88] employed syngeneic heart transplant models to test the hypothesis that TLR4 mediated early inflammatory response in cold I/R in murine hearts. They demonstrated that serum TNF, IL-6, JE/monocyte chemotractant protein (MCP)-1, IL-1beta, as well as intragraft TNF, IL-1beta, IL-6, early growth response (EGR)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA levels were significantly lower in the C3H/HeJ (deficient in TLR4 signaling, donors)→C3H/HeJ mice (recipients) compared to the C3H/HeOuJ (wild type, donors)→C3H/HeOuJ mice (recipients). Treatment with anti-HMGB1 neutralizing antibody or anti-HSC70-specific antibody during the period of mouse myocardial I/R resulted in suppression of cytokine expression (such as IL-6, TNF-alpha and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1] messenger RNA [mRNA]), either from the layer of protein or mRNA, and improved cardiac functional recovery [82,89]. Activated inflammatory cells also act as a significant factor for TLR4-mediated I/R injury. It was shown that hearts isolated from TLR4-defective mice undergoing global myocardial I/R reduced neutrophil infiltration and expressed lower levels of keratinocytic-derived chemokine (KC) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1). In the syngeneic heart transplant model described above, less infiltration along with less expression of chemoattractants →C3H/HeJ mice compared to C3H/HeOuJ mice→C3H/HeOuJ mice [88]. Neutrophil activation and infiltration may be associated with chemoattractants in myocardial I/R injury [83]. Abundant evidence substantiates the role of neutrophils in myocardium undergoing I/R – neutrophils are activated and recruited to the I/R area within the period during which endothelial and myocyte injury occurs [90–94]. Activated neutrophils can aggravate such injury via interaction with other cells and production of oxidants and proteases.
EFFECT OF TLR4-MEDIATED CYTOKINES IN I/R INJURY ON CARDIAC FUNCTION:
The cytokines mediated by the TLR4-mediating signaling pathway in the myocardial I/R primarily consist of the TNF family, IL family, chemoattractant and adhesion molecules family, which all can act to induce I/R cardiac dysfunction.
TNF-alpha is the principal cytokine induced by TLR4 in myocardial I/R. From 1986 to 1998, many animal experiments were performed, and it was concluded that TNF-alpha appears to be an important cardiodepressant for myocardium and depressed myocardial contractility [95–97]. Clinical data also indicated that TNF-alpha contributes to myocardial dysfunction and hemodynamic instability following CPB [98–102]. TNF-alpha produces its acute negative inotropic effects by interfering with Ca+ homeostasis, inducing direct cytotoxicity, disrupting excitation-contraction coupling, desensitizing the beta- and alpha- catechol receptor, and feeding back to induce other myocardial depressants such as IL-1beta [103]. TNF-alpha induces these negative inotropic effects by 2 different mechanisms in early and delayed phases [97,104]. In the early phase of inflammatory response, TNF-alpha may depress alpha- and beta- adrenergic responsiveness of myocytes via an NO-independent manner that is probably mediated by sphingolipid metabolites and caused by TNF-alpha effecting on intracellular calcium transient [105–107]. In the delayed phase of inflammatory response, TNF-alpha induces cardiac dysfunction via an NO-dependent pathway, which is mediated by production of nitric oxide (NO) and by depressed sensitivity of the myofilament to Ca+[107,108]. Myocardial apoptosis (programmed cell death) is another mechanism leading to TNF-alpha-mediated cardiac depression. TNF-alpha antagonists can reduce cardiac infarct size after myocardial I/R injury and improve cardiac function, which is regulated by the magnitude of myocardial apoptosis. Myocardial apoptosis is characterized by programmed cell death with the maintenance of cell membrane integrity and without releasing creatine kinase. Apoptotic myocardial cells can still retain their ability to contract in response to calcium ionophores [109]. Myocardial apoptosis is mainly induced via a TNF-alpha receptor-1 and TNF-alpha receptor-2 with a death domain (TRADD). Specific signal transduction molecules initiated by exogenous or endogenous stimuli deliver apoptotic signals between TRADD and a kinase domain to activate caspases that facilitate DNA fragmentation and eventual cell apoptosis. This process is thought to be mediated by sphingosine and NO. Cardiac myocyte apoptosis-associated clinical syndromes include chronic heart failure, ischemia arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, viral myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy, as well as cardiogenic arrest [103,110].
IL is another important cytokine inducing TLR4-mediated myocardial I/R injury. IL-1 induces the negative inotropic effect of myocardium and depresses myocardial contractility via expression of iNOS, p38 and p42/p44 MAPK signaling pathways [111–113]. It can result in arrhythmogenesis after myocardial I/R via decreases in Ca+ regulatory gene expression [114–116], and mediates neonatal myocardium apoptosis, identical to TNF-alpha [117]. Clinical research data establishes that increased levels of IL-6 are associated with cardiac dysfunction after CPB [118]. IL-6 is a multifunction cytokine produced by different cell types, and is reported to serve as a direct cardiodepressant, inhibiting contractility in the hamster myocardium [119]. The primary mechanism of IL-6-mediated myocardial contractility inhibition is shown by reduced peak systolic intracellular Ca+ transient levels, increased iNOS-induced NO production, and, subsequently, decreased levels of cGMP-mediated L-type Ca+-channel [119–121]. In addition, IL-6 induces activation and production of diverse chemoattractants, intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM) and complements, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP), which is an acute phase protein produced by the liver. These cytokines have a damaging effect on myocardium and lead to cardiodepression [122–125].
ICAM-1, a member of the adhesion molecule family, is a type of transmembrane protein, with a molecular weight of 80–114 kDa. This cytokine is capable of being expressed by immune cells and non-immune cells, including leukocytes and endothelial cells. ICAM-1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of I/R injury and seems to be of particular importance for attachment and transendothelial migration of leukocytes [126]. Entman et al. demonstrated that ICAM-1 induced leukocyte-mediated cardiomyocte damage after CPB [127]. Appleyard and Cohn, deploying a sheep model, showed that myocardial stunning induced by cardiac I/R can be attenuated by blocking neutrophil-endothelial cell interaction with ICAM-1 receptors [128]. Siminiak reported that administration of antibodies that block the function of adhesion molecules attenuated PMN-mediated tissue destruction during on-pump CABG surgery [129]. In summary, ICAM-1 actually mediates cardiomyocyte damage via neutrophil-endothelial cell interaction after cardiac I/R.
TLR4 SIGNALING PATHWAY AND MYOCARDIAL I/R INJURY:
TLR signals via 2 different pathways, known as MyD88-dependent pathway and MyD88-independent pathway (TRIF-dependent pathway). Both of these distinct signaling pathways may act together to mediate myocardial I/R injury. Kaczorowski [82] found that the hearts of MyD88 knock-out (KO) mice and TRIF KO mice undergoing cold I/R exhibited lower levels of TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-1beta, ICAM-1 and MCP-1 located both in serum and intragrafts through syngenieic mouse heart transplant models, concluding that MyD88 and TRIF both contributed to the inflammation response occurring after cold I/R. NF-κB, which is a downstream transcription factor in the TLR4-mediated signaling pathway, can be activated, thereby entering the cell nucleus to promote a series of proinflammatory cytokine genes expression-mediating inflammatory responses. Myocardial I/R injury is closely related to TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathways and also involves the iNOS-dependent mechanism. Yang and Jiang [130] applied Valsartan, which is a kind of angiotensin II type I receptor blocker, to preconditioning in rat hearts before I/R, and demonstrated that Valsartan preconditioning inhibited TLR4 and NF-κB expression concomitant with an improvement in myocardial injury. HSC70 [84], which is produced during myocardial I/R as a kind of endogenous ligand binding to TLR4, induced NF-κB activation and depressed myocardial contractility in a TLR4-dependent manner. LPS, which is a kind of exogenous ligand binding to TLR4, can induce cardiac myocyte damage via a TLR4-dependent signaling pathway that is also induced by cardiomyocyte I/R injury. Baumgarten [111] applied LPS in both wild-type and C3H/HeJ mice. He found that the levels of NF-κB and iNOS were upregulated in control mice vs. mutant mice. Inhibition of iNOS could prevent the influence of LPS on contractile activity in control myocytes. A syngenieic heart transplant model performed by Kaczorowski showed less myocardial NF-κB translocation at the mutant→mutant group compared to the wild-type→wild-type [88].
Myocardial I/R injury occurs not only through the TLR4 signaling pathway itself, but also through other related signaling pathways inter-regulating with the TLR4 signaling pathway, such as PI3K/AKt signaling and AMPK and ERK signaling. Zhao [132] proposed that cardioprotective effects against ischemic myocardial injury without TLR4 signaling may be mediated through regulating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and ERK signaling pathway, and demonstrated that ERK and AMPK signaling was augmented during ischemia in C3H/HeJ (TLR4-deficient) mouse hearts vs. C3H/HeN (wild type) mouse hearts. Isolated cardiomyocytes from C3H/HeJ hearts showed resistance to contractile dysfunction compared to those from C3H/HeN hearts, which were associated with greater hypoxic activation of AMPK and ERK signaling in C3H/HeJ hearts vs. C3H/HeN hearts. It appears that the TLR4 signaling pathway inhibits AMPK and ERK signaling pathways to cause myocardial I/R injury. Another signaling pathway, TLR4/PI3K/AKt-dependent signaling pathway, may be the mechanism of cardiomyocyte I/R injury. It was reported that TLR4 (−/−) mice experienced decreased myocardial injury following I/R. Pharmacologic inhibitors of PI3K (wortmannin or LY294002) were administered before myocardial I/R. The blockade can abrogate myocardial protection in TLR4(−/−) following I/R. Protection against myocardial I/R injury in TLR4 (−/−) mice is mediated through a PI3K/AKt-dependent mechanism. The mechanisms by which PI3k/Akt are augmented in the TLR4(−/−) myocardium may involve increased phosphorylation/inactivation of myocardial phosphatase, tension homology deleted on chromosome 10, and increased phosphorylation/inactivation of myocardial glycogen synthase kinase-3beta. Myocardial I/R injury may be mediated by suppressing the PI3k/Akt signaling pathway, which is induced by TLR4 (+/+) [133]. We conclude that multiple signaling pathways interacting with each other lead to myocardial I/R injury.
Left ventricular remodeling is a complication secondary to myocardial I/R injury and myocardial infarction. Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is strongly associated with inflammatory responses and extracellular matrix degradation. Therefore, we proposed that MI and myocardial I/R injury mediates LV remodeling via the same mechanism. Riad [134] demonstrated that TLR4 KO mice undergoing MI showed improved LV function and reduced LV remodeling (reduced levels of atrial natriuretic factor and total collagen, as well as a reduced heart weigh-to-body weight ratio) vs. wild type-MI mice. This was associated with a reduction of protein levels of the intracellular TLR4 adaptor protein MyD88 and enhanced protein expression of the anti-hypertrophic JNK in KO-MI mice vs. wild type-MI mice. Thus, LV remodeling could be the combined effects of TLR4-dependent pathway and JNK.
A number of endogenous molecules are released by different immune cells and non-immune cells during myocardial I/R. These endogenous ligands bind to TLR4 and activate diverse innate immune responses. The immune response processes are mediated by the TLR4 signaling pathway (MyD88-dependent pathway and TRIF-dependent pathway) interacting with other signaling pathways (PI3K/Akt and AMPK, ERK signaling pathway). Finally, transcriptional factor NF-κB is activated and enters the nucleus to promote the inflammatory response. This is the basic mechanism of TLR4 signaling pathway-mediated myocardial I/R injury.
Conclusions
TLRs-mediated innate immune response and adaptive immune response represent the first line of defense against invading pathogens. In addition to the central role they play in host immune defense against micro-organisms, TLRs are capable of responding to stress and modulating inflammation and tissue damage following noninfectious impairments such as cardiac ischemia and reperfusion injury. Ischemia and perfusion injury is defined as the process of restoring blood flow to the ischemic myocardium, inducing myocardial injury and producing a spectrum of reperfusion-associated pathologies. CPB during cardiac surgery, CABG, and PCI all may experience myocardial I/R injury. Thus, research on TLRs-mediated myocardial I/R is of great clinical significance in the search for measures to diminish or eliminate the adverse effects of myocardial I/R injury. We could solve these problems through neutralizing TLRs activator, disrupting TLRs signaling pathway or obstructing distal effectors by specific blockades that thwart development of effective pharmacologic therapies. Some laboratories paradoxically have discovered that TLR4 has a beneficial effect on myocardium, as demonstrated by the fact that LPS, at sub-lethal doses, has a preconditioning-like effect, protecting the heart against subsequent I/R injury. The mechanism involved in the LPS-inducing beneficial impact on myocardial I/R injury requires further investigation.
Reference
1. Medzhitov R, Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response: Nature, 2007; 449(7164); 819-26, pmid: 17943118
2. Ishii KJ, Koyama S, Nakagawa A, Host innate immune receptors and beyond: making sense of microbial infections: Cell Host Microbe, 2008; 3(6); 352-63, pmid: 18541212
3. Steinman RM, Banchereau J, Taking dendritic cells into medicine: Nature, 2007; 449(7161); 419-26, pmid: 17898760
4. Steinman RM: Immunity, 2008; 29(3); 319-24, pmid: 18799140
5. Janeway CA, Approaching the asymptote? Evolution and revolution in immunology: Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 1989; 54(Pt 1); 1-13, pmid: 2700931
6. Kanzler H, Barrat FJ, Hessel EM, Coffman RL, Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists: Nat Med, 2007; 13(5); 552-59, pmid: 17479101
7. Leaver SK, Finney SJ, Burke-Gaffney A, Evans TW, Sepsis since the discovery of Toll-like receptors: disease concepts and therapeutic opportunities: Crit Care Med, 2007; 35(5); 1404-10, pmid: 17414083
8. Zuany-Amorim C, Hastewell J, Walker C, Toll-like receptors as potential therapeutic targets for multiple diseases: Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2002; 1(10); 797-807, pmid: 12360257
9. Mollen KP, Anand RJ, Tsung A, Emerging paradigm: toll-like receptor 4-sentinel for the detection of tissue damage: Shock, 2006; 26(5); 430-37, pmid: 17047512
10. Jiang D, Liang J, Fan J, Regulation of lung injury and repair by Toll-like receptors and hyaluronan: Nat Med, 2005; 11(11); 1173-79, pmid: 16244651
11. Prince JM, Levy RM, Yang R, Toll-like receptor-4 signaling mediates hepatic injury and systemic inflammation in hemorrhagic shock: J Am Coll Surg, 2006; 202(3); 407-17, pmid: 16500244
12. Lehnardt S, Lehmann S, Kaul D, Toll-like receptor 2 mediates CNS injury in focal cerebral ischemia: J Neuroimmunol, 2007; 190(1–2); 28-33, pmid: 17854911
13. Foot DK, Lewis RP, Pearson TA, Beller GA, Demographics and cardiology, 1950–2050: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000; 35(5 Suppl B); 66B-80B
14. Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study: Lancet, 1997; 349(9064); 1498-504, pmid: 9167458
15. Mathers CD, Loncar D, Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030: PLoS Med, 2006; 3(11); e442, pmid: 17132052
16. Tissier R, Berdeaux A, Ghaleh B, Making the heart resistant to infarction: how can we further decrease infarct size?: Front Biosci, 2008; 13; 284-301, pmid: 17981547
17. Akira S, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O, Pathogen recognition and innate immunity: Cell, 2006; 124(4); 783-801, pmid: 16497588
18. Monie TP, Moncrieffe MC, Gay NJ, Structure and regulation of cytoplasmic adapter proteins involved in innate immune signaling: Immunol Rev, 2009; 227(1); 161-75, pmid: 19120483
19. Matsushima N, Tanaka T, Enkhbayar P, Comparative sequence analysis of leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) within vertebrate toll-like receptors: BMC Genomics, 2007; 8; 124, pmid: 17517123
20. Bella J, Hindle KL, McEwan PA, Lovell SC, The leucine-rich repeat structure: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2008; 65(15); 2307-33, pmid: 18408889
21. Bell JK, Mullen GE, Leifer CA, Leucine-rich repeats and pathogen recognition in Toll-like receptors: Trends Immunol, 2003; 24(10); 528-33, pmid: 14552836
22. Kajava AV, Vassart G, Wodak SJ, Modeling of the three-dimensional structure of proteins with the typical leucine-rich repeats: Structure, 1995; 3(9); 867-77, pmid: 8535781
23. Kobe B, Deisenhofer J, A structural basis of the interactions between leucine-rich repeats and protein ligands: Nature, 1995; 374(6518); 183-86, pmid: 7877692
24. Choe J, Kelker MS, Wilson IA, Crystal structure of human toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) ectodomain: Science, 2005; 309(5734); 581-85, pmid: 15961631
25. Jiang Z, Georgel P, Li C, Details of Toll-like receptor: adapter interaction revealed by germ-line mutagenesis: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006; 103(29); 10961-66, pmid: 16832055
26. Nishiya T, DeFranco AL, ligand-dependent Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR 4)-oligomerization is directly linked with TLR 4-signaling: J Endotoxin Res, 2004; 10(4); 257-260, pmid: 15373971
27. Akira S, Takeda K, Kaisho T, Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity: Nat Immunol, 2001; 2(8); 675-80, pmid: 11477402
28. Medzhitov R, Janeway C, Innate immune recognition: mechanisms and pathways: Immunol Rev, 2000; 173; 89-97, pmid: 10719670
29. Pulendran B, Ahmed R, Translating innate immunity into immunological memory: implications for vaccine development: Cell, 2006; 124(4); 849-63, pmid: 16497593
30. Trinchieri G, Sher A, Cooperation of Toll-like receptor signals in innate immune defence: Nat Rev Immunol, 2007; 7(3); 179-90, pmid: 17318230
31. Lee MS, Kim YJ, Signaling pathways downstream of pattern-recognition receptors and their cross talk: Annu Rev Biochem, 2007; 76; 447-80, pmid: 17328678
32. Beutler B, Inferences, questions and possibilities in Toll-like receptor signalling: Nature, 2004; 430(6996); 257-63, pmid: 15241424
33. Miyake K, Innate immune sensing of pathogens and danger signals by cell surface Toll-like receptors: Semin Immunol, 2007; 19(1); 3-10, pmid: 17275324
34. Kawai T, Akira S, The roles of TLRs, RLRs and NLRs in pathogen recognition: Int Immunol, 2009; 21(4); 317-37, pmid: 19246554
35. Kumar H, Kawai T, Akira S, Pathogen recognition in the innate immune response: Biochem J, 2009; 420(1); 1-16, pmid: 19382893
36. Hoebe K, Du X, Georgel P, Identification of Lps2 as a key transducer of MyD88-independent TIR signaling: Nature, 2003; 424(6950); 743-48, pmid: 12872135
37. Beutler B, Tlr4: central component of the sole mammalian LPS sensor: Curr Opin Immunol, 2000; 12(1); 20-26, pmid: 10679411
38. Aliprantis AO, Yang RB, Mark MR, Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through toll-like receptor-2: Science, 1999; 285(5428); 736-39, pmid: 10426996
39. Lien E, Sellati TJ, Yoshimura A, Toll-like receptor 2 functions as a pattern recognition receptor for diverse bacterial products: J Biol Chem, 1999; 274(47); 33419-25, pmid: 10559223
40. Hirschfeld M, Kirschning CJ, Schwandner R, Cutting edge: inflammatory signaling by Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins is mediated by toll-like receptor 2: J Immunol, 1999; 163(5); 2382-86, pmid: 10452971
41. Farhat K, Riekenberg S, Heine H, Heterodimerization of TLR2 with TLR1 or TLR6 expands the ligand spectrum but does not lead to differential signaling: J Leukoc Biol, 2008; 83(3); 692-701, pmid: 18056480
42. Hayashi F, Smith KD, Ozinsky A, The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5: Nature, 2001; 410(6832); 1099-103, pmid: 11323673
43. Mancuso G, Gambuzza M, Midiri A, Bacterial recognition by TLR7 in the lysosomes of conventional dendritic cells: Nat Immunol, 2009; 10(6); 587-94, pmid: 19430477
44. Dennis VA, Dixit S, O’Brien SM, Live Borrelia burgdorferi spirochetes elicit inflammatory mediators from human monocytes via the Toll-like receptor signaling pathway: Infect Immun, 2009; 77(3); 1238-45, pmid: 19139200
45. Murawski MR, Bowen GN, Cerny AM, Respiratory syncytial virus activates innate immunity through Toll-like receptor 2: J Virol, 2009; 83(3); 1492-500, pmid: 19019963
46. McCluskie MJ, Krieg AM, Enhancement of infectious disease vaccines through TLR9-dependent recognition of CpG DNA: Curr Top Microbiol Immunol, 2006; 311; 155-78, pmid: 17048708
47. Yarovinsky F, Zhang D, Andersen JF, TLR11 activation of dendritic cells by a protozoan profilin-like protein: Science, 2005; 308(5728); 1626-29, pmid: 15860593
48. Beutler BA, TLRs and innate immunity: Blood, 2009; 113(7); 1399-407, pmid: 18757776
49. O’Neill LA, Bowie AG, The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signaling: Nat Rev Immunol, 2007; 7(5); 353-64, pmid: 17457343
50. Fitzgerald KA, Palsson-McDermott EM, Bowie AG, Mal (MyD88-adapter-like) is required for Toll-like receptor-4 signal transduction: Nature, 2001; 413(6851); 78-83, pmid: 11544529
51. Jiang Z, Georgel P, Li C, Details of Toll-like receptor: adapter interaction revealed by germ-line mutagenesis: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2006; 103(29); 10961-66, pmid: 16832055
52. Li C, Zienkiewicz J, Hawiger J, Interactive sites in the MyD88 Toll/interleukin (IL) 1 receptor domain responsible for coupling to the IL1beta signaling pathway: Biol Chem, 2005; 280(28); 26152-59
53. Janssens S, Beyaert R, A universal role for MyD88 in TLR/IL-1R-mediated signaling: Trends Biochem Sci, 2002; 27(9); 474-82, pmid: 12217523
54. Muzio M, Ni J, Feng P, Dixit VM, IRAK (Pelle) family member IRAK-2 and MyD88 as proximal mediators of IL-1 signaling: Science, 1997; 278(5343); 1612-15, pmid: 9374458
55. Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Kopp E, MyD88 is an adaptor protein in the hToll/IL-1 receptor family signaling pathways: Mol Cell, 1998; 2(2); 253-58, pmid: 9734363
56. Yamamoto M, Sato S, Hemmi H, Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway: Science, 2003; 301(5633); 640-43, pmid: 12855817
57. Janssens S, Beyaert R, Functional diversity and regulation of different interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) family members: Mol Cell, 2003; 11(2); 293-302, pmid: 12620219
58. Li S, Strelow A, Fontana EJ, Wesche H, IRAK-4: a novel member of the IRAK family with the properties of an IRAK-kinase: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002; 99(8); 5567-72, pmid: 11960013
59. Beutler B, Inferences, questions and possibilities in Toll-like receptor signaling: Nature, 2004; 430(6996); 257-63, pmid: 15241424
60. Yamamoto M, Akira S, TIR domain – containing adaptors regulate TLR-mediated signaling pathways: Nippon Rinsho, 2004; 62(12); 2197-203, pmid: 15597785
61. Fitzgerald KA, McWhirter SM, Faia KL, IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway: Nat Immunol, 2003; 4(5); 491-96, pmid: 12692549
62. Jennings RB, Sommers HM, Smyth GA, Myocardial necrosis induced by temporary occlusion of a coronary artery in the dog: Arch Pathol, 1960; 70; 68-78, pmid: 14407094
63. Yellon DM, Baxter GF, Protecting the ischaemic and reperfused myocardium in acute myocardial infarction: distant dream or near reality?: Heart, 2000; 83(4); 381-87, pmid: 10722532
64. Pierce GN, Czubryt MP, The contribution of ionic imbalance to ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury: J Mol Cell Cardiol, 1995; 27(1); 53-63, pmid: 7760373
65. Piper HM, García-Dorado D, Ovize M, A fresh look at reperfusion injury: Cardiovasc Res, 1998; 38(2); 291-300, pmid: 9709390
66. Heyndrickx GR, Early reperfusion phenomena: Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2006; 10(3); 236-41, pmid: 16959758
67. Kloner RA, Jennings RB, Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 1: Circulation, 2001; 104(24); 2981-89, pmid: 11739316
68. Wan S, LeClerc JL, Vincent JL, Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass: mechanisms involved and possible therapeutic strategies: Chest, 1997; 112(3); 676-92, pmid: 9315800
69. Li YJ, Ding WH, Gao W, Relation between inflammation related cytokines and myocardial microcirculatory reperfusion state: Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi, 2004; 43(2); 102-5, pmid: 15059405
70. Atar D, Huber K, Rupprecht HJRationale and design of the ‘F.I.R.E.’ study, A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to measure the effect of FX06 (a fibrin-derived peptide Bbeta(15–42)) on ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Cardiology, 2007; 108(2); 117-23, pmid: 17019083
71. Vinten-Johansen J, Involvement of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of lethal myocardial reperfusion injury: Cardiovasc Res, 2004; 61(3); 481-97, pmid: 14962479
72. Braunwald E, Kloner RA, The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction: Circulation, 1982; 66(6); 1146-49, pmid: 6754130
73. Kloner RA, Arimie RB, Kay GL, Evidence for stunned myocardium in humans: a 2001 update: Coron Artery Dis, 2001; 12(5); 349-56, pmid: 11491199
74. Ambrosio G, Tritto I, Clinical manifestations of myocardial stunning: Coron Artery Dis, 2001; 12(5); 357-61, pmid: 11491200
75. Kloner RA, Jennings RB, Consequences of brief ischemia: stunning, preconditioning, and their clinical implications: part 2: Circulation, 2001; 104(25); 3158-67, pmid: 11748117
76. Krug A, de Rochemont Du Mesnil, Korb G, Blood supply of the myocardium after temporary coronary occlusion: Circ Res, 1966; 19(1); 57-62, pmid: 5912914
77. Boyle EM, Pohlman TH, Cornejo CJ, Verrier ED, Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: ischemia-reperfusion: Ann Thorac Surg, 1996; 62(6); 1868-75, pmid: 8957415
78. Ito H, No-reflow phenomenon and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med, 2006; 3(9); 499-506, pmid: 16932767
79. Granger DN, Ischemia-reperfusion: mechanisms of microvascular dysfunction and the influence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease: Microcirculation, 1999; 6(3); 167-78, pmid: 10501090
80. Manning AS, Hearse DJ, Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias: mechanisms and prevention: J Mol Cell Cardiol, 1984; 16(6); 497-518, pmid: 6146724
81. Kaczorowski DJ, Tsung A, Billiar TR, Innate immune mechanisms in ischemia/reperfusion: Front Biosci (Elite Ed), 2009; 1; 91-98, pmid: 19482628
82. Kaczorowski DJ, Nakao A, Vallabhaneni R, Mechanisms of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-mediated inflammation after cold ischemia/reperfusion in the heart: Transplantation, 2009; 87(10); 1455-63, pmid: 19461481
83. Ao L, Zou N, Cleveland JC, Myocardial TLR4 is a determinant of neutrophil infiltration after global myocardial ischemia: mediating KC and MCP-1 expression induced by extracellular HSC70: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2009; 297(1); H21-28, pmid: 19448144
84. Zou N, Ao L, Cleveland JC, Critical role of extracellular heat shock cognate protein 70 in the myocardial inflammatory response and cardiac dysfunction after global ischemia-reperfusion: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2008; 294(6); H2805-13, pmid: 18441202
85. Yang J, Yang J, Ding JW, Myocardial toll like receptor 4 expression in a rat model of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury: Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi, 2008; 36(1); 57-61, pmid: 19099931
86. Yang J, Yang J, Ding JW, Sequential expression of TLR4 and its effects on the myocardium of rats with myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury: Inflammation, 2008; 31(5); 304-12, pmid: 18677579
87. Cha J, Wang Z, Ao L, Cytokines link Toll-like receptor 4 signaling to cardiac dysfunction after global myocardial ischemia: Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85(5); 1678-85, pmid: 18442564
88. Kaczorowski DJ, Nakao A, Mollen KP, Toll-like receptor 4 mediates the early inflammatory response after cold ischemia/reperfusion: Transplantation, 2007; 84(10); 1279-87, pmid: 18049113
89. Dinerman JL, Mehta JL, Saldeen TG, Increased neutrophil elastase release in unstable angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction: J Am Coll Cardiol, 1990; 15(7); 1559-63, pmid: 2345235
90. Engler RL, Dahlgren MD, Morris DD, Role of leukocytes in response to acute myocardial ischemia and reflow in dogs: Am J Physiol, 1986; 251(2 Pt 2); H314-23, pmid: 3740286
91. Engler RL, Dahlgren MD, Peterson MA, Accumulation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes during 3-h experimental myocardial ischemia: Am J Physiol, 1986; 251(1 Pt 2); H93-100, pmid: 3089032
92. Engler RL, Schmid-Schönbein GW, Pavelec RS, Leukocyte capillary plugging in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion in the dog: Am J Pathol, 1983; 111(1); 98-111, pmid: 6837725
93. Jolly SR, Kane WJ, Hook BG, Reduction of myocardial infarct size by neutrophil depletion: effect of duration of occlusion: Am Heart J, 1986; 112(4); 682-90, pmid: 3766367
94. Tracey KJ, Beutler B, Lowry SF, Shock and tissue injury induced by recombinant human cachectin: Science, 1986; 234(4775); 470-74, pmid: 3764421
95. Finkel MS, Oddis CV, Jacob TD, Negative inotropic effects of cytokines on the heart mediated by nitric oxide: Science, 1992; 257(5068); 387-89, pmid: 1631560
96. Murray DR, Freeman GL, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces a biphasic effect on myocardial contractility in conscious dogs: Circ Res, 1996; 78(1); 154-60, pmid: 8603499
97. Cain BS, Meldrum DR, Dinarello CA, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta synergistically depress human myocardial function: Crit Care Med, 1999; 27(7); 1309-18, pmid: 10446825
98. Cain BS, Meldrum DR, Harken AH, McIntyre RC, The physiologic basis for anticytokine clinical trials in the treatment of sepsis: J Am Coll Surg, 1998; 186(3); 337-50, pmid: 9510266
99. Hennein HA, Ebba H, Rodriguez JL, Relationship of the proinflammatory cytokines to myocardial ischemia and dysfunction after uncomplicated coronary revascularization: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994; 108(4); 626-35, pmid: 7934095
100. te Velthuis H, Jansen PG, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Myocardial performance in elderly patients after cardiopulmonary bypass is suppressed by tumor necrosis factor: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1995; 110(6); 1663-69, pmid: 8523877
101. Menasché P, Haydar S, Peynet J, A potential mechanism of vasodilation after warm heart surgery. The temperature-dependent release of cytokines: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994; 107(1); 293-99
102. Meldrum DR, Dinarello CA, Shames BD, Ischemic preconditioning decreases postischemic myocardial tumor necrosis factor-alpha production. Potential ultimate effector mechanism of preconditioning: Circulation, 1998; 98(19 Suppl); II214-18, pmid: 9852905 discussion II218–19
103. Oral H, Kapadia S, Nakano M, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and the failing human heart: Clin Cardiol, 1995; 18(9 Suppl 4); IV20-27, pmid: 7489617
104. Müller-Werdan U, Schumann H, Loppnow H, Endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor alpha exert a similar proinflammatory effect in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, but have different cardiodepressant profiles: J Mol Cell Cardiol, 1998; 30(5); 1027-36, pmid: 9618243
105. Fahey TJ, Yoshioka T, Shires GT, Fantini GA, The role of tumor necrosis factor and nitric oxide in the acute cardiovascular response to endotoxin, 1996; 223(1); 63-69
106. Meldrum DR, Tumor necrosis factor in the heart: Am J Physiol, 1998; 274(3 Pt 2); R577-95, pmid: 9530222
107. Wan S, LeClerc JL, Vincent JL, Cytokine responses to cardiopulmonary bypass: lessons learned from cardiac transplantation: Ann Thorac Surg, 1997; 63(1); 269-76, pmid: 8993291
108. Maekawa N, Wada H, Kanda T, Improved myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor-alpha: J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002; 39(7); 1229-35, pmid: 11923051
109. Krown KA, Page MT, Nguyen C, Tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis in cardiac myocytes. Involvement of the sphingolipid signaling cascade in cardiac cell death: J Clin Invest, 1996; 98(12); 2854-65, pmid: 8981934
110. Vandenabeele P, Declercq W, Vanhaesebroeck B, NF receptors are required for TNF-mediated induction of apoptosis in PC60 cells: J Immunol, 1995; 154(6); 2904-13, pmid: 7876558
111. Evans HG, Lewis MJ, Shah AM, Interleukin-1 beta modulates myocardial contraction via dexamethasone sensitive production of nitric oxide: Cardiovasc Res, 1993; 27(8); 1486-90, pmid: 8221802
112. Oyama J, Shimokawa H, Momii H: J Clin Invest, 1998; 101(10); 2207-14, pmid: 9593776
113. Guillén I, Blanes M, Gómez-Lechón MJ, Castell JV, Cytokine signaling during myocardial infarction: sequential appearance of IL-1 beta and IL-6: Am J Physiol, 1995; 269(2 Pt 2); R229-35, pmid: 7544543
114. LaPointe MC, Isenović E, Interleukin-1beta regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 involves the p42/44 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in cardiac myocytes: Hypertension, 1999; 33(1 Pt 2); 276-82, pmid: 9931117
115. Schulz R, Nava E, Moncada S, Induction and potential biological relevance of a Ca(2+)-independent nitric oxide synthase in the myocardium: Br J Pharmacol, 1992; 105(3); 575-80, pmid: 1378338
116. Pinsky DJ, Cai B, Yang X, The lethal effects of cytokine-induced nitric oxide on cardiac myocytes are blocked by nitric oxide synthase antagonism or transforming growth factor beta: J Clin Invest, 1995; 95(2); 677-85, pmid: 7532189
117. McTiernan CF, Lemster BH, Frye C, Interleukin-1 beta inhibits phospholamban gene expression in cultured cardiomyocytes: Circ Res, 1997; 81(4); 493-503, pmid: 9314830
118. Deng MC, Dasch B, Erren M, Impact of left ventricular dysfunction on cytokines, hemodynamics, and outcome in bypass grafting: Ann Thorac Surg, 1996; 62(1); 184-90, pmid: 8678641
119. Hofmann U, Domeier E, Frantz S, Increased myocardial oxygen consumption by TNF-alpha is mediated by a sphingosine signaling pathway: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2003; 284(6); H2100-5, pmid: 12560208
120. Finkel MS, Hoffman RA, Shen L, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) as a mediator of stunned myocardium: Am J Cardiol, 1993; 71(13); 1231-32, pmid: 8480654
121. Kinugawa K, Takahashi T, Kohmoto O, Nitric oxide-mediated effects of interleukin-6 on [Ca2+]i and cell contraction in cultured chick ventricular myocytes: Circ Res, 1994; 75(2); 285-95, pmid: 7518362
122. Gwechenberger M, Mendoza LH, Youker KA, Cardiac myocytes produce interleukin-6 in culture and in viable border zone of reperfused infarctions: Circulation, 1999; 99(4); 546-51, pmid: 9927402
123. Kukielka GL, Smith CW, Manning AM, Induction of interleukin-6 synthesis in the myocardium. Potential role in postreperfusion inflammatory injury: Circulation, 1995; 92(7); 1866-75, pmid: 7671371
124. Blake GJ, Ridker PM, Novel clinical markers of vascular wall inflammation: Circ Res, 2001; 89(9); 763-71, pmid: 11679405
125. Panichi V, Migliori M, De Pietro S, The link of biocompatibility to cytokine production: Kidney Int Suppl, 2000; 76; S96-103, pmid: 10936805
126. Springer TA, Adhesion receptors of the immune system: Nature, 1990; 346(6283); 425-34, pmid: 1974032
127. Entman ML, Youker K, Shoji T, Neutrophil induced oxidative injury of cardiac myocytes. A compartmented system requiring CD11b/CD18-ICAM-1 adherence: J Clin Invest, 1992; 90(4); 1335-45, pmid: 1357003
128. Appleyard RF, Cohn LH, Myocardial stunning and reperfusion injury in cardiac surgery: J Card Surg, 1993; 8(2 Suppl); 316-24, pmid: 8461524
129. Siminiak T, Smielecki J, Dye JF, Increased release of the soluble form of the adhesion molecules L-selectin and ICAM-1 but not E-selectin during attacks of angina pectoris: Heart Vessels, 1998; 13(4); 189-94, pmid: 10442400
130. Yang J, Jiang H, Yang J, Valsartan preconditioning protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway: Mol Cell Biochem, 2009; 330(1–2); 39-46, pmid: 19370315
131. Baumgarten G, Knuefermann P, Schuhmacher G, Toll-like receptor 4, nitric oxide, and myocardial depression in endotoxemia: Shock, 2006; 25(1); 43-49, pmid: 16369185
132. Zhao P, Wang J, He L, Deficiency in TLR4 signal transduction ameliorates cardiac injury and cardiomyocyte contractile dysfunction during ischemia: J Cell Mol Med, 2009; 13(8A); 1513-25, pmid: 19508385
133. Hua F, Ha T, Ma J, Protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in TLR4-deficient mice is mediated through a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent mechanism: J Immunol, 2007; 178(11); 7317-24, pmid: 17513782
134. Riad A, Jäger S, Sobirey M, Toll-like receptor-4 modulates survival by induction of left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in mice: J Immunol, 2008; 180(10); 6954-61, pmid: 18453617
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






